About DOE Button Organization Button News Button Contact Us Button
US Department of Energy Seal and Header Photo
Science and Technology Button Energy Sources Button Energy Efficiency Button The Environment Button Prices and Trends Button National Security Button Safety and Health Button
Office of Environmental Management Safety Performance Cleanup Closure
  You are here: DOE > Environmental Management >

Office of Environmental Management
West Valley Demonstration Project

Small Box Arrow Home
Small Box Arrow BEMR Contents
Small Box Arrow U.S. Map

The West Valley Demonstration Project is located on a 1,320 hectare- (3,300-acre) tract approximately 48 kilometers (30 miles) south of Buffalo, New York. This site is also the location of the Western New York Nuclear Services Center. The West Valley Demonstration Project occupies approximately 93 hectares (230 acres) of this property, which is owned by the State of New York. The Department of Energy manages the West Valley Demonstration Project oversight responsibilities through the onsite area office.

LOCALITY MAP

Estimated Site Total
(Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
  FY 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000      
Waste Management 122,100 135,002 141,387 149,964 159,930 Grey shaded area reflects annual cost estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October 1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
1996 Appropriation 115,389     These levels reflect the current estimates for compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see Readers' Guide.
1997 Congressional Request   123,601    
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
  FY 1996-2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Life Cycle*
Waste Management 133,155 129,418 96,244 111,240 129,203 149,639   3,744,495
* Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in constant FY 1996 dollars.

FACILITY MISSION

From 1966 to 1972, Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc. operated a commercial nuclear fuel reprocessing plant at the Western New York Nuclear Services Center under contract to the State of New York. The plant, which reprocessed uranium and plutonium from spent nuclear fuel, generated approximately 2.3 million liters (600,000 gallons) of liquid high-level waste that was stored in underground tanks. In 1972, nuclear fuel reprocessing operations were discontinued. Contamination at the site is a result of the historic commercial nuclear fuel assembly and reprocessing operations rather than from a weapons mission.

SITE MAP

In 1980, Congress passed Public Law 96-368, the West Valley Demonstration Project Act, which authorizes the Department of Energy to conduct a technology demonstration project for the safe solidification and cleanup of the high-level waste and facilities used during cleanup. The Act also requires the Department to develop containers suitable for the permanent disposal of the solidified high-level radioactive waste and to transport the waste to an appropriate federal repository for permanent disposal. The cost estimates in this report were developed consistent with the provisions of the West Valley Demonstration Project Act and do not include any costs beyond those associated with transporting of the high-level waste to the federal repository. By provisions in the Act, low-level and transuranic waste resulting from high-level waste processing at the West Valley Demonstration Project require disposal under applicable licensing regulations. Further, the high-level waste tanks and other facilities in which the solidified high-level radioactive waste was stored, the facilities used in the solidification of the waste, and any material and hardware used in connection with the demonstration project require decontamination and decommissioning. Previous litigation resulted in a Stipulation of Compromise issued by the United States District Court Western District of New York, which requires disposal of low-level and transuranic waste pending completion and direction of the Site Completion/Site Closure Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision. Consequently, low-level and transuranic waste has been placed in retrievable storage onsite.

READER'S NOTE

The West Valley site has not generated a life-cycle Base Case because of the sensitivities surrounding the current Site Cleanup Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Currently, as directed by the United States District Court Stipulation of Compromise, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement is being issued for public and judicial review. Since the draft did not identify a preferred alternative, site personnel cannot generate the life-cycle estimate without prejudicing one or more of the alternatives. While costs presented for site activities before FY 2000 reflect outyear budgeting, estimates after that point reflect a cost average of the four alternatives depicted in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (see "site completion and site closure alternatives" sidebar). The site will not be able to develop a realistic life-cycle Base Case until after the Record of Decision is issued in October 1997 because:

The Department of Energy does not own the West Valley Demonstration Project. It is a New York State Energy Research and Development Authority site, and the State is addressing the issue of its closure jointly with the Department through the Environmental Impact Statement process.

The Draft Environmental Impact Statement, which is currently out for public review, does not identify a preferred alternative. The West Valley Demonstration Project cannot give the public the impression that a preferred alternative has already been internally identified when it has not, nor can it disseminate for review public documents with conflicting information. The Stipulation of Compromise clearly states specific conditions concerning public and judicial review of the Site Completion and Site Closure Environmental Impact Statement.

Regulatory issues must be resolved prior to selecting a specific alternative, or a preferred alternative. Publication of a Baseline Environmental Management Report Base Case could unnecessarily damage the credibility of the Department of Energy in the Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision process.

