|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
The West Valley Demonstration Project is located on a 1,320 hectare- (3,300-acre)
tract approximately 48 kilometers (30 miles) south of Buffalo, New York. This
site is also the location of the Western New York Nuclear Services Center. The
West Valley Demonstration Project occupies approximately 93 hectares (230
acres) of this property, which is owned by the State of New York. The
Department of Energy manages the West Valley Demonstration Project oversight
responsibilities through the onsite area office.
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
|
(Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
|
|
|
| Waste Management
|
122,100
|
135,002
|
141,387
|
149,964
|
159,930
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
115,389 |
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
123,601
|
|
|
|
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
|
| |
2030
|
| Waste Management
|
133,155
|
129,418 |
96,244
|
111,240 |
129,203
|
149,639
|
|
3,744,495
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
From 1966 to 1972, Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc. operated a commercial nuclear
fuel reprocessing plant at the Western New York Nuclear Services Center under
contract to the State of New York. The plant, which reprocessed uranium and
plutonium from spent nuclear fuel, generated approximately 2.3 million liters
(600,000 gallons) of liquid high-level waste that was stored in underground
tanks. In 1972, nuclear fuel reprocessing operations were discontinued.
Contamination at the site is a result of the historic commercial nuclear fuel
assembly and reprocessing operations rather than from a weapons mission.
SITE MAP
In 1980, Congress passed Public Law 96-368, the West Valley Demonstration
Project Act, which authorizes the Department of Energy to conduct a technology
demonstration project for the safe solidification and cleanup of the high-level
waste and facilities used during cleanup. The Act also requires the Department
to develop containers suitable for the permanent disposal of the solidified
high-level radioactive waste and to transport the waste to an appropriate
federal repository for permanent disposal. The cost estimates in this report
were developed consistent with the provisions of the West Valley Demonstration
Project Act and do not include any costs beyond those associated with
transporting of the high-level waste to the federal repository. By provisions
in the Act, low-level and transuranic waste resulting from high-level waste
processing at the West Valley Demonstration Project require disposal under
applicable licensing regulations. Further, the high-level waste tanks and other
facilities in which the solidified high-level radioactive waste was stored, the
facilities used in the solidification of the waste, and any material and
hardware used in connection with the demonstration project require
decontamination and decommissioning. Previous litigation resulted in a
Stipulation of Compromise issued by the United States District Court Western
District of New York, which requires disposal of low-level and transuranic
waste pending completion and direction of the Site Completion/Site Closure
Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision. Consequently, low-level and
transuranic waste has been placed in retrievable storage onsite.
|
READER'S NOTE
The West Valley site has not generated a life-cycle Base Case because of the
sensitivities surrounding the current Site Cleanup Draft Environmental Impact
Statement. Currently, as directed by the United States District Court
Stipulation of Compromise, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement is being
issued for public and judicial review. Since the draft did not identify a
preferred alternative, site personnel cannot generate the life-cycle estimate
without prejudicing one or more of the alternatives. While costs presented for
site activities before FY 2000 reflect outyear budgeting, estimates after that
point reflect a cost average of the four alternatives depicted in the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (see "site completion and site closure
alternatives" sidebar). The site will not be able to develop a realistic
life-cycle Base Case until after the Record of Decision is issued in October
1997 because:
The Department of Energy does not own the West Valley Demonstration Project. It
is a New York State Energy Research and Development Authority site, and the
State is addressing the issue of its closure jointly with the Department
through the Environmental Impact Statement process.
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement, which is currently out for public
review, does not identify a preferred alternative. The West Valley
Demonstration Project cannot give the public the impression that a preferred
alternative has already been internally identified when it has not, nor can it
disseminate for review public documents with conflicting information. The
Stipulation of Compromise clearly states specific conditions concerning public
and judicial review of the Site Completion and Site Closure Environmental
Impact Statement.
Regulatory issues must be resolved prior to selecting a specific alternative, or
a preferred alternative. Publication of a Baseline Environmental Management
Report Base Case could unnecessarily damage the credibility of the Department
of Energy in the Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision process.
|
After evaluating the alternatives presented in the initial Environmental Impact
Statement in 1982, the Department of Energy selected vitrification as the
treatment process to stabilize the liquid high-level waste for ultimate
disposal at a federal repository as directed by the Act and the Stipulation of
Compromise. New York State, through its Energy Research and Development
Authority, cooperates in the West Valley Demonstration Project and currently
contributes approximately ten percent of the project's phase I costs (through
the vitrification campaign). For the purposes of this report, estimates through
FY 2000 are for the Department of Energy only, based on the current 90 percent
Department of Energy and ten percent New York State cost sharing agreement.
