|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
The Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant occupies approximately 324 hectares (811 acres) within
the Oak Ridge Reservation in the Bear Creek Valley, and is located
approximately 3.2 kilometers (2 miles) from downtown Oak Ridge, Tennessee. See
the Oak Ridge Associated Universities and Oak Ridge Institute for Science and
Education section of this report for the Locality Map.
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
|
(Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
|
|
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
3,104
|
31,201
|
32,043
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
33,665
|
29,805
|
41,105
|
31,325
|
34,945
|
|
| Waste Management
|
53,456
|
50,551
|
108,315
|
107,499
|
111,758
|
|
| Total |
87,121
|
80,356
|
152,523
|
170,025
|
178,747
|
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
73,199
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
64,783
|
|
|
|
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
11,990
|
27,546
|
32,407
|
19,464
|
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
32,212
|
27,636
|
37,646
|
28,325
|
26,205
|
47,790
|
79,330
|
|
| Waste Management
|
80,461
|
73,007
|
57,033
|
53,044
|
52,729
|
53,433
|
51,341
|
|
| Total |
124,663
|
128,189
|
127,086
|
100,833 |
78,934
|
101,223 |
130,671
|
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
56,275
|
5,526
|
3,500
|
1,140
|
2,500
|
500
|
|
|
| Waste Management
|
51,341
|
51,341
|
51,341
|
51,341
|
51,341
|
51,341
|
32,300
|
|
| Total |
107,616
|
56,867
|
54,841
|
52,481
|
53,841
|
51,841
|
32,300
|
|
| |
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457,038
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,742,930
|
| Waste Management
|
32,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,968,465
|
| Total |
32,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,168,433
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
Built in 1943 as part of the Manhattan Project, the original mission of the Oak
Ridge Y-12 Plant was to use an electromagnetic process to separate uranium
isotopes. Between World War II and 1993 this mission continued. The role of the
Y-12 Plant has evolved into supporting highly sophisticated manufacturing and
development engineering associated with the production and fabrication of
nuclear weapons components.
The Y-12 Plant is implementing new programmatic changes while maintaining safe
and reliable nuclear weapons processing technologies. Currently, the work force
is refocusing technical capabilities and expertise at the facility to provide:
(1) nuclear weapons component disassembly and storage, (2) enriched uranium
material storage and management, (3) weapons process technology and development
support, (4) renovation or decontamination and decommissioning of standby or
shutdown buildings, (5) transfer of the Department of Energy-developed
technology to enhance the competitiveness of U.S. industry in world markets,
and (6) maintenance and support to the Department of Energy's Office of
Non-Proliferation and Arms Control.
Environmental management activities ongoing at the site include environmental
restoration activities to assess the condition and contamination of sites and
facilities to decide how the contamination can be contained or cleaned up. In
December 1989, the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant was placed on the Environmental
Protection Agency's National Priorities List as part of the Oak Ridge
Reservation. In January 1992, a Federal Facilities Agreement was signed between
the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency Region IV, and
the State of Tennessee that provides a framework for remediation activities at
the plant. Containment and cleanup are proceeding according to evaluations of
risk to the public and the environment. Facilities no longer needed by the
plant are being stabilized for future decommissioning.
SITE MAP
Onsite waste management facilities treat, store, and dispose of waste generated
by ongoing operations at the Y-12 Plant, including environmental restoration;
they also prepare some waste to be transferred offsite for treatment or
disposal. Waste management activities are conducted under the requirements of
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Department of Energy Orders, and
other federal and state laws.
The Department's Office of Defense Programs is the landlord of the Oak Ridge
Y-12 Plant, and this report assumes it to remain in that capacity for the life
cycle of this estimate. However, surplus facilities and areas will continue to
transfer to the Environmental Management program.
FUTURE USE
The Department of Energy has been developing strategic plans regarding future
use of the Oak Ridge Reservation and the Y-12 Plant through the Common Ground
Process. This process is a stakeholder-driven process to determine preferred
land-use options for the Oak Ridge Reservation so that cleanup operations are
based on the most likely and acceptable land uses. The land uses recommended by
the Department of Energy as a result of the Common Ground Process are used for
planning facility use and reuse for the next 25 years. A 25-year period was
chosen based on realistic land-use planning. The Department of Energy will
revise land use at the Oak Ridge Reservation regularly to reflect recommended
changes and new information. The land-use recommendations for cleanups are
effective in terms of cost and risk management, while taking into account the
preferences of the stakeholders. The Common Ground Report has been completed.
The recommendations for the 25-year period are assumed to remain the same for
the life-cycle estimate of this report.
The proposed future land-use designations are as follows: Industrial, Open
Space/Wildlife Management, and Controlled Access. These proposed land uses are
illustrated in the future use map which can be found in the Oak Ridge
Associated Universities and Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education site
summary. The Industrial, with restricted use category applies to those areas
that are currently in use or identified by the Y-12 Plant as proposed
facilities for research and development, operations, or support. These sites
will remain under government control, providing administrative and engineering
controls to protect worker health and safety.
For the Upper East Fork Poplar Creek area, current Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act documentation describes the proposed
land use as Industrial, with additional exposure restrictions, such as physical
contact with the creek and unmonitored excavation. This proposed land use seems
to be the most realistic alternative because of the levels of both radioactive
and nonradioactive contamination.
Land uses in the Bear Creek Valley were agreed upon by the Tennessee Department
of Environment and Conservation and the Environmental Protection Agency
according to the Feasibility Study alternatives screening process. Buried waste
will remain in place and under Department of Energy control due to the high
costs associated with excavation of this waste. It is expected that uncapped
areas will be capped or treated in place to mitigate further releases of
contaminants to ground water and surface water. Areas to the west of the burial
grounds extending to Highway 95 will be restored to Open Space/Wildlife
Management because contamination is believed to be limited to shallow soil
depths located in depositional areas of the Bear Creek floodplain. These
shallow soils will be excavated and consolidated on the Department of Energy
property.
Land use for the Chestnut Ridge Area Operable Unit 2 (the Filled Coal Ash
Pond/Upper McCoy Branch) has been documented in the Feasibility Study
alternative screening process. Remediation will include stabilization of the
dam, which will remain under Department of Energy control. The Chestnut Ridge
area includes many waste management areas. These areas are not being evaluated
under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
process because this estimate assumes them to remain Controlled Access,
regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Land use for the
undeveloped areas of Chestnut Ridge has not been determined, but this estimate
assumes they will remain Open Space/Wildlife Management areas.
NUCLEAR MATERIAL AND FACILITY STABILIZATION
A total of 23 facilities at the Y-12 Plant are proposed for incorporation into
the Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization program. Three of these 23
facilities comprise almost 93,333 square meters (1 million square feet) of
combined floor space. These contaminated facilities are either currently
declared surplus or projected to be surplus within the next five years.
Although additional facilities will transfer to the Environmental Management
program over time, this report only estimates those facilities that have
already been declared surplus. A total of four scheduling transfer units have
been identified for current surplus facilities.
These scheduling transfer units define projects that will accomplish
stabilization and deactivation, thereby reducing environmental, health, and
safety risks; consolidating and removing waste inventories; and reducing
surveillance and maintenance costs as facilities are prepared for
decommissioning. Although alternate uses are also pursued during this process,
this baseline report assumes that all of the facilities will be transferred to
the Environmental Restoration program for decommissioning following completion
of nuclear material and facility stabilization actions. This report further
assumes the Office of Defense Programs completed stabilization activities for
all scheduling transfer unit facilities. This estimate assumes that all nuclear
material and facility stabilization activities will be complete by FY 2015.
Descriptions of the scheduling transfer units follow.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 4, or the "Oil project," includes six small facilities
used for chemical/oil filtration, pumping, and storage. This report assumes
that Defense Programs completed stabilization actions in these facilities prior
to transfer to the Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization program. This
estimate further assumes that nuclear material and facility stabilization
activities associated with Scheduling Transfer Unit 4 will begin in FY 1998 and
be completed by FY 2003.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 7 includes one major facility, Building 9201-5, which
contains approximately 49,290 square meters (64,570 square yards) of floor
space. The facility served a number of weapons-related production functions
including arc melt, assembly, coating, machining, and nondestructive testing
operations. This estimate assumes that nuclear material and facility
stabilization activities associated with this scheduling transfer unit will
begin in FY 1999 and be completed by FY 2014.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 8 includes one major facility, Building 9204-4, which
contains approximately 25,482 square meters (33,381 square yards) of floor
space. The facility served a number of weapons-related production functions
including assembly, metal preparation, machining, and nondestructive testing
operations. This estimate assumes that nuclear material and facility
stabilization activities associated with this scheduling transfer unit will
begin in FY 1999 and be completed by FY 2015.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 9 includes one facility, Building 9206, which contains
approximately 6,231 square meters (8,163 square yards) of floor space. The
facility was used for weapons-related chemical processing operations. This
report assumes that nuclear material and facility stabilization activities
associated with this scheduling transfer unit will begin in FY 1998 and be
completed by FY 2014.
The scope of the site's Waste Management program includes all costs associated
with treatment, storage, and disposal of waste generated by the Nuclear
Material and Facility Stabilization program. This estimate assumes that there
will be no associated costs for program management/support for the Nuclear
Material and Facility Stabilization program at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant.
Parametric models determined the cost estimates for all scheduling transfer
units.
Major Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Activity Milestones
| Scheduling Transfer Units 4, and 7 through
9
|
| Pre-Deactivation/Stabilization Surveillance and
Maintenance
|
2003
|
| Stabilization
|
2006
|
| Post-Stabilization Surveillance and Maintenance
|
2008
|
| Deactivation
|
2012
|
| Post-Deactivation Surveillance and Maintenance
|
2015
|
PRE-DEACTIVATION/STABILIZATION SURVEILLANCE AND MAINTENANCE
Pre-deactivation/stabilization surveillance and maintenance activities will
focus on monitoring and maintenance of facilities. These actions will be
reviewed and revised appropriate with intended future Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization program activities. Currently, these activities are
planned for Scheduling Transfer Units 7, 8, and 9.
