|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
The Grand Junction Projects Office, Grand Junction, Colorado is responsible for
remediating the Monticello Projects, which include the Monticello Mill Tailings
site and the Monticello Vicinity Properties. These sites, which are included on
the National Priorities List, are located near the City of Monticello in San
Juan County, Utah. The Monticello Mill Tailings site comprises three operable
units: the mill site, a 44-hectare (108-acre) tract located along Montezuma
Creek, south of the City of Monticello; 25 peripheral properties located north
and south of the mill site; and the surface (Montezuma Creek) and ground water
located beneath and extending beyond the mill site. The Monticello Vicinity
Properties encompasses 410 vicinity properties in six sections located in and
around the Town of Monticello. Additional vicinity properties may be included
following completion of additional inclusion surveys.
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
| (Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
34,594
|
33,040
|
22,678
|
15,931
|
6,274
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
32,785
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
30,402
|
|
|
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
21,640
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,948
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
The Vanadium Corporation of America, with funds from the Defense Plant
Corporation, constructed a mill in 1942 to produce vanadium and
uranium-vanadium sludge for the Manhattan Project. The Atomic Energy Commission
bought the site in 1948. Uranium milling, the processing of uranium ore, began
September 15, 1949 and continued until January 1, 1960, when the mill was
permanently closed. Part of the land was transferred for a period of time to
the Bureau of Land Management, but otherwise the site remained under the
control of the Atomic Energy Commission, now the Department of Energy.
SITE MAP
In 1980, the Monticello mill site was accepted into the Surplus Facilities
Management program and the Monticello Remedial Action Project was established.
In 1983, remedial activities for vicinity properties were separated from the
Monticello Remedial Action Project with the establishment of the Monticello
Vicinity Properties Project. In 1987, the Monticello Projects were transferred
from the Surplus Facilities Management program to the Department of Energy's
Defense Decontamination and Decommissioning program, then to the Department of
Energy's Environmental Management program.
Residues from vanadium and uranium milling, known as mill tailings, were left
in place at the mill site. Although the milling process recovered about 93
percent of the uranium, the tailings that remain contain several radioactive
elements, including uranium, thorium, radium, polonium, and radon. The total
volume of tailings, process-related contaminated material, and
tailings-contaminated soil is estimated at 2.0 million cubic meters (2.6
million cubic yards) throughout the Monticello sites. The tailings piles at the
mill site were stabilized and covered with soil in 1961 to limit their
dispersal or use. However, uranium mill tailings and byproduct materials, which
were produced during uranium milling, contaminated the mill site, peripheral
properties, and surface and ground water. Contamination also occurred in the
City of Monticello from wind-blown materials and from the use of mill tailings
as construction and fill materials.
The mission of the Monticello Projects is to ensure that the environmental
impacts associated with past activities at the site are identified,
investigated and that appropriate action is taken to protect public health and
welfare and the environment. The Grand Junction Projects Office is responsible
for remediating the Monticello Projects. The 1990 Record of Decision specified
disposal of the contaminated materials from the Monticello Projects sites in a
permanent repository south of the mill site on Department of Energy-owned
property. The Department confirmed this decision in 1994, and the specific
location and design of the repository was finalized, with award of the
subcontract for repository construction issued in 1995. During construction of
the repository, contaminated materials removed from the peripheral and vicinity
properties will be placed in an interim repository on the mill site. An
independent verification contractor will verify the removal of contaminants by
documenting that radiological and chemical residual compliance with authorized
limits through document reviews and field measurements. The sites will be
considered remediated when they are in accordance with the Federal Facility
Agreement and Records of Decision signed by the Department of Energy, the
Environmental Protection Agency, and the State of Utah.
There are no current or planned nuclear material and facility stabilization
activities at the Monticello Projects and all waste management activities are
included within the scope of Environmental Restoration. There are no landlord
costs associated with the Monticello Projects.
The Department of Energy will retain responsibility for surveillance and
monitoring at all of the remediated areas where contamination exceeding
risk-based cleanup standards remains as long as necessary to ensure adequate
protection of human health and the environment.
FUTURE USE
Future use of the existing Monticello mill site, following cleanup, has yet to
be finalized. The Monticello Site-Specific Advisory Board and other state,
county, and city organizations are participating in the analysis and
decisionmaking of future land uses for the property, with a final decision
expected in FY 1996.
FUTURE USE MAP
The Advisory Board has recommended that the mill site be deeded to the City of
Monticello for a golf course and recreational area. A decision concerning the
future use of the mill site is expected to be reached by the end of FY 1996,
and the determination on future use will be documented in a future-use plan
that will be presented for stakeholder comment and approval. However, this
report assumes that the Site-Specific Advisory Board recommendation will be
accepted and that the site's future land use will be designated Recreational.
All but a few private vicinity and peripheral properties and large Department
of Energy-owned properties will be remediated and released for a variety of
uses that may include Residential and Agricultural. The application of
supplemental standards, allowing limited land use, is being considered for the
private and Department of Energy-owned properties. This report is based on the
assumption supplemental standards will be applied only to these properties.