After evaluating the alternatives presented in the initial Environmental Impact Statement in 1982, the Department of Energy selected vitrification as the treatment process to stabilize the liquid high-level waste for ultimate disposal at a federal repository as directed by the Act and the Stipulation of Compromise. New York State, through its Energy Research and Development Authority, cooperates in the West Valley Demonstration Project and currently contributes approximately ten percent of the project's phase I costs (through the vitrification campaign). For the purposes of this report, estimates through FY 2000 are for the Department of Energy only, based on the current 90 percent Department of Energy and ten percent New York State cost sharing agreement. Because the cost sharing agreement is only applicable to activities concluded through FY 2000, costs beyond that point represent project totals only, and this report assumes them to be 100 percent Department of Energy. The State of New York and the Department of Energy will negotiate cost sharing agreements for outyear activities at a later date, and estimated Department of Energy liability will be modified accordingly.

All environmental management activities at this site are a function of the West Valley Demonstration Project and are under the purview of the Office of Environmental Management. All decommissioning, environmental restoration and treatment, and storage and disposal activities are conducted within the scope of the waste management program.

The State of New York is, and will remain, the landlord for this facility throughout the life cycle covered by this report. The Department of Energy is responsible for maintaining areas of the site that present an environmental risk and that are related to fulfilling the West Valley Demonstration Project Act.

SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL AT WEST VALLEY

In addition to the highly radioactive liquid waste stored at the West Valley site, the Department of Energy owns 125 irradiated nuclear fuel assemblies that are contained in the site's storage pool while awaiting disposition. Final disposition of the fuel elements is not a part of the West Valley Demonstration Project. Rather, the Final Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-level Waste Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement cover the disposition of these fuel elements. The transportation of these fuel assemblies to Idaho has been delayed until FY 2000. This delay has impacted project transition schedules for the fuel storage pool. The Department's Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management funds the costs for the extended storage of spent nuclear fuel at West Valley, and it will fund the ultimate storage and long-term management at Idaho; these costs are not considered part of the West Valley Demonstration Project, nor are they included in Baseline Environmental Management Report cost estimates. The West Valley Demonstration Project response to the Materials In Inventory Initiative questionnaire reported that approximately 27 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel (125 assemblies) are being stored onsite.

FUTURE USE

Because the Department of Energy does not own any portion of the Western New York Nuclear Service Center, there will be no future federal use of the site or facilities upon completion of the requirements of the Act. When the Department of Energy has completed its mission at the West Valley Demonstration Project, any remaining facilities and all land used by the Department of Energy will revert back to the State of New York. To the extent practicable, future use considerations for the area are being considered in the site-wide Draft Environmental Impact Statement, to which the State of New York is a partner. This document, which is being prepared under the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, has extensive stakeholder involvement. The Department of Energy, in accordance with legal site agreements, will leave the site in a condition that will allow the State of New York to reinstate the Nuclear Regulatory Commission license and perform any future use that the State deems appropriate.

STAKEHOLDER INTERACTIONS

The West Valley Area Office, which reports to the Ohio Operations Office, conducted public participation activities for the West Valley Demonstration Project Site. The West Valley office distributed a news release announcing a public meeting to explain the 1995 report to the public for review and comment, and placed notices in newspapers to announce availability of the report in the area reading rooms and public libraries. At a public meeting in August 1995, West Valley Associate Director for Operations and Support Richard Provencher led a question-and-answer session. The office sponsored a follow-on meeting in November 1995 to discuss budgetary issues related to the 1996 report as well as the Site Stabilization Plan for cleanup and ongoing maintenance activities. If you would like more information about the report or have questions about the results for this site, please contact:

Public Participation
Russ Gill
(716) 942-4547 klahni@wvdp.com
Technical Liaison
Dan Sullivan
(716) 942-4016 klahni@wvdp.com
Public Affairs
John Chamberlain
(716) 942-4547 klahni@wvdp.com

WASTE MANAGEMENT

All site activities, including high-level waste solidification, decontamination and decommissioning, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act corrective measures, and other necessary site remedial activities, are conducted within the scope of waste management operations. The Waste Management program is responsible for all waste generated during the fulfillment of the site mission. See the Site Map for the location of Waste Management program activities.