STABILIZATION
Stabilization activities currently planned at Scheduling Transfer Units 7, 8,
and 9 will focus on high priority problems and limited decontamination and
corrections for hazardous and mixed waste. This estimate assumes that
stabilization activities for all applicable scheduling transfer units will be
completed by FY 2006.
POST-STABILIZATION SURVEILLANCE AND MAINTENANCE
Post-stabilization surveillance and maintenance activities will focus on
required health physics checks, instrumentation monitoring and repair, and
facility maintenance for all scheduling transfer units until deactivation
begins. This estimate assumes that all post-stabilization surveillance and
maintenance activities for all scheduling transfer units will be complete by FY
2008.
DEACTIVATION
Deactivation activities will include limited decontamination, instrumentation
and utility consolidation or elimination, and waste and recyclable material
removal for all scheduling transfer units. This estimate assumes that
deactivation activities for all scheduling transfer units will be completed by
FY 2012.
POST-DEACTIVATION SURVEILLANCE AND MAINTENANCE
Post-deactivation surveillance and maintenance activities will consist of
required monitoring and maintenance of facilities for all scheduling transfer
units until they are transferred to the Environmental Restoration
Decommissioning program. This report assumes that post-deactivation
surveillance and maintenance activities for all scheduling transfer units will
be completed by FY 2015.
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Activities Cost Estimate
|
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
|
| |
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Additional Scheduling Transfer Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pre-Stab. Surveil. and Maintenance
|
11,181
|
15,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,890
|
| Stabilization
|
|
11,181
|
5,125
|
|
|
|
|
81,534
|
| Post-Stab. Surveil. and Maintenance
|
550
|
|
10,871
|
|
|
|
|
57,106
|
| Deactivation
|
258
|
258
|
16,411
|
17,293
|
|
|
|
171,102
|
| Post-Deact. Surveil. and Maintenance
|
|
110
|
|
2,171
|
|
|
|
11,406
|
| Total |
11,990
|
27,546
|
32,407
|
19,464
|
|
|
|
457,038
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
Because the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant contains facilities that generate, treat,
store, and dispose of hazardous and radioactive materials, there are numerous
areas that will require investigation and remediation. Altogether, over 200
areas of concern have been identified. This baseline report assumes that all
major sites requiring remediation have been identified; however, continuing
investigations may lead to the discovery of additional areas. Areas of concern
may include landfills, incinerators, storage areas, above-ground and
underground tanks, surface impoundments, and treatment plants. These areas are
currently under investigation to determine whether remediation is required and,
if so, the best technology for the remediation. In order of increasing
mobility, the contaminants present at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant are metals,
radionuclides, volatile organic compounds, and nitrates.
Environmental restoration activities are conducted within the framework of the
1992 Federal Facilities Agreement. This agreement requires preparing an
assessment and proposed remediation plan for each site (or group of sites);
submitting the plan to various stakeholders, such as regulatory agencies and
interested members of the public; and identifying, in a Record of Decision,
which of the proposed remedial action alternatives described in the plan has
been selected for implementation.
Areas of concern at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant have been consolidated into three
hydrologic, geographical units. These units include the Chestnut Ridge
Hydrologic Region, the Bear Creek Valley Region, and the Upper East Fork Poplar
Creek Characterization Area. Also included in the estimate are areas that are
yet to undergo preliminary assessment/site inspections. These areas are
referred to as the Y-12 Study Areas. All decommissioning activities at the
Plant are considered to be a separate area action.
There is a large facility that the Office of Defense Programs no longer needs
that have been transferred to the Environmental Restoration program for
surveillance and maintenance and decommissioning. In addition, this estimate
assumes that the facilities identified in the Nuclear Material and Facility
Stabilization section of the report will ultimately be transferred to the
Environmental Restoration program for decommissioning. In most cases, this
report assumes that these facilities will be cleaned up for industrial reuse.
Although the Environmental Restoration program's primary mission is to
remediate contaminated sites and decommission facilities, it may also be
responsible for some of the associated costs for treatment, storage and
disposal for some of its activities. To manage the waste associated with
environmental restoration activities, onsite and commercial options are
evaluated. Evaluations are based on the activities conducted, the risk
associated with those activities, and the cost of onsite versus commercial
capability. In performing these option evaluations, the Environmental
Restoration program, with the support of the Waste Management program, prepares
waste management plans and develops project specifications and waste management
documentation.
For waste treatment, storage, and disposal performed onsite, all associated
activities and costs are included within the scope of the Waste Management
program. Because offsite treatment, storage, and disposal costs can appear in
either Environmental Restoration or Waste Management program estimates, each of
the area discussions below identifies the organization responsible for
associated costs.
Major Environmental Restoration Activity Milestones
| Chestnut Ridge Hydrologic Region
|
| Assessment
|
1999
|
| Remedial Action
|
2005
|
| Bear Creek Valley Region
|
| Assessment
|
2015
|
| Remedial Action
|
2020
|
| Upper East Fork Poplar Creek
|
| Assessment
|
2030
|
| Remedial Action
|
2010
|
| Y-12 Plant Study Areas
|
| Assessment
|
2030
|
| Remedial Action
|
2030
|
| Decommissioning Area Actions
|
| Facility Decommissioning
|
2035
|
| Long-Term Surveillance and Monitoring
|
2060
|
Chestnut Ridge Hydrologic Region
The Chestnut Ridge Hydrologic Region is being evaluated as four distinct
operable units. These include Operable Unit 1 - the Security Pits; Operable
Unit 2 - the Filled Coal Ash Pond and Upper McCoy Branch watershed; Operable
Unit 3 - the United Nuclear Corporation site; and Operable Unit 4 - Rogers
Quarry and the Lower McCoy Branch. This estimate assumes that access and use of
these sites will remain restricted for the life cycle of this estimate.
ASSESSMENT
The Operable Unit 1 - the Security Pits consist of a series of trenches used
for the disposal of hazardous chemical waste until 1984 and nonhazardous waste
disposal until 1988. In 1988, the unit was capped in accordance with a
Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation-approved Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act closure plan. This unit currently remains in
interim status pending issuance of a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
post-closure permit from the State of Tennessee.
Operable Unit 2 - the Filled Coal Ash Pond was constructed in 1955 to serve as
a settling basin for coal ash from the Y-12 Steam Plant Facility. By 1967, the
pond had filled, and sediments overflowed into the McCoy Branch and flowed into
Rogers Quarry. In 1993, a Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study began at
Operable Unit 2 and was completed in March 1995. The primary contaminants at
this operable unit include metals and radionuclides in the coal ash slurry. The
approved proposed plan includes stabilization of the earth embankment, which
remains in the pond to prevent future releases of coal ash slurry to the
environment. This operable unit site will remain under Department of Energy
control. This report assumes that assessments for this operable unit will be
completed by FY 1999.
Operable Unit 3 - the United Nuclear Corporation site received 11,000 0.2-cubic
meter (55-gallon) drums of sludge fixed in cement; 18,000 drums of contaminated
soil; and 288 wooden boxes of contaminated building materials between 1982 and
1984. In accordance the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act requirements
outlined in a 1991 Record of Decision, the area has been covered with a
multilayer cap. This estimate assumes that No Further Action is required at
this operable unit.
Operable Unit 4 - Rogers Quarry was used as a source of construction materials
during the 1940s and 1950s. The quarry was abandoned in the 1960s, at which
time the quarrying equipment was left in place, and it was allowed to fill with
water. The quarry was contaminated by coal ash from Operable Unit 2 and was
used for the disposal of other plant process materials. Historical analysis of
quarry sediments and surface water indicates that there is minimal risk
associated with this site. This estimate assumes that No Further Action is
required for this operable unit.
REMEDIAL ACTION
Future remedial actions at Operable Unit 1 include collecting and transporting
contaminated surface water from the waste trenches to treatment facilities at
the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant. For the Operable Unit 2 Coal Ash Pond, the assumed
remedial action will be stabilization of the dam with surface-water rerouting.
A Record of Decision identifying this preferred remedial action alternative for
Operable Unit 2 is scheduled for approval in June 1996. Remedial actions at
these operable units are intended to prevent the transport of contaminants from
the identified sources; however, they will not remove existing contamination.
This estimate assumes that remedial activities at these operable units will be
completed by FY 2005.
Contaminated surface water collected from Operable Unit 1 seeps and springs will
be treated at an existing Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant treatment facility and
discharged through a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System monitored
outfall. This estimate assumes that no soil or sediment will be excavated under
the proposed remedial action alternative.
Bear Creek Valley Region
Bear Creek Valley is being evaluated as a single watershed with multiple
sources contributing to ground-water and surface-water contamination. The Bear
Creek Valley Watershed includes the following potential contaminant sources:
the S-3 Ponds (four unlined surface impoundments used for disposal of process
effluent), oil-retention ponds, an oil landfarm, waste burial grounds, a site
used for a boneyard and burnyard, two spoil areas, and a storage yard.
ASSESSMENT
The S-3 Ponds were constructed in 1951 and consist of four unlined surface
impoundments with a total storage capacity of approximately 38 million liters
(10 million gallons). The primary contaminants in the S3 Ponds were
nitrates and uranium, with some heavy metals and organic solvents. During
operations, effluent pumping into the pond was as high as 20,845 liters (5,500
gallons) per day. In 1988, the S-3 Ponds were closed as a landfill under
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act requirements. Site closure was completed
through the construction of an asphalt parking lot over the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act cap.
