|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
The Oak Ridge National Laboratory occupies approximately 1,160 hectares (2,900
acres) within the Oak Ridge Reservation in Melton and Bethel Valleys,
approximately 16 kilometers (10 miles) southwest of downtown Oak Ridge,
Tennessee. To view the Locality Map for the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, see
the Oak Ridge Associated Universities Program site summary.
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
| (Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
|
|
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
15,129
|
14,681
|
12,981
|
10,940
|
8,715
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
63,627
|
69,452
|
82,523
|
59,737
|
59,264
|
|
| Waste Management
|
83,146
|
94,305
|
124,928
|
120,776
|
125,732
|
|
| Total |
161,902
|
178,437
|
220,433
|
191,453
|
193,710
|
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
158,162 |
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
164,263
|
|
|
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
11,875
|
8,854
|
10,886
|
9,048
|
3,448
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
63,233
|
79,613
|
161,973
|
166,882
|
199,829 |
80,850
|
110,431 |
|
| Waste Management
|
102,940
|
92,318
|
81,739
|
80,559
|
63,481
|
49,953
|
49,322
|
|
| Total |
178,047
|
180,786
|
254,598
|
256,489 |
266,758
|
130,803 |
159,753
|
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
52,882
|
41,597
|
17,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Waste Management
|
45,197
|
45,565
|
45,565
|
45,565
|
45,565
|
45,565
|
29,202
|
|
| Total |
98,079
|
87,161
|
62,783
|
45,565
|
45,565
|
45,565
|
29,202
|
|
| |
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,559
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,872,547
|
| Waste Management
|
29,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,258,677
|
| Total |
29,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,351,784
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
Weapons research facilities were established at the site of the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory in 1943 as part of the World War II Manhattan Project. The
Laboratory's original mission was to produce and chemically separate the first
gram quantities of plutonium as part of the national effort to produce the
atomic bomb. As its role in the development of nuclear weapons decreased over
time, the scope of its work expanded to include production of isotopes,
fundamental research in a variety of sciences, research involving hazardous and
radioactive materials, environmental research, and radioactive waste disposal.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory is one of the country's largest multidisciplinary
and multiprogram laboratories and research facilities. Its primary mission is
to perform leading-edge nonweapons research and development. This includes
conducting applied research and engineering development in support of
Department of Energy programs in nuclear fusion and fission, energy
conservation, fossil fuels, and other energy technologies, as well as
performing basic scientific research in selected areas of the physical, life,
and environmental sciences. Other missions include contributing to the national
initiative to improve science and mathematics education. In addition to the
primary mission, environmental management activities are ongoing at the site.
Continuing environmental restoration activities assess the condition and
contamination of sites and facilities to determine how the contamination can be
contained or cleaned up.
SITE MAP
Since its establishment in 1943, operations at Oak Ridge National Laboratory
have produced facilities, soils and water contaminated with radionuclides,
heavy metals, and chemicals. In December 1989, the Oak Ridge National
Laboratory was placed on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National
Priorities List as a part of the Oak Ridge Reservation. In January 1992, the
Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency Region IV, and the
State of Tennessee signed a Federal Facilities Agreement that provided a
framework for environmental restoration activities at the Laboratory.
Presently, containment and cleanup are occurring according to priorities set by
the evaluation of risk to the public and the environment. Facilities that the
Laboratory no longer needs are being stabilized for future decommissioning and
decontamination.
Waste management facilities operate onsite to either treat, store, or dispose
of waste generated by ongoing operations and environmental cleanup, or to
prepare waste for transfer offsite for treatment, storage, or disposal. Waste
management follows the requirements of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act, Department of Energy Orders, and other federal and state laws. As required
by the Federal Facility Compliance Act, the Oak Ridge Reservation submitted a
Site Treatment Plan. The State of Tennessee issued a Unilateral Order for
compliance with the schedules and milestones in the Site Treatment Plan for
mixed waste.
The Oak Ridge National Laboratory is expected to remain an important national
research and development facility well into the future. Although ultimate use
of the site is unclear, long-term surveillance, maintenance, and institutional
controls, which are expected to continue indefinitely, will limit future uses.
The Department's Office of Energy Research is the landlord of the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory, and this report assumes it will remain in that capacity
for the life cycle of this estimate.
FUTURE USE
The Department of Energy has been developing strategic plans for the ultimate
use of the Oak Ridge Reservation and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory through
the Common Ground Process. This stakeholder-driven process will determine
preferred land-use options for the Oak Ridge Reservation, so that cleanup
operations will be based on the most likely and acceptable land uses. The
Department of Energy's recommended land uses are used for planning facility use
and reuse for the next 25 years. The 25-year period was chosen based on
realistic land-use planning in projecting long-term use of Oak Ridge
Reservation sites and facilities. The Department of Energy will revise land use
at the Oak Ridge Reservation regularly to reflect recommended changes and new
information. The land-use recommendations are the basis for cleanup actions
that are effective in terms of cost and risk management while taking into
account the preferences of the stakeholders. The Common Ground Report is
scheduled for completion by the end of FY 1995. This report uses the same
assumptions in the 25-year period for the rest of the life cycle covered by
this report.
The proposed future land-use designations for Oak Ridge National Laboratory
are: Industrial use, Controlled Access, and Open Space/Wildlife Management.
These proposed land uses are illustrated in the Future Use Map, which can be
found in the Oak Ridge Associated Universities site summary.
In some places, clean areas surround isolated areas of contamination. Cleanup
efforts would return these areas to a level of contamination compatible with
projected use for the surrounding area.
The Industrial use category applies to those areas that are currently in use or
identified by the Laboratory for proposed facilities for research and
development, operations, or support. These sites will remain under government
control, with administrative and engineering controls to protect worker health
and safety.
The existing inactive buried waste areas result from historic practices (for
example, shallow land burial). Because of the complexity and expense of
removing the legacy buried waste, this estimate assumes that most of it will
remain in its current location indefinitely, until more effective technologies
and alternative disposal locations are identified and available. Therefore, the
future-use category designation will remain Controlled Access.
NUCLEAR MATERIAL AND FACILITY STABILIZATION
A total of 70 facilities at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and facilities
that the Laboratory operates at the Y-12 Plant are scheduled to enter the
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization program. Nineteen of these
facilities that were formerly used to produce radioactive isotopes for a
variety of purposes, began the process of stabilization/deactivation in FY
1994. In FY 1996, an additional 31 facilities received a high threat score in
the Surplus Facilities Inventory Assessment and were added to the program. They
are currently in a pre-stabilization surveillance and maintenance phase.
Although additional facilities may transfer to the Environmental Management
program over time, the report only makes estimates for those facilities that
are now or are projected to be surplused over the next five years. A total of
seven scheduling transfer units have been identified for current surplus
facilities.
These scheduling transfer units define projects that will accomplish
stabilization and deactivation actions reducing environmental, health, and
safety risks; consolidating and removing waste inventories; and reducing
surveillance and maintenance costs as facilities are prepared for
decommissioning. Although alternate uses are also pursued during the process,
this report assumes that all of the facilities will be transferred to the
Environmental Restoration program for decommissioning following completion of
actions by the Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization program. This report
also assumes that all Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization activities
will be complete by FY 2018. Descriptions of these scheduling transfer units
are provided below.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 1, or the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Isotopes
project, includes 19 former isotope production facilities that contain
contaminated hot cells, lab hoods, radioactive isotope inventories, radioactive
waste, and active instrumentation and utilities systems. Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization activities associated with this scheduling transfer unit
began in FY 1994 and are expected to be complete by FY 2000.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 2, or the Oak Ridge National Laboratory "High Rankers"
project, includes 31 facilities that received a high threat score in the
Surplus Facilities Inventory Assessment. Major facilities include the Tower
Shielding Facility and reactor; the Bulk Shielding Reactor; the Integrated
Processing Demonstration Facility; and the High Radiation Level Analytical
Facility. The other 27 facilities are associated ancillary facilities.
According to this baseline report, Energy Research completed stabilization
actions in these facilities prior to their transfer to the Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization program. This estimate assumes that Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization activities associated with this scheduling transfer unit
will begin in FY 1996 and will be completed by FY 2004.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 11, or the Oak Ridge National Laboratory "Medium
Rankers" project, includes five facilities that received a medium threat score
in the Surplus Facilities Inventory Assessment. These are Building 2017-East
Research Service Satellite Shop; Building 3121-Cell Off-Gas Filter House;
Building 3531-Greenhouse; Building 3597-Hot Garden Storage; and Building
7819-Interim Decontamination Building. This report assumes that Energy Research
completed some stabilization actions in these facilities prior to their
transfer to the Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization program. This
report also assumes that Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization activities
associated with this scheduling transfer unit will begin in FY 2003 and be will
completed by FY 2011.
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Waste Type and Volume Table
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
Projects
|
Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
284
|
|
Low-Level Waste
|
1,147
|
|
Hazardous Waste
|
260
|
Scheduling Transfer Unit 12 includes the Biology Building, a 53,940-square
meter (64,188-square yard) laboratory facility located at the Y-12 plant that
has been used for biological research experiments. Contaminants include lead,
polychlorinated biphenyls, and fixed alpha contamination. This estimate assumes
that Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization activities associated with
this scheduling transfer unit will begin in FY 2003 and will be completed by FY
2018.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 13, or the Oak Ridge National Laboratory at Y-12
"Medium Rankers" project, consists of seven fusion energy experiments in the
9201-3 facility, a 96 cyclotron in building 9204-2A, a curium handling glove
box in building 9204-3, and four tanks associated with these previous
operations. This report assumes that Energy Research completed some
stabilization activities for all facilities. This report also assumes that
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization activities associated with this
scheduling transfer unit will begin in FY 2003 and will be completed by FY
2009.
Major Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Activity Milestones
| Scheduling Transfer Unit 1
|
2000
|
|
Scheduling Transfer Unit 2
|
2004
|
|
Scheduling Transfer Unit 11
|
2011
|
|
Scheduling Transfer Unit 12
|
2018
|
|
Scheduling Transfer Unit 13
|
2009
|
|
Scheduling Transfer Unit 14
|
2010
|
|
Scheduling Transfer Unit 15
|
2014
|
Scheduling Transfer Unit 14, or the Oak Ridge National Laboratory "Low Rankers
1" project, consists of nine facilities that received a low threat score in the
Surplus Facilities Inventory Assessment. The facilities include three storage
buildings, a stack, two tanks and three others. This report assumes that Energy
Research completed some stabilization activities for all facilities. This
report also assumes that Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization activities
associated with this scheduling transfer unit will begin in FY 2004 and will be
completed by FY 2010.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 15, or the Oak Ridge National Laboratory "Low Rankers
2" project, consists of four facilities that received a low threat score in the
Surplus Facilities Inventory Assessment. It includes a hydrofracture facility,
three other facilities, and Buildings 2000, 2001 and 2024. This report assumes
that Energy Research completed some stabilization activities for all
facilities. This report also assumes that Nuclear Material and Facility
Stabilization activities associated with this scheduling transfer unit will
begin in FY 2005 and will be completed by FY 2014.
The scope of the site's Waste Management program includes all costs associated
with treating, storing, and disposing of waste that leaves the areas of
contamination. This estimate assumes that there will be no associated costs for
program management/support for the Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
program at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. With the exception of Scheduling
Transfer Unit 1, cost estimates for all scheduling transfer units were
determined using parametric models. Cost estimates for Scheduling Transfer Unit
1 were extracted from the project baseline.
PRE-DEACTIVATION/STABILIZATION SURVEILLANCE AND MAINTENANCE
Pre-deactivation/stabilization surveillance and maintenance activities will
focus on monitoring and repairing facilities. These activities will be reviewed
and revised appropriate with intended future Nuclear Material and Facility
Stabilization program actions. Currently, these activities are only planned for
Scheduling Transfer Unit 12.
STABILIZATION
Stabilization activities currently planned at Scheduling Transfer Unit 12 will
focus on required corrections for asbestos, hazardous chemicals, and
polychlorinated biphenyls. All stabilization activities at Scheduling Transfer
Units 11, 13, and 15 will focus on high priority problems and limited
decontamination and corrections for hazardous and mixed waste. This estimate
assumes that stabilization activities for all applicable scheduling transfer
units will be completed by FY 2010.
POST-STABILIZATION SURVEILLANCE AND MAINTENANCE
Post-stabilization surveillance and maintenance activities at Scheduling
Transfer Units 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 will focus on required health checks,
monitoring and repairing instrumentation, and maintaining the facilities until
deactivation begins. Currently, post-stabilization surveillance and maintenance
activities for 31 facilities at Scheduling Transfer Unit 2 are scheduled to
begin in FY 1996. This estimate assumes that post-stabilization surveillance
and maintenance activities at all applicable scheduling transfer units will be
complete by FY 2012.
DEACTIVATION
Deactivation activities at Scheduling Transfer Unit 1 currently focus on
removing radioactive isotope inventories and performing limited decontamination
to reduce background levels, reducing or eliminating instrumentation and
utilities, and removing waste and recyclable materials. This estimate assumes
that deactivation activities at Scheduling Transfer Unit 1 will be completed by
FY 1999. Current plans for deactivating Scheduling Transfer Unit 2 will focus
on two priorities: (1) fuel removal from the Tower Shielding Reactor and the
Bulk Shielding Reactor and its eventual transfer to the Savannah River Site;
and (2) removal of the four 315 foot towers. All other deactivation activities
at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory will include limited decontamination,
instrumentation and utility consolidation or elimination, and waste and
recyclable material removal. This estimate assumes that deactivation activities
for all applicable scheduling transfer units will be completed by FY 2017 .
POST-DEACTIVATION SURVEILLANCE AND MAINTENANCE
Post-deactivation surveillance and maintenance will consist of required
monitoring and maintenance of facilities for all scheduling transfer units
until they are transferred to the Environmental Restoration decommissioning
program. This estimate assumes that post-deactivation surveillance and
maintenance for all applicable scheduling transfer units will be complete by FY
2018.
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2025
|
2030
|
| Pre-Stab. Surveil. and Maintenance
|
|
5,170
|
3,447
|
|
|
|
|
43,085
|
| Stabilization
|
|
405
|
5,170
|
|
|
|
|
27,876
|
| Post-Stab. Surveil. and Maintenance
|
2,349
|
140
|
677
|
3,447
|
|
|
|
33,064
|
| Deactivation
|
9,312
|
2,669
|
1,569
|
5,462
|
3,104
|
|
|
110,579
|
| Post-Deact. Surveil. and Maintenance
|
214
|
470
|
23 |
140
|
344
|
|
|
5,955
|
| Total |
11,875
|
8,854
|
10,886
|
9,048
|
3,448
|
|
|
220,559
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
As a result of the 1992 Federal Facilities Agreement, the Environmental
Restoration program has identified approximately 350 sites contaminated with
radioactivity or hazardous chemicals. Because of the large number of
contaminated sites and the complexity of the hydrologic conditions at Oak
Ridge, these sites have been combined into 20 waste area groupings at the Oak
Ridge National Laboratory. These waste area groupings are generally defined by
small watersheds containing contiguous and similar waste sites. In some cases,
consolidation of individual sites is necessary because they are hydrologically
inseparable. This allows perimeter monitoring of both ground water and surface
water and the development of a response that protects human health and the
environment.
Waste area groupings comprise one or more operable units. Several solid waste
management units, such as storage areas for hazardous solid waste, can be
combined into an single operable unit. Most of the these units are related to
the fact that Laboratory operations manage both solid and liquid radioactive
waste.
Of the 20 waste area groupings identified at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory,
13 have been identified as potential contaminant sources. Nine of these
currently have active projects in the Environmental Restoration program,
including Waste Area Groupings 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, and 13. The
Laboratory's Ground-water program is also an active project. For the purpose of
this report, waste area groupings at the Laboratory are consolidated according
to geographical location. For instance, the Bethel Valley Area includes Waste
Area Groupings 1 and 3; the Melton Valley Area includes Waste Area Groupings 2,
and 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; and the External Areas include Waste Area Groupings
11 and 13. The Ground-Water and Decommissioning programs are considered
separate project areas. Except for Waste Area Grouping 2, all waste area
groupings are sources of contaminants for other areas. As each of the
contaminant-source waste area groupings is characterized, small operable units
are identified and priorities are set for remediation.
For the most part, large volumes of radioactively contaminated soils and
contaminated facilities to be decommissioned will be stabilized in place within
the area of contamination. Remedial action waste to be managed outside the area
of contamination include hazardous and mixed waste, some radioactive sludges in
tanks and surface impoundments, radioactively contaminated soil hot spots that
can be excavated, and some investigation-derived waste such as decontamination
fluids and disposable personal protective equipment.
