About DOE Button Organization Button News Button Contact Us Button
US Department of Energy Seal and Header Photo
Science and Technology Button Energy Sources Button Energy Efficiency Button The Environment Button Prices and Trends Button National Security Button Safety and Health Button
Office of Environmental Management Safety Performance Cleanup Closure
  You are here: DOE > Environmental Management >

Office of Environmental Management
Savannah River Site 4

Small Box Arrow Home
Small Box Arrow BEMR Contents
Small Box Arrow U.S. Map

Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Section

Environmental Restoration Section

Waste Management Section

LANDLORD ACTIVITIES

The Savannah River Site Infrastructure Program supports line-item projects and general plant projects for constructing or improving facilities, systems, and plant infrastructure. These areas include fire protection, office buildings, domestic water, and bridges. General capital equipment will be acquired and managed to support Savannah River Site missions and goals. The Infrastructure Program consists primarily of capital work and related operating cost work (for example, other project cost activities and requirements). The funding is based on guidance from the Department of Energy and prioritization with other site programs. This prioritization process was initiated for the FY 1997 Outyear Budget and is used to prepare the FY 1996 Annual Operating Plan.

Provision for other landlord-type functions and elements such as: security, emergency preparedness, utilities, space and services, laboratories, transportation, roads and grounds, medical, janitorial, food services, environmental safety and health site-wide programs, and record/storage facilities) are based on specific program requirements and needs. Funding for other landlord activities is provided as operating costs through specific program elements, based on program needs and requirements. The Savannah River Site does not receive directly appropriated funding to support the Landlord/Infrastructure Program. The costs are distributed as a mix of direct charges, vouchered, area support, overheads, and general and administrative allocations.

The FY 1996 Infrastructure Program supports 14 line items, various capital improvement items, general plant project items, and studies funded by the Department of Energy. Future requirements for the Infrastructure Program and other landlord activities will be based on existing and future site missions. The Department will continue to consider privatization, commercialization, consolidation, and subcontracting to ensure the most cost-effective use of resources.

Landlord Cost Estimate
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
  FY 1996-2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030  
Directly Appropriated Landlord 17,534 14,841 15,189 15,730 15,648 15,907 15,652  
  FY 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 2065 Life Cycle*
Directly Appropriated Landlord 15,990 16,012 16,137         793,203
* Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in constant FY 1996 dollars.

DESCRIPTION OF PERSONNEL

Current Composition

The work scope at the Savannah River Site comprises all phases of Environmental Management programs, including material stabilization, waste management, technology development, environmental restoration, and landlord activities. The personnel composition of the site, profiled in the table below, reflects this scope. The contractor work force is a mix of professional and labor personnel who support the day-to-day operations and plan and conduct remediation at the site.

Full-Time Equivalent Composition Table*

grahpic table
* The Projections for Full-Time Equivalent employees are based on FY 1996 planning baselines (see Reader's Guide).

Site Management Structure

Westinghouse Savannah River Company operates the Savannah River Site for the Department of Energy under a single management and operating contract that is consistent with those used at a number of Department of Energy locations. The contractor performs its duties in accordance with Department of Energy Orders, contracting officer direction, and day­to-day technical direction from the Department of Energy Savannah River Program Office. A single, integrated contractor, Bechtel Savannah River, Inc., is primarily responsible for engineering, design, and construction activities. The site subcontracts all other acquired services on a competitive basis in accordance with best commercial practices, consistent with required government regulatory and socioeconomic terms and conditions. A new contract is being negotiated. Although it is expected to continue the basic management and operations concept, it will require the contractor to assume substantially greater liability and it will place significant emphasis on privatization and targeted subcontracting to experts to ensure optimal cost-effectiveness. The "primary best in class" subcontractors will be proposed under the new contract arrangement. They will be experts in construction, environmental remediation, and decontamination and decommissioning. In addition, 14 other major partners will play roles in the operations at Savannah River Site.

CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES

If you would like more information about performing work for the Department of Energy's Environmental Management program at this site, please contact:

Major Procurements
Ron Simpson
Director, Contracts Division
United States Department of Energy Savannah River Operations
P.O. Box A
Aiken, SC 29802
p: (803) 725-3350
f: (803) 725-8573
Small Business Procurements
Donnie Campbell
Contracts Division
U. S. DOE Savannah River Operations
P.O. Box A
Aiken, SC 29802
p: (803) 725-3350
f: (803) 725-8573

Future Full-Time Equivalent Needs

The change in mission from defense production to environmental management and the decline in budget continue to impact the required skill mix of the worker population and maintenance of the required core competencies to meet mission requirements. Retaining and replacing critical skills and core competencies is critical to meeting the long-term site objectives. Programs have been implemented to analyze and manage the skill mix of the work force to minimize the impact of restructuring activity on mission-based staffing requirements and to maximize the use of the retained work force. The Environmental Management program has identified core competency and critical skills, with a focus on requirements for operations and maintenance, engineering, research and development, scientific program support, and radiological and industrial hygienists requirements. The programs in place are designed to maintain required core competency for each program phase through timely personnel transfers, retraining, subcontracting, and limited hiring.

Beyond FY 1999, the level of staffing will continue downward through FY 2001 when it will level out through the completion of program scopes. The Department will adjust the mix of skills and staffing levels within each program to meet the requirements of emerging work.

FUNDING ESTIMATE

The following table presents the estimated defense funding information for the Savannah River Site.