Oil Retention Ponds 1 and 2 were constructed to intercept seepage from burial
trenches. Both ponds were closed in 1990 under the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act.
The Oil Landfarm was used for dumping waste oils and coolants containing
beryllium compounds, depleted uranium, polychlorinated biphenyls, and
chlorinated organic compounds. Operations ceased in 1982, and in 1990 the
landfarm was closed in accordance with a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
closure plan that the Environmental Protection Agency and the State of
Tennessee approved.
Sanitary Landfill received nonhazardous waste from the Y-12 Plant until 1982.
In 1983, the site was graded, capped, and closed in accordance with the
Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation sanitary landfill
regulations. The burial grounds cover an area of approximately 8 hectares (20
acres). Trenches were excavated to a depth of 14 to 25 feet and filled with
hazardous and nonhazardous solid and liquid waste, including volatile organic
compounds. Hazardous waste disposal operations at this site were discontinued
in 1981. The site has been capped as part of approved Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act closures.
The boneyard/burnyard consists of approximately eight acres used from 1953 to
1970 as a burning and disposal site for sanitary, metallic, chemical, and
radioactive solid waste and debris from the Y-12 Plant. The southeastern two
acres of the boneyard/burnyard is referred to as the chemical storage area.
This area was used to burn or neutralize liquid and gaseous waste from 1975 to
1981. This area was closed under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and
capped.
The Rust Spoil Area was used for the disposal of scrap material from renovation
and maintenance as well as approximately 76,000 cubic meters (99,560 cubic
yards) of nonuranium-contaminated construction spoils. Contaminants include
solvents, asbestos, and mercury.
Spoil Area 1 is located near the southwest end of the Y-12 Plant. This area was
used for disposal of approximately 76,000 cubic meters (99,560 cubic yards) of
construction debris originally designated as nonhazardous and nonradioactive.
Review of past plant practices indicates that some of the material may have
actually been contaminated with trace amounts of asbestos, mercury, beryllium,
thorium, and uranium. The contaminated areas have been capped to prevent any
infiltration of water that could mobilize the contaminants. A Record of
Decision proposing No Further Action at this site is currently being developed.
Maintenance of the existing soil cap will continue indefinitely.
The SY-200 Yard provided above-ground storage for polychlorinated
biphenyls-containing transformers, lead shielding plates, and radioactively
contaminated materials. Soil contamination is of primary concern in both spoil
areas and the storage yard. The contaminated areas have been capped to prevent
any infiltration of water that could mobilize the contaminants. A Record of
Decision proposing No Further Action at this site is currently being developed.
This report assumes that assessments for the Bear Creek Valley Region will be
completed by FY 2015.
REMEDIAL ACTION
Planned remedial action in the Bear Creek Valley Region includes covering an
additional 4 hectares (10 acres) of the burial grounds with a cap. At the
boneyard/burnyard, approximately 1,520 cubic meters (1,991 cubic yards) of
soil are to be excavated and relocated to a portion of the site for capping.
Ground water and surface water collected from the Bear Creek Valley watershed
is treated at a facility constructed by the Environmental Restoration program
and currently operated by the Waste Management program. Hot spots in the Bear
Creek flood plain will be cleared of contaminated vegetation and soils.
Implementation of these remedial action alternatives assumes that the
Department of Energy will maintain control of the waste management areas for
the foreseeable future. However, the Bear Creek Valley west of the burial
grounds will eventually be restored to unrestricted use since contamination is
limited to shallow soil depths in depositional areas of the flood plain. This
estimate assumes that remedial activities at these operable units will be
completed by FY 2020.
|
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION
A buried waste site in situ grouting technology demonstration was completed in
FY 1995 to assess the potential applicability of this technology to remediation
of the burial grounds. The results of the demonstration will be assessed, and
the baseline will be revised to include this technology if it is considered
appropriate and cost-effective.
|
Treated water is discharged through an existing National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System outfall. All excavated soils will remain onsite, covered by
a soil cap. Consistent with existing Memorandum of Understandings, the scope of
remedial actions includes costs for design and construction of the facility.
The scope of the Waste Management program includes costs for facility
operation.
This baseline report assumes that approximately 291,477 cubic meters (381,835
cubic yards) of hazardous ground water, 218,494 cubic meters (286,227 cubic
yards) of low-level mixed radioactive ground water, and 189 cubic meters (248
cubic yards) of polychlorinated biphenyl-contaminated ground water will be sent
to the treatment facility during the life cycle of this estimate. This report
also assumes that these activities will result in approximately 16,717 cubic
meters (21,899 cubic yards) of hazardous sludges, which will be disposed of by
the Waste Management program.
Upper East Fork Poplar Creek
The Upper East Fork Poplar Creek Characterization Area consists of both
surface-water and ground-water components of the watershed and contributing
contaminant sources. The Characterization Area is bounded by the base of Pine
Ridge to the north and Chestnut Ridge to the south. The area is bounded to the
west by the Bear Creek Characterization Area and to the east by the Department
of Energy property boundary. The Characterization Area also includes a
ground-water contamination plume that extends beyond the Department of Energy
site boundary to the east.
ASSESSMENT
Numerous primary and secondary sources of contamination have been identified
within the Upper East Fork Poplar Creek Characterization Area. Infiltration
from the S-3 Area dominates contamination in the western end of the area. The
salvage yard, the S-2 Area, and the 81-10 Area have also been identified as
potentially significant sources. In addition, over 200 areas of concern have
been identified as low-priority contaminant sources.
To take advantage of the wealth of historical data available for the
characterization area, a modified Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
approach was proposed and accepted by all Federal Facilities Agreement parties.
This approach uses historical data to the fullest possible extent to complete
the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study and to focus data collection
efforts on specific Feasibility Study needs. The process will also use
"uncertainty" management techniques to bound rather than quantify data
deficiencies. Because an extensive storm sewer system lies beneath the
characterization area, a subbasin approach is used to link information from
potential source areas, such as soil data and waste inventories, to
surface-water and ground-water data. This approach will allow each subbasin to
be prioritized according to its relative contaminant contributions to the
surface and ground water. This estimate assumes that assessment activities for
the characterization area will be completed by FY 2030.
The Remedial Investigation Work Plan for the characterization area has been
submitted to the regulatory agencies. This work plan details the process to be
used to evaluate existing data and the methodology to determine the
significance of data gaps, and the need for additional sampling and monitoring.
REMEDIAL ACTION
Although work within this characterization area is still in the investigation
phase, this estimate assumes that remediation for Upper East Fork Poplar Creek
will require a combination of technologies, including the installation of caps
over certain areas, demolition of buildings and equipment, soil excavation, and
other measures. Ground-water treatment is based on air stripping volatile
organics and releasing them to Upper East Fork Poplar Creek. Remediation may
also include the installation of caps over certain areas, demolition of
buildings and equipment, soil excavation, and other measures.
Interim remedial actions are currently under way to reduce mercury levels in
Y-12 Plant wastewater to remain in compliance with National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System discharge permit conditions. Actions include elimination of
potential sources by the removal of contaminated piping. Source elimination
projects were completed in 1995. A mercury treatment system has been completed
to remove mercury from ground water extracted from beneath Building 9201-2.
Additional evaluation and design of mercury treatment systems is underway for
Buildings 9201-5, 9201-4, and 9204-4 and Outfall 51. This estimate assumes that
evaluation and design of these mercury systems will be completed by FY 2005.
This baseline report assumes that approximately 765 cubic meters (1,002 cubic
yards) of low-level mixed waste soil will be removed and sent to the Y-12
Plant's Waste Management program, along with 14 cubic meters (18.3 cubic yards)
of low-level waste soil and 76 cubic meters (100 cubic yards) of miscellaneous
types of soil waste. This report assumes that remedial actions at Upper East
Fork Poplar will be completed by FY 2010.
The Upper East Fork Poplar Creek life-cycle baseline contains plans for a
ground-water capture and treatment system to remove volatile organic compounds
present in an offsite ground-water plume. The capture system will consist of 16
wells located between the base of Chestnut Ridge and the base of Pine Ridge.
These wells will deliver ground water to an air stripper treatment system to
remove the organics. The treatment system effluent will be released through an
existing National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System outfall. This baseline
report assumes that approximately 9,464 cubic meters (12,398 cubic yards) of
low-level mixed contaminated ground water will be sent to the Y-12 Plant Waste
Management program for treatment; however, this report further assumes that the
397,468 cubic meters (520,683 cubic yards) of low-level waste ground water will
be managed by the Environmental Restoration program.
Y-12 Study Areas
Over 200 areas of concern have been identified in the Y-12 Plant area as
low-priority contaminant sources. Most of these areas have not yet undergone a
Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection to ascertain if they truly are of
concern and need further investigation and remedial actions. However, to
capture all future costs in this estimate, assessment and remedial action costs
have been included for these sites. The Environmental Restoration program is
responsible for the surveillance and maintenance of these sites until they are
remediated, or it is determined that they require No Further Action. This
report assumes that if cleanup of these sites is necessary, the remedial
actions would be similar to those already planned or executed at the Y-12
Plant, including capping, hot spot soil removal, and tank excavation. Waste
volume were not included in this estimate because little was know about these
sites.
Decommissioning
Building 9201-4 is the only facility currently in the Y-12 Plant
decommissioning program. However, the decommissioning of facilities identified
in the Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization program is also included
within the scope of the Environmental Restoration program estimate. These
estimates were prepared using a parametric model, and the details of
decommissioning activities are not known. As facilities are transferred from
the Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization program, they will be assessed
and plans for decommissioning will be formulated. This estimate assumes that a
total of five scheduling transfer units, including one that is currently within
the scope of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Nuclear Material and Facility
Stabilization program, will be transferred to the Y-12 Plant Environmental
Restoration program by FY 2015.