Several facilities no longer needed by the Office of Energy Research have been
transferred to the Environmental Restoration program for surveillance and
monitoring and decommissioning. In addition, this report assumes that the
facilities identified in the Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
program section of the report will ultimately be transferred to the
Environmental Restoration program for decommissioning. In most cases, the
report also assumes that these facilities will be cleaned up for free release
or demolished so that the area can be reused.
Although the Environmental Restoration program's primary mission is to
remediate contaminated sites and decommission facilities, it may also be
responsible for some of the associated costs for treatment, storage, and
disposal for some of its activities. To manage the waste associated with
environmental restoration activities, onsite and commercial options are
evaluated. Evaluations are based on the activities conducted, the risk
associated with those activities, and the cost of onsite versus commercial
capability. In performing these option evaluations, the Environmental
Restoration program, with the support of the Waste Management program, prepares
waste management plans, and develops project specifications and waste
management documentation.
If waste treatment, storage, and disposal is to be performed onsite, all
associated activities and costs are included within the scope of the Waste
Management program. Because offsite treatment, storage, and disposal costs can
appear in either Environmental Restoration or Waste Management program
estimates, each of the area discussions below will identify the organization
that is responsible for associated costs.
Major Environmental Restoration Milestones
| Bethel Valley Area
|
|
Assessment
|
2035
|
|
Remedial Action
|
2035
|
|
Melton Valley Area
|
|
Assessment
|
2040
|
|
Remedial Action
|
2035
|
|
External Areas
|
|
Assessment
|
2030
|
|
Remedial Action
|
2040
|
|
Ground-water Program
|
|
Remedial Action
|
2030
|
|
Decommissioning Area Actions
|
|
Assessment
|
2040
|
|
Facility Decommissioning
|
2045
|
|
Long-Term Surveillance and Monitoring
|
2045
|
Bethel Valley Area
The Bethel Valley Area includes both Waste Area Groupings 1 and 3. Waste Area
Grouping 1, the Laboratory's main plant area, lies within the Bethel Valley
portion of the White Oak Creek drainage basin. The total area of the basin is
about 826 hectares (2,040 acres). Waste Area Grouping 3 is approximately 1
kilometer (0.6 mile) west of the main plant area.
ASSESSMENT
Waste Area Grouping 1 is divided into ten operable units and contains
approximately half the remedial action sites identified to date. These operable
units include: the Gunite and Associated Tanks, the Surface Impoundments, Core
Hole 8, and Liquid Low-Level Radioactive Waste Tanks. Most of these sites were
used to collect and store low-level waste in tanks, ponds, and waste treatment
facilities; however, some also include landfills and spill and leak sites
identified during the last 40 years. Contaminated ground water from some of
these sites reaches White Oak Creek and its tributaries through seeps. The 12
Gunite Tanks, centrally located in Waste Area Grouping 1, received liquid
radioactive waste from research activities conducted from 1943 through the late
1970s. These tanks contain an estimated 95 percent of the radioactivity
inventory in Waste Area Grouping 1. Because this grouping hosts an operating
multifunctional site with a large work force, remediation will be technically
and logistically complex.
A Phase I Remedial Investigation on Waste Area Grouping 1 was completed in FY
1992. Instead of preparing a Feasibility Study for the entire grouping,
assessment of each operable unit will proceed independently. This report
assumes that some of the operable units will require additional Remedial
Investigations (Phase II), while others will proceed directly to an
alternatives evaluation and decision document. This report also assumes that
Phase II investigations will be complete in FY 2030, and that ground-water
assessments will continue until FY 2009. This baseline report assumes that
assessments for Waste Area Grouping 1 will be completed by FY 2035.
Waste Area Grouping 3 includes Solid Waste Storage Area 3, a closed scrap-metal
yard, and an active landfill. Solid Waste Storage Area 3 and the closed
scrap-metal yard are inactive landfills known to contain radioactive solid
waste and surplus materials generated at Oak Ridge from 1946 to 1979. The
active landfill, opened in 1975, is used to dispose of uncontaminated
construction materials and steam plant fly ash. Since Waste Area Grouping 3 is
located along a drainage divide, most surface and ground water discharges into
White Oak Creek, and Raccoon Creek. This baseline report assumes that a
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study will be required and that assessment
for Waste Area Grouping 3 will be completed by FY 2020.
This baseline report assumes that assessments for all Bethel Valley Area waste
area groupings will be completed by FY 2035.
REMEDIAL ACTION
This report assumes that each of the ten operable units within Waste Area
Grouping 1 has its own remediation process and schedule. Remedial actions have
been completed successfully to mitigate the contaminant plume at Core Hole 8.
Other remedial actions will be performed in the near future at the Gunite and
Associated Tanks and the Surface Impoundments operable units. Final remediation
of the ground water, pipelines, and storm drains in Waste Area Grouping 1 and
sediments in White Oak Creek will be deferred until other contaminant sources
and soil units have been remediated.
The Gunite and Associated Tanks area comprises three separate tank groups:
South Tank Farm Waste Tanks, North Tank Farm Waste Tanks, and Building 3550
Laboratory Waste Tanks. At this operable unit, Phase II tank sludge sampling
involves using a floating boom that deploys a clamshell sampling device to
obtain sludge and debris samples anywhere on the tank bottom. The boom will
also deploy a new underwater camera system that will videotape the conditions
on the tank floor, walls, and dome. The floating boom successfully collected
sludge and debris samples. Planning is under way to perform necessary
maintenance work on the tank Cold Test Facility at Waste Area Grouping 5 for
use on cold tests of sluicing and/or sampling equipment. Design packages have
been issued for the site preparation and facility modifications required for
two tanks in the North Tank Farm. Technical specifications have been issued for
the modified light duty robotic utility arm intended for use in collecting
samples and moving sluicing equipment around within the tank. The Waste
Management and Technology Development programs are actively involved in the
Gunite Tanks project, which will ensure that technologies and facilities
necessary to remove and treat the waste are available when required. This
estimate assumes that remedial action at this operable unit will be complete in
FY 2010.
The Surface Impoundments Operable Unit consists of four surface impoundments
located in the south central portion of the Bethel Valley Oak Ridge National
Laboratory facilities complex. Remediation is being conducted as a Streamlined
Approach for Environmental Restoration Pilot, which is one of only five such
projects at Department of Energy sites across the United States. Principal
radionuclide contaminants are strontium-90, cesium-137, and tritium. A
bentonite blanket was installed in January 1995 to control the seepage from the
impoundments to White Oak Creek. The draft of the Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study includes a new alternative to build a
consolidation cell on the operable unit to facilitate remediation of other Oak
Ridge National Laboratory impoundments. As part of the Pilot initiative,
preparations have been initiated for an independent commercial/industrial cost
estimate for remediation of the surface impoundments, using the alternatives
identified by the Feasibility Study.
In addition, effluent from certain impoundments and above- and below-grade
collection sumps at the Laboratory is pumped to the Process Waste Treatment
Plant, which the Waste Management program operates for treatment prior to
release. The Surface Impoundments operable unit will also take the Equalization
Basin and Process Waste Ponds out of service. These areas will require
construction of additional surge capacity. The Process Waste Treatment Plant
Surge Capacity Upgrade will provide improved surge capacity for the Process
Waste Treatment Plant. The addition of a 3.8 million-liter (1 million-gallon)
tank with transfer pumps and a jet mixer installed in a concrete dike will
ensure this additional capacity. Significant construction progress continues,
including principal completion of the 2.5 million-liter (650,000gallon)
concrete containment basin. This report assumes that construction and upgrades
at the Process Waste Treatment Plant will be completed by FY 2002. This
estimate assumes that the Waste Management program will perform this work. This
baseline report assumes that remedial action at the Surface Impoundments
Operable Unit will be completed by FY 2002.
Waste Area Grouping 1 ground-water activities focus on shallow ground water
that discharges to surface streams within this grouping. The potential exists
for contaminant migration from various sources within Waste Area Grouping 1
through both shallow and deeper ground water to offwaste area grouping
receptors. This project is entering into a period of monitoring and
characterization to identify contaminant sources and their migration pathways,
with the objective of identifying potential locations for early actions.
Analytical results from the first round of sampling suggest that contaminant
concentrations are increasing, particularly in the western portion of
the plant. This report assumes that remedial actions for ground water will
be completed by FY 2010.
The Core Hole 8 plume of contaminated ground water was discovered during Phase
I ground-water investigations. A system was designed to collect, transfer, and
treat contaminated ground water from an underground stream before it entered
the storm sewer system and discharged to surface water. From three catch
drains, the ground water is pumped to the Process Waste Treatment Plant, which
is operated by the Waste Management program, where contaminants are removed and
the treated water is released. The pumping system became operational on March
31, 1995. This baseline report assumes that ground-water monitoring at the Core
Hole 8 plume will be completed by FY 2006.
The inactive Liquid Low-Level Radioactive Waste Tanks Operable Unit includes
tanks that are no longer in use and are classified as removed from service.
Liquids and sludges remain in many of the tanks, with several tanks receiving
in-leakage from ground water and rainwater. These tanks are physically located
in Waste Area Groupings 1, 5, 8, and 9. A streamlined remediation approach
has been used that combines the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act Site Investigation, Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study, and Proposed Plan documents into a single
unified Proposed Plan for groups of inactive tanks termed batches. Field
investigation activities began on four of the inactive lowlevel liquid
waste tanks. After a health physics survey has been completed, each tank found
to contain liquids (and its vault) will be sampled and videotaped to determine
the condition of the tank and document the configuration. The Environmental
Restoration program used existing environmental safety and health and other
required documentation, which will result in a significant savings in the site
investigation. Because the risk from these first four tanks has been determined
to be within acceptable limits, there will be no Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act driver for this batch. The regulators
have given verbal approval to proceed with removal or inplace
stabilization of these tanks as a maintenance activity rather than a
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act activity.
Removal, if required, will be coordinated with the Waste Management program.
The Liquid Low-Level Radioactive Waste Tanks Operable Unit also addresses tank
systems included under Appendix F of the Federal Facilities Agreement. The
stated objective of the Federal Facilities Agreement as it relates to the tank
systems in Appendix F is to ensure structural integrity, containment, detection
of releases, and source control pending final remedial action at the site. The
Agreement requires the immediate removal of leaking lowlevel liquid waste
tank systems from service. It also requires that lowlevel liquid waste
tank systems that do not meet the design and performance requirements
established for secondary containment and leak detection be either upgraded or
replaced. A number of ongoing activities provide testing, maintenance, and
upgrades to the Liquid Lowlevel Waste Tank systems. The final required
remedial actions at this operable unit involve some source removal, but most of
the contaminants will be contained in place. This baseline report assumes that
remedial action at the Liquid Low-level Radioactive Waste Tanks will be
completed by FY 2030.
This report assumes that the government and the private sector will continue to
use the main plant area at Oak Ridge National Laboratory for active research
and development operations. The remediated sites within Waste Area Grouping 1
will either be released to or restricted from these active research operations,
depending on residual risks associated with contamination left in place. This
baseline report assumes that remedial action at Waste Area Grouping 1 will be
completed by FY 2035.
Waste Area Grouping 3 has been determined to pose low risk to human health and
the environment, and no actions are planned for the immediate future. However,
this estimate assumes that future remedial actions will involve containment of
the waste in place and installation of a cap. Waste generated by environmental
restoration activities at Waste Area Grouping 3 consists of uncontaminated
construction materials and steam plant fly ash. This report assumes that this
waste will remain in place. This baseline report assumes that remedial actions
for Waste Area Grouping 3 will be completed by FY 2025.
This baseline report assumes that approximately 6,696 cubic meters (8,772 cubic
yards) of solid low-level radioactive waste and 27,778 cubic meters (36,389
cubic yards) of solid low-level mixed waste (mostly soil), and 4,358 cubic
meters (5,709 cubic yards) of sanitary waste generated at the Bethel Valley
Area will be left in place. This report also assumes that approximately 127,615
cubic meters (167,176 cubic yards) of low-level radioactive liquids, ground
water and wastewater generated by these activities will be transferred to the
Waste Management program for treatment, storage and disposal, along with small
quantities of hazardous waste, low-level waste solids (mostly paper/cloth), and
sanitary waste liquids and solids.
This baseline report assumes that remedial actions for all Bethel Valley Area
waste area groupings will be completed by FY 2035.
Melton Valley Area
The Melton Valley Area includes Waste Area Groupings 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and
10. Waste Area Grouping 2 is located approximately 2.4 kilometers (1.5 miles)
southwest of the main plant area. Waste Area Grouping 4 is located
approximately 0.8 kilometers (0.5 mile) southwest of the Laboratory's main
plant. Waste Area Grouping 5 and 10 are located approximately 1.6 kilometers (1
mile) south of the main plant area. Waste Area Grouping 6 is located north of
White Oak Lake, approximately 2 kilometers (1.2 miles) south of the
Laboratory's main plant. Waste Area Grouping 7 is approximately 1.6 kilometers
(1 mile) south of the Laboratory's main plant area. Waste Area Grouping 8 is
located approximately 1 kilometer (0.6 mile) south of the main plant. Waste
Area Grouping 9 includes the area surrounding the Homogeneous Reactor
Experiment, approximately 1 kilometer (0.6 miles) southwest of the main plant
area.
ASSESSMENT
Waste Area Grouping 2 includes two sites. The first site consists of the area
encompassed by the stream channels and floodplain areas of White Oak Creek and
Melton Branch; the second site includes White Oak Lake, White Oak Lake Dam, and
the White Oak Creek Embayment prior to confluence with the Clinch River. White
Oak Creek, White Oak Lake, and its tributaries represent the major drainage
system for Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the surrounding facilities.
White Oak Creek and its tributaries are located in both the Melton and Bethel
Valleys. White Oak Creek flows into the Clinch River. White Oak Lake is formed
by White Oak Lake Dam and is approximately 3.2 kilometers (2 miles) south of
the Oak Ridge National Laboratory main complex. White Oak Lake is a surface
impoundment that serves as a final settling basin for particle-reactive
contaminants from Oak Ridge National Laboratory. White Oak Creek Embayment
encompasses the area downstream of White Oak Lake Dam to the confluence of
White Oak Creek with the Clinch River.
Contaminants of concern identified to date within Waste Area Grouping 2 are
strontium90; cesium137; cobalt-60; thorium; uranium; transuranics;
metals (mercury, zinc, and chromium); and some organic compounds (including
polychlorinated biphenyls) located primarily in bottom sediments. These
contaminants have migrated from sources within Waste Area Groupings 1 and 3
through 9. Consequently, Waste Area Grouping 2 is considered both an
"integrator" and conduit for contaminants moving through the surface-water
system to White Oak Creek and to offsite areas. Sitewide surface-water
assessment activities and ground-water assessment activities continue.
Strontium-90 and tritium analyses of all surface-water samples collected during
FY 1994 have been assessed to evaluate the relative contributions to human
health risks of discrete and nondiscrete sources throughout the waste area
groupings, during both baseflow and stormflow conditions in wet and dry
seasons. The data will provide guidance for future seep and tributary sampling
efforts conducted in the surface-water program to evaluate changes in source
strengths, as well as provide a basis for prioritizing corrective actions.
Piezometer and well sampling are ongoing to supplement the ground-water data
base. This data will supplement the ground-water data base in the area of
potential offsite flux of contaminants and provide data to assess potential
offsite receptors of human health risk.
Work in flood plain soil characterization, White Oak Lake bathymetry, erosion
rates, and Intermediate Holding Pond radiological inventory has been completed.
Constituent investigations on activities that are to be part of the Phase I
Remedial Investigation Report will be used to evaluate the potential for
offsite transport of contaminated sediment and for uptake of contamination by
biota.
Hydrologic modeling of the White Oak Creek system and compilation of data for
simulation of floods with 50year return frequency estimates have been
completed. This work was performed to quantify the potential of extreme storm
events for transporting radioactively contaminated sediment into the Clinch
River and potentially exposing the offsite public to unacceptable health risk.
Collection of bimonthly seep and tributary transect samples for radionuclide
analysis and sediment core sampling has been completed at the Intermediate Pond
site.
Samples also were collected for three wetseason storms in support of the
Waste Area Grouping 4 source characterization activity. Indicator analyses were
run to identify samples for subsequent complete analysis for strontium90,
tritium, and gamma activity, which produced significant cost savings by
avoiding excessive analyses. The results will establish baseline conditions
against which postconstruction fluxes will be measured to establish the
efficiency of corrective actions.
The Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV approved the FY 1995 Remedial
Investigation Work Plan. The final Phase I Remedial Investigation Report will
be complete by FY 1996. This baseline report assumes that assessments for Waste
Area Grouping 2 will be completed by FY 2015.
Waste Area Grouping 4 includes Solid Waste Storage Area 4, experimental pilot
pits in Area 7811, and liquid low-level waste transfer lines connecting them to
Solid Waste Storage Area 4. Waste Storage Area 4 was opened in 1951 for routine
burial of solid low-level radioactive waste. From 1955 to 1963, when Oak Ridge
was the Southeast Regional Burial Ground, Storage Area 4 received a wide
variety of poorly characterized waste (including radioactive waste) consisting
of paper, clothing, equipment, filters, animal carcasses, and laboratory waste.
About half of the waste was received from 50 institutions, facilities, and
locations other than Oak Ridge. The waste was placed in trenches, in shallow
auger holes, and in ground piles for covering at a later date.
The major contaminants at Waste Area Grouping 4 are strontium-90, tritium,
cesium-137, and a small amount of cobalt-60. This grouping is a major
contributor of strontium-90 and tritium to the White Oak Creek, accounting for
approximately 18 percent of the strontium-90 discharge observed at White Oak
Dam over the past three years. Moreover, approximately 70 percent of the
strontium-90 discharge from Waste Area Grouping 4 can be attributed to seepage
from three discrete areas in which "bathtubbing" occurs in trenches.
Bathtubbing occurs when waste trenches are flooded from the subsurface during
storms or high ground-water conditions, water leaches contaminants out of the
waste, and contaminated water seeps into the soil at the downgradient end of
the trench.
A Phase I Site Investigation was conducted to confirm the location and behavior
of bathtubbing trenches. Phase II Site Investigation activities, completed in
June 1995, were added to further delineate the trench boundaries and decrease
the total remediation cost. The investigation addressed the conceptual
hydrologic model approved for the site. This baseline report assumes that
assessments for Waste Area Grouping 4 will be completed by FY 2040.
Waste Area Grouping 5 consists of Solid Waste Storage Area 5 and the
surrounding land. Solid Waste Storage Area 5 opened in 1959, when Solid Waste
Storage Area 4 neared capacity, and closed in 1973. Although both the Old
Hydrofracture Facility and the New Hydrofracture Facility are within this waste
area grouping's boundaries, they are not included in its scope of work.
Solid Waste Storage Area 5 includes two distinct areas: Storage Area 5
North and Storage Area 5 South. Storage Area 5 North is used mainly for
long-term storage of legacy transuranic waste and is currently an active waste
management facility operated by the Waste Management program. Before 1970,
transuranic waste was buried in unlined trenches and auger holes. After 1970,
retrievable storage was required. Storage Area 5 South was used mainly for
disposal of low-level radioactive waste. However, an unknown quantity of
transuranic waste was buried in trenches and auger holes in the south area
before of Solid Waste Storage Area 5 North was designated as the Transuranic
Waste Storage Area.
Sixteen remediation sites are located within Waste Area Grouping 5, including
lowlevel liquid waste transfer lines and leak sites, hydrofracture surface
facilities, waste storage tanks, a sludge basin and a holding pond, and a
shallow land burial ground containing radioactive and hazardous waste (Solid
Waste Storage Area 5 South). The major contaminants in shallow ground
water are strontium90 and tritium.
Two separate projects have been completed. The Waste Area Grouping 5 Remedial
Investigation collected, analyzed, and reported data for use in remediation
planning. A second project was completed that collected and treated water from
two contaminated seeps into Melton Branch that were contributing significant
amounts of strontium90 to White Oak Creek.
Work involving surface-water modeling at Waste Area Grouping 5, a data quality
summary, and Baseline Risk Assessment were completed. The Remedial
Investigation Report was issued to the Tennessee Department of Environment and
Conservation and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on March 30, 1995.
This baseline report assumes that assessments for Waste Area Grouping 5 will be
completed by FY 2030.
Waste Area Grouping 6 includes Solid Waste Storage Area 6, the Emergency Waste
Basin, and the Explosives Detonation Trench. Solid Waste Storage Area 6 is
located north of White Oak Lake and State Highway 95 and is south of the
Laboratory's main plant.
Waste burials started at Solid Waste Storage Area 6 in 1969, and were expanded
to full-scale operation in 1973 when Solid Waste Storage Area 5 was closed.
Approximately 7.6 hectares (19 acres) of this 27.2-hectare (68-acre) site have
been used for waste disposal. Solid Waste Storage Area 6 has received low-level
radioactive waste and chemical, biological, and mixed waste, including
solvents, laboratory glassware and equipment, and protective clothing. Changes
in disposal techniques occurred in 1986 and 1987. Disposal in unlined trenches
was replaced with disposal of waste in approved containers, and criteria for
waste acceptance were defined and implemented.
The Emergency Waste Basin was constructed in 1961 for emergency storage of
liquid waste that could not be discharged into White Oak Creek. The basin has a
capacity of 57 million liters (15 million gallons), but has not been used to
date. Sampling of the basin's small drainage has shown the presence of some
radioactivity; however, the source of this contamination is currently not
known.
The Explosives Detonation Trench is located in the east central part of Solid
Waste Storage Area 6. It was used to detonate explosives and
shocksensitive chemicals requiring disposal. Explosive waste was laid in
the bottom of the trench and detonated with a small plastic explosive charge.
No releases are believed to have occurred.
Ground-water monitoring stations have been constructed and baseline sampling of
ground-water monitoring wells has been conducted. Sampling of all Waste Area
Grouping 6 seeps and springs was completed and a plan for technical
demonstration studies was presented to the regulators.
Comments have been received from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and
the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation on the Waste Area
Grouping 6 Environmental Monitoring Plan, and responses have been incorporated.
This baseline report assumes that assessments for Waste Area Grouping 6 will be
completed by FY 1998.
The major sites in Waste Area Grouping 7 are seven pits and trenches used from
1951 to 1966 to dispose of liquid low-level waste. This waste area grouping
also includes a decontamination facility, three leak sites, a storage area
containing shielded transfer tanks and other equipment, and seven fuel wells
used to dispose of acid solutions primarily containing enriched uranium from
the homogeneous reactor experiment fuel.
| TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
From FY 1995 to FY 1996, in situ vitrification was applied to two or more
segments of Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Pit 1 to establish field-scale
technical performance and promote public acceptance. In situ vitrification
involves melting the entire mass of contaminated soil into a chemically
homogeneous and durable glass microcrystalline waste form. The melt dissolves
and incorporates radionuclides and nonvolatile hazardous elements such as heavy
metals and destroys organic components. Most semivolatile organics are retained
in the melt, and the small quantity of material escaping from the melt is
captured and treated. In situ vitrification could be applied to other pits in
Waste Area Grouping 7 and "hot spots" in other burial areas on the Oak Ridge
Reservation and across the Department of Energy complex to destroy organics and
incorporate other components into the chemically homogeneous and durable glassy
product.
Direct Sampling Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry Instrumentation development is being
sponsored jointly by the Technology Development Program and Oak Ridge National
Laboratory Environmental Restoration. Fieldable multimedia direct sampling ion
trap mass spectrometry instrumentation will be developed for the rapid
determination of organic pollutants in air, water, soil, and waste. The field
instrument will have the capabilities of the laboratory-based instrument and
will be optimized for direct sampling and user convenience. Demonstration,
development, and commercialization of the instrument will also be expedited.
|
In situ vitrification has been selected as the baseline closure technology for
the waste pits and trenches at Waste Area Grouping 7. Pit 1 was selected for
the demonstration because of its limited size of 900 cubic meters (1,179 cubic
yards), and radionuclide inventory (87 curies of mixed fission products).
With the exception of technology demonstration, the formal Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act process on Waste Area
Grouping 7 has not begun. This baseline report assumes that assessments for
Waste Area Grouping 7 will be completed by FY 2025.
Waste Area Grouping 8 consists of the inactive Molten-Salt Reactor (included in
the Decontamination section of this report) and the operating High Flux Isotope
Reactor with associated tank and piping systems, six pipeline leak sites and an
old transfer line, five surface impoundments, a spoils area, and waste storage
facilities operated with a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act permit.
Low-level liquid waste and process waste from the reactor facilities are
collected in tanks and then pumped to the main plant area for storage and
treatment. Surface water and ground water from Waste Area Grouping 8 discharge
into Melton Branch. Waste Area Grouping 8 has not been investigated. However,
this report assumes that it poses a low risk, and no action is planned in the
immediate future. This baseline report assumes that assessments for Waste Area
Grouping 8 will be completed by FY 2030.
Waste Area Grouping 9 is composed of four primary contaminated sites: the
Homogeneous Reactor Experiment settling pond impoundment, two buried liquid
low-level waste collection and evaporator tanks, a septic tank, and the
Homogeneous Reactor Experiment parking lot. Although the Homogeneous Reactor
Experiment building is located in Waste Area Grouping 9, it is not included
within the scope of Waste Area Grouping 9 remediation estimate. Waste Area
Grouping 9 has not been investigated. Radionuclide constituents, inventories,
and waste volumes are known only for the Homogeneous Reactor Experiment
settling pond impoundment. However, this report assumes that Waste Area
Grouping 9 poses a lower risk than many other areas at the Oak Ridge National
Laboratory. This baseline report assumes that assessments for Waste Area
Grouping 9 will be completed by FY 2020.
Waste Area Grouping 10 consists of injection wells and subsurface grout sheets
constructed for hydrofracturing experiments conducted in the late 1950s and
l960s, followed by waste disposal operations until 1984. Although the
facilities built for these experiments, the Old Hydrofracture Facility and the
New Hydrofracture Facility, are located in Waste Area Grouping 5, they are
included in the scope of this waste area grouping.
In 1959, grout consisting of diatomaceous earth and cement was experimentally
injected into an underground shale formation to observe the fracture pattern
created in the shale and to identify potential operating problems. The site of
the second hydrofracture experiment is in Waste Area Grouping 8. This
experiment was designed to duplicate and to scale actual disposal operation;
however, radioactive tracers were used instead of actual waste. Bentonite,
cement, and water tagged with cesium-137 were used in formulating the grout.
As part of the assessment, a conceptual model is in development based on a
review of pressure, radiological, and specific conductance data compiled from
the sampling of wells associated with the Old Hydrofracture Facility.
Preliminary data indicate that three of these wells are under artesian pressure
and may be providing a pathway for contaminated deep ground water to reach
zones overlying the waste injection zone, approximately 275 meters (900 feet)
below ground surface. Additional data will be collected from these wells to
help estimate flow volumes rising in the Old Hydrofracture wells.
A Site Characterization Summary Report has been submitted to and commented on
by the appropriate regulatory agencies for the Waste Area Grouping 10 wells
that are associated with past waste disposal operations conducted at the New
Hydrofracture Facility.
The Plugging and Abandonment Options Analysis Report for Old Hydrofracture
Wells in Waste Area Grouping 10 has been completed. The report will become the
basis of a general plugging and abandonment approach for most Waste Area
Grouping 10 wells and a more focused strategy for the Old Hydrofracture
Facility wells which were characterized in FY 1994. Wellhead tapping and
sampling were initiated for 21 wells associated with the New Hydrofracture
Facility. This baseline report assumes that assessments for Waste Area Grouping
10 will be completed by FY 2030.
This baseline report assumes that assessments for all Melton Valley Area waste
area groupings will be completed by FY 2040.
REMEDIAL ACTION
Conclusions regarding restoring the main weirs in Waste Area Grouping 2 were as
follows: the Department of Energy should proceed with conventional dredging and
cleanup operations in Melton Branch and White Oak Creek as already proposed,
and it should initiate the regulatory permitting and approval process.
Six seep sites have been upgraded, and flow measurement instrumentation has
been installed in support of the Waste Area Grouping 4 engineering projects
information center project. Samples from base flow and one storm were collected
for analysis. The results will identify the sources that contribute the most to
downstream strontium90 fluxes, thus pinpointing source trenches for
subsequent corrective action.
Interim corrective measures are likely to be implemented for soils and
sediments in Waste Area Grouping 2; they have been contaminated primarily with
cesium-137 and cobalt-60 from upgradient sources and have high priority for
remediation. Unlike surface water or ground water, these soils and sediments
are relatively stationary and do represent a significant potential source of
particle-bound contaminants. Assumed interim corrective actions include a
combination of stabilization (for example, capping or adding simple erosion
barriers), removal, and soil solidification in-place vitrification. The White
Oak Creek Embayment sediment-interaction dam was completed in FY 1992 as a
time-critical removal action to prevent contaminated White Oak Creek Embayment
sediment from being transported offsite and into the Clinch River. This report
assumes that remedial actions for Waste Area Grouping 2 are scheduled between
FY 2011 to FY 2020 based on priority. However, because surface water and ground
water from all other waste area groupings feed into Waste Area Grouping 2,
remedial activities could be staged to correspond to the remediation of the
other waste area groupings. This report assumes that solid low-level waste will
be generated during the hot sediment stabilization and the final remedial
action. All waste generated from the interim and final remedial actions at
Waste Area Grouping 2 are transferred to the Waste Management program for
treatment, storage, and disposal. This baseline report assumes that remedial
actions for Waste Area Grouping 2 will be completed by FY 2020.
The Department has changed the Waste Area Grouping 4 seeps collection and
treatment project from a removal action to an interim remedial action. It has
identified four source trenches that will be grouted to isolate
strontium-90-containing waste from the shallow ground water. This report
assumes that the final remediation will be containment of the contamination in
place and treatment of the wastewater. This baseline report assumes that
remedial actions at Waste Area Grouping 4 will be completed by FY 2035.
The Waste Area Grouping 5 Seep areas C and D collection and treatment systems,
based on the use of hydrous silicate minerals (zeolite) to capture strontium,
have been constructed. The Waste Area Grouping 5 Seeps C and D
Post-Construction Report (D2) and a performance assessment for the removal
action were submitted to the Tennessee Department of Environment and
Conservation and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The Seep C treatment
system captured 81 millicuries of strontium90 during the months of April
and May, which resulted in a 21 percent average reduction at White Oak Dam. The
Seep D treatment system captured 55.6 millicuries of strontium90 during
the months of April and May, which resulted in a 14 percent reduction at White
Oak Dam.
Another early action will be taken to remove sludges from tanks at the Old
Hydrofracture Facility, but no other remediation is currently planned at this
time. This report assumes that the remedial approach for the remainder of Waste
Area Grouping 5 will include constructing a large-area cap, and hydrologic
isolation, such as cut off walls, to isolate contaminants at the Solid Waste
Storage Area 5 from ground water. This report assumes that the final
remediation will be containment of the contamination in place and treatment of
the wastewater. The Waste Management program will be responsible for treating
transuranic sludges from the tanks and low-level waste wastewater. This
baseline report assumes that remedial actions for the remainder of Waste Area
Grouping 5 will be completed in FY 2020.
Waste Area Grouping 6 has low priority for remediation because it contributes
only about two percent of the risk resulting from all the contaminants
discharged at White Oak Dam. The public rejected an earlier decision to
construct a large cap to achieve hydrologic isolation of the buried waste. This
waste area grouping will be monitored to track the total annual discharges of
tritium and strontium-90.
Construction of the Tumulus I and II closure cap was completed in October 1994.
In addition, well plugging and abandonment activities have been completed. A
total of 636 wells have been plugged and abandoned. This baseline report
assumes that No Further Action is required for Waste Area Grouping 6.
Early remedial actions for Waste Area Grouping 7 include demonstrating in situ
soil vitrification and upgrading the existing cap and surface drainage to
control contaminant migration from all pits and trenches. Remediation will
include vitrification in waste pits, waste trenches, and auger holes drilled
for the Homogeneous Reactor Experiment. Each site will then be backfilled,
capped, and a French drain will be installed.
A bench-scale in situ vitrification test was completed in which an estimated
67.5 kilograms (150 pounds) of Oak Ridge National Laboratory soil were melted.
Testing of the large-scale in situ vitrification equipment was completed in
preparation for the equipment's shipment to Oak Ridge for the Pit 1 in situ
vitrification demonstration.
Contaminated soils at the locations of underground pipeline leaks and
decontamination facility soils will be excavated, consolidated in one place,
and capped. The excavated areas will be backfilled with clean soil and
revegetated. This baseline report assumes that remedial actions for Waste Area
Grouping 7 will be completed by FY 2025.
The anticipated remedial approach for Waste Area Grouping 8 facilities calls
for stabilization of contamination in place and capping the area as
appropriate. Low-level liquid waste and process waste from the reactor
facilities are collected in tanks and then pumped to the main plant area for
storage and treatment at waste management facilities. This baseline report
assumes that remedial actions for Waste Area Grouping 8 will be completed by FY
2030.
