|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
The Ohio Field Office is located in Miamisburg, Ohio.
Estimated Site Total
| (Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
|
|
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
4,104
|
4,341
|
4,471
|
6,038
|
5,092
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
16,827
|
22,531
|
23,207
|
24,938
|
25,479
|
|
| Waste Management
|
7,070
|
2,966
|
3,055
|
3,213
|
3,410
|
|
| Total
|
28,001
|
29,839
|
30,733
|
34,189
|
33,981
|
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
23,980
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
33,159
|
|
|
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
4,517
|
3,882
|
2,699
|
6,018
|
3,475
|
2,697
|
2,697
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
21,207
|
16,632
|
1,354
|
1,545
|
1,156
|
|
|
|
| Waste Management
|
3,760
|
2,738
|
2,030
|
2,340
|
2,700
|
3,130
|
|
|
| Total
|
29,484
|
23,252
|
6,084
|
9,903
|
7,331
|
5,827
|
2,697
|
|
| |
2040
|
2045
|
2050
|
2055
|
2060
|
2065
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,318
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,475
|
| Waste Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,490
|
| Total
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428,283
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
Although it is relatively new, the Department of Energy's Ohio Field Office
shares a long history with the U.S. Defense weapons complex, the residents of
Ohio, and most recently, the residents of New York. The Ohio Field Office
concept was launched following an October 1993 realignment meeting at
Headquarters.
The mission of the Ohio Field Office is to provide administrative, financial,
and technical support to the Ashtabula, Columbus, Fernald, Miamisburg, and West
Valley Area Offices, which will allow them to complete environmental
restoration, waste management, and economic development activities supporting
the Department's goals. These programmatic activities are conducted in a manner
that ensures safety, social and fiscal responsibility, cost- effectiveness,
environmental responsibility, physical security, and stakeholder involvement.
FUTURE USE
The Environmental Management program management activities are expected to
remain at the Ohio Field Office, at least through FY 2005. Most facilities at
the Mound site will be transitioned to the city or to private ownership.
Complete remediation is expected at the Fernald site in FY 2019; the West
Valley site will be returned to the State of New York, and Reactive Metals,
Inc. and Battelle Columbus Laboratories will be returned to the respective
contractor owners once remediation and decommissioning are complete.
NUCLEAR MATERIAL AND FACILITY STABILIZATION
Activities associated with the Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
program support site planning activities such as surplus facilities
assessments, facility transfers, safe shutdowns, and site development.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
Activities associated with the Environmental Restoration program support
stabilizing contaminated soil; pumping, treating, and containing ground water;
decontaminating, decommissioning, and demolishing process buildings; and
exhuming sludge and buried drums.
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Activities associated with the Waste Management program support designing,
constructing, and operating a variety of treatment facilities to prepare waste
for disposal and facilities for safe storage of the various waste streams.
DESCRIPTION OF PERSONNEL
Current Composition
The current FY 1996 federal Full-Time Equivalent allocation of 118 is presented
in the table below. As an oversight office, the Ohio Field Office specialities
include management, general administration, engineers, scientists, and
administrative personnel, who support the Waste Management programs,
Environmental Restoration and Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization.
These numbers will remain steady during the next few years but are expected to
decline over the next ten years.
Full-Time Equivalent Composition Table*
* The Projections for Full-Time Equivalent employees are based on FY 1996
planning baselines (see Reader's Guide).
Site Management Structure
The Ohio Field Office staff serves as an Office of Support. The Office was
established to provide centralized services to multiple, geographically
dispersed Area Offices. When initially established in 1994, three Area Offices
were under Ohio Field Office cognizance. One Area Office was added in 1995 and
another in 1996. The services provided include general management, Chief
Financial Officer functions, project control direction, compliance and safety
and common administration support such as personnel and contracting. From its
inception, the Office has focused on decreasing the cost of all federal and
contractor support activities to increase the funding available for completing
direct mission work. Ensuring safety is the only higher priority throughout the
Ohio Field Office and the Area Offices within its management control. Ohio also
has a successful record of teaming with its stakeholders who have been
instrumental in achieving many major successes, including the ability of the
sites to sustain scope through productivity enhancements. Regulators have been
deeply involved in the sites' development and implementation of innovative
approaches, which accelerate mission completion and facilitate transfer of the
sites into the private sector.
Future Full-Time Equivalent Needs
The level and mix of Full-Time Equivalents at the Ohio Field Office is expected
to remain relatively static during the near term. Given its vision of
completing cleanup activities and making all five sites available for economic
development within the next decade, the goal is to eliminate the necessity for
Department of Energy presence. Although this is a significant goal and the
pressures on the federal staff are intense, management and employees are fully
committed to achieving the vision with no increase in Full-Time Equivalents.
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following tables present estimated funding information for the Ohio Field
Office.
Defense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
4,465
|
3,837
|
2,668
|
5,949
|
3,435
|
2,666
|
2,666
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
21,207
|
16,632
|
1,354
|
1,545
|
1,156
|
|
|
|
| Total
|
25,672
|
20,470
|
4,023
|
7,494
|
4,591
|
2,666
|
2,666
|
|
| |
2040
|
2045
|
2050
|
2055
|
2060
|
2065
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,762
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,475
|
| Total
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343,237
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Nondefense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
52
|
45
|
31
|
69
|
40
|
31
|
31
|
|
| Waste Management
|
3,760
|
2,738
|
2,030
|
2,340
|
2,700
|
3,130
|
|
|
| Total
|
3,812
|
2,783
|
2,061
|
2,409
|
2,740
|
3,161
|
31
|
|
| |
2040
|
2045
|
2050
|
2055
|
2060
|
2065
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
| Waste Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,490
|
| Total
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,046
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
|
 |