BUILDING 9201-4
Decontamination plans for the eventual end use of Building 9201-4 were
originally developed to allow eventual unrestricted reuse. However, in FY 1995
the proposed final status of this building was changed to an "unoccupied
warehouse." Implementation of Phases 2 and 3 of the earlier decommissioning
plan has been eliminated. Other facilities for decommissioning will continue to
be identified as the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant focuses on new and changing missions.
This report assumes that assessment at this facility will be completed by FY
1996.
An interim action for abatement of asbestos material from Building 9201-4 is
scheduled for completion in FY 2015. All decommissioning and demolition
activities at the facility are scheduled for completion by FY 2015. All
facility decommissioning at the Y-12 Plant is scheduled for completion by FY
2035.
Decommissioning activities at 9201-4 include the removal of over 8,000 cubic
meters (10,480 cubic yards) of hazardous liquids, 700 cubic meters (917 cubic
yards) of hazardous sludges, 500 cubic meters (655 cubic yards) of hazardous
soil, 2,500 cubic meters (3,275 cubic yards) of hazardous metal debris, 300
cubic meters (393 cubic yards) of asbestos, 800 cubic meters (1,048 cubic
yards) of biological debris, 90 cubic meters (118 cubic yards) of hazardous
rubble and other debris, and 850 cubic meters (1,114 cubic yards) of low-level
radioactive waste soil. The removal of these materials will allow the
Department of Energy or other entities to reuse the facility.
Waste anticipated to be generated during decommissioning of Building 9201-4
includes chiefly hazardous waste, including mercury, low-level waste soils and
asbestos-contaminated materials. Some other incidental low-level radioactive or
mixed waste may be encountered, but is not expected to be a significant
problem. Disposal of hazardous and mixed waste will be at offsite facilities.
Low-level radioactive waste is no longer disposed of at the Y-12 Plant. It is
currently being stored pending availability of offsite disposal. The disposal
of this waste will be coordinated through the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant Waste
Management program.
SCHEDULING TRANSFER UNITS
The Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization program
currently expects to complete post-deactivation activities at all Y-12 Plant
scheduling transfer units by FY 2015. This estimate also assumes that the Oak
Ridge National Laboratory will transfer Scheduling Transfer Unit 13 to the Y-12
Plant Environmental Restoration program for decommissioning. This report
assumes that decommissioning activities at all these scheduling transfer units
will be completed by FY 2035.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 4, the Z Oil project, is currently expected to be
transferred to the Y-12 Plant Environmental Restoration program in FY 2003.
This estimate assumes that decommissioning activities associated with this
project will be completed by FY 2005.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 7, the Building 9201-5 project, is currently expected
to be transferred to the Y-12 Plant Environmental Restoration program in FY
2014. This estimate assumes that decommissioning activities associated with
this project will be completed by FY 2035.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 8, the Building 9204-4 project, is currently expected
to be transferred to the Y-12 Plant Environmental Restoration program in FY
2015. This estimate assumes that decommissioning activities associated with
this project will be completed by FY 2035.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 9, the Building 9206 project, is currently expected to
be transferred to the Y-12 Plant Environmental Restoration program in FY 2014.
This estimate assumes that decommissioning activities associated with this
project will be completed by FY 2030.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 13, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory "Medium Rankers"
project, is currently expected to be transferred to the Y-12 Plant
Environmental Restoration program in FY 2009. This estimate assumes that
decommissioning activities associated with this project will be completed by FY
2015.
Long-Term Surveillance and Monitoring
All costs associated with long-term surveillance and monitoring are included as
one line item in this estimate. At the Chestnut Ridge Hydrologic Region, a
network of ground-water monitoring wells were installed to monitor contaminant
migration from Operable Unit 1. The Operable Unit 1 closure plan also requires
quarterly sampling and reporting. Surface-water effluent from Rogers Quarry
(Operable Unit 4) is monitored under the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System program. Monitoring of ground water is also required under
the Operable Unit 3 Record of Decision. This estimate assumes that long-term
surveillance and monitoring at the Chestnut Ridge Hydrologic Region will
continue until FY 2010.
Quarterly ground-water monitoring is performed in the Bear Creek Valley Region
and reported annually in the Ground-Waste Quarterly Assessment Report.
Semi-annual ground-water monitoring is required as part of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act post-closure permit for the S-3 Ponds and the Oil
Landfarm. The Y-12 Plant Ground-Water program currently conducts quarterly
ground-water monitoring of the burial grounds until the Tennessee Department of
Environment and Conservation issues the post-closure permit for those
facilities. Quarterly inspections are also performed for all closed treatment,
storage, and disposal facilities. This report assumes that long-term
surveillance and monitoring activities for the Bear Creek Valley Region will
continue until FY 2025.
The only long-term surveillance and monitoring activities under way at the
Upper East Fork Poplar Creek Characterization Area are those associated with
the validation of the effects of the mercury source elimination activities
performed in support of National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
compliance and the offsite ground-water monitoring in Union Valley. This report
assumes that quarterly ground-water monitoring and annual reporting will be
required until FY 2030.
Long-term surveillance and monitoring activities are also being performed on
facilities until they can be decontaminated for reuse or until the
decommissioning and demolition process is complete. These activities generally
involve regular observation of the structure to ensure that safety and security
are maintained at a level appropriate for the status and eventual disposition
of the facility. This estimate assumes that long-term surveillance and
monitoring activities will be required until FY 2060.
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
|
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Chestnut Ridge Hydrologic Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Remedial Action
|
1,588
|
883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bear Creek Valley Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
656
|
314
|
542
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
|
| Remedial Action
|
1,472
|
960
|
5,176
|
1,825
|
431
|
|
|
|
| Upper East Fork Poplar Creek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
4,972
|
3,801
|
59
|
|
3,635
|
28,122
|
15,204
|
|
| Remedial Action
|
3,157
|
2,436
|
4,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Y-12 Plant Study Areas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
|
|
97
|
483
|
3,297
|
6,096
|
6,313
|
|
| Remedial Action
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,582
|
|
| Decommissioning Area Actions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
557
|
144
|
31
|
124
|
3,732
|
795
|
|
|
| Facility Decommissioning
|
5,537
|
7,499
|
7,597
|
5,601
|
3,500
|
9,041
|
29,363
|
|
| Long-Term Surveil. and Monitoring
|
9,704
|
6,462
|
14,134
|
13,895
|
7,046
|
1,461
|
|
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
4,479
|
5,136
|
5,136
|
5,136
|
4,564
|
2,275
|
3,868
|
|
| Total |
32,212
|
27,636
|
37,646
|
28,325
|
26,205
|
47,790
|
79,330
|
|
| |
2065
|
| Chestnut Ridge Hydrologic Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452
|
| Remedial Action
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,355
|
| Bear Creek Valley Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,868
|
| Remedial Action
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,319
|
| Upper East Fork Poplar Creek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278,971
|
| Remedial Action
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,332
|
| Y-12 Plant Study Areas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,431
|
| Remedial Action
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,910
|
| Decommissioning Area Actions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,917
|
| Facility Decommissioning
|
53,636
|
5,425
|
3,325
|
1,083
|
2,375
|
475
|
|
672,287
|
| Long-Term Surveil. and Monitoring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,505
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
2,639
|
101
|
175
|
57
|
125
|
25
|
|
168,583
|
| Total |
56,275
|
5,526
|
3,500
|
1,140
|
2,500
|
500
|
|
1,742,930
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Direct Program Management/Support
Program management functions provide essential administration and oversight to
the environmental restoration activities at the Y-12 Plant. This support is
focused on ensuring proper identification, characterization, remediation and
revitalization of the contaminated sites. Business management accounts for a
large portion of the program management. This includes the progress tracking,
contract management, facility management, financial management (budget
preparation and control) for Y-12 Plant projects. Project management personnel
for the Lockheed Martin Energy System, Inc. and support groups provide project
management support skills as well as coordination with the other sites in the
Oak Ridge Operations Office.
Federal employees oversee the contractors for the Y-12 Plant Environment
Restoration Program. However, their costs are included in the Oak Ridge
Operations Office section of this report along with the Integrating Contractor
Central Operations Office support.
There has been a concentrated effort to reduce program management costs.
Overlapping activities and management areas have been eliminated, and business
systems that required extensive personnel hours have been replaced by
electronic data bases and reporting systems.
|
STAKEHOLDER INTERACTIONS
The Oak Ridge Operations Office conducted public participation activities for
the following sites in the Oak Ridge area: Oak Ridge Associated Universities
and Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge K-25 Site, Oak
Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge Reservation, Oak Ridge Reservation Offsite
Program, and the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant. The office completed a mailing to
stakeholders in May 1995 announcing the availability of the 1995 report and
offering it by mail upon request. Articles about the report appeared in the
summer and fall 1995 editions of Environmental Update, a newsletter
distributed to 43,000 stakeholders, and the summer 1995 quarterly stakeholder
public meeting featured a Baseline Environmental Management Report poster
session. Approximately 75 stakeholders attended a workshop in August 1995,
where presenters received comments and answered questions. In response to
public comments, changes were made to the narrative for the 1996 report,
clarifying terms and addressing issues such as private reuse of facilities. If
you would like more information about the report or have questions about the
results, please contact:
|
Public Participation
Walter Perry
(423) 576-0885
perrywn@oro.doe.gov
|
Technical Liaison
Marianne Heiskell
(423) 576-0314
heiskellmm@oro.doe.gov
|
Public Affairs
Steve Wyatt
(423) 5760887
wyattsl@oro.doe.gov
|
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Waste management activities at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant encompass treatment,
storage, disposal and related support activities for multiple waste types
generated by the Department of Energy's Offices of Defense Programs and
Environmental Management (nuclear material and facility stabilization and
environmental restoration activities). This is accomplished by providing
capabilities to manage waste, emphasizing safe and compliant operations,
reducing legacy waste inventory, overseeing implementation of pollution
prevention programs, including waste minimization, and increasing efficiency in
all phases of operations.