This report assumes that the technical approach for Waste Area Grouping 9
facilities will involve stabilizing contamination in place and capping the area
as appropriate. Liquid low-level waste from the tanks will be transferred to
the Waste Management program liquid low-level waste evaporator facilities
located in the main plant area for volume reduction and concentrate storage. In
addition, a cryogenics technology demonstration is planned for winter 1996-1997
by a consortium of Environmental Restoration and Technology Development
programs, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This baseline report
assumes that remedial actions for Waste Area Grouping 9 will be completed by FY
2025.
This report assumes that Waste Area Grouping 10 remedial action approach will
involve limited plugging and abandoning injection wells, deep observation and
monitoring wells, and deep boreholes that are not suitable for recompletion and
use as ground-water monitoring wells. The civil survey of wells (with the
exception of wells in the Seep C exclusion zone) has been completed. Borehole
geophysical logging has also been completed. This baseline report assumes that
remedial actions for Waste Area Grouping 10 will be completed by FY 2035.
This baseline report assumes that 30,167 cubic meters (39,519 cubic yards) of
solid low-level radioactive waste (mostly soil) and 1,412 cubic meters (1,850
cubic yards) of low-level mixed soil, and 3,300 cubic meters (4,323 cubic
yards) of sanitary waste generated by remedial actions at the Melton Valley
Area will be left in place. This report also assumes that 2,890 cubic meters
(3,786 cubic yards) of low-level mixed waste sludges will remain in the area of
containment, and that 317,975 cubic meters (416,547 cubic yards) of low-level
radioactive ground water will treated and released onsite.
This report further assumes that approximately 219,916 cubic meters (288,090
cubic yards) of low-level radioactive liquids, ground water and wastewater
generated by remedial activities will be transferred to the Waste Management
program for treatment, storage and disposal along with roughly 716 cubic meters
(938 cubic yards) of solid low-level waste (mostly paper/cloth). This estimate
also assumes that the Waste Management program will also receive approximately
seven cubic meters of liquid (9.2 cubic yards), 28 cubic meters (36.7 cubic
yards) of solid low-level mixed waste, 12 cubic meters (15.7 cubic yards) of
liquid hazardous waste, eight cubic meters (10.5 cubic yards) of solid
hazardous waste, 493 cubic meters (646 cubic yards) of transuranic sludges,
111,654 cubic meters (146,267 cubic yards) of sanitary liquids, ground water
and wastewater, and 595 cubic meters (779 cubic yards) of solid sanitary waste.
This report assumes that remedial actions for all Melton Valley Area waste area
groupings will be completed by FY 2035.
External Areas
The External Areas include Waste Area Groupings 11 and 13. These waste area
groupings are not located on the Oak Ridge National Laboratory site, but they
are located on the Oak Ridge Reservation. Waste Area Grouping 11 is located in
the McNew Hollow area on the western edge of East Fork Ridge between State
Highway 95 (White Wing Road) and the Oak Ridge Turnpike. Waste Area Grouping 13
is a 2.4-hectare (six-acre) area located approximately 100 meters (330 feet)
north of Clinch River and 2.1 kilometers (1.3 miles) south of the intersection
of Bethel Valley Road and Tennessee State Route 95.
ASSESSMENT
Waste Area Grouping 11 consists of the White Wing Scrap Yard, a largely wooded
area of approximately 12 hectares (30 acres). The site was used to store
contaminated materials from the three Oak Ridge plants. Materials from the Oak
Ridge National Laboratory were mainly contaminated steel tanks; trucks;
earth-moving equipment; assorted large pieces of steel, stainless steel, and
aluminum; and reactor cell vessels removed during cleanup of Building 3019 at
the Laboratory. Waste was stored above-ground. Much of the stored materials and
contaminated soil was removed between 1966 and 1971; however, smaller
quantities of contaminated debris (for example, scrap metal and concrete)
remain at the site. Contaminants of concern identified to date are cesium-137,
thorium-234, uranium-235, and polychlorinated biphenyls. Numerous radioactive
areas, steel drums, and polychlorinated biphenyl-contaminated soil were
identified at Waste Area Grouping 11 during surface radiological investigations
conducted during 1989 and 1990. The amount of material or contaminated soil
remaining in the area is not known. A geophysical survey has been completed.
This baseline report assumes that assessments for Waste Area Grouping 11 will
be completed by FY 2030.
Waste Area Grouping 13 contained eight cesium-137 test plots (Cesium-137
Contaminated Field) and an experimental area for the study of runoff
(Cesium-137 Erosion/Runoff Study Area). As part of a nuclear weapons fallout
experiment in 1968, Oak Ridge scientists dispersed cesium-137 fused in silica
particles into four of the eight plots. Prior to remediation, about 5.2 curies
of activity remained. Because the water table in this area is shallow
(approximately 8 feet below the surface), it was determined that early action
was needed because the cesium-137 could migrate offsite via ground water. This
baseline report assumes that assessments for Waste Area Grouping 13 have been
completed.
The report also assumes that assessments for the all External Areas waste area
groupings will be completed by FY 2030.
REMEDIAL ACTION
At Waste Area Grouping 11, an interim action to remove contaminated surface
debris was completed under an Interim Record of Decision in FY 1994.
Approximately 450 cubic meters (589 cubic yards) of debris were removed. The
Post-construction Report was submitted to the regulators, and regulatory
approval was received for the revised report. This report assumes that a final
remedial action involving the removal of organic debris, and capping of the
site will be completed by FY 2040.
Remedial actions at Waste Area Grouping 13, which began in FY 1993 and were
completed in FY 1994, included excavating soil to a depth of 1.1 to 1.2 meters
(3.5 to 4 feet). This report assumes that No Further Action is required.
Contaminated soils currently stored in silos in Waste Area Grouping 13 are
within the scope of the Waste Management program.
This baseline report assumes that approximately 165 cubic meters (216 cubic
yards) of low-level radioactive soil will be consolidated and remain in place
at the External Areas. This report also assumes that approximately 50 cubic
meters (66 cubic yards) of paper/cloth, 400 cubic meters (524 cubic yards) of
low-level liquids/wastewater waste, and 15 cubic meters (20 cubic yards) of
sanitary waste will be transferred to the Waste Management program for
treatment and disposal.
This report assumes that remedial actions for the all External Areas waste area
groupings will be completed by FY 2040.
Ground-Water Program
The Laboratory's ground-water program focuses on investigating the extent of
contamination in deep ground water and pathways by which contaminants reach the
deep ground water. It is divided into two operable units: Bethel Valley and
Melton Valley. The program addresses contaminant transport by ground water
between and beneath contaminant sources and migration potential of
contamination related to hydrofracturing activities discussed in the Melton
Valley Area (Waste Area Grouping 10) section of this report.
ASSESSMENT
Data will be analyzed to determine the potential for ground-water inflow or
outflow beneath surface-watershed divides, the role of subsidence (karst) in
providing contaminant routes, the effects of subsurface retardation processes
on long-term contaminant migration, the depth of potential contaminant
circulation, the long-term containment of hydrofracture contaminants at depth,
and the point at which ground water leaves the Oak Ridge National Laboratory
site. The ground-water assessment will provide data on the nature and extent of
ground-water contamination and tools for evaluating future potential risks to
onsite and offsite users of ground water.
A draft summary plan has been prepared for developing and installing a
ground-water monitoring system for the hydrofracture grout sheets and west
Melton Valley. The plan describes the design and installation of a ground-water
monitoring system for the western portion of Melton Valley at Oak Ridge
National Laboratory, which will identify and quantify contaminants from waste
disposal facilities that may migrate to the Clinch River or beyond. This report
assumes that monitoring will include well sampling for various contaminants. It
also assumes that all ground-water monitoring activities will be completed by
FY 2030.
Decommissioning
The following area actions describe the decommissioning of the facilities
currently within the scope of the Environmental Restoration program.
Surveillance and monitoring is currently ongoing at those facilities to
maintain them in a safe shutdown condition until they can be decommissioned.
This includes monitoring contamination, maintaining fire protection systems,
and maintaining the structural integrity of roofs and equipment.
Decommissioning of several buildings located at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant are
also included within the scope of the Environmental Restoration program at the
Oak Ridge National Laboratory. These facilities, which previously supported
activities at the Laboratory, include the Molten-Salt Corrosion Loop, the
Coolant Salt Technology Facility, and a decontamination facility. This estimate
assumes that decommissioning activities at these facilities will be completed
by FY 2035.
The decommissioning of the facilities identified in the Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization program is also included in the Environmental
Restoration program estimate. However, these estimates were prepared using a
parametric model, and the details of the decommissioning activities are not
known. As facilities are transferred from the Nuclear Material and Facility
Stabilization program, they will be assessed and plans for decommissioning will
be formulated. This estimate assumes that a total of six scheduling transfer
units that include over 75 areas and facilities will be added to the
Environmental Restoration program through FY 2018.
MOLTEN SALT REACTOR EXPERIMENT FACILITY
The Molten Salt Reactor Experiment is located on Melton Valley Drive about 0.8
kilometers (one-half mile) south of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory main
plant. The facility consists of several buildings including Building 7503,
which contains the main reactor, reactor cells, radiator stack, the Blower
House, and the Vent House. Other buildings on the site include a one-story
office building (Building 7509), Substores (Building 7507), Field Service Shop
(Building 7516), Diesel Generator House (Building 7555), plant cooling tower
(Building 7513), the Off-Gas Filter House (Building 7511), blowers, and stack
(Building 7512).
This 8-megawatt nuclear reactor was fueled with uranium fluoride and other
salts that were heated until molten. The molten salt mixture was pumped to a
graphite moderator core, where it achieved a critical geometry. The heat
produced in the core maintained the molten state of the salt and provided
additional thermal energy that could be converted to electricity. In addition,
with certain choices of fuel salt, the neutrons produced by the nuclear
reaction could be used to convert some of the nonfissionable salt mixture to
fissionable material. This process is called nuclear breeding. During its
initial campaign, the experiment was used to prove the feasibility of molten
salt-fueled reactors. Between 1965 and 1969, the reactor was operated in a
second campaign to demonstrate the molten salt breeder concept for commercial
power generation.
The Molten Salt Reactor Experiment reactor building will be made available for
reuse following entombment of reactor and drain tank cells. Auxiliary cells
will be decontaminated for reuse. All other facilities will be dismantled and
removed. This baseline report assumes that the decommissioning will generate
asbestos debris, transuranic-contaminated metal, and transuranic-contaminated
inorganic nonmetal debris. This report also assumes that all waste associated
with these activities will be transferred to the Waste Management program.
Entombed waste at the Molten Salt Reactor site will require periodic monitoring
until FY 2020.
OLD HYDROFRACTURE FACILITY
The Old Hydrofracture Facility is located between White Oak Creek and Melton
Branch, upstream of the confluence of these two small streams. Building 7852
includes a mixer cell, an injection pump cell for the head end of the injection
pump, a wellhead cell, an engine pad (to the south), and a control room (to the
north). The three cells have 12-inch thick concrete walls that are not lined
(but are painted inside). Windows into the hot cells are of bullet proof glass,
and a mirror is installed in the mixing cell. The roof of the mixing cell is
fixed in place, but the roofs of the pump cell and well are removable. The
mixing cell contains a mixer assembly (a 5-foot diameter vertical cylinder with
conical bottom, 9 feet overall height, and a jet-type mixer attached at the
bottom) and a grout mix "tub" (3 feet in diameter and 6.5 feet high) with its
agitator. The tops of both of these vessels and the motor for the agitator are
exposed to the elements because they extend through he roof of the mixing cell.
The cell also contains valves and piping.
The pump cell contains minor equipment, including hoses and ladders. The well
cell contains a small drum-sized tank (T-8), piping, valves, and the top of the
injection well. The control room includes an elevated observation platform at
the window in the north wall of the mixing cell; it also contains several
instruments. A hoist, an air filter and blower, and three disconnected solids
conveyors from the bins are located on the roof of Building 7852. In the ground
outside the southwest corner of Building 7852 are the tops of two vertical
buried pipes in which well tools were stored.
The Old Hydrofracture Facility will be totally dismantled and removed from the
site. The decontamination and decommissioning scope does not include the
injection well, five inactive low-level liquid radioactive waste tanks and
valve pit, waste pits, or the retention pond, because they are a part of the
Waste Area Grouping 5 remedial action. The Old Hydrofracture technical approach
and schedule must be integrated with remedial action planned for Waste Area
Grouping 5 and plugging and abandonment of the Old Hydrofracture injection well
as part of Waste Area Grouping 10. This baseline report assumes that
decommissioning will generate low-level metal debris, low-level inorganic
nonmetal, asbestos debris and transuranic- contaminated metal debris. This
report also assumes that decommissioning activities at this facility will be
completed by FY 2045. It also assumes that all waste generated by these
activities will be transferred to the Waste Management program.
HOMOGENEOUS REACTOR EXPERIMENT
The Homogeneous Reactor Experiment is located in Waste Area Grouping 9 on
Melton Valley Drive. The Reactor was constructed in 1951 as the first aqueous
experimental research reactor. The reactor facility consists of the main
facility, Building 7500, and several adjacent structures. Two sets of reactor
experiments were conducted in the facility, HRE-1 and HRE-2. The major
components within the reactor cell are the reactor-vessel assembly, heat
exchangers, dump and storage tanks, and pressurizers for the fuel and blanket
systems. Other system components are pumps, radiolytic-gas combiners,
condensate storage tanks, pneumatic valve assemblies, and cold trap. The cell
also contains air-cooling equipment; the reactor thermal shield; a large
quantity of structural steel; and auxiliary water, air, steam, electrical,
refrigeration, instrument, and leak-detector lines and equipment.
Above-ground structures and ancillary facilities will be dismantled and removed
for disposal. Below-grade structures will be entombed in place. This baseline
report assumes that the decommissioning will generate asbestos debris. This
estimate assumes that all waste generated by these activities will be
transferred to the Waste Management program. Entombed waste at the Homogeneous
Reactor Experiment will require periodic monitoring until FY 2020.
SHIELDED TRANSFER TANKS FACILITY
The Shielded Transfer Tanks are five obsolete cylindrical shipping casks that
were used to transport high specific activity radioactive solutions by rail
during the 1960s and early 1970s. The tanks are currently stored at the Oak
Ridge National Laboratory. Four of the casks are Model II Shielded Transfer
Tanks that measure approximately 84 inches in height by 78 inches in diameter,
have a 1,895-liter (500-gallon) capacity stainless steel tank filled with
approximately 1,516-liters (400 gallons) of Decalso ion-exchange medium (sodium
aluminosilicate) encased in 3.5 inches of lead shielding that weighs
approximately 17,460 kilograms (38,800 pounds) when filled. One of the casks is
a Model III Shielded Transfer Tank, called the gun barrel tank because it was
constructed from a surplus naval gun, which measures 102 inches in height by 72
inches in diameter, has a 1,137-liter (300-gallon) capacity stainless steel
tank filled with approximately 758 liters (200 gallons) of Linde AW-500
ion-exchange resin encased inside the nine-inch thick walls of the gun barrel,
which weighs approximately 18,900 kilograms (42,000 pounds) when fully loaded.
The Shielded Transfer Tanks will be flushed of residual inventory and
decontaminated to permit contact dismantlement/waste segregation. This baseline
report assumes that the decommissioning will generate low-level metal debris,
low-level inorganic sludges and low-level mixed metal debris. This report also
assumes that decommissioning activities at this facility will be completed by
FY 2030. It further assumes that all waste generated by these activities will
be transferred to the Waste Management program.
OAK RIDGE RESEARCH REACTOR
The Oak Ridge Research Reactor facility is located on Hillside Avenue between
Third and Fifth streets at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It comprises
three main buildings: the reactor building, the reactor primary-water
pumphouse, and the reactor secondary-water pumphouse and cooling tower. Several
small structures located throughout the area house ancillary components. They
include the pool secondary pumphouse and cooling tower, the pressurized off-gas
filter pit, the cell-ventilation filter pit, the heat-exchanger pit, and the
primary-coolant bypass-valve pit.
The reactor building (3042) is a mill-type semi-airtight steel-framed structure
covered with insulated metal panels. It covers an area 111 feet 8 inches long
and 102 feet 10 inches wide. The floor level of the full basement is 20 feet
below the first floor level. The building has a center bay area and two low-bay
areas that run along each east-west side of the building. The building is
windowless to eliminate glare on the pool surface and to maintain airtight
integrity under emergency conditions. The basement floor space includes
facilities for pool cooling, experiment cooling, and miscellaneous pumping
operations. Also located in this space are the pool-water and reactor-water
demineralizer units, pool fill and drain pumps, electric-power distribution
center, auxiliary ventilating fans and air filter banks, subpile room, plug
storage facility, and experimental work and storage areas.
