|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
The New Brunswick Site is a 2.3 hectare (5.6acre) property in New
Brunswick, New Jersey that is owned by the Department of Energy. Located
in an industrialized area less than 3.2 kilometers (2 miles) from downtown
New Brunswick, it is bordered by Jersey Avenue on the north, an Amtrak railway
on the south, and industrial development on the east and west.
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
| (Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
1999
|
2000
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
5,215
|
465
|
132
|
|
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
5,494
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
515
|
|
|
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2005
|
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,790
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
From 1948 through 1977, the Department of Energy and its predecessor agencies
used the New Brunswick Site as a general nuclear chemistry laboratory for work
related to nuclear and nonnuclear materials for the reactor and weapons
programs. The site consisted of a main building, a plutonium laboratory
complex, a Hot Cell for handling radioactive materials, and nine other
structures. During its 29 years of operation, New Brunswick Laboratory
provided a variety of services that used nuclear materials such as thorium and
uranium ores, highpurity plutonium and americium, and types of enriched
uranium. Throughout this period, the complex discharged liquid waste containing
various radionuclides into the sanitary sewer system as permitted by Atomic
Energy Commission guidelines then in effect.
SITE MAP
In 1960, soil contaminated with pitchblende [uranium oxide (U3O8), the main
component of highgrade African or domestic uranium ore, which also
contains other oxides and sulfides, including radium, thorium, and lead
compounds] was moved to the site from a landfill in a nearby town. The
Department mixed the material with clean soil and used it to fill an unused
rail siding that once entered the property from the southern side. The total
volume of contaminated soil placed in this area was approximately
3,450 cubic meters (4,500 cubic yards). In 1977, the Department
relocated all laboratory operations and personnel to Illinois, and declared the
New Jersey facility surplus. Partial remediation of the site was performed in
1978 and from 1981 through 1983.
The site poses no health risks. The only remaining areas of contamination are
the area where the old rail siding was filled in and two small subsurface
areas. A fence with locked gates restricts public access. Vegetation covers the
surface to prevent contaminant migration via runoff from contaminated soils.
Gamma activity from the contaminated areas is low, and site contaminants do not
affect local ground water.
FUTURE USE
Because the Department of Energy owns the site, future use of the site after
remediation depends on disposition of the property by the General Services
Administration. If the property is released for private ownership, it is likely
to be developed for industrial uses because of zoning restrictions and
prevalent use of surrounding property. The approach assumed for this report
allows for Industrial/Commercial use after remedial action is complete.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
The New Brunswick Site is being cleaned up under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. Key regulators include
the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Environmental Protection
Agency Region II, and the local health department. The Department is
preparing documentation required by the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act in support of remedial action.
The Department undertook the first phase of remedial action in 1978, soon after
operations at the site ended. This phase included removal of most contaminated
materials, including exposed plumbing, contaminated equipment, and portions of
floors, walls, and ceilings.
In 1980, additional radiological characterization revealed residual
contamination in onsite sewer lines and further defined the extent of soil
contamination. The results of this characterization initiated a second phase of
remedial action that was conducted from 1981 through 1983. All above-ground
structures, contaminated concrete foundations, onsite drain lines, and
radioactively contaminated soil on the front two-thirds of the site were
removed and disposed of at the Nevada Test Site. Final activities for this
second phase of work involved restoring the remediated portion of the site
by grading, planting a ground cover as a pollution control measure, and
installing 13 ground-water wells.
The Department will use typical construction and excavation equipment such as
front-end loaders, backhoes, and dump trucks during future remedial actions.
Trucks will take excavated soils to a rail siding for loading into rail cars,
which will transport the material to an existing out-of-state commercial
disposal facility.
Major Environmental Restoration Activity Milestones
| Assessment (Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis with Action
Memorandum)
|
1996
|
|
Remedial Action
|
1998
|
ASSESSMENT
After the first phase of remedial action at the site in 1978, surveys detected
surface contamination (primarily uranium, thorium, and americium) in and on
buildings. Trace amounts of radium, cesium, strontium, yttrium, and plutonium
were also detected. Surveys in 1980 revealed low levels of contamination in the
onsite sewer lines and more precisely defined the extent of soil contamination.