Waste streams at the Y-12 Plant have been prioritized considering risk of
continued management, availability of treatment technology and capability,
volume of waste in storage, volume of waste generated annually, and more
generally, the ability to show tangible progress in meeting the objectives of
the Federal Facility Compliance Act. In general order of priority, the waste
streams at the Y-12 Plant are (1) mixed waste liquids to be treated in the
Toxic Substances Control Act Incinerator; (2) combustible solids also to be
treated in the Incinerator; (3) explosive waste, (4) compressed gases; (5)
aqueous liquids to be treated in existing facilities; (6) West End Treatment
Facility sludges; and (7) waste covered under existing treatment variances
(that is, toxicity-characteristic waste). Remaining waste streams, including
contact- and remote-handled transuranic solids, inorganic solids and debris,
no-radioactivity-added waste, and other waste targeted for treatment via the
broad spectrum procurement and the transportable vitrification system, were
assigned lower priorities and are not rank-ordered.
In recognition of its commitment to pollution prevention, the Y-12 Plant is
currently piloting a chargeback program. Under this program, generators are
assessed fees based upon type and quantity of waste generated. Funds accrued
through the fee system will then be set aside and made available for the
implementation of waste minimization and pollution prevention projects. This
incentive will allow sites to pinpoint the major sources of waste generation
and will focus attention and resources on minimizing future waste generation
and associated costs.
Waste generated at the Y-12 Plant includes low-level waste, low-level mixed
waste, hazardous waste, and sanitary/industrial waste. In order to manage this
waste effectively, the Waste Management program will continue to operate waste
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities, including onsite wastewater
treatment facilities, storage pads and buildings, and sanitary/industrial
landfills. To facilitate waste flow, the Waste Management program conducts
waste planning, characterization, certification, collection, transportation,
tracking, examination, and assay. All waste management operations are conducted
within the requirements of applicable Departmental Orders to ensure proper
operational conduct, worker safety, public health, and environmental
protection. This baseline report assumes that Defense Programs activities will
continue through FY 2060, and waste management facilities will be kept
operational, through routine infrastructure upgrades, until decontamination and
decommissioning activities begin in FY 2061.
Currently, low-level mixed waste is managed according to the requirements of a
September 1995 Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Unilateral
Order and the modified Site Treatment Plan. This Order specifies technologies
and schedules for the treatment of all low-level mixed waste and transuranic
mixed waste on the Oak Ridge Reservation.
Furthermore, consideration of transportation issues must be addressed prior to
the National Environmental Policy Act planning process. Issues include material
classification, decisions regarding modal options (for example, truck, train,
air), and packaging options. Collection and transport activities include costs
associated with waste transportation by waste type for onsite movement of waste
and intersite movement (that is, between the Y-12 Plant, the Oak Ridge National
Laboratory, and the K-25 Site). The treatment and/or disposal cost estimate, as
applicable, includes costs for shipment to the commercial sector for treatment
and/or disposal.
Low-Level Mixed Waste
Low-level mixed waste generated and stored at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant is
currently managed according to the requirements outlined in the September 1995
Unilateral Order. This Order specifies technologies and schedules to treat all
low-level mixed waste, based on information the Department provides in the
modified Site Treatment Plan.
GENERATION AND HANDLING
The primary generator of low-level mixed waste at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant is
the Department's Office of Defense Programs; however, environmental restoration
and nuclear material and facility stabilization activities also generate some
low-level waste at the plant. Waste generated by these programs includes both
liquid and solid mixed waste. This report assumes that all costs associated
with the characterization and certification, classification, packaging,
collection, transport and tracking of low-level waste are the responsibility of
the generator.
Major Waste Management Project Cost Estimate
|
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
|
| |
|
| 9720-31 RCRA Motel
|
1,228
|
1,209
|
1,209
|
1,209
|
1,209
|
1,209
|
1,209
|
|
| Central Pollution Control Facility (CPCF)
|
2,559
|
2,921
|
2,921
|
2,921
|
2,921
|
2,921
|
2,921
|
|
| Containerized Regulated Storage Units
|
5,919
|
6,838
|
6,838
|
6,838
|
6,838
|
6,838
|
6,838
|
|
| Groundwater Treatment Facility
|
1,138
|
1,264
|
1,264
|
1,264
|
1,264
|
1,264
|
1,264
|
|
| Liquid Storage Facility
|
761
|
771
|
771
|
771
|
771
|
771
|
771
|
|
| LLW Storage Units
|
386
|
384
|
384
|
384
|
384
|
384
|
384
|
|
| Old Salvage Yard
|
140
|
140
|
140
|
140
|
140
|
140
|
140
|
|
| Sanitary/Industrial Landfill
|
7,157
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
|
| West End Treatment Facility
|
7,935
|
8,248
|
8,248
|
8,248
|
8,248
|
8,248
|
8,248
|
|
| |
|
| 9720-31 RCRA Motel
|
1,209
|
1,209
|
1,209
|
1,209
|
1,209
|
1,209
|
1,209
|
|
| Central Pollution Control Facility (CPCF)
|
2,921
|
2,921
|
2,921
|
2,921
|
2,921
|
2,921
|
450
|
|
| Containerized Regulated Storage Units
|
6,838
|
6,838
|
6,838
|
6,838
|
6,838
|
6,838
|
326
|
|
| Groundwater Treatment Facility
|
1,264
|
1,264
|
1,264
|
1,264
|
1,264
|
1,264
|
350
|
|
| Liquid Storage Facility
|
771
|
771
|
771
|
771
|
771
|
771
|
200
|
|
| LLW Storage Units
|
384
|
384
|
384
|
384
|
384
|
384
|
384
|
|
| Old Salvage Yard
|
140
|
140
|
140
|
140
|
140
|
140
|
140
|
|
| Sanitary/Industrial Landfill
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
|
| West End Treatment Facility
|
8,248
|
8,248
|
8,248
|
8,248
|
8,248
|
8,248
|
350
|
|
| |
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
| 9720-31 RCRA Motel
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,770
|
| Central Pollution Control Facility (CPCF)
|
450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,557
|
| Containerized Regulated Storage Units
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443,135
|
| Groundwater Treatment Facility
|
350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,030
|
| Liquid Storage Facility
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,067
|
| LLW Storage Units
|
384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,811
|
| Old Salvage Yard
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,500
|
| Sanitary/Industrial Landfill
|
4,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383,053
|
| West End Treatment Facility
|
350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538,056
|
| * Project costs represent a subset of total Waste
Management costs.
|
| ** Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
This baseline report assumes that a total of 42,000 cubic meters (55,020 cubic
yards) of solid low-level mixed waste will transfer to the Waste Management
program over the life cycle of this estimate. This report assumes that
environmental restoration and nuclear material and facility stabilization
activities will generate approximately 2,000 cubic meters (2,620 cubic yards)
of solid low-level mixed waste through FY 2035. The annual generation rate will
vary with the project schedules.
This report also assumes that Defense Programs activities will generate
approximately 40,000 cubic meters (52,400 cubic yards) of solid low-level mixed
waste, with an annual generation rate of roughly 380 cubic meters (498 cubic
yards) until FY 2060. All applicable treatment and storage facilities described
below will be maintained and upgraded to allow them to remain active until FY
2060.
TREATMENT
As outlined in the September 1995 Unilateral Order and the Site Treatment Plan,
the low-level mixed waste treatment strategy relies on a combination of
approaches: (1) treatment in existing facilities; (2) private sector treatment;
(3) disposal in lieu of treatment for waste with treatment variances; (4)
development of limited new onsite facilities; and (5) treatment at other
Department of Energy facilities, if required.
The modified Site Treatment Plan delineates how the Department will: (1) treat
low-level mixed waste at the site; or (2) develop technologies when
technologies do not exist or when existing technologies need to be modified.
For some waste streams, plans and schedules for characterizing waste for
treatment, for undertaking technology assessments, and for providing the
required plans and schedules for developing capacities and technologies are
provided. This Plan applies specifically to mixed waste streams on the Oak
Ridge Reservation and fulfills multiple purposes including: (1) fulfilling
requirements of the Federal Facility Compliance Act; (2) establishing an
enforceable framework from which the Department of Energy will develop methods
to treat all land-disposal-restricted mixed waste currently in storage and to
be generated/received during the term of the Site Treatment Plan; (3) allowing
compliant storage of waste pending treatment and disposal; and (4) fulfilling
the requirement for a treatment methods plan for the June 1992 Federal Facility
Compliance Agreement between Department of Energy and the Environmental
Protection Agency Region IV.
The modified Site Treatment Plan also calls for treatment of existing
inventories of the following mixed waste generated and/or stored at the Y-12
Plant by FY 2007 or earlier: mixed waste liquids, combustible solids, explosive
waste, compressed gases, aqueous liquids, West End Treatment Facility sludges,
and waste covered under existing variances. Schedules for treatment of the
remaining mixed waste streams are extended to approximately FY 2020. This
estimate assumes a disposal strategy for mixed waste treatment residues at
Envirocare of Utah. The option of onsite disposal capability is currently being
evaluated jointly with the Environmental Restoration program. The feasibility
of a low-level mixed waste and low-level waste disposal unit located on the Oak
Ridge Reservation and regulated under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act is also being evaluated.
Untreated mixed waste generated and/or stored at the Y-12 Plant consists solely
of low-level mixed waste. All transuranic waste is located at the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory, and management of this waste is discussed in that section
of the Baseline Environmental Management Report. All low-level mixed waste that
is not subject to an exemption or variance will be treated to meet the
applicable concentration- or technology-based treatment standard. Also,
low-level mixed waste containing polychlorinated biphenyls or halogenated
organic compounds must be treated using specified technologies.