Oak Ridge Research Experimental Facilities within Building 3042 will be
dismantled and removed. The Oak Ridge Reactor Heat Exchangers will be
dismantled for disposal. Underground piping will be stabilized in place. The
Oak Ridge Reactor will be decontaminated and dismantled for complete removal.
Below-grade structures will be stabilized in place. Above-ground ancillary
facilities will be dismantled and removed; underground portions will be
stabilized in place. This baseline report assumes that decommissioning will
generate asbestos debris. This report also assumes that all waste generated by
these activities will be transferred to the Waste Management program. Entombed
waste at the reactor site will require periodic monitoring until FY 2045.
METAL RECOVERY FACILITY
The Metal Recovery Facility (Building 3505) is located in the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory complex between Third Street and Fourth Street, south of
Central Avenue. The Metal Recovery Facility was originally built in 1951 for
the recovery of uranium from fuel and waste solutions with a modified PUREX
process. During the initial processing (1952-1954), more than 100 metric tons
(80 tons) of uranium were recovered, primarily from sludge in the adjacent
gunite tanks. The facility was later found to be extremely useful for
recovering uranium, plutonium, neptunium, americium and other miscellaneous
materials from a variety of low-burnup reactor fuels and other special feed
materials.
The Metal Recovery Facility is a one-story, steel-siding structure set on a
concrete slab. It is constructed around seven above-grade processing cells
(cells A-G) and a below-grade dissolver tank pit. A series of operating
galleries surrounds the cells and pit. Personnel areas, including an office,
locker room, and shop, are located on the south end of the building. Much of
the existing building is the result of numerous building additions conducted
throughout the operating life of the facility. Hence, the building is not a
single unified structure, but rather a series of separate additions connected
together to provide the necessary confinement and shielding for plant
operations.
The cells form the major structural support for the north end of the building.
Cells A-E were constructed of cured reinforced concrete; cells F and G were
later additions made of solid-concrete-block construction. Extensions of cells
B and C above the roof line are also composed of solid concrete block. The Cell
A floor plan is approximately 19 feet by 21 feet by 17 feet high. Typical cell
inner dimensions for cells B-G are 8 feet by 9 feet by 17 feet high with an
additional 12-foot height provided for cells B and C. All of the process cells
contain stainless steel floor liners and floor drains that discharge to the
dissolver pit. An overhead stainless steel duct (exterior to the building)
connects each of the cells to the laboratory gaseous-waste-treatment system
with final exhaust out the main Oak Ridge National Laboratory stack. A
decontamination and decommissioning program was completed in the mid-1980s that
successfully removed all process equipment in the building. All in-cell
equipment and services have been removed. Cell G has been decontaminated, and
the concrete has been scrabbled to a low-contamination level.
The Metal Recovery Facility will be totally dismantled and removed from the
site. The decontamination and decommissioning scope does not include the
transfer canal, the dissolver pit, or tanks W-19 and 20. (These activities are
included within the scope of Waste Area Grouping 1.) This baseline report
assumes that decommissioning will generate low-level contaminated soils,
low-level metal debris, low-level inorganic nonmetal, low-level organic debris,
and transuranic-contaminated inorganic nonmetal debris. This report also
assumes that decommissioning activities at this facility will be completed by
FY 2030. It further assumes that all waste generated by these activities will
be transferred to the Waste Management program.
FISSION PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY FACILITY CELLS
The Fission Product Development Laboratory, or Building 3517, is located on the
Oak Ridge National Laboratory complex, south of the South Tank Farm between
Third Street and Fourth Street. Building 3517 is a concrete-block and
corrugated-aluminum-sided structure located in the Bethel Valley. The two main
building levels consist of operating areas, service areas, offices, and other
personnel access areas arranged around a large concrete cell block containing
approximately 20 separate cells. A crane bay encloses the area over the tops of
the cells. Four additional underground cells are located on the north side of
the building.
Department of Energy Environmental Restoration and Waste Management programs at
Headquarters in Washington, DC set the scope of this decontamination effort to
include only process cells 4, 5, 6, and 7 and the service tunnel. As a result,
this baseline is concerned only with equipment removal from and decontamination
of those areas. Estimates for background radiation in these inactive process
cells is in the range of 10-100 rad/hour with isolated hot spots of 100-1000
rad/hour in transfer lines or equipment. Cells 4 and 5 are stainless
steel-lined process cells 9 feet wide, 12.5 feet long, and 12 feet deep. Cells
4 and 5 contain a variety of tanks, piping, samplers, services, and
instrumentation. Cell ventilation is supplied by a 12-inch stainless steel
duct, and solution lines penetrate the north side of the cell and terminate on
the second level of the Fission Product Development Laboratory. Cell 4 was used
to process strontium-90 feed materials. Cell 5 was used as a transfer station
in the cesium-137 feed preparation and as a scavenge and sampling cell in the
cesium-137 crystallization process. Cells 6 and 7 are stainless steel-lined
process cells 9 feet wide, 12.5 feet long, and 12 feet deep. Cells 6 and 7
contain a variety of tanks, piping, samplers, services, and instrumentation.
Cell ventilation is supplied by a 12-inch stainless steel duct, and solution
lines penetrate the north side of the cell and terminate on the second level of
the Fission Product Development Laboratory. Cell 6 was used as an evaporator
cell to concentrate the mixed fission products from the feed product waste.
Cell 7 was used for the initial crystallization in the scavenging of cesium-137
from the mixed fission products feed material. The service tunnel provides the
services for Cells 1 through 8. The Fission Product Development Laboratory
inactive cells will be stripped of process equipment and decontaminated for
reuse. This report assumes that decommissioning activities at this facility
will be completed by FY 2040.
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY GRAPHITE REACTOR
The Oak Ridge National Laboratory Graphite Reactor, or Building 3001, and its
ancillary facilities are centrally located on the north side of the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory complex, south of Reactor Drive. The building is a
stainless-steel-sided, steel-roofed, mill-type building, approximately 140 feet
long, by 116 feet wide, by 70 feet high. Two-storied annexes on the east and
west sides of the reactor building provide room for laboratories, offices,
change rooms, and other facilities.
The Graphite Reactor contained an air-cooled, graphite-moderated and
-reflected, heterogeneous, natural uranium unfueled reactor. The graphite pile
has the approximate dimensions of a 24-foot cube; it sits inside a 7-foot thick
composite concrete wall and is covered by a 7-foot thick concrete roof. The
concrete foundation rests on bedrock, although the bedrock is not uniform under
all sides of the reactor. The graphite pile rests on a pedestal that is
approximately 2 feet and 6 inches higher than the ground floor of the reactor
building. The pedestal is 14-feet thick, including the 4-foot thick bottom
foundation mat. The moderator-reflector assembly is a 24-foot, by 24- foot, by
24-foot 4-inch high assembly composed of 4 square inch graphite blocks up to 50
inches long.
Suction fans in a remote fan house (Building 3003) located on top of the ridge
north of 3001 pulled cooling air for the pile into the north side of the
reactor building and circulated it through concrete duct work. The outlet duct
originally went directly to the fan house (3003) where fans expelled it to a
200-foot high vent stack. Additional facilities located in the Graphite Reactor
complex include the Stack (3018), the Filter House (300), and the Transfer
Canal.
In 1966, the Graphite Reactor site was designated a Registered National
Historic Landmark. Although correspondence concerning the registration does not
require protecting specific pieces of equipment, the Atomic Energy Commission's
instructions to the operating contractor states that the National Park Service
expects "a reasonable effort to preserve on the site the principal structure
and enough of its contents to enable the visitor to associate the site with the
historical events that gave the landmark significance. This does not mean that
the owner must retain all structures and equipment in their original condition
or necessarily refrain from using the facility or site for other purposes so
long as some appropriate evidence of the landmark remains."
The graphite reactor core will be entombed to permit continued existence of the
reactor building as a national historic landmark. The visual appearance of the
reactor loading face will be maintained. This estimate assumes that
decommissioning will generate low-level contaminated soils, low-level metal
debris, low-level inorganic nonmetal, low-level organic debris, asbestos
debris, transuranic-contaminated metal and transuranic-contaminated inorganic
nonmetal debris. This report also assumes that all waste generated by these
activities will be transferred to the Waste Management program. Entombed waste
at the Graphite Reactor will require periodic monitoring until FY 2040.
LOW-INTENSITY TEST REACTOR
The Low-Intensity Test Reactor facility has three buildings: the Low Intensity
Test Reactor Building (3005), the Demineralized Water Building (3004), and the
Low-Intensity Test Reactor Water-to-Air Heat Exchanger (3077).
This complex is located at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory between Third and
Fifth Streets, just north of the Oak Ridge Research Reactor and the Graphite
Reactor.
The 3-megawatt Low-Intensity Test Reactor was one of the early research
reactors built with highly enriched fuel, with normal water as the coolant and
moderator and beryllium as the reflector. In the center of the ground floor
plan is the reactor-core vessel, and six horizontal radial beam tubes extend
from the vessel tank through 3 to 3.4 meters (10 to 11 feet) of shielding to
the laboratory rooms. Immediately surrounding the vessel tank is a layer of
sand approximately 10.1 centimeters (4 inches) thick, supported by steel plate
on the steel grill and confined close to the vessel tank by a 0.6-centimeter
(0.25-inch) thick layer of borated plastic. An electronically controlled,
gravity-driven fast acting shutdown system ensured safety by inserting shim
rods into the reactor to shut it down. A high-speed, sensitive, automatic
server system controlled the power level. The core used Materials Testing
Reactor fuel elements and was in a vessel equipped with coolant water lines
arranged to provide a downward flow through the core. The water was circulated,
cooled, and cleaned continuously during reactor operation.
The Low-Intensity Test Reactor started operation as a 500-kilowatt training
reactor and was modified three times to increase the power level to 3 megawatts
to make it a more useful research tool. The instrumentation and controls had
two major renovations, and individual components were periodically updated. The
reactor building was also upgraded as stricter containment regulations were
promulgated.
The Low-Intensity Test Reactor and associated structures will be totally
dismantled and removed from the site. The decontamination and decommissioning
scope does not include the backfilled waste impoundments. This report assumes
that decommissioning will generate low-level contaminated soils, low-level
metal debris, low-level inorganic nonmetal, low-level organic debris,
transuranic-contaminated metal and transuranic-contaminated inorganic nonmetal
debris. This report also assumes that all waste generated by these activities
will be transferred to the Waste Management program.
FISSION PRODUCT PILOT PLANT
The Fission Product Pilot Plant is located in the Oak Ridge National Laboratory
complex near the South Tank Farm. It was operated from 1948 to 1958 but is
currently entombed within a poured-and-block concrete-shielded structure with
61- to 91-centimeters (24- to 36-inch) walls. The remains of the facility
consist of the building and an adjacent hot cell, internally divided into two
rooms with reinforced concrete walls originally 46-centimeters (18-inches)
thick and a roof 61 centimeters (24 inches) thick. All the doors to the hot
cell portion of the building are sealed with concrete block and mortary.
Additional concrete block shielding 0.61 to 0.91 meters (2- to 3-feet) thick
was added, bringing the total hot-cell wall thickness in most areas to about
1.1 to 1.4 meters (3.5 to 4.5 feet). The present overall outside dimensions of
the shielded area are 3.8 by 6.7 meters (12 feet 8 inches by 22 feet).
In 1994, a limited remote characterization was performed to obtain information
for planning for decontamination and decommissioning. General exposure rates in
the north cell run from approximately 0.2 rem per hour at 0.3 meters (1 foot)
from the access hole to 23 rem per hour at 2.4 meters (8 feet). General
exposure rates in the south cell range from approximately 25 millirem per hour
to 450 millirem per hour. In most areas of the building, exposure rates due to
the floor are higher than those due to the walls. The cells contain piping,
process vessels of various sizes, and instrumentation.
The Fission Product Pilot Plant will be totally dismantled and removed from the
site. The decontamination and decommissioning schedule must coincide with the
remediation schedule for the South Tank Farm.
HIGH-LEVEL CHEMICAL DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY
The High-Level Chemical Development Laboratory is located in the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory complex on the south side of Building 4505. It was designed
and operated as a laboratory and small-scale pilot plant for development
studies of reactor-fuel processing, separation and recovery of transuranic
materials, and separation of fission products from aqueous waste. Adequate
containment and approval to handle multigram quantities of transuranic elements
permitted this facility to demonstrate small-scale fuel processing.
The building is a doubly contained, multistory structure housing four hot
cells. The front cell face is in the operating area, which contains building
instrumentation and associated support equipment for the cells. The charging
area is located behind the cell bank. A removable door at the rear of each cell
provides access to the interior. Additional access was provided from the
penthouse above the cells through an alpha-tight maintenance glovebox and a
shielded manipulator cave. A 10-ton capacity gantry crane in the penthouse was
used to station bottom-loading carriers over slug chutes accessing three of
these cells.
Ventilation from the building and cells is routed through a below-grade filter
pit located west of Building 4507, which contains a tank designated T-30 that
was formerly used for storage of radioactive solutions from facility
operations.
The High-Level Chemical Development Laboratory will be decommissioned by
removing equipment, initial decontamination, and finally removing the building
and all related structures. The decontamination and decommissioning scope does
not include the T-30 tank. This baseline report assumes that decommissioning
will generate low-level soils, low-level metal debris, low-level inorganic
nonmetal debris, and transuranic-contaminated liquids. This report also assumes
that decommissioning activities at this facility will be complete by FY 2040.
It further assumes that all waste generated by these activities will be
transferred to the Waste Management program.
SCHEDULING TRANSFER UNITS
The Oak Ridge National Laboratory Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
program currently expects to complete post-deactivation activities at all
scheduling transfer units by FY 2018. However, only Scheduling Transfer Units
1, 2, 11, 12, 14 and 15 are currently scheduled for transfer to the
Laboratory's Environmental Restoration program. This estimate assumes that
Scheduling Transfer Unit 13 will be transferred to and included within the
scope for the Environmental Restoration program at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant.
This report assumes that decommissioning activities at all applicable
scheduling transfer units will be completed by FY 2025.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 1, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Isotopes project,
is currently expected to be transferred to the Environmental Restoration
program in FY 2001. This estimate assumes that decommissioning activities
associated with this project will be completed by FY 2009.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 2, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory "High Rankers"
project, is currently expected to be transferred to the Environmental
Restoration program in FY 2005. This estimate assumes that decommissioning
activities associated with this project will be completed by FY 2020.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 11, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory "Medium Rankers"
project, is currently expected to be transferred to the Environmental
Restoration program in FY 2011. This estimate assumes that decommissioning
activities associated with this project will be completed by FY 2015.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 12, the Biology Building 9207 at the Y-12 Plant, is
currently expected to be transferred to the Environmental Restoration program
in FY 2018. This estimate assumes that decommissioning activities associated
with this project will be completed by FY 2025.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 14, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory ALow Rankers 1"
project, is currently expected to be transferred to the Environmental
Restoration program in FY 2010. This estimate assumes that decommissioning
activities associated with this project will be completed by FY 2025.
Scheduling Transfer Unit 15, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory ALow Rankers 2"
project, is currently expected to be transferred to the Environmental
Restoration program in FY 2014. This estimate assumes that decommissioning
activities associated with this project will be completed by FY 2020.
This baseline report assumes that approximately 2,848 cubic meters (3,731 cubic
yards) of metal, 1,659 cubic meters (2,173 cubic yards) of rubble/debris and
132 cubic meters (173 cubic yards) of other solids contaminated with low-level
radioactive waste generated by decommissioning activities will be entombed in
place. This report also assumes that approximately 869 cubic meters (1,138
cubic yards) of low-level mixed rubble, 391 cubic meters (512 cubic yards) of
low-level mixed metal, and 125 cubic meters (164 cubic yards) of transuranic
and transuranic mixed metals will also be entombed. This estimate assumes that
the Environmental Restoration program will be responsible for removing and
disposing of 928 cubic meters (1,216 cubic yards) of low-level radioactive
metals and 12 cubic meters (15.7 cubic yards) of transuranic metals.