Defense Funding Estimate
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
  FY 1996-2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030  
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization 569,741 380,341 286,106 114,596 88,334 49,080 87,903  
Environmental Restoration 153,095 260,955 274,847 494,356 518,682 391,474 236,826  
Waste Management 590,535 649,625 632,159 693,027 754,067 762,459 671,534  
Directly Appropriated Landlord 17,534 14,841 15,189 15,730 15,648 15,907 15,652  
Total 1,330,905 1,305,762 1,208,301 1,317,708 1,376,731 1,218,920 1,011,915  
  FY 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 2065 Life Cycle*
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization 36,614             8,063,567
Environmental Restoration 142,628 47,681 16,863         12,687,036
Waste Management 425,790 259,182 6,623 62       27,225,313
Directly Appropriated Landlord 15,990 16,012 16,137         793,203
Total 621,022 322,875 39,623 62       48,769,120
* Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in constant FY 1996 dollars.

COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS ESTIMATE

The estimated life-cycle cost for the Savannah River Site in the 1995 Baseline Environmental Management Report was approximately $67.6 billion. The life-cycle cost in the 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report is approximately $48.8 billion, which is 27 percent lower than in the 1995 report, after taking FY 1995 expenditures into account. The life-cycle costs for the Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization, Environmental Restoration, and Waste Management programs are components of the Savannah River Site total. The three tables provide more detailed breakdowns of life-cycle cost differences estimated for major program elements.

In the 1995 estimate, Program Management was represented in a separate table and discussion. In the 1996 report, Program Management appears separately as a line item on each program's cost table. Other cost differences within each of the program elements are addressed by activity.

Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Program Overall Differences (Including Landlord Activities)

Life-cycle costs are 32 percent lower in the 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report ($9.0 billion) than in the 1995 Baseline Environmental Management Report ($13.1 billion). The cost difference can be attributed a 38 percent decrease (to $5.3 billion) for Landlord support, a 77 percent decrease (to $525 million) for Surveillance and Maintenance, and a 39 percent increase (to $3.05 billion) for Stabilization and Deactivation. The duration of the program is five years shorter in the 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report, ending in FY 2035.

Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Program Element
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Program Element
Life-Cycle Cost
Basis for Change
1995 estimate ($) 1996 estimate ($) Percent change
Stabilization and Deactivation 2.2 Billion 3.05 Billion + 39% 6-year schedule extension (complete in 2035 vs. 2029)
Surveillance and Maintenance 2.3 Billion 525 Million - 77% 9-year schedule compression (complete in 2017 vs. 2026)

Environmental Restoration Program Overall Differences

Life-cycle costs are 24 percent lower in the 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report ($12.7 billion) than in the 1995 Baseline Environmental Management Report ($16.7 billion). Most of the cost difference ($4 billion) can be attributed to lower costs for decommissioning ($7 billion). The program duration is shorter in the 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report, ending in FY 2045.

Environmental Restoration Program Element
Environmental Restoration Program Element Life-Cycle Cost Basis for Change
1995 estimate ($) 1996 estimate ($) Percent change
Assessment 490 Million 2.1 Billion + 332% 5-year schedule compression (complete in 2040 vs. 2045)
Decommissioning 12.4 Billion 5.9 Billion - 57% 13-year schedule compression (complete in 2040 vs. 2053)

Less costly decommissioning strategy

Remediation 1.6 Billion 2.6 Billion + 66% 10-year schedule compression (complete in 2035 vs. 2045)

Increased number of sites

Revised cost assumption

Long-Term Surveillance and Monitoring 399 Million 1.4 Billion + 239% 3-year schedule extension (complete in 2043 vs. 2040)

New approach to decommissioning

Support Costs 1.8 Billion 1.3 Billion - 30% 8-year schedule compression (complete in 2045 vs. 2053)

Waste Management Program Overall Differences

Life-cycle costs are 31 percent lower in the 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report ($27.2 billion) than in the 1995 Baseline Environmental Management Report ($39.3 billion). Most of the cost difference ($ 12.2 billion) can be attributed to lower support costs ($6.2 billion), lower costs for spent nuclear fuel ($2.4 billion), and lower costs for low-level mixed waste ($4.1 billion). The program duration is shorter in the 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report, ending in FY 2045.

Waste Management Program Element
Waste Management Program Element Life-Cycle Cost Basis for Change
1995 estimate ($) 1996 estimate ($) Percent change
High-Level Waste 13.9 Billion 13.9 Billion No major difference 15-year schedule extension (complete in FY 2045 vs. FY 2030)
Spent Nuclear Fuel 4.1 Billion 1.7 Billion - 59% $ 5-year schedule compression (complete in FY 2040 vs. FY 2035)
Transuranic Waste 846 Million 779 Million - 8% 11-year schedule compression (complete in FY 2038 vs. FY 2049)
Low-Level Mixed Waste 6.5 Billion 2.4 Billion - 63% 13-year schedule compression (complete in FY 2041 vs. FY 2054)
Low-Level Waste 2.9 Billion 2.9 Billion No major difference 6-year schedule compression (complete in FY 2043 vs. FY 2049)

70% reduction in waste volume

Increase unit cost for treatment and storage

Decrease unit cost for disposal

Hazardous Waste 55 Million 415 Million - 25% 6-year schedule compression (complete in FY 2040 vs. FY 2046)

Site estimate rather than Activity Data Sheets

Sanitary Waste 124 Million 182 Million + 47% Site estimate rather than Activity Data Sheets
Support Costs 11 Billion 4.9 Billion - 56% 12-year schedule compression (complete in FY 2043 vs. FY 2054)
 
The White House FirstGov.gov Link: Privacy Program E-gov IQ FOIA
U.S. Department of Energy | 1000 Independence Ave., SW | Washington, DC 20585
1-800-dial-DOE | f/202-586-4403 | e/General Contact

Web Policies | No Fear Act | Site Map | Privacy | Phone Book | Employment