Treatment options use existing or modified onsite facilities and private sector
capabilities to treat waste streams for which technologies exist. Five
technology-based waste groups have been identified: incineration,
stabilization, neutralization, precipitation, and chemical oxidation. Aqueous
waste streams will be treated in existing, onsite wastewater treatment
facilities and may require some nominal pre-treatment, supplemental
characterization, and/or additional handling/bulking. Neutralization will be
used to treat corrosive waste. Precipitation will be used to treat aqueous
waste containing metals. Chemical oxidation will be used to treat
cyanide-bearing waste. Incineration is the required treatment technology for
approximately 40 waste streams on the Oak Ridge Reservation, including bulked
organic liquids, organically contaminated aqueous waste, scintillation fluids,
organic homogeneous solids, and organic debris. Several large and small volume
sludge streams are targeted for treatment by the private sector with treatment
technologies the private sector determines to be appropriate.
The Oak Ridge Reservation Site Treatment Plan outlines plans and schedules for
the treatment of Y-12 Plant mixed waste. Liquid mixed waste treatment at the
Y-12 Plant is shown in the following sidebar.
| Y-12 PLANT MIXED WASTE TREATMENT FACILITIES
The Central Pollution Control Facility and Plating Rinsewater Treatment
Facility are designed to treat nonnitrate-bearing waste from Oak Ridge
Reservation facility operations. The Central Pollution Control Facility and the
Plating Rinsewater Treatment Facility are intended to process 10.2 and 30.2
million liters (2.7 and 8 million gallons) of wastewater per year,
respectively. Industrial waste liquids are delivered to the Central Pollution
Control Facility and Plating Rinsewater Treatment Facility in 1,895-liter
(500-gallon) tankers and 2,274-liter (600-gallon) poly tanks via direct
pipeline from the Plating Shop sump. Composition analysis documentation
accompanies the waste received at the Central Pollution Control Facility,
providing operation personnel with information to determine the treatment
scheme for the waste. However, the waste received at the Plating Rinsewater
Treatment Facility by direct pipeline is accepted directly from the generating
customer without composition analysis.
The Plating Rinsewater Treatment Facility receives hazardous, heavy
metal-contaminated rinsewaters from plating operations. The Central Pollution
Control Facility is the primary facility for the routine treatment of
nonnitrate waste. The Central Pollution Control Facility directly receives
concentrated acidic or caustic waste and oily mopwater waste containing
beryllium, thorium, uranium-emulsified oils, and commercial soaps or cleaners.
The Central Pollution Control Facility also receives treated Plating Rinsewater
Treatment Facility effluent for final filtration and discharge. Treated Central
Pollution Control Facility effluent is monitored to meet National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System discharge requirements and is discharged into East
Fork Poplar Creek. Mopwater sludges are accumulated for storage at the West
Tank Farm. Other sludges are dewatered and placed in 0.2-cubic meter
(55-gallon) drums for interim storage and final disposal.
The Ground-Water Treatment Facility is designed to treat water collected from
ponds and seeps on the Oak Ridge Reservation. The water may be contaminated
with various volatile and nonvolatile organic compounds and/or polychlorinated
biphenyls. The polychlorinated biphenyls are removed from the ground water at
the Liquid Storage Facility and then transported via tanker truck to the
Ground-Water Treatment Facility for removal of other organic compounds and
inorganic precipitates. Ground water is monitored to satisfy National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System discharge requirements prior to discharge into
East Fork Poplar Creek.
The West End Treatment Facility is located at the west end of the Y-12 Plant.
The principal process system groupings of the West End Treatment Facility are
the Head End Treatment Systems, the West Tankfarm, and the Effluent Polishing
Systems. Heavy metal and radionuclide removal occur at the Head End Treatment
Systems. The West Tankfarm performs biological wastewater treatment,
thickening, decanting, and sludge storage. The Effluent Polishing Systems are
used to remove residual heavy metals, including uranium, and organics from the
sludge decant such that the liquid will meet the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System discharge permit and radioactive constituent concentration
guidelines.
|
STORAGE
The Waste Oil/Solvent Drum Storage Facility, Oil Dike-7, is located near the
corner of K Road and West Second Street. The Building contains four Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act-permitted 113,700-liter (30,000-gallon) and two
37,900-liter (10,000-gallon) bulk oil storage tanks with secondary containment.
Oils and solvents contaminated with uranium and polychlorinated biphenyls are
stored here.
The Waste Oil/Solvent Drum Storage Facility, Oil Dike-8, is an interim status
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act hazardous waste storage facility. This
facility is located in the north side of West Second Street, west of the
intersection with K Road. The building has a capacity of approximately 1,000
drums.
Waste Oil/Solvent Storage Facility, Oil Dike-9, is a Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act Part B-permitted unit located on and within a concrete pad with a
raised diked perimeter designed to contain any spills. Five 151,600-liter
(40,000-gallon) storage tanks are located within the diked area. The tanker
transfer bay/drum storage area is located within a curbed concrete pad adjacent
to the containment dike. It is designed to store 208-liter (55-gallon) drums
for an additional 33,352 liters (8,800 gallons) of storage capacity.
Polyethylene tanks containing free liquids may also be stored in this area.
This concrete pad is also used for tanker loading/unloading and as a transfer
area for moving waste from drums and containers to tanks.
The Liquid Organic Waste Solvent Storage Facility, Oil Dike-10, is located in
the northwest corner of the New Salvage Yard. The Oil Dike-10 Storage Facility
is a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Part B-permitted hazardous waste
storage facility and consists of a concrete pad with a raised dike to contain
any spills. The six storage tanks with a total capacity of 121,280 liters
(32,000 gallons) are located within the diked area. Liquid waste is received at
the facility in drums, tanker trucks, or polyethylene bulk storage tanks and is
pumped into the tanks for storage. All of the waste types to be managed at this
facility must be compatible with the drums in which they are stored and
transported. Some of the solvents contain trace quantities of uranium. These
solvents are sampled, identified, and kept separate from other batched solvents
before storing. Mixed waste is also stored at the Classified Waste Storage
Facility, Containerized Waste Storage Area, and additional buildings.
DISPOSAL
Commercial disposal is the planned option for disposal of low-level mixed waste
treatment residues and low-level mixed waste with treatment variances or that
meet treatment standards. The option of an onsite disposal facility for legacy
low-level mixed waste and legacy low-level waste, to be regulated under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, is being
pursued.
Low-Level Waste
Low-level waste generated and managed at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant is
predominantly contaminated with uranium isotopes. The strategy for managing
low-level waste consists of collection and onsite treatment for radioactive
wastewater and a combination of onsite storage, private sector treatment, and
offsite disposal for solid low-level waste.
The current strategy for managing this waste includes: minimized generation
through segregation, process control and reuse/recycle; use of commercial
vendors where cost-effective for waste volume reduction and treatment prior to
long-term storage or disposal; storage on the Oak Ridge Reservation; and
offsite disposal of stored and future generation.
GENERATION AND HANDLING
The primary generator of low-level waste at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant is the
Department's Office of Defense Programs; however, environmental restoration and
nuclear material and facility stabilization activities also generate some
low-level waste at the plant. This estimate assumes that all costs associated
with the characterization and certification, classification, packaging,
collection, transport and tracking of low-level waste are the responsibility of
the generator.
This baseline report assumes that a total of 390,000 cubic meters (510,900
cubic yards) of solid low-level waste will transfer to the Waste Management
program over the life cycle of this estimate. This report assumes that
environmental restoration and nuclear material and facility stabilization
activities will generate approximately 2,700 cubic meters (3,537 cubic yards)
of solid low-level waste through FY 2035. The annual generation rate will vary
with the project schedules.
This report also assumes that Defense Programs activities will generate
approximately 387,000 cubic meters (506,970 cubic yards) of solid low-level
waste, with an annual generation rate of roughly 5,000 cubic meters (6,550
cubic yards) until FY 2060. All applicable treatment and storage facilities
described below will be maintained and upgraded to allow them to remain active
until FY 2060.
TREATMENT
Currently, two solid low-level waste treatment facilities are operational at
the Y-12 Plant: the Uranium Chip Oxidization Facility and the Waste Feed
Preparation Facility. The Uranium Chip Oxidization Facility thermally oxidizes
depleted and natural uranium machine chips under controlled conditions to a
stable uranium oxide. The oxide is transferred into drums and transported to
the Depleted Uranium Oxide Storage Vaults. The Waste Feed Preparation Facility
is used for baling solid low-level waste materials only. Interim storage for
the compacted bales of solid waste is provided before they are transferred to
the Above-Ground Storage Facility, pending shipment to an offsite vendor for
treatment. As determined to be cost-effective, beneficial for storage and/or
offsite disposal, solid low-level waste treatment is limited to volume
reduction through supercompaction or incineration. Commercial vendors supply
this capability.
STORAGE
Low-level waste storage facilities at the Y-12 Plant include: the Old Salvage
Yard, Depleted Uranium Oxide Storage Vaults I and II, the Classified Waste
Storage Facility, the Containerized Waste Storage Area, and the Above-Ground
Storage Facility. The Old Salvage Yard, located at the west end of the Y-12
Plant, contains legacy-contaminated scrap metal, as well as large bulky items,
and items containing a higher level of contamination. Contaminated scrap metal
is accepted only if segregated and packaged.
Depleted Uranium Oxide Storage Vaults I and II are partially underground,
constructed of reinforced concrete, and have a usable storage volume of 720
cubic meters (943 cubic yards). Openings for filling the vaults are provided at
the top of each. Depleted uranium oxide powder is delivered to the storage
vaults in sealed 114- to 208-liter (30- and 55-gallon) drums. Depleted uranium
sawfines are delivered in 0.2-cubic meter (55-gallon) drums mixed with depleted
uranium oxide at a ratio of at least 10:1 (oxide to sawfines).