This report further assumes that the Environmental Restoration program will
transfer approximately 124 cubic meters (162 cubic yards) of low-level
contaminated asbestos, 1,830 cubic meters (2,397 cubic yards) of low-level
radioactive liquids/wastewaters, 189 cubic meters (248 cubic yards) of
low-level mixed radioactive liquids, 11 cubic meters (14.4 cubic yards) of
transuranic liquids, 2,038 cubic meters (2,670 cubic yards) of low-level
radioactive soil, 1,700 cubic meters (2,227 cubic yards) of low-level
radioactive solids, 1,253 cubic meters (1,641 cubic yards) of low-level mixed
radioactive solids, and 893 cubic meters (1,170 cubic yards) of transuranic
solids to the Waste Management program.
Environment Restoration Waste Type and Volume Table
| Environmental Restoration Projects
|
Transuranic Waste
|
1,410
|
|
Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
1,478
|
|
Low-Level Waste
|
4,754
|
|
Hazardous Waste
|
32
|
|
Sanitary Waste
|
117,644
|
Long-Term Surveillance and Monitoring
All costs associated with long-term surveillance and monitoring are included as
one line item in this estimate. Long-term surveillance and monitoring
activities will be required at the completion of the remedial actions at all
Waste Area Groupings. Long-term surveillance and monitoring at Waste Area
Grouping 6 will focus on estimating total annual discharges from flow paths at
surface-water sites where monitoring gages are present, along the ungaged
perimeter, and from shallow and deep ground-water systems. Future assessments
at this Waste Area Grouping will be based on successive annual monitoring
results. Resources will be directed to flow paths where the largest contaminant
releases occur. Long-term surveillance and monitoring activities following
remedial actions at Waste Area Groupings 8 and 9 will be required because
contamination at these areas is being stabilized in place. Monitoring
activities for these Waste Area Groupings will ensure that remedial action has
contained contamination at these areas. Costs associated with monitoring
surface and ground water for both these Waste Area Groupings are included
within the scope of remedial action. All other activities will include sampling
the existing wells and those wells to be constructed in the area. Monitoring
will ensure that the remedial actions have accomplished the intended purpose of
eliminating or containing the contamination. This report assumes that long-term
surveillance and monitoring for all Waste Area Groupings will continue until FY
2045.
Direct Program Management/Support
Program management functions provide essential administration and oversight to
the environmental restoration activities at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
This support is focused on ensuring proper identification, characterization,
remediation and revitalization of the contaminated sites. Business management
accounts for a large portion of the program management. This includes the
progress tracking, contract management, facility management, and financial
management (budget preparation and control) for Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Site projects. Project management personnel for the Lockheed Martin Energy
System, Inc. and support groups provide project management support skills as
well as coordination with the other sites in the Oak Ridge Operations Office
and the Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation.
Federal employees oversee the contractors for the Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Environmental Restoration program. However, these costs are included in the Oak
Ridge Operations Office section of this report, along with Integrating
Contractor Central Operations Office support.
There has been a concentrated effort to reduce program management costs.
Overlapping activities and management areas have been eliminated, and business
systems that required extensive personnel hours have been replaced by
electronic data bases and reporting systems.
| STAKEHOLDER INTERACTIONS
The Oak Ridge Operations Office conducted public participation activities for
the following sites in the Oak Ridge area: Oak Ridge Associated Universities
and Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge K-25 Site, Oak
Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge Reservation, Oak Ridge Reservation Offsite
Program, and the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant. The office completed a mailing to
stakeholders in May 1995, announcing the availability of the 1995 report and
offering it by mail upon request. Articles about the report appeared in the
summer and fall 1995 editions of Environmental Update, a newsletter
distributed to 43,000 stakeholders, and the summer 1995 quarterly stakeholder
public meeting featured a Baseline Environmental Management Report poster
session. Approximately 75 stakeholders attended a workshop in August 1995,
where presenters took comments and answered questions. In response to public
comments, changes were made to the narrative for the 1996 report, clarifying
terms and addressing issues such as private reuse of facilities. If you would
like more information about the report or have questions about the results,
please contact:
|
|
Public Participation
Walter Perry
(423) 576-0885 perrywn@oro.doe.gov
|
Technical Liaison
Marianne Heiskell
(423) 576-0314 heiskellmm@oro.doe.gov
|
Public Affairs
Steve Wyatt
(423) 5760887 wyattsl@oro.doe.gov
|
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Bethel Valley Area
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
2,423
|
5,659
|
3,724
|
9,490
|
4,117
|
5,174
|
1,459
|
|
| Remedial Action
|
12,381
|
6,915
|
10,271
|
2,206
|
60,638
|
17,593
|
554
|
|
| Melton Valley Area
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
9,905
|
12,724
|
16,099
|
18,118
|
16,943
|
31,224
|
12,614
|
|
| Remedial Action
|
2,213
|
6,422
|
42,034
|
25,829
|
83,711
|
4,029
|
54,306
|
|
| External Areas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,768
|
322
|
|
| Remedial Action
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
| Ground Water Program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
4,971
|
7,607
|
7,624
|
7,625
|
6,101
|
|
|
|
| Decommissioning Area Actions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
850
|
6,759
|
3,029
|
1,728
|
212
|
826
|
11,109
|
|
| Facility Decommissioning
|
16,630
|
20,153
|
65,576
|
82,147
|
14,394
|
8,465
|
19,841
|
|
| Long-Term Surveil. and Monitoring
|
5,418
|
5,506
|
5,743
|
11,868
|
7,417
|
3,475
|
2,979
|
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
8,441
|
7,869
|
7,871
|
7,871
|
6,296
|
6,296
|
6,296
|
|
| Total |
63,233
|
79,613
|
161,973
|
166,882 |
199,829
|
80,850
|
110,431
|
|
| |
2050
|
2055
|
2060
|
2065
|
| Bethel Valley Area
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,092
|
| Remedial Action
|
344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
554,510
|
| Melton Valley Area
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
4,769
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
612,026
|
| Remedial Action
|
4,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,113,305
|
| External Areas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,450
|
| Remedial Action
|
1,512
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,710
|
| Ground Water Program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,642
|
| Decommissioning Area Actions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
567
|
599
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,395
|
| Facility Decommissioning
|
34,226
|
38,486
|
16,224
|
|
|
|
|
1,580,710
|
| Long-Term Surveil. and Monitoring
|
678
|
1,717
|
287
|
|
|
|
|
225,442
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
6,296
|
708
|
708
|
|
|
|
|
293,265
|
| Total |
52,882
|
41,597
|
17,219
|
|
|
|
|
4,872,547
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Waste management activities at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory encompass
treatment, storage, disposal and related activities for multiple waste types
generated by numerous Department of Energy programs, including the Offices of
Energy Research, Nuclear Energy, Defense Programs, and Environmental Management
(nuclear material and facility stabilization and environmental restoration
activities). The objective of waste management activities at the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory is to provide support necessary for accepting and disposing
of waste generators' missions. This is accomplished by maintaining and
enhancing current capabilities to manage waste, emphasizing safe and compliant
operations, reducing legacy waste inventory, overseeing implementation of
pollution prevention programs (including waste minimization) and increasing
efficiency in all phases of operations.
Waste generated at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory includes liquid, gaseous,
and solid low-level waste; low-level mixed waste; transuranic and mixed
transuranic wastes; hazardous waste; and sanitary waste. The Waste Management
program also manages spent nuclear fuel for the Oak Ridge Reservation. Major
waste generating activities include radioisotope production and processing;
nuclear reactor operation; physical, chemical, and biological research; and
operation of analytical laboratories.
Waste streams at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory have been prioritized
considering risk of continued management, availability of treatment technology
and capability, volume of waste in storage, volume of waste generated annually,
and more generally, the ability to show tangible progress in meeting the
objectives of the Federal Facility Compliance Act. In general order of
priority, the waste streams at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory are (1) mixed
waste liquids to be treated in the Toxic Substances Control Act Incinerator;
(2) combustible solids also to be treated in the Incinerator; (3) explosive
waste; (4) compressed gases; (5) aqueous liquids to be treated in existing
facilities; (6) waste covered under existing treatment variances (that is,
toxicity-characteristic waste); and (7) Toxic Substances Control Act
Incinerator residues. Remaining waste streams, including contact- and
remote-handled transuranic solids, inorganic solids and debris,
no-radioactivity-added waste, and other waste targeted for treatment via the
broad spectrum procurement and the transportable vitrification system, were
assigned lower priorities and are not rank-ordered.
To manage this waste effectively, the Waste Management program will continue to
operate treatment, storage, and disposal facilities. These facilities include
onsite wastewater, radioactive gaseous and hazardous waste treatment
facilities; storage pads, buildings, bunkers and trenches; and low-level
disposal pads. The Waste Management program conducts requisite waste planning,
characterization, certification, collection, transport, tracking, examination,
and assay. This estimate assumes that waste management activities will continue
at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory through the FY 2070.
Two major environmental compliance initiatives are currently under way for Oak
Ridge National Laboratory waste management activities. First, low-level mixed
and transuranic waste is being managed under the requirements of a September
1995 Order by the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Environment and
Conservation resulting from submission and negotiation on the modified Site
Treatment Plan.
The second initiative implements the requirements of the 1992 Federal
Facilities Agreement with the State of Tennessee and the Environmental
Protection Agency as they pertain to active liquid low-level waste tank systems
at the Laboratory. Additional regulatory drivers for waste management
activities at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory include the Atomic Energy Act,
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air
Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the National Environmental Policy Act,
equivalent state requirements, and Department of Energy Orders.
Transportation issues associated with all waste types are addressed prior to or
during the National Environmental Policy Act planning process. Collection and
transport activities include costs for waste transportation by waste type for
onsite movement of waste and inter-site movement (that is, between the Y-12
Plant, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the K-25 Site). Treatment and/or
disposal cost estimates, as applicable, include costs for shipment offsite for
treatment and/or disposal.
The Waste Management Pollution Prevention program includes an organized,
comprehensive, and continuous effort to systematically reduce the quantity and
toxicity of all types of waste and environmental releases from Laboratory
operations. The program is designed to encourage waste reduction technology
development and to promote increased awareness of waste reduction among
Laboratory employees.
In recognition of its commitment to pollution prevention, Oak Ridge Operations
is piloting a chargeback program, which charges generators' fees based on type
and quantity of waste generated. The funds accrued through the fee system will
be set aside and made available for the implementation of waste minimization
and pollution prevention projects. This incentive will allow sites to pinpoint
the major sources of waste generation and focus attention and resources on
minimizing future waste generation and associated costs.
Major Waste Management Activity Milestones
| Spent Nuclear Fuel Operations
|
2060
|
|
Transuranic Waste Operations
|
2023
|
|
Low-Level Mixed Waste Operations
|
2060
|
|
Low-Level Waste Operations
|
2060
|
|
Hazardous Waste Operations
|
2060
|
|
Sanitary Waste Operations
|
2060
|
Major Waste Management Projects Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Gaseous Treatment System
|
1,488
|
1,590
|
1,590
|
1,590
|
1,590
|
1,590
|
1,590
|
|
| Hazardous Waste Storage Units
|
15 |
15
|
15 |
15
|
15 |
15
|
15 |
|
| Interim Waste Management Disposal Facil.
|
6,634
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LLLW Treatment System
|
22,582
|
9,950
|
5,750
|
5,750
|
5,750
|
5,750
|
5,750
|
|
| LLW Storage Units
|
1,257
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
|
| Mixed Waste Storage Units
|
2,365
|
2,418
|
2,418
|
2,418
|
2,418
|
2,418
|
2,418
|
|
| Non-Radiological Wastewater Treat. System
|
2,154
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
|
| Process Waste Treatment System
|
7,536
|
9,980
|
6,380
|
6,380
|
6,380
|
6,380
|
6,380
|
|
| TRU Storage Units
|
1,499
|
1,630
|
1,630
|
1,630
|
1,630
|
1,630
|
1,630
|
|
| |
|
| Gaseous Treatment System
|
1,590
|
1,590
|
1,590
|
1,590
|
1,590
|
1,590
|
200
|
|
| Hazardous Waste Storage Units
|
15 |
15
|
15 |
15
|
15 |
15
|
15 |
|
| Interim Waste Management Disposal Facil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LLLW Treatment System
|
5,750
|
5,750
|
5,750
|
5,750
|
5,750
|
5,750
|
210
|
|
| LLW Storage Units
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
320
|
|
| Mixed Waste Storage Units
|
2,418
|
2,418
|
2,418
|
2,418
|
2,418
|
2,418
|
260
|
|
| Non-Radiological Wastewater Treat. System
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
|
| Process Waste Treatment System
|
6,380
|
6,380
|
6,380
|
6,380
|
6,380
|
6,380
|
350
|
|
| TRU Storage Units
|
1,630
|
1,630
|
1,630
|
1,630
|
1,630
|
1,630
|
1,390
|
|
| |
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
| Gaseous Treatment System
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,840
|
| Hazardous Waste Storage Units
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
| Interim Waste Management Disposal Facil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,770
|
| LLLW Treatment System
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481,009
|
| LLW Storage Units
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,987
|
| Mixed Waste Storage Units
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,504
|
| Non-Radiological Wastewater Treat. System
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,770
|
| Process Waste Treatment System
|
350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441,981
|
| TRU Storage Units
|
1,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,193
|
| * Project costs represent a subset of total Waste
Management costs.
|
| ** Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Spent Nuclear Fuel
The Oak Ridge National Laboratory Spent Nuclear Fuel program provides safe,
reliable, and efficient management and preparation for offsite shipment of
spent nuclear fuel stored on the Oak Ridge Reservation. Currently, spent
nuclear fuel is stored in underground retrievable dry storage units,
above-grade buildings, hot cells, and wet storage basins. Onsite transportation
of some of the spent nuclear fuel is feasible with current equipment; however,
offsite transportation will require lease or procurement of shipping cask(s),
which the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has licensed and certified. The
responsibility of the Spent Nuclear Fuel program is to ensure safe storage and
handling of the spent nuclear fuel now located on the Reservation until a
facility is available for disposition of the fuel. This is accomplished by
stabilizing the fuel as required for safe storage, replacing or modifying
facilities that cannot meet current standards, providing additional capacity
for storage of newly generated fuel, examining and characterizing spent nuclear
fuel and accomplishing objectives in a compliant manner to protect the
environment and the health and safety of workers and the public.
GENERATION AND HANDLING
The total spent nuclear fuel inventory at the Laboratory consists of
approximately 0.93 metric tons of initial heavy metal. However, the High Flux
Isotope Reactor is discharging additional spent nuclear fuel at the rate of
about 120 kilograms (264.6 pounds) of heavy metal per year. This estimate
assumes that an additional amount of approximately 1.1 metric tons (1 ton) of
initial heavy metal will be added to the spent nuclear fuel inventory from this
source by FY 2000, if spent fuel from the High Flux Isotope Reactor is not
transferred to the Savannah River Site for consolidated storage.
TREATMENT
Although no facilities currently exist on the Oak Ridge Reservation for
treatment of spent nuclear fuel for offsite shipment, this estimate assumes
that facilities at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, such as Building 3525,
will be used to examine and repackage spent nuclear fuel.
STORAGE
Thirteen facilities are currently used to store spent nuclear fuel on the Oak
Ridge Reservation. These facilities include the High Flux Isotope Reactor pool,
Building 7900; Bulk Shielding Reactor pool, Building 3010; Molten Salt Reactor
Experiment, Building 7503; the Tower Shielding Reactor, and Buildings 7823A,
7827, 7829, 7920, and 3525. The total amount of heavy metal stored at these
facilities is 933 kilograms (2,060 pounds).
Improvements to current spent nuclear fuel storage facilities are also being
implemented, so that spent fuel can be consolidated into fewer storage
facilities. This will result in reduced surveillance and maintenance costs and
quicker deactivation of facilities now used for spent nuclear fuel storage. In
addition, other dry storage facilities will be modified to protect health and
the environment, resolving identified vulnerabilities. However, this estimate
assumes that the Oak Ridge Reservation, in accordance with the Record of
Decision for the Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Environmental
Impact Statement, will ship spent nuclear fuel to the Savannah River Site in FY
1996 and FY 1997, and to the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory in FY 2000
and FY 2001 for long-term storage. The report assumes that the spent nuclear
fuel destined for the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory will be repackaged
during FY 1996 and FY 1997 and stored in upgraded onsite dry storage facilities
until shipment to that site.
DISPOSAL
All disposal costs for the Oak Ridge spent nuclear fuel inventory are accounted
for at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory and the Savannah River Site.
In effect, the strategy for disposition of spent nuclear fuel for the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory is offsite shipment in accordance with the Record of
Decision. This report assumes that decommissioning of onsite spent nuclear fuel
storage facilities will be completed by FY 2060.
All disposal costs for Oak Ridge's spent nuclear fuel inventory are accounted
for at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory and the Savannah River Site.