In 1989, the Department of Energy undertook a survey to determine whether
radioactive contamination existed on the offsite railroad property to the south
and whether soils in the filled rail siding contained hazardous waste as
defined under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Results revealed no
radioactive contamination at the offsite railroad property and indicated that
levels of all chemical contaminants except mercury, copper, and zinc are below
the proposed soil cleanup levels.
In August 1992, the Department conducted additional onsite surveys and limited
radiological and chemical sampling to collect information for remedial action
planning. As in earlier surveys, the tests detected contamination only in the
filled railroad spur at a small location along the southwestern fenceline.
An environmental surveillance program has been in place at the site since 1983.
Air, ground water, and soil are monitored and periodically sampled to detect
any abovebackground contamination from the site. An annual report compiles
and interprets the monitoring and sampling data from the previous year. During
activities such as soil excavation, the Department will conduct additional
monitoring to ensure that no contaminants are spread as a result of the work.
Results of routine chemical and radiological ground-water sampling at the site
since 1983 indicate that ground water has been largely unaffected by site
contamination.
REMEDIAL ACTION
During remediation of the New Brunswick Site, the Department will use a
streamlined approach to expedite the process and conserve resources. Although
the presence of chemical contamination onsite and the nature and extent of the
radiological conditions on the rear third of the site are not fully defined,
the Department will perform only limited additional characterization.
The decision to use a streamlined approach is based on the assumption that
aboveguideline radioactive contamination is present onsite only in the
filled railroad spur area and in two small areas)
one near the middle of the lot and another along the rear fenceline. The
offsite railroad area is not likely to be radioactively contaminated, and no
hazard assessment should be required. Furthermore, the Department assumes that
the site does not contain chemical contamination at levels that would expand
the anticipated excavation area (railroad spur) or affect the handling or
disposal of the excavated material. Additional sampling before or during
cleanup will be conducted to confirm this assumption.
Documented information regarding historical site activities, remedial actions
completed to date, and survey and sampling results to date support these
assumptions. The front twothirds of the site has been cleaned up and
certified. After 29 years of operation, contamination was confined to
building surfaces and drain pipes; it is probable that any laboratory
contamination was cleaned up during the first two phases of cleanup.
The scenario used for the Baseline Environmental Management Report cost
estimate assumes excavation of contaminated soil and disposal at an existing
outofstate commercial disposal facility. The cost estimate assumes a
total waste volume of 3,450 cubic meters (4,500 cubic yards). Before
excavation, a radiological survey will delineate the extent of contamination.
The Department will construct temporary access roads on the property, and use
an existing concrete pad as a decontamination area for trucks and other
equipment. Radiological surveys will be performed during excavation to
determine the presence and extent of remaining contamination. Excavation will
continue until all radioactively contaminated material above cleanup guidelines
has been removed. In addition to attaining cleanup guidelines, the Department
will practice the principle of reducing contamination to levels that are as low
as reasonably achievable.
Silt fences and/or hay bales will control sediment and soil erosion and runoff
during cleanup. Routinely wetting the soil during excavation will suppress
dust. Berms, dikes, or ditches will control surface water.
Soil excavation will use typical construction equipment such as backhoes.
Excavated soil will be placed in roll-off containers on trucks, which will then
be covered and secured, for transportation to a rail siding. The containers
will then be transferred to rail cars for shipment to the outofstate
commercial disposal facility.
In remediated areas, the Department will collect radiological and chemical
verification samples before or during remedial action. Analyses of samples
collected by an independent verification contractor and the Department of
Energy will verify these data. Conducting verification sampling while remedial
action is in progress will allow any unexpected areas of contamination to be
excavated without requiring excavation equipment and crews to remobilize. This
approach will conserve time and resources. After the remediated areas have been
certified to be
within radiological and chemical guidelines, the Department will restore them
with clean backfill material as required and reseed them with ground cover.
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2005
|
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| FUSRAP - New Brunswick Site
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
| Remedial Action
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,590
|
| Total |
1,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,790
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following table presents estimated funding information for the New
Brunswick Site.
Nondefense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2005
|
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,790
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
|
 |