Uranium-contaminated waste from the Y-12 Plant will be stored until offsite
disposal is arranged. This low-level waste may be stored at the K-25 Site, as
well as the Y-12 Plant.
The Classified Waste Storage Facility includes areas for waste volume reduction
of industrial combustible trash, storage of classified waste that may or may
not be contaminated with uranium, storage of polychlorinated
biphenyl-contaminated materials that also may be contaminated with uranium, and
an interim status area. This facility accepts solid materials only. No liquids
are permitted. The facility meets Y-12 Plant security requirements for
classified waste management and Departmental Order 5820.2A guidelines for the
management of both low-level and mixed waste. In addition, the facility is
permitted to accept both Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and Toxic
Substances Control Act-regulated waste. This facility will be upgraded to
accommodate nondestructive testing equipment to analyze the amount and assay of
uranium in waste packages.
The Containerized Waste Storage Area, situated south of the Y-12 Plant,
consists of three concrete pads measuring 790 square meters (1,034.9 square
yards) each. Two of the pads are covered with open-sided dome tents, and each
pad is surrounded by an impermeable dike to contain spills. All waste stored at
the Containerized Waste Storage Area is in containers such as approved carbon
steel drums, original vendor drums, 1,250- and 2,501-liter (330- and
660-gallon) steel reinforced polyethylene tanks, ST-5 boxes, and 6.8-cubic
meter (9-cubic yard) dumpsters. Each pad has a calculated maximum capability to
store 1 million liters (270,000 gallons) of waste materials based on actual
dike capacity and storage space for 388 ST-5 boxes or 3168 drums. The
Containerized Waste Storage Area is a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
interim status unit. Radioactively contaminated waste and mixed waste
containing uranium-238 may also be stored at the Containerized Waste Storage
Area.
The 13-hectare (33-acre) Above-ground Storage Facility is located north of Bear
Creek Road, east of the "A" burial trenches, and west of the Sanitary
Landfill/Oil Landfarm Area. The facility consists of several fabric buildings
that are designed for the interim storage of low-level radioactive waste
contained in strong, tight containers built to Department of Transportation
specifications.
DISPOSAL
The strategy to ensure disposal capability for all low-level waste generated on
the Oak Ridge Reservation, including the Y-12 Plant, relies on a combination of
onsite and offsite facilities. Onsite disposal of low-level waste is currently
primarily limited to mixed fission product waste generated at the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory. Plans for a replacement disposal facility are being
pursued, with Bear Creek Valley the most likely candidate for a tumulus
disposal facility. Low-level waste disposal on the Oak Ridge Reservation is
limited by complex geology and hydrology and future land-use plans. The
long-range strategy for this waste is to dispose of it at another Department of
Energy facility. This estimate assumes that the Nevada Test Site will be that
disposal site.
The option of an onsite disposal facility for legacy low-level waste and
low-level mixed waste, to be regulated under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act, is also being pursued; however, this
estimate does not reflect this approach. This facility could be used to dispose
of Y-12 Plant stored inventories and Environmental Restoration
program-generated waste at the plant.
Hazardous Waste
The strategy for managing hazardous waste at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant comprises
reducing waste generation; obtaining a no-added-radioactivity determination to
facilitate disposition of current inventories and newly generated hazardous
waste, including waste containing polychlorinated biphenyls; using commercial
sector capabilities; and continuing treatment in onsite wastewater treatment
facilities.
GENERATION AND HANDLING
The primary generator of hazardous waste at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant is the
Department's Office of Defense Programs; however, environmental restoration and
nuclear material and facility stabilization activities also generate some
hazardous waste at the plant. This estimate assumes that all costs associated
with characterizing, certifying, classifying, packaging, collecting,
transporting, and tracking hazardous waste are the responsibility of the
generator.
This baseline report assumes that a total of 23,000 cubic meters (30,130 cubic
yards) of solid hazardous waste will transfer to the Waste Management program
over the life cycle of this estimate. This report assumes that environmental
restoration and nuclear material and facility stabilization activities will
generate approximately 22,000 cubic meters (28,820 cubic yards) of solid
hazardous waste through FY 2035. The annual generation rate will vary with the
project schedules.
This report also assumes that Defense Programs activities will generate
approximately 1,000 cubic meters (1,310 cubic yards) of solid hazardous waste,
with an annual generation rate of roughly 0.2 cubic meters (0.26 cubic yards)
until FY 2060. All applicable treatment and storage facilities described below
will be maintained and upgraded to allow them to remain active until FY 2060.
TREATMENT
The Y-12 Plant currently treats liquid hazardous waste at the onsite Plating
Rinsewater Treatment Facility. The Plating Rinsewater Treatment Facility uses,
in addition to its own systems, process systems within the Central Pollution
Control Facility, which is a mixed waste facility. Also, liquid hazardous waste
is treated at the Ground-water Treatment Facility, which includes processes for
the removal of volatile organics and polychlorinated biphenyls.
STORAGE
Until such time as the no-added-radioactivity policies and procedures are
implemented, all Resource Conservation and Recovery Act-contaminated waste is
classified as mixed waste and managed as such. The storage inventory of
potentially hazardous waste at the Y-12 Plant is approximately 1,660 cubic
meters (2,175 cubic yards). This inventory includes polychlorinated biphenyl-
and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act-contaminated solid waste. Any
remaining hazardous waste generated and placed in storage is considered mixed
waste. Building 9720-31, which is located on the south side of the West Third
Street, east of the existing Fire Training Facility (Building 9817), houses the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Storage and Staging Facility. Building
9720-31 receives and temporarily stores waste from all areas of the Y-12 Plant
that cannot be stored at other locations within the plant boundaries.
DISPOSAL
No onsite hazardous waste disposal capability exists at the Y-12 Plant.
Hazardous waste will be disposed of offsite in conjunction with commercial
treatment contracts.
Sanitary Waste
The Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant is the single largest generator of sanitary waste on
the Oak Ridge Reservation. The strategy for managing sanitary waste at the Y-12
Plant comprises minimization of waste generation, use of commercial recycle
markets and disposal in Industrial Landfill II, Industrial Landfill B and the
Construction/Demolition Landfill VI. Classified and sanitary solid waste are
disposed of in Industrial Waste Landfill IV. Cafeteria waste, animal bedding,
and steam plant fly ash are sent offsite to appropriate commercial facilities.
GENERATION AND HANDLING
The primary generator of sanitary waste at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant is the
Department of Energy's Office of Defense Programs; however, environmental
restoration activities also generate some sanitary waste at the plant.
This baseline report assumes that environmental restoration and nuclear
material and facility stabilization activities will generate approximately
13,600 cubic meters (17,816 cubic yards) of solid sanitary waste through FY
2035 from the K-25 Site, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the Oak Ridge
Reservation Offsite Programs, as well as the Y-12 Plant. The annual generation
rate will vary with the project schedules.
This report also assumes that Defense Programs activities will generate
approximately 30,000 cubic meters (39,300 cubic yards) of solid sanitary waste,
with an annual generation rate of roughly 1,000 cubic meters (1,310 cubic
yards) until FY 2060. All applicable treatment and storage facilities described
below will be maintained and upgraded to allow them to remain active until FY
2060.
TREATMENT
Industrial solid waste is compacted for volume reduction at the Building
9720-25 Baler Facility.
STORAGE
The New Salvage Yard, which is operated by Lockheed Martin's Y-12 waste
management organization, is located on the north side of Bear Creek Road
approximately one mile west of the intersection of Bear Creek Road and Old Bear
Creek Road. The yard is used to store and sell surplus materials generated at
the Y-12 Plant, provided they are not radioactively contaminated, Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act-hazardous, and are unclassified.
Activities associated with the New Salvage Yard include the transportation,
storage, segregation, and sale of surplus items. Items stored at the New
Salvage Yard are considered unusable as originally intended and cannot be
repaired or recycled in an economical manner within the Y-12 Plant. These items
are stored at the New Salvage Yard until they can be sold.
DISPOSAL
The strategy for solid industrial waste disposal at the Y-12 Plant involves
minimization of waste generation; use of commercial recycle markets; and
disposal in Industrial Landfill II, Industrial Landfill V, and the
Construction/Demolition Landfill VI.
The majority of industrial and sanitary solid waste streams at the Y-12 Plant
are disposed of at the Sanitary Landfill, Industrial Landfill-V, and the
Construction/Demolition Landfill-VI located on Chestnut Ridge south of the Y-12
Plant. Classified industrial and sanitary solid waste are disposed of in
Industrial Waste Landfill IV. These waste streams are verified, either through
analysis or generator knowledge, as meeting the Sanitary Landfill-II and
Industrial Landfill-V Waste Acceptance Criteria and are then transported for
disposal. The Y-12 Plant routinely receives solid sanitary waste for disposal
from the K-25 Site and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Cafeteria waste,
animal bedding, and Steam Plant fly ash are sent offsite to a commercial
landfill for disposal.