This estimate assumes that decommissioning of onsite spent nuclear fuel storage
facilities will be completed by FY 2070.
Transuranic Mixed and Transuranic Waste
The transuranic mixed waste on the Oak Ridge Reservation is all located at the
Oak Ridge National Laboratory. This waste is divided into three primary waste
streams, remote-handled transuranic sludges, contact-handled transuranic
solids, and remote-handled transuranic solids. These waste streams are managed
according to the requirements of September 1995 State Order and modified Site
Treatment Plan, which specifies treatment technologies and schedules for the
treatment of all transuranic mixed waste.
Long-range plans call for transuranic waste to be repackaged and certified to
meet the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant waste acceptance criteria and to be
shipped to that facility for ultimate disposal. Remote-handled transuranic
sludges were ranked as one of the highest priority waste streams at the Oak
Ridge National Laboratory because of the long-term risk associated with
continued storage and because of the need to ensure that remote-handled
transuranic waste is available and ready for shipment in accordance with the
National Transuranic program and the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant waste shipping
and acceptance schedules. This estimate assumes that treatment of the
transuranic waste will rely on a combination of private sector treatment and
use of existing facilities to accelerate treatment schedules and reduce costs.
Existing facilities would provide locations for the private sector to set up
and operate treatment capability.
GENERATION AND HANDLING
The primary generators of transuranic mixed waste at the Oak Ridge National
Laboratory are the Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management
(environmental restoration activities) and the Nuclear Energy program. Waste
generated by these activities include contact-handled transuranic solids and
debris, and remote-handled transuranic sludges, solids and debris.
Buildings 7920 and 7930, known collectively as the Radiochemical Engineering
Development Center, were constructed in the mid-1960s. These facilities provide
for the protection, storage and distribution of radioactive heavy elements, and
are the principal source of both stored and newly generated
transuranic-contaminated wastes at the Laboratory. The Center accounts for
greater than 99 percent of the radioactivity in liquid low-level and
transuranic waste. Transuranic-contaminated sludges currently generated at the
Laboratory are primarily the result of operations at these facilities.
This baseline report assumes that a total of 2,400 cubic meters (3,144 cubic
yards) of solid transuranic waste will transfer to the Waste Management program
over the life cycle of this estimate. This report assumes that environmental
restoration and nuclear material and facility stabilization activities will
generate approximately 1,400 cubic meters (1,834 cubic yards) of solid
transuranic waste through FY 2045. The annual generation rate will vary with
the project schedules.
This report also assumes that Nuclear Energy activities will generate
approximately 1,000 cubic meters (1,310 cubic yards) of solid transuranic
waste, with an annual generation rate of roughly 15 cubic meters (19.7 cubic
yards) until FY 2060.
TREATMENT
The 1995 State Order and modified Site Treatment Plan govern the treatment of
transuranic mixed waste at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, both
remote-handled transuranic sludges and contact- and remote-handled transuranic
solids. The Order includes five primary requirements: (1) that remote-handled
transuranic sludge treatment begin by June 30, 2002; (2) that shipments of
stabilized remote-handled transuranic sludge to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
begin by September 30, 2002; (3) that processing of contact- and remote-handled
transuranic solids begin by October 1, 2014; (4) that shipment of processed
contact- and remote-handled transuranic solids to the Waste Isolation Pilot
Plant begin by March 31, 2015; and (5) that shipment of stabilized sludges and
processed contact- and remote-handled solids to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
be completed by September 30, 2023.
The Site Treatment Plan outlines a treatment strategy for transuranic mixed
waste that relies on a combination of approaches. These approaches include: (1)
treatment in existing facilities, (2) private sector treatment, (3) disposal in
lieu of treatment for waste with treatment variances, (4) limited development
of new onsite facilities, and (5) treatment at other Department of Energy
facilities, if required.
The compliance strategy for the remote-handled transuranic sludges is to
stabilize them and ship the final waste form to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
in Carlsbad, New Mexico. Compliance with the land disposal restrictions
treatment standards for the transuranic mixed waste will be met by using the
no-migration variance approach. Transuranic mixed waste will be processed to
meet only the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant waste acceptance criteria. Under this
strategy, the Department of Energy will continue interim storage of transuranic
mixed waste, continue preparation of waste for shipment, and then transport and
dispose of the waste in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
STORAGE
The Waste Management program has a significant volume of stored transuranic
waste, the majority of which is contained in 0.2- cubic meter (55-gallon)
stainless steel drums (contact-handled) and large diameter concrete casks and
tanks (remote-handled solids and sludges, respectively). Contact-handled
transuranic waste is stored in below-ground concrete block facilities and
above-ground buildings, while remote-handled transuranic waste is stored in
both bunkers and earthen trenches and as sludge in below-grade tanks. Storage
of inventoried and newly generated transuranic and transuranic mixed waste will
continue until treatment and disposal facilities are available.
DISPOSAL
The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant is the planned disposal site for transuranic
wastes from Oak Ridge. The Waste Management program plans to be ready to send
the first shipment of transuranic waste in FY 2002 and complete shipments by FY
2023. All disposal costs for transuranic and transuranic mixed waste are
included in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant program estimate. The costs
included in this estimate are for managing transuranic and transuranic mixed
waste, and include retrieval, characterization, treatment, and packaging to
meet the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant waste acceptance criteria.
Low-Level Mixed Waste
Low-level mixed waste stored and generated at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory
is managed according to the terms and conditions in the September 1995 State
Order and modified Site Treatment Plan. This Order specifies treatment
technologies and schedules for the treatment of all low-level mixed waste based
on information the Department of Energy provided in the Site Treatment Plan.
GENERATION AND HANDLING
The primary generator of low-level mixed waste at the Oak Ridge National
Laboratory is the Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management
(environmental restoration, and nuclear material and facility stabilization
activities); however, Energy Research program activities also generate some
low-level mixed waste at the Laboratory. This estimate assumes that the
generator is responsible for characterization and certification,
classification, packaging, collection, transport and tracking.
This baseline report assumes that a total of 3,700 cubic meters (4,847 cubic
yards) of solid low-level mixed waste will transfer to the Waste Management
program over the life cycle of this estimate. This report assumes that
environmental restoration and nuclear material and facility stabilization
activities will generate approximately 1,500 cubic meters (1,965 cubic yards)
of solid low-level mixed waste through FY 2045. The annual generation rate will
vary with the project schedules.
This report also assumes that Energy Research activities will generate
approximately 2,200 cubic meters (2,882 cubic yards) of solid low-level mixed
waste, with an annual generation rate of roughly 25 cubic meters (32.8 cubic
yards) until FY 2060. All applicable treatment and storage facilities described
below will be maintained and upgraded to allow them to remain active until FY
2060.
TREATMENT
The current treatment strategy for low-level mixed waste at the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory relies on a combination of approaches: (1) treatment in
existing facilities, (2) private sector treatment, (3) disposal in lieu of
treatment for waste with treatment variances, (4) development of limited new
onsite facilities, and (5) treatment at other Department of Energy facilities,
if required.
The September 1995 State Order and the modified Site Treatment Plan govern this
low-level mixed waste treatment strategy. The Site Treatment Plan delineates
how the Department will treat the sites' low-level mixed waste or how it will
develop technologies when they do not exist or need to be modified. For some
waste streams, plans and schedules are provided for characterizing waste for
treatment, for undertaking technology assessments, and for providing the
required plans and schedules for developing capacities and technologies. The
Site Treatment Plan applies to all mixed waste streams on the Oak Ridge
Reservation. The Site Treatment Plan fulfills the requirements of the Federal
Facility Compliance Act; establishes an enforceable framework from which the
Department will develop methods to treat all land disposal-restricted mixed
waste currently in storage and generated/received during the term of the Site
Treatment Plan; allows compliant storage of waste pending treatment and
disposal; and fulfills the requirement for a treatment methods plan, which the
Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV agreed
to in the June 1992 Federal Facility Compliance Agreement.
The Site Treatment Plan calls for treatment of the following mixed waste
generated and/or stored at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory by FY 2008 or
earlier: mixed waste liquids, combustible solids, explosive waste, compressed
gases, aqueous liquids, and waste covered under existing variances. Schedules
for treating the remaining mixed waste streams are extended to approximately FY
2020.
Treatment options use existing or modified onsite facilities and private sector
capabilities to treat the waste streams for which technology exists. Five
technology-based waste groups have been identified: incineration,
stabilization, neutralization, precipitation, and chemical oxidation. Aqueous
waste streams will be treated in existing onsite wastewater treatment
facilities and may require some nominal pre-treatment, supplemental
characterization, and/or additional handling/bulking. Neutralization will be
used to treat corrosive waste. Precipitation will be used to treat aqueous
waste containing metals. Chemical oxidation will be used to treat
cyanide-bearing waste. Incineration is the required treatment technology for
approximately 40 waste streams on the Oak Ridge Reservation, including bulked
organic liquids, organically contaminated aqueous waste, scintillation fluids,
organic homogeneous solids, and organic debris. Stabilization will be
accomplished primarily through the use of private sector capabilities. Several
large and small volume sludge streams are targeted for treatment through the
private sector, with treatment technology to be determined by the private
sector.
STORAGE
The Building 7654 Long-term Hazardous Waste Storage Facility is used to store
low-level mixed waste, the majority of which comprises bulk scintillation
fluids, scintillation vials, and others. The 208-liter (55-gallon) drums
contain the majority of mixed waste transported to Building 7654. Containers
smaller than 114 liters (30 gallons) are either combined with compatible waste
or lab-packed. The maximum inventory in storage at any time is 300 drums; total
capacity is 62,535 liters (16,500 gallons). Double-stacking of drums is
employed to maintain adequate aisle space. Pallets are placed between the
double layers of drums.
Waste stored at the Building 7507, Mixed Waste Storage Facility, is similar to
that stored in Building 7654; it consists of scintillation counting vials
containing organic and inorganic mixtures contaminated with low levels of
radioactivity. Toluene and xylene are regular constituents of the mixtures.
Other stored waste includes organic waste, carcinogenic waste,
mercury-contaminated solid waste, waste oils, waste solvents, and other process
waste. The total capacity of the pad is 83,380 liters (22,000 gallons), or 400
208-liter (55-gallon) drums.
Waste currently stored in the Building 7823 Mixed Waste Storage Facility
includes mixed waste oils, solvents, and other process waste. This is a
single-level, semi-underground building with a concrete floor. The facility
will hold approximately 1,100 0.2- cubic meter (55-gallon) drums. Tank 7830a
located near the New Hydrofracture Facility inside Building 7830a provides
storage for mixed waste oils contaminated with spent solvents, metals, and
radiological constituents. The tank has a nominal capacity of 18,950 liters
(5,000 gallons). Some waste generated at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory is
transferred to the K-25 Site for storage before it is sent to disposal.
DISPOSAL
The current strategy for disposing of mixed waste treatment residues is to
dispose of all waste at Envirocare of Utah. The option of an onsite disposal
capability for legacy waste is currently being evaluated in concert with the
Environmental Restoration program. Evaluation continues on the feasibility of a
low-level mixed and a low-level legacy waste disposal unit located on the Oak
Ridge Reservation and regulated under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act.
Commercial disposal is the planned option for low-level mixed waste treatment
residues and low-level mixed waste with treatment variances that meet treatment
standards. The feasibility of a legacy low-level mixed and a low-level waste
disposal unit is being evaluated in collaboration with the Environmental
Restoration program.
Low-Level Waste
Low-level waste generated and managed at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory
consists primarily of mixed fission products with small quantities of naturally
occurring and accelerator-produced radioactive material generated and managed
as low-level waste. The strategy for managing low-level waste consists of
collection and onsite treatment for radioactive wastewater and gaseous waste;
implementation of activities to comply with Federal Facility Agreement
requirements applicable to Oak Ridge National Laboratory liquid waste systems;
and a combination of onsite storage, private sector treatment and onsite or
offsite disposal for solid low-level waste. Waste stream-specific
characteristics (for example, radionuclide content and concentration and waste
matrix) dictate the combination of options to be employed for solid low-level
waste management.
The current strategy for managing Oak Ridge National Laboratory solid low-level
waste includes: minimized generation through segregation, process control or
reuse/recycle; continued onsite disposal at the Laboratory for waste certified
as meeting onsite disposal performance assessment requirements; use of
commercial vendors where cost effective for waste volume reduction and
treatment prior to long-term storage or disposal; storage on the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory for waste not certified to meet onsite disposal performance
objectives while awaiting offsite disposal; and use of offsite disposal for
stored inventory and future generation.
GENERATION AND HANDLING
The primary generator of low-level waste at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory
is the Department of Energy's Office of Energy Research; however, environmental
restoration and nuclear material and facility stabilization activities also
generate some low-level waste at the Laboratory. This estimate assumes that all
costs associated with the characterization and certification, classification,
packaging, collection, transport and tracking of low-level waste are the
responsibility of the generator.
This baseline report assumes that a total of 100,000 cubic meters (131,000
cubic yards) of solid low-level waste will transfer to the Waste Management
program over the life cycle of this estimate. This report assumes that
environmental restoration and nuclear material and facility stabilization
activities will generate approximately 5,900 cubic meters (1,572 cubic yards)
of solid low-level waste through FY 2045. The annual generation rate will vary
with the project schedules.
This report also assumes that Energy Research activities will generate
approximately 94,100 cubic meters (123,271 cubic yards) of solid low-level
waste, with an annual generation rate of roughly 1,200 cubic meters (1,572
cubic yards) until FY 2060. All applicable storage facilities described below
will be maintained and upgraded to allow them to remain active until FY 2060.
TREATMENT
The liquid low-level waste system at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory consists
of collection tanks and piping, evaporator facilities, evaporator storage
tanks, and Melton Valley storage tanks. The waste accumulated in the collection
tanks is transferred via underground piping to the Liquid Low-Level Waste
Evaporator Facility where it is concentrated to an average volume reduction
factor of 30:1. The concentrated waste is then transferred to one of several
storage tanks, and the evaporator condensate is transferred to the Process
Waste Treatment Plant for further treatment. Portions of the liquid low-level
waste system require upgrading or replacement to meet requirements of the Oak
Ridge Federal Facilities Agreement. Projects have been implemented to provide
underground tank and pipeline replacement at key locations across Oak Ridge
National Laboratory. Upgrades are scheduled to be completed by FY 2005.
The second liquid radioactive waste treatment system at Oak Ridge National
Laboratory is the Process Waste System. The processing steps include softening,
clarification, filtration, and ion exchange. The concentrated radioactive
material resulting from the regeneration of the Process Waste Treatment Plant
ion exchange columns is evaporated and transferred to the Liquid Low-Level
Waste System. Waste management operates a radioactive gaseous waste system that
provides negative pressure containment, filtration, scrubbing and monitored
discharge for radioactively contaminated ventilation collected from hot cells
and process vessels.
Offsite commercial treatment facilities reduce the volume of a portion of Oak
Ridge National Laboratory's contact-handled solid low-level radioactive waste.
Commercial services are available for supercompaction, incineration, and metal
melting. Commercial vendors treat ion exchange resins and periodically solidify
liquid low-level radioactive waste concentrates at the Laboratory. Additional
treatment facilities are not currently planned for the Oak Ridge National
Laboratory.
STORAGE
In 1986, the Waste Management program began interim storage of some
contact-handled solid low-level waste at the Oak Ridge K-25 Site because of the
limited disposal capacity remaining in Solid Waste Storage Area 6. To date,
approximately 2,500 drums of solid low-level waste and 125 boxes from Oak Ridge
National Laboratory are being stored at the K-25 Site. The Waste Management
program has constructed several portable storage facilities for onsite interim
storage of the low-activity waste streams, which include contaminated soils,
process wastewater sludge, biological waste, and very low-activity waste. This
estimate assumes that the Waste Management program will be responsible for
storage of these low-activity waste streams until new disposal facilities on
the Oak Ridge Reservation are available, or offsite disposal is accessed.
The Waste Management program is also storing remote-handled solid low-level
waste that does not meet the waste acceptance criteria for onsite disposal
facilities. Remote-handled low-level waste is stored in above- and below-grade
storage facilities. Above-grade concrete cask storage areas are used to store
solidified supernatants from the liquid low-level waste evaporator concentrate
storage tanks. Below-grade storage wells are used to store irradiated hardware,
sealed radiation sources, and other solid low-level waste that does not meet
the onsite disposal waste acceptance criteria. Cask storage areas are used to
store irradiated hardware that is too large for the below-grade storage wells.