Because the cost sharing agreement is only applicable to activities concluded
through FY 2000, costs beyond that point represent project totals only, and
this report assumes them to be 100 percent Department of Energy. The State of
New York and the Department of Energy will negotiate cost sharing agreements
for outyear activities at a later date, and estimated Department of Energy
liability will be modified accordingly.
All environmental management activities at this site are a function of the West
Valley Demonstration Project and are under the purview of the Office of
Environmental Management. All decommissioning, environmental restoration and
treatment, and storage and disposal activities are conducted within the scope
of the waste management program.
The State of New York is, and will remain, the landlord for this facility
throughout the life cycle covered by this report. The Department of Energy is
responsible for maintaining areas of the site that present an environmental
risk and that are related to fulfilling the West Valley Demonstration Project
Act.
|
SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL AT WEST VALLEY
In addition to the highly radioactive liquid waste stored at the West Valley
site, the Department of Energy owns 125 irradiated nuclear fuel assemblies that
are contained in the site's storage pool while awaiting disposition. Final
disposition of the fuel elements is not a part of the West Valley Demonstration
Project. Rather, the Final Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-level Waste Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement and Idaho National Engineering Laboratory
Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement
cover the disposition of these fuel elements. The transportation of these fuel
assemblies to Idaho has been delayed until FY 2000. This delay has impacted
project transition schedules for the fuel storage pool. The Department's Office
of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management funds the costs for the extended
storage of spent nuclear fuel at West Valley, and it will fund the ultimate
storage and long-term management at Idaho; these costs are not considered part
of the West Valley Demonstration Project, nor are they included in Baseline
Environmental Management Report cost estimates. The West Valley Demonstration
Project response to the Materials In Inventory Initiative questionnaire
reported that approximately 27 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel (125
assemblies) are being stored onsite.
|
FUTURE USE
Because the Department of Energy does not own any portion of the Western New
York Nuclear Service Center, there will be no future federal use of the site or
facilities upon completion of the requirements of the Act. When the Department
of Energy has completed its mission at the West Valley Demonstration Project,
any remaining facilities and all land used by the Department of Energy will
revert back to the State of New York. To the extent practicable, future use
considerations for the area are being considered in the site-wide Draft
Environmental Impact Statement, to which the State of New York is a partner.
This document, which is being prepared under the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act, has extensive stakeholder involvement. The Department
of Energy, in accordance with legal site agreements, will leave the site in a
condition that will allow the State of New York to reinstate the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission license and perform any future use that the State deems
appropriate.
|
STAKEHOLDER INTERACTIONS
The West Valley Area Office, which reports to the Ohio Operations Office,
conducted public participation activities for the West Valley Demonstration
Project Site. The West Valley office distributed a news release announcing a
public meeting to explain the 1995 report to the public for review and comment,
and placed notices in newspapers to announce availability of the report in the
area reading rooms and public libraries. At a public meeting in August 1995,
West Valley Associate Director for Operations and Support Richard Provencher
led a question-and-answer session. The office sponsored a follow-on meeting in
November 1995 to discuss budgetary issues related to the 1996 report as well as
the Site Stabilization Plan for cleanup and ongoing maintenance activities. If
you would like more information about the report or have questions about the
results for this site, please contact:
|
Public Participation
Russ Gill
(716) 942-4547 klahni@wvdp.com
|
Technical Liaison
Dan Sullivan
(716) 942-4016 klahni@wvdp.com
|
Public Affairs
John Chamberlain
(716) 942-4547 klahni@wvdp.com
|
WASTE MANAGEMENT
All site activities, including high-level waste solidification, decontamination
and decommissioning, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act corrective
measures, and other necessary site remedial activities, are conducted within
the scope of waste management operations. The Waste Management program is
responsible for all waste generated during the fulfillment of the site mission.
See the Site Map for the location of Waste Management program activities.
The West Valley Demonstration Project comprises the following major components:
-
Vitrification of Liquid High-level Waste. This activity is the primary mission
and near-term (1996-1998) focus of the West Valley Demonstration Project.
During the first portion of this demonstration project, the liquid high-level
waste will be immobilized/vitrified in borosilicate glass and stored onsite.
Decontamination and decommissioning of project facilities will follow
vitrification. The solidification of the high-level waste liquid into
borosilicate glass will begin in FY 1996 and will represent a significant
achievement for the Department of Energy. The total estimated cost to complete
the vitrification campaign is $400 million.