Waste Management Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
23,478
|
24,975
|
19,591
|
16,534
|
16,534
|
18,238
|
16,534
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
9,305
|
9,141
|
9,110
|
8,594
|
8,313
|
8,322
|
8,322
|
|
| Disposal |
127
|
98
|
18
|
14
|
14
|
401
|
14
|
|
| Low-Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
776
|
765
|
765
|
765
|
765
|
765
|
765
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
1,059
|
1,033
|
1,033
|
1,033
|
1,033
|
1,033
|
1,033
|
|
| Disposal |
1,843
|
3,082
|
4,260
|
5,100
|
5,100
|
5,100
|
5,100
|
|
| Hazardous Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
20,921
|
12,838
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
1,055
|
1,073
|
1,073
|
1,073
|
1,073
|
1,073
|
1,073
|
|
| Disposal |
135
|
35
|
26
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
|
| Sanitary Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
115
|
122
|
122
|
122
|
122
|
122
|
122
|
|
| Disposal |
7,167
|
4,967
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
4,962
|
4,961
|
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
14,481
|
14,878
|
14,865
|
14,843
|
14,809
|
13,412
|
13,412
|
|
| Total |
80,461
|
73,007
|
57,033
|
53,044
|
52,729
|
53,433
|
51,341
|
|
| |
|
| Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
16,534
|
16,534
|
16,534
|
16,534
|
16,534
|
16,534
|
4,680
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
8,322
|
8,322
|
8,322
|
8,322
|
8,322
|
8,322
|
1,810
|
|
| Disposal |
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
|
| Low-Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
765
|
765
|
765
|
765
|
765
|
765
|
90
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
1,033
|
1,033
|
1,033
|
1,033
|
1,033
|
1,033
|
1,033
|
|
| Disposal |
5,100
|
5,100
|
5,100
|
5,100
|
5,100
|
5,100
|
5,100
|
|
| Hazardous Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
1,073
|
1,073
|
1,073
|
1,073
|
1,073
|
1,073
|
1,073
|
|
| Disposal |
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
|
| Sanitary Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
122
|
122
|
122
|
122
|
122
|
122
|
122
|
|
| Disposal |
4,961
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
4,961
|
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
13,412
|
13,412
|
13,412
|
13,412
|
13,412
|
13,412
|
13,412
|
|
| Total |
51,341
|
51,341
|
51,341
|
51,341
|
51,341
|
51,341
|
32,300
|
|
| |
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
| Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
4,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,222,240
|
| Storage and Handling
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
573,293
|
| Disposal |
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,993
|
| Low-Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,678
|
| Storage and Handling
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,603
|
| Disposal |
5,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351,924
|
| Hazardous Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,835
|
| Storage and Handling
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,384
|
| Disposal |
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
| Sanitary Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,115
|
| Disposal |
4,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383,140
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
13,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,039,979
|
| Total |
32,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,968,465
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Direct Program Management/Support
Program support activities for the Waste Management program encompass
activities that are necessary for, but not directly a part of, treatment,
storage, disposal, or related operations (for example, waste characterization,
collection, and transport). Program support activities include Department of
Energy and managing and operating contractor program management; oversight of
pollution prevention programs; general safety, health and environmental
compliance oversight; utilities for general support facilities; taxes;
procurement for general support activities; and establishment and maintenance
of waste tracking systems. The level of general program support is proportional
to treatment, storage, disposal, and related activities.
DESCRIPTION OF PERSONNEL
Current Composition
The employees working for Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, as presented in the
following table, are a combination of engineers, scientists, technicians,
managers, construction crafts personnel, operators, laborers and general
workers, administrative professionals, general administrators, and managers.
Since there are several waste operations facilities at the Y-12 Plant, there is
a larger percentage of operators than at other facilities. This work force is
expected to remain relatively stable over the next few years. In addition, the
Department of Energy contracts to Jacobs Engineering and Foster-Wheeler, who
predominantly employ scientists and engineers and MK-Ferguson, who
predominantly employs construction crafts personnel, operators, and engineers.
Lockheed Martin subcontracts to a variety of engineering, consulting, and site
investigation firms, including several small disadvantaged businesses under the
Small Business Administration "8a" set aside program. All federal Full-Time
Equivalents who provide support and oversee the work at the Y-12 Plant are
included in the Oak Ridge Operations Office section in this report.
Full-Time Equivalent Composition Table*
* The Projections for Full-Time Equivalent employees are based on FY 1996
planning baselines (see Reader's Guide).
Site Management Structure
Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. is the integrating contractor for
environmental restoration activities at the Y-12 Plant for the Department of
Energy, as well as the managing and operating contractor. They integrate their
own work activities as well as those of Department of Energy prime contractors
for technical support, engineering and construction, and their own
subcontractors for site remedial investigation work.
The Lockheed Martin Energy Systems contract has recently been extended for an
additional two years, through March 1998. As a part of that contract, Lockheed
Martin has committed to incentive contracting as a part of contract reform. An
increasing number of the Lockheed Martin-managed activities will be task order
contracts. The primary features of these task order projects are as follows:
contracting companies function as a team, and the Department of Energy and the
team negotiate terms of the project; the team collects an incentive fee for
finishing under budget but absorbs a percentage of any cost overrun; the
Department of Energy shares risk of cost overruns; and streamlined bid
specifications simplify the process and reduce cost estimates.
| CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES
If you would like more information about performing work for the Department of
Energy's Environmental Management program at this site, please contact:
|
Major Procurements
Peter Dayton
Director
Procurements and Contracts Division., AD-42 United States Department of Energy
Oak Ridge Operations Office
P.O. Box 2001
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8755
p: (423) 576-0795
f: (423) 576-9189
|
Small Business Procurements
Chiquita Young
Procurements and Contracts Division., AD-4
United States Department of Energy
Oak Ridge Operations Office
P.O. Box 2001
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8755
p: (423) 576-5657
f: (423) 576-9189
|
Future Full-Time Equivalent Needs
This estimate assumes that the mix of needed Full-Time Equivalents that the
Environmental Management program supports for the Y-12 Plant will remain fairly
stable. Remedial action, nuclear material and facility stabilization, and waste
management activities will continue to support Environmental Management and
other Department of Energy programs at Y-12. However, as the decommissioning of
facilities and larger scale remediation begins, there will be a particular need
for heavy equipment operators, laborers, health and safety personnel, and
decontamination personnel as the buildings are cleared and demolished.
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following tables present estimated funding information for the Y-12 Plant.
Defense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
11,750
|
26,995
|
31,759
|
19,075
|
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
32,212
|
27,636
|
37,646
|
28,325
|
26,205
|
47,790
|
79,330
|
|
| Waste Management
|
80,401
|
72,947
|
56,973
|
52,984
|
52,669
|
53,373
|
51,281
|
|
| Total |
124,363
|
127,578
|
126,378
|
100,384 |
78,874
|
101,163 |
130,611
|
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
56,275
|
5,526
|
3,500
|
1,140
|
2,500
|
500
|
|
|
| Waste Management
|
51,281
|
51,281
|
51,281
|
51,281
|
51,281
|
51,281
|
32,240
|
|
| Total |
107,556
|
56,807
|
54,781
|
52,421
|
53,781
|
51,781
|
32,240
|
|
| |
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
447,897
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,742,930
|
| Waste Management
|
32,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,963,965
|
| Total |
32,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,154,792
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Nondefense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
FY 1996-2000
|
2005
|
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
240
|
551
|
648
|
389
|
|
|
|
|
| Waste Management
|
60
|
60
|
60
|
60
|
60
|
60
|
60
|
|
| Total |
300
|
611
|
708
|
449
|
60
|
60
|
60
|
|
| |
FY 2035
|
2040
|
2045
|
2050
|
2055
|
2060
|
2065
|
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Waste Management
|
60
|
60
|
60
|
60
|
60
|
60
|
60
|
|
| Total |
60
|
60
|
60
|
60
|
60
|
60
|
60
|
|
| |
FY 2070
|
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
Life Cycle*
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,141
|
| Waste Management
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
| Total |
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,641
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS ESTIMATE
The FY 1996 life-cycle cost for the Y-12 Plant has changed by only two percent
from last year's estimate. However, individual program estimates have changed
significantly.
Comparison Table
| |
Thousands of Dollars
|
|
| Nuclear Mat. & Fac. Stab.
|
529,236 |
150
|
457,038 |
72,048
|
14 |
| Environmental Restoration
|
2,137,912 |
32,400
|
1,742,930 |
362,582
|
17 |
| Waste Management |
2,360,044
|
41,400 |
3,968,465
|
1,649,821 |
71
|
| Landlord |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Program Management 2
|
1,071,466 |
3,300
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Site Total |
6,098,658
|
77,250 |
6,166,433
|
145,025 |
2
|
1 The FY 1995 life-cycle and annual costs are provided
to determine the corrected FY 1995 cost.
2 Program Management was reported in an independent cost table last year, but
is reported as a line item in the relevant program (Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization, Environmental Restoration, and Waste Management)
activity cost estimate tables for the FY 1996 Baseline Report.
|
The FY 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report estimates for the Nuclear
Materials and Facility Stabilization program again used parametric models to
project the life-cycle costs for the Y-12 facilities. Minimal adjustments were
made to last year's data to reflect facility conditions and work already
completed. Scheduling Transfer Unit 4 has already been stabilized and costs for
that activity no longer appear in the report. The deactivation estimates have
been lowered to reflect site conditions and experience gained in the activity.
The FY 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report estimates for
Environmental Restoration program activities are reduced because of a
significant decrease in the scope of the Y-12 Decommissioning program from
$1,400,000 to $563,000. The Phase II and Phase III scope of the decommissioning
of Building 9201-4 were eliminated along with the waste management estimate.
These phases are no longer needed because that building will be cleaned up for
warehouse use rather than for free release. Also, Buildings 9213, 9620-2,
9416-2 and 9416-9 are considered No Further Action facilities and have been
dropped from the scope. Direct program management/support is included for this
activity estimate.
The FY 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report estimates for Waste
Management program activities at the Y-12 Plant now include: proportionate
shares of centralized mixed waste program costs (previously all reported under
the K-25 Site, reflecting funds management); decontamination and
decommissioning costs for currently operating and planned Waste
Management-owned facilities; increased the use of offsite facilities for
low-level waste and low-level mixed waste disposal; and reduced waste
projections from Environmental Restoration and the Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization programs. These actions have resulted in a 71 percent
increase in Waste Management program estimated costs.
|
 |