DISPOSAL
The current strategy for disposal at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory varies
according to isotopic content and radionuclide concentration of the waste and
the specific disposal facility and technology. The strategy to ensure disposal
capability for all low-level waste generated at the Oak Ridge National
Laboratory relies on a combination of onsite and offsite facilities. Onsite
disposal of low-level waste is primarily limited to mixed fission product waste
generated at the Laboratory. This waste is currently being disposed of at the
Interim Waste Management Facility (an above-ground engineered disposal
facility) which began operations in FY 1991. This report assumes that at
current and projected generation rates, by using aggressive volume reduction
technologies, this facility will reach full capacity by FY 2008. Although plans
for a disposal facility are currently being pursued, this report assumes that
the long-range disposal strategy for low-level waste will be offsite disposal
at the Nevada Test Site.
Hazardous Waste
The strategy for managing hazardous waste at Oak Ridge National Laboratory
consists of reducing waste generation; obtaining no-added-radioactivity
determinations to dispose of current inventories and newly generated waste as
hazardous using commercial sector capabilities; and continued treatment in
existing onsite facilities.
GENERATION AND HANDLING
The primary generator of hazardous waste at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory
is the Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (environmental
restoration and nuclear material and facility stabilization activities);
however, Energy Research program activities also generate some hazardous waste
at the Laboratory. This estimate assumes that all costs associated with the
characterization and certification, classification, packaging, collection,
transport and tracking of low-level waste are the responsibility of the
generator.
This baseline report assumes that a total of 360 cubic meters (472 cubic yards)
of solid low-level waste will transfer to the Waste Management program over the
life cycle of this estimate. This report assumes that environmental restoration
and nuclear material and facility stabilization activities will generate
approximately 300 cubic meters (393 cubic yards) of solid low-level waste
through FY 2045. The annual generation rate will vary with the project
schedules.
This report also assumes that Energy Research activities will generate
approximately 60 cubic meters (78.6 cubic yards) of solid low-level waste, with
an annual generation rate of approximately 0.8 cubic meters (1.05 cubic yards)
until FY 2060.
TREATMENT
The Nonradiological Wastewater Treatment Plant is operated under Section 402 of
the Clean Water Act and is exempt from Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
permit requirements for treatment, storage, and disposal facilities. In the
past, bulk nonnitrate acids were neutralized at the Nonradiological Wastewater
Treatment Plant and discharged to White Oak Creek via the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System permit. The Nonradiological Wastewater Treatment
Plant is planned for use in the future for corrosives in storage. Many
generators now neutralize corrosives to prevent generation of hazardous waste.
Other products, such as antifreeze and nonhazardous scintillation fluids, are
currently being treated at the Sanitary Wastewater Treatment Plant. These items
were previously sent to hazardous waste operators and disposed of offsite.
However, onsite treatment represents a significant savings over disposal costs.
Although limited, essential onsite hazardous waste treatment capability exists
at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Explosive, shock-sensitive and reactive
waste is treated at the Chemical Detonation Facility. Commercial offsite
treatment with disposal is planned for the remaining waste.
STORAGE
Storage facilities at Oak Ridge National Laboratory are used to store: (1) bulk
waste chemicals that have been packaged and labeled in accordance with
Department of Transportation requirements; (2) small containers of laboratory
chemicals and related wastes; and (3) polychlorinated biphenyls and
polychlorinated biphenyl-contaminated liquids and solids. Waste is
characterized as ignitable, corrosive, extraction procedure toxic, oxidizers,
poisons, and polychlorinated biphenyls or polychlorinated
biphenyl-contaminated.
DISPOSAL
No onsite hazardous waste disposal capability exists at the Oak Ridge National
Laboratory. Hazardous waste will be disposed of in conjunction with commercial
treatment contracts.
Sanitary Waste
The strategy for managing sanitary waste at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory
constitutes the use of both onsite and offsite commercial facilities including
the Anderson County Landfill and the Y-12 Sanitary Landfill. Waste recycle
opportunities will also continue to be pursued to reduce the quantity of waste
requiring disposal and to extend the life of the disposal facilities. The Waste
Management program has no current or planned activities associated with the
storage of solid sanitary and industrial waste at the Oak Ridge National
Laboratory.
GENERATION AND HANDLING
The primary generator of sanitary waste at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory is
the Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (environmental
restoration activities); however, Energy Research program activities also
generate some sanitary waste at the Laboratory.
This baseline report assumes that a total of 158,000 cubic meters (206,980
cubic yards) of sanitary waste will transfer to the Waste Management program
over the life cycle of this estimate. This report assumes that environmental
restoration and nuclear material and facility stabilization activities will
generate approximately 115,000 cubic meters (150,650 cubic yards) of sanitary
waste (mostly liquid) through FY 2045. The annual generation rate will vary
with the project schedules.
This report also assumes that Energy Research activities will generate
approximately 43,000 cubic meters (56,330 cubic yards) of solid low-level
waste, with an annual generation rate of roughly 1,700 cubic meters (2,227
cubic yards) until FY 2021.
DISPOSAL
Industrial solid waste and construction demolition debris generated at the Oak
Ridge National Laboratory, and waste containing less than 35 picocuries per
gram of radioactivity (total uranium) are transported and disposed of at the
Y-12 Industrial Landfills in accordance with the state operating permit. At
current generation rates, the existing landfill has a life expectancy of
greater than 50 years. All sanitary and industrial liquid waste is discharged
to White Oak Creek per the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit requirements.
Offsite disposal is limited to specific waste streams that are generated in
areas known to be noncontaminated. This waste is disposed of in the Anderson
County Landfill.
Direct Program Management/Support
Direct program support activities for the Waste Management program encompass
activities that are necessary for, but are not directly a part of, treatment,
storage, disposal, or related operations. Program support activities include
Department of Energy and Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. program
management; oversight of pollution prevention programs; general safety, health
and environmental compliance oversight; utilities for general support
facilities; taxes; and procurement for general support activities; and
establishment and maintenance of waste tracking systems. The level of general
program support is proportional to treatment, storage, disposal, and related
activities and reduces or increases as treatment, storage, disposal, and
related activities decrease or increase.
Waste Management Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Spent Nuclear Fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
2,780
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Transuranic Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
24,614
|
21,600
|
17,425
|
23,825
|
|
326
|
814
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
2,571
|
2,760
|
2,760
|
2,760
|
2,760
|
2,760
|
2,760
|
|
| Transuranic Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
2,170
|
8,430
|
7,771
|
8,937
|
2,440
|
2,360
|
|
|
| Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
93
|
147
|
670
|
2,073
|
303
|
95
|
95
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
3,019
|
2,428
|
2,428
|
2,428
|
2,428
|
2,428
|
2,428
|
|
| Disposal |
50
|
11
|
167
|
524
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
|
| Low-Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
19,968
|
17,920
|
13,720
|
13,720
|
13,720
|
13,720
|
13,720
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
6,265
|
2,455
|
2,455
|
2,455
|
2,455
|
2,455
|
2,455
|
|
| Disposal |
11,180
|
7,293
|
6,584
|
7,080
|
7,726
|
6,367
|
6,253
|
|
| Hazardous Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
69
|
36
|
68
|
30
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
15 |
15
|
15 |
15
|
15 |
15
|
15 |
|
| Sanitary Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
2,795
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
|
| Disposal |
5
|
10
|
8
|
4
|
14
|
|
|
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
27,345
|
25,914
|
25,368
|
14,408
|
29,308
|
17,116
|
18,470
|
|
| Total |
102,940
|
92,318
|
81,739
|
80,559
|
63,481
|
49,953
|
49,322
|
|
| |
|
| Spent Nuclear Fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Transuranic Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
814
|
814
|
814
|
814
|
814
|
814
|
814
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
2,760
|
2,760
|
2,760
|
2,760
|
2,760
|
2,760
|
2,520
|
|
| Transuranic Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
95
|
95
|
95
|
95
|
95
|
95
|
95
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
2,428
|
2,428
|
2,428
|
2,428
|
2,428
|
2,428
|
270
|
|
| Disposal |
9
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
|
| Low-Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
13,720
|
13,720
|
13,720
|
13,720
|
13,720
|
13,720
|
760
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
2,455
|
2,455
|
2,455
|
2,455
|
2,455
|
2,455
|
1,450
|
|
| Disposal |
6,253
|
6,253
|
6,253
|
6,253
|
6,253
|
6,253
|
6,253
|
|
| Hazardous Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
15 |
15
|
15 |
15
|
15 |
15
|
15 |
|
| Sanitary Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
2,300
|
|
| Disposal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
14,345
|
14,713
|
14,713
|
14,713
|
14,713
|
14,713
|
14,713
|
|
| Total |
45,197
|
45,565
|
45,565
|
45,565
|
45,565
|
45,565
|
29,202
|
|
(This table is continued on the following page.)
Waste Management Activities Cost Estimate - Continued
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
| Spent Nuclear Fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,900
|
| Transuranic Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475,587
|
| Storage and Handling
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,657
|
| Transuranic Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,538
|
| Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,184
|
| Storage and Handling
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,474
|
| Disposal |
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,250
|
| Low-Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
951,641
|
| Storage and Handling
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,125
|
| Disposal |
6,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512,536
|
| Hazardous Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,160
|
| Storage and Handling
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
| Sanitary Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment |
2,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,976
|
| Disposal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
14,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,376,324
|
| Total |
29,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,258,677
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
DESCRIPTION OF PERSONNEL
Current Composition
The employees working for Lockheed Martin Energy Systems are engineers,
scientists, technicians, managers, construction crafts personnel, operators,
laborers and general workers, administrative professionals, general
administrators, and managers. Because there are several waste operations
facilities at the Laboratory, there are more operators than at other
facilities. This work force is expected to remain relatively stable over the
next several years. In addition, the Department of Energy contracts to Jacobs
Engineering and Foster Wheeler, both of whom predominantly employ scientists
and engineers, and MK-Ferguson, the construction contractor, who employs
construction crafts personnel, operators, and engineers. Lockheed Martin
subcontracts to a variety of engineering, consulting, and site investigation
firms including several small disadvantaged businesses under the Small Business
Administration "8a" set aside program. The federal Full-Time-Equivalents who
provide support and oversee the Environmental Management work at the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory are included in the Oak Ridge Operations Office section of
this report. The following table presents the contractor work force by skill
mix.
Full-Time Equivalent Composition Table*
* The Projections for Full-Time Equivalent employees are based on FY 1996
planning baselines (see Reader's Guide).
Site Management Structure
Lockheed Martin Energy Systems is the integrating contractor for the
Environmental Management activities at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory for
the Department of Energy. The company integrates its own work activities as
well as those of Department of Energy prime contractors for technical support,
engineering and construction, and its own subcontractors for site remedial
investigation work. Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation was recently
formed to contract as the managing and operation contractor of the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory for the Department of Energy. Lockheed Martin Energy
Systems is entering into a Memorandum of Understanding with Lockheed Martin
Energy Research Corporation that will indicate the cooperation and roles and
responsibilities between the two contractual entities.
The Lockheed Martin Energy Systems contract has recently been extended for an
additional two years, through March 1998. In that contract, Lockheed Martin has
committed to incentive contracting as a part of contract reform. An increasing
number of the Lockheed Martin-managed activities will be task order contracts.
The primary features of these task order projects are as follows: contracting
companies function as a team; the Department of Energy and the team negotiate
terms of the project; the team collects an incentive fee for finishing under
budget, but absorbs a percentage of any cost overrun; the Department of Energy
shares risk of cost overruns; and streamlined bid specifications simplify the
process and reduce cost estimates.
| CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES
If you would like more information about performing work for the Department of
Energy's Environmental Management program at this site, please contact:
|
Major Procurements
Peter Dayton
Director
Procurements and Contracts Division., AD-42
Oak Ridge Operations Office
P.O. Box 2001
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8755
p: (423) 576-0795
: (423) 576-9189
|
Small Business Procurements
Chiquita Young
Procurements and Contracts Division., AD-42 United States Department of Energy
Oak Ridge Operations Office
P.O. Box 2001
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8755
p: (423) 576-5657
f: (423) 576-9189
|
Future Full-Time Equivalent Needs
According to this estimate, the mix of Full-Time Equivalents supported by
Environmental Management for the Oak Ridge National Laboratory will remain
fairly stable. Remedial action and waste management activities will continue to
support Environmental Restoration. However, as the decommissioning of
facilities and larger scale remediation begins, and the buildings are cleaned
and demolished, heavy equipment operators, laborers, health and safety
personnel, and decontamination personnel will be needed.
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following tables present estimated funding information for the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory.
Defense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
15,498
|
18,874
|
29,675
|
52,677
|
117,532 |
21,735
|
11,250
|
|
| Waste Management
|
63,817
|
57,031
|
43,619
|
43,029
|
31,740
|
25,139
|
25,068
|
|
| Total |
79,315
|
75,905
|
73,294
|
95,706
|
149,272
|
46,875
|
36,318
|
|
| |
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
10,137
|
9,581
|
4,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Waste Management
|
23,006
|
23,190
|
23,190
|
23,190
|
23,190
|
23,190
|
15,008
|
|
| Total |
33,143
|
32,771
|
27,239
|
23,190
|
23,190
|
23,190
|
15,008
|
|
| |
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,455,045
|
| Waste Management
|
15,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,292,067
|
| Total |
15,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,747,113
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Nondefense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of
Constant 1996 Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
11,875
|
8,854
|
10,886
|
9,048
|
3,448
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
47,735
|
60,739
|
132,298
|
114,205
|
82,298
|
59,115
|
99,181
|
|
| Waste Management
|
39,123
|
35,287
|
38,119
|
37,529
|
31,740
|
24,814
|
24,254
|
|
| Total |
98,732
|
104,881
|
181,304
|
160,783 |
117,486
|
83,929
|
123,435
|
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
42,745
|
32,015
|
13,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Waste Management
|
22,191
|
22,375
|
22,375
|
22,375
|
22,375
|
22,375
|
14,194
|
|
| Total |
64,937
|
54,390
|
35,544
|
22,375
|
22,375
|
22,375
|
14,194
|
|
| |
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,559
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,417,502
|
| Waste Management
|
14,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,966,610
|
| Total |
14,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,604,671
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual
costs in constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS ESTIMATE
The FY 1996 life-cycle cost estimate for the Oak Ridge National Laboratory is
17 percent ($1.8 billion) lower than the FY 1995 estimate. Most of this
reduction is the result of lower estimated costs for the Waste Management and
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization programs.
As with the FY 1995 Baseline Environmental Management Report, parametric models
were used to project life-cycle costs for most Nuclear Material and Facility
Stabilization program activities. The baseline cost estimate was used for the
Isotopes Facility Deactivation Project. This resulted in a 25 percent lower
life-cycle cost estimate. Also, the FY 1995 Baseline Environmental Management
Report contained some facilities that are currently in the Environmental
Restoration baseline estimate. These facilities have been deleted from the FY
1996 Nuclear Materials and Facility Stabilization program estimate.
The FY 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report estimate for Environmental
Restoration program activities did not change substantially from the FY 1995
report. This report reflects essentially the same scope for activities, with
the exception of decommissioning of facilities identified by the Nuclear
Materials and Facility Stabilization program. This provided an additional 70
facilities to the program. In addition, the direct program management/support
costs were included within the scope of the program estimate.
Comparison Table
| |
Thousands of Dollars
|
|
| Nuclear Mat. & Fac. Stab.
|
307,385 |
13,656
|
220,559 |
73,170
|
25 |
| Environmental Restoration
|
4,434,247 |
67,700
|
4,886,699 |
520,152
|
12 |
| Waste Management |
4,834,533
|
116,500 |
4,258,677
|
459,356 |
10
|
| Landlord |
-
|
- |
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Program Management 2
|
1,842,801 |
6,800
|
- |
-
|
-
|
| Site Total |
11,418,966
|
200,200 |
9,365,936
|
1,852,830 |
17
|
1 The FY 1995 life-cycle and annual costs
are provided to determine the corrected FY 1995 cost.
2 Program Management was reported in an independent cost table last year, but
is reported as a line item in the relevant program (Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization, Environmental Restoration, and Waste Management)
activity cost estimate tables for the FY 1996 Baseline Report.
|
The 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report estimates for Waste
Management program activities at Oak Ridge National Laboratory now include:
proportionate shares of centralized mixed waste program costs (previously all
reported under K-25 Site, reflecting how funds are managed); decommissioning
costs for currently operating and planned Waste Management-owned facilities;
revised methods of treatment for transuranic and mixed transuranic waste;
increased use of offsite facilities for low-level and low-level mixed waste
disposal; and reduced waste projections from the Environmental Restoration and
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization programs. Collectively, these
changes reduced the estimated costs for the Waste Management program by
approximately 10 percent.
|
 |