The West Valley Demonstration Project comprises the following major components:

  1. Vitrification of Liquid High-level Waste. This activity is the primary mission and near-term (1996-1998) focus of the West Valley Demonstration Project. During the first portion of this demonstration project, the liquid high-level waste will be immobilized/vitrified in borosilicate glass and stored onsite. Decontamination and decommissioning of project facilities will follow vitrification. The solidification of the high-level waste liquid into borosilicate glass will begin in FY 1996 and will represent a significant achievement for the Department of Energy. The total estimated cost to complete the vitrification campaign is $400 million.
  2. Site Transition Activities. This category includes a series of activities that, when completed in FY 2005, will reduce environmental risks and reduce operating costs during the transition from vitrification to project completion. Examples include: removing high-level waste tank farm residuals, stabilizing nuclear fuel fines and other selected material in the Process Building Head End cells, replacing leaking Process Building roof areas, minimizing the spread of ground-water contamination in the North Plateau Area, and minimizing site operations and support facility requirements. These activities can be accomplished without causing prejudice to the selection of the closure options in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Preliminary estimates for this work scope indicate that the effort will cost approximately $200 million.
  3. Site Completion and Site Closure Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision. This category represents the work scope that will disposition the current facilities according to the outcome of the Site Completion and Site Closure Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision. The alternatives are detailed in the following discussion. The West Valley Demonstration Project currently is using an average of the estimates for the closure option, as the Draft Environmental Impact Statement closure engineering reports describe. The average of these alternatives is $1.6 billion.
  4. Site Support and Operations. This category characterizes the ongoing annual site costs for project support activities. These activities include program management, security, regulatory compliance, radiological support, accounting, environmental safety and health, facilities management (engineering and maintenance), utilities, training, quality assurance, business systems, warehousing, and auditing. The average for these annual costs is approximately $56 million.

Major Waste Management Activity Milestones
TASK
COMPLETION DATE
Fiscal Year
Begin Radioactive Vitrification System Operations 1996
Public Review and Closure for Comments on Environmental Impact Statement 1996
Publish Site Completion/Site Closure Record of Decision 1997
Initial Vitrification System Radioactive Operations 1998
Return Site to New York To Be Determined

SITE COMPLETION AND SITE CLOSURE ALTERNATIVES

The Record of Decision may include the selection of one of three alternatives, or a combination of several portions of the alternatives, for the site completion and site closure activity. These alternatives present various actions to address the different areas of the site. The related cost estimates were developed to provide comparative alternative analyses for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. The site completion and site closure alternatives are summarized as follows:

  1. Removal and Release to Allow Unrestricted Use. This alternative will return the Western New York Nuclear Services Center as near as possible to its pre-development condition and allow its release for unrestricted use. All current waste onsite would be exhumed or removed and sent offsite for disposal along with any waste generated by high-level waste processing and decontamination and decommissioning. The preliminary cost estimate for Alterative I is $3.3 billion, and the assumed duration is 20 years.
  2. Removal, On-Premises Waste Storage, and Partial Release to Allow Unrestricted Use. The objective of this alternative is to return the site in a state that is as near as possible to its pre-development condition and allow release of the Western New York Nuclear Service Center and nearby offsite areas for unrestricted use, except for a buffer zone surrounding new on-premises waste storage facilities. The waste storage facilities under this option would require a long-term monitoring and maintenance program. The preliminary cost estimate for Alterative II is $2.0 billion and the assumed duration is 25 years.
  3. In­Place Closure and On-Premises Low-Level Waste Disposal. Two approaches have been considered for this site-wide alternative:

  • Monolith - Decontamination, as necessary, would be performed. The Process Building, the high-level waste Tank Farm, and the Vitrification Facility would be backfilled with low-density concrete to stabilize any remaining contamination. Any radioactive waste generated during closure, as well as waste that is currently stored onsite in the Chemical Process Cell Waste Storage Area and the Lag Storage Area, would be placed inside the Process Building and/or the Vitrification Facility prior to backfilling. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensed Disposal Area and State Disposal Area burial grounds would be stabilized and the waste left in place. Erosion control structures would be constructed. A long-term continuous monitoring and maintenance program would be instituted. The preliminary cost estimate for Alterative III A is $295.0 million, and the assumed duration is seven years.
  • Capped Rubble Pile - Facilities would be decontaminated, as necessary, prior to being dismantled. Dismantlement would require special equipment and the construction of a new confinement structure around the Process Building and the Vitrification Facility to control the spread of radioactivity during dismantlement and to minimize exposure to workers. Rubble would remain in place, and an engineered barrier cap would cap it. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensed Disposal Area and State Disposal Area burial grounds would be stabilized and the waste left in place. Erosion control structures would be constructed. Any radioactive waste generated by dismantlement as well as waste that is currently stored onsite in the Chemical Process Cell Waste Storage Area and the Lag Storage Area, would be disposed of in a new onsite radioactive waste disposal facility. A long-term continuous monitoring and maintenance program would be instituted. The preliminary cost estimate for Alterative III B is $785.0 million, and the assumed duration is 24 years.

Waste Management Activities Cost Estimate
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
  FY 1996-2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Life Cycle*
High Level Waste                
Treatment 133,155 129,418 96,244 111,240 129,203 149,639   3,744,495
* Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in constant FY 1996 dollars.