-
Site Transition Activities. This category includes a series of activities that,
when completed in FY 2005, will reduce environmental risks and reduce operating
costs during the transition from vitrification to project completion. Examples
include: removing high-level waste tank farm residuals, stabilizing nuclear
fuel fines and other selected material in the Process Building Head End cells,
replacing leaking Process Building roof areas, minimizing the spread of
ground-water contamination in the North Plateau Area, and minimizing site
operations and support facility requirements. These activities can be
accomplished without causing prejudice to the selection of the closure options
in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Preliminary estimates for this
work scope indicate that the effort will cost approximately $200 million.
-
Site Completion and Site Closure Environmental Impact Statement Record of
Decision. This category represents the work scope that will disposition the
current facilities according to the outcome of the Site Completion and Site
Closure Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision. The alternatives are
detailed in the following discussion. The West Valley Demonstration Project
currently is using an average of the estimates for the closure option, as the
Draft Environmental Impact Statement closure engineering reports describe. The
average of these alternatives is $1.6 billion.
-
Site Support and Operations. This category characterizes the ongoing annual
site costs for project support activities. These activities include program
management, security, regulatory compliance, radiological support, accounting,
environmental safety and health, facilities management (engineering and
maintenance), utilities, training, quality assurance, business systems,
warehousing, and auditing. The average for these annual costs is approximately
$56 million.
Major Waste Management Activity Milestones
| Begin Radioactive Vitrification System Operations
|
1996
|
| Public Review and Closure for Comments on Environmental
Impact Statement
|
1996
|
| Publish Site Completion/Site Closure Record of Decision
|
1997
|
| Initial Vitrification System Radioactive Operations
|
1998
|
| Return Site to New York
|
To Be Determined
|
|
SITE COMPLETION AND SITE CLOSURE ALTERNATIVES
The Record of Decision may include the selection of one of three alternatives,
or a combination of several portions of the alternatives, for the site
completion and site closure activity. These alternatives present various
actions to address the different areas of the site. The related cost estimates
were developed to provide comparative alternative analyses for the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement. The site completion and site closure
alternatives are summarized as follows:
-
Removal and Release to Allow Unrestricted Use. This alternative will
return the Western New York Nuclear Services Center as near as possible to its
pre-development condition and allow its release for unrestricted use. All
current waste onsite would be exhumed or removed and sent offsite for disposal
along with any waste generated by high-level waste processing and
decontamination and decommissioning. The preliminary cost estimate for
Alterative I is $3.3 billion, and the assumed duration is 20 years.
-
Removal, On-Premises Waste Storage, and Partial Release to Allow Unrestricted
Use. The objective of this alternative is to return the site in a
state that is as near as possible to its pre-development condition and allow
release of the Western New York Nuclear Service Center and nearby offsite areas
for unrestricted use, except for a buffer zone surrounding new on-premises
waste storage facilities. The waste storage facilities under this option would
require a long-term monitoring and maintenance program. The preliminary cost
estimate for Alterative II is $2.0 billion and the assumed duration is 25
years.
-
InPlace Closure and On-Premises Low-Level Waste Disposal. Two
approaches have been considered for this site-wide alternative:
-
Monolith
- Decontamination, as necessary, would be performed. The Process Building, the
high-level waste Tank Farm, and the Vitrification Facility would be backfilled
with low-density concrete to stabilize any remaining contamination. Any
radioactive waste generated during closure, as well as waste that is currently
stored onsite in the Chemical Process Cell Waste Storage Area and the Lag
Storage Area, would be placed inside the Process Building and/or the
Vitrification Facility prior to backfilling. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Licensed Disposal Area and State Disposal Area burial grounds would be
stabilized and the waste left in place. Erosion control structures would be
constructed. A long-term continuous monitoring and maintenance program would be
instituted. The preliminary cost estimate for Alterative III A is $295.0
million, and the assumed duration is seven years.
-
Capped Rubble Pile - Facilities would be decontaminated, as necessary,
prior to being dismantled. Dismantlement would require special equipment and
the construction of a new confinement structure around the Process Building and
the Vitrification Facility to control the spread of radioactivity during
dismantlement and to minimize exposure to workers. Rubble would remain in
place, and an engineered barrier cap would cap it. The Nuclear Regulatory
Commission Licensed Disposal Area and State Disposal Area burial grounds would
be stabilized and the waste left in place. Erosion control structures would be
constructed. Any radioactive waste generated by dismantlement as well as waste
that is currently stored onsite in the Chemical Process Cell Waste Storage Area
and the Lag Storage Area, would be disposed of in a new onsite radioactive
waste disposal facility. A long-term continuous monitoring and maintenance
program would be instituted. The preliminary cost estimate for Alterative III B
is $785.0 million, and the assumed duration is 24 years.
|
Waste Management Activities Cost Estimate
|
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
|
| |
2030
|
| High Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
133,155
|
129,418
|
96,244
|
111,240 |
129,203
|
149,639 |
|
3,744,495
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
DESCRIPTION OF PERSONNEL
Current Composition
The current site personnel staffing level adequately addresses all of the
required disciplines to operate and maintain the facility in a safe and
compliant manner and are presented in the table below. The uncertainties
associated with the lack of a specific site completion/site closure alternative
complicate outyear forecasts. However, the present project management
philosophy generally recognizes that the personnel level will be fairly
constant, with a slow decline consistent with expected project funding levels.