DESCRIPTION OF PERSONNEL

Current Composition

The current site personnel staffing level adequately addresses all of the required disciplines to operate and maintain the facility in a safe and compliant manner and are presented in the table below. The uncertainties associated with the lack of a specific site completion/site closure alternative complicate outyear forecasts. However, the present project management philosophy generally recognizes that the personnel level will be fairly constant, with a slow decline consistent with expected project funding levels. There are no expected hiring "peaks."

Full-Time Equivalent Composition Table*

graphic table
*The projections for Full-Time Equivalent employees are based on FY 1996 planning baselines (see Reader's Guide).

Site Management Structure

The Department of Energy established a prime contract for overall management of the West Valley Demonstration Project and the Westinghouse Electric Corporation was the successful bidder. Under contract to the Department, Westinghouse established the West Valley Nuclear Services Company, Inc. to carry out the activities necessary to achieve the goals of the West Valley's Demonstration Project. As the management and operating contractor, West Valley Nuclear Services Company is responsible for West Valley Demonstration Project's management and integration, conceptual design and engineering management, construction management, decontamination and decommissioning, and site/facility operation. West Valley Nuclear Services Company, within its authority, has subcontracted portions of the work to Dames & Moore (Environmental Services), Raytheon (Architectural Engineering Services), Bel Power (Construction Services), Burns International Security Company, and others. In addition, West Valley Nuclear Services has working technical support and interfaces with a number of national laboratories. As management and operating contractor, West Valley Nuclear Services assumed responsibility for site management in 1982.

In 1994, the Department of Energy extended the contract for the West Valley Demonstration Project with the West Valley Nuclear Services for five years. The nature of the contract was changed to a performance measurement-based contract with a focus on ensuring greater results. Measures and additional contractor ownership have been developed ensuring that the contractor is held responsible for its actions and is responsible for the efficiency and effectiveness of the work. In response to contract reform initiatives, the extended contract includes innovative measures that cover all facets of work at the project. The previous award fee contract was changed to a performance-based fee plan, allowing West Valley Nuclear Services Company to share more risk with the Department of Energy and incorporating incentives for reward through performance excellence.

CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES

If you would like more information about performing work for the Department of Energy's Environmental Management program at this site, please contact:

Major Procurements
Mona Snyder
Director
Procurement and Contracts Division
United States Department of Energy
Ohio Field Office
P.O. Box 3020
Miamisburg, OH 45343-3020
p: (513) 865-5295
f: (513) 865-3843
Small Business Procurements
Melissa Johnson
Procurement and Contracts Division
United States Department of Energy
Ohio Field Office
P.O. Box 3020
Miamisburg, OH 45343-3020
p: (513) 865-4569
f: (513) 865-3843

Future Full-Time Equivalent Needs

Existing personnel staffing levels and disciplines will be monitored to ensure an adequate composition of skills for the project while the mission evolves from high-level waste vitrification processing, to facility transition, to site completion and site closure, according to the Environmental Impact Statement /Record of Decision.

FUNDING ESTIMATE

The following table presents estimated funding information for the West Valley site.

Nondefense Funding Estimate
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
  FY 1996-2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Life Cycle*
Waste Management 133,155 129,418 96,244 111,240 129,203 149,639   3,744,495
* Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in constant FY 1996 dollars.

COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS ESTIMATE

This Baseline Environmental Management Report estimate compares favorably with the previous year's estimate regarding site support operations, vitrification of high-level waste, site treatment activities, and site completion and closure. Despite approximately $21 million in funding cuts and rescissions, there have been no serious impacts on the critical high-level waste vitrification baseline schedule. The ability to absorb these funding adjustments is primarily the result of cost savings initiatives and relatively minor replanning of noncritical closure activities.

Comparison Table

Activity
FY 1995
Life Cycle
FY 1995 Only 1
FY 1996
Life Cycle
Change in
Dollars
Change in
Percent
 
Thousands of Dollars
 
Nuclear Mat. & Fac. Stab. - - - -
Environmental Restoration - - - - -
Waste Management 3,754,705 127,100 3,744,495 116,890 3
Landlord - - - - -
Program Management 2 - - - - -
Site Total 3,754,705 127,100 3,744,495 116,890 3
1 The FY 1995 life-cycle and annual costs are provided to determine the corrected FY 1995 cost.
2 Program Management was reported in an independent cost table last year, but is reported as a line item in the relevant program (Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization, Environmental Restoration, and Waste Management) activity cost estimate tables for the FY 1996 Baseline Report.
 
The White House FirstGov.gov Link: Privacy Program E-gov IQ FOIA
U.S. Department of Energy | 1000 Independence Ave., SW | Washington, DC 20585
1-800-dial-DOE | f/202-586-4403 | e/General Contact

Web Policies | No Fear Act | Site Map | Privacy | Phone Book | Employment