There are no expected hiring "peaks."
Full-Time Equivalent Composition Table*
*The projections for Full-Time Equivalent employees are based on FY 1996
planning baselines (see Reader's Guide).
Site Management Structure
The Department of Energy established a prime contract for overall management of
the West Valley Demonstration Project and the Westinghouse Electric Corporation
was the successful bidder. Under contract to the Department, Westinghouse
established the West Valley Nuclear Services Company, Inc. to carry out the
activities necessary to achieve the goals of the West Valley's Demonstration
Project. As the management and operating contractor, West Valley Nuclear
Services Company is responsible for West Valley Demonstration Project's
management and integration, conceptual design and engineering management,
construction management, decontamination and decommissioning, and site/facility
operation. West Valley Nuclear Services Company, within its authority, has
subcontracted portions of the work to Dames & Moore (Environmental
Services), Raytheon (Architectural Engineering Services), Bel Power
(Construction Services), Burns International Security Company, and others. In
addition, West Valley Nuclear Services has working technical support and
interfaces with a number of national laboratories. As management and operating
contractor, West Valley Nuclear Services assumed responsibility for site
management in 1982.
In 1994, the Department of Energy extended the contract for the West Valley
Demonstration Project with the West Valley Nuclear Services for five years. The
nature of the contract was changed to a performance measurement-based contract
with a focus on ensuring greater results. Measures and additional contractor
ownership have been developed ensuring that the contractor is held responsible
for its actions and is responsible for the efficiency and effectiveness of the
work. In response to contract reform initiatives, the extended contract
includes innovative measures that cover all facets of work at the project. The
previous award fee contract was changed to a performance-based fee plan,
allowing West Valley Nuclear Services Company to share more risk with the
Department of Energy and incorporating incentives for reward through
performance excellence.
|
CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES
If you would like more information about performing work for the Department of
Energy's Environmental Management program at this site, please contact:
|
Major Procurements
Mona Snyder
Director
Procurement and Contracts Division
United States Department of Energy
Ohio Field Office
P.O. Box 3020
Miamisburg, OH 45343-3020
p: (513) 865-5295
f: (513) 865-3843
|
Small Business Procurements
Melissa Johnson
Procurement and Contracts Division
United States Department of Energy
Ohio Field Office
P.O. Box 3020
Miamisburg, OH 45343-3020
p: (513) 865-4569
f: (513) 865-3843
|
Future Full-Time Equivalent Needs
Existing personnel staffing levels and disciplines will be monitored to ensure
an adequate composition of skills for the project while the mission evolves
from high-level waste vitrification processing, to facility transition, to site
completion and site closure, according to the Environmental Impact Statement
/Record of Decision.
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following table presents estimated funding information for the West Valley
site.
Nondefense Funding Estimate
|
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
|
| |
2030
|
| Waste Management
|
133,155
|
129,418 |
96,244
|
111,240 |
129,203
|
149,639
|
|
3,744,495
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS ESTIMATE
This Baseline Environmental Management Report estimate compares favorably with
the previous year's estimate regarding site support operations, vitrification
of high-level waste, site treatment activities, and site completion and
closure. Despite approximately $21 million in funding cuts and rescissions,
there have been no serious impacts on the critical high-level waste
vitrification baseline schedule. The ability to absorb these funding
adjustments is primarily the result of cost savings initiatives and relatively
minor replanning of noncritical closure activities.
Comparison Table
| |
Thousands of Dollars
|
|
| Nuclear Mat. & Fac. Stab.
|
|
- |
- |
-
|
- |
| Environmental Restoration
|
- |
-
|
- |
-
|
- |
| Waste Management |
3,754,705
|
127,100 |
3,744,495
|
116,890 |
3
|
| Landlord |
-
|
- |
-
|
- |
-
|
| Program Management 2
|
- |
-
|
- |
-
|
- |
| Site Total |
3,754,705
|
127,100 |
3,744,495
|
116,890 |
3
|
1 The FY 1995 life-cycle and annual costs are provided
to determine the corrected FY 1995 cost.
2 Program Management was reported in an independent cost table last year, but
is reported as a line item in the relevant program (Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization, Environmental Restoration, and Waste Management)
activity cost estimate tables for the FY 1996 Baseline Report.
|
|
 |