This estimate also assumes the Monticello Canyon Creek area will be designated
a Recreational area following removal from the National Priority List.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
The Monticello Vicinity Properties site was placed on the National Priority
List on June 10, 1986. The Monticello Mill Tailing site, containing three
operable units: the mill site (Operable Unit I), the peripheral properties
(Operable Unit 2), and contaminated surface and ground water and sediments in
Montezuma Creek Canyon (Operable Unit 3) was placed on the list on November 16,
1989. Operable Units I and II are being remediated under the Monticello
Remedial Action Project. Operable Unit 3 is being remediated under the
Monticello Surface- and Ground-Water Remedial Action Project. The operable
units were established to differentiate between the affected tracts of land or
the kinds of contamination.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION MAP
Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
of 1980, Section 120, a Federal Facilities Agreement among the Environmental
Protection Agency, the State of Utah, and the Department was executed in
December 1988. The primary purpose of this agreement is to ensure that
environmental impacts associated with past and present activities at the mill
site and on peripheral and vicinity properties have been thoroughly
investigated. It also seeks to ensure that appropriate response actions are
taken and completed, as necessary, to protect the public's health and welfare
and the environment. A Record of Decision for the Monticello Vicinity
Properties Project was issued in November 1989, and a Record of Decision for
Operable Units I and II was issued on September 20, 1990. The Environmental
Protection Agency and the State of Utah will be required to validate the
completion of remedial action.
Environmental restoration activities include an assessment of the area to
determine the nature and extent of contamination and the potential risk to
human health and safety or the environment; remedial action or cleanup of the
contaminants to prohibit migration through the air, soil, or ground water, or
stabilization of the contaminant to prohibit its dispersal; decommissioning and
disposition of deactivated, surplus facilities (Operable Unit I only); disposal
of waste materials removed during the remediation or decommissioning processes
in the onsite repository will ultimately be sealed with a water balance cover;
and long-term surveillance and monitoring to demonstrate that contamination has
been successfully removed and contained in the repository. Hazardous substances
that are not disposed of in the onsite repository will be shipped offsite to
permitted commercial treatment, storage, and disposal facilities. The waste
transportation and disposal activities are included in the costs of remedial
action.
The planned long-term surveillance and maintenance, including monitoring of the
repository liner system and underlying ground water following mill site
remediation, will be performed by the Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance
program, assigned to the Grand Junction Projects Office. A review of the
protectiveness of the remedial actions will be required at least every five
years and continue until contaminant levels allow unlimited use and
unrestricted exposure at the sites. Although contamination exceeding risk-based
cleanup levels of radium-226 in excess of cleanup standards will not remain on
the properties (except for the repository), supplemental standards may be
applied to specified peripheral and vicinity properties (for example, city
streets, utility corridors and pinyon/juniper stands), requiring the
development of Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Plans and contingency
plans. If at a later date, the regulators determine that the completed remedial
action is no longer protective of human health or the environment, the
Department will be responsible for implementing the needed actions to remediate
the contamination or otherwise control the risk it poses. The cost associated
with the preparation of the plans and the long-term monitoring activity are not
included in the Monticello Projects but are included in the Grand Junction
Projects Office Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance program.
Major Environmental Restoration Activity Milestones
Monticello Remedial Action Project
Operable Unit I
|
|
Assessment
|
1998
|
|
Remediation
|
2001
|
|
Operable Unit II
|
|
Remediation
|
1998
|
|
Monticello Surface- and Ground-Water Remedial Action Projects - Record
of Decision
|
1998
|
|
Monticello Vicinity Properties - Remediation
|
1998
|
Operable Unit I: Mill Tailings and Mill Site Property
Operable Unit I includes the 44 hectares (110 acres) of the original mill site.
This land contains the original mill tailing piles, the tailings removed from
the Monticello peripheral properties (Operable Unit II), and the tailings
removed from the Monticello Vicinity Properties. The original mill tailings
piles are within the flood plain of Montezuma Creek. They are also partially in
contact with a shallow alluvial aquifer underlying the site. The volume of
tailings, contaminated soil, and contaminated building material in the tailings
impoundments and mill area are estimated at approximately 1.7 million cubic
meters (2.2 million cubic yards).
There are two tasks identified for this operable unit. The first, mill site
remediation, includes those activities necessary for remediation of the mill
site: construction of the repository; excavation, loading, and hauling the
tailings and contaminated material; disposal of tailings and contaminated
material in the onsite repository; and interim grading of the mill site. Once
the land-use requirements are finalized, the second task, mill site
restoration, will be initiated and will include those activities necessary to
restore the mill site.
Technical risks for Operable Unit I are high because of the issues of disposal
cell longevity and ground-water protection. The long-term performance of the
disposal cell (up to 1,000 years or to the extent reasonably achievable but at
least 200 years as specified in Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, Part 192)
will require extensive geotechnical expertise and stringent quality control
during the construction phase to mitigate these impacts.
ASSESSMENT
Preliminary evaluations of Operable Unit I were conducted to evaluate the
potential presence of contamination from historic uses. Based on the
preliminary evaluations, environmental site assessments were performed and
specific areas of concern were identified based on visual observations, field
tests, or documented historical contamination. Further site characterization
activities (including visual inspections and soil, air, building materials, and
ground-water sampling to aid in the identification of site contaminants) and
specific delineation samplings were completed prior to beginning remedial
action. The contaminants on the mill site have been classified as byproduct
materials, including tailings. The site assessment activities have been
completed and the data used to perform analyses of the risks to the public and
environment. The risk analysis data in turn has been used to develop an
approach for remediation of the mill site and a design for the onsite
repository. These activities have been completed and the recommendations
approved by the Environmental Protection Agency and the State of Utah.
REMEDIAL ACTION
For Operable Unit I, the selected remedy is excavation of the tailings on the
mill site and removal of the tailings and contaminated material to a permanent
repository south of the mill site on Department of Energy-owned property. The
mill site will be remediated to standards in Code of Federal Regulations Title
40, Part 192, Subpart A, for radium-226 and the "hot-spot" criteria established
by Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program. Standards for remediation
of thorium, uranium, and heavy metals will be established through a
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act risk
assessment. Mill site tailings will be excavated and disposed of at the onsite
repository located approximately 1.6 to 2.5 kilometers (1 to 1.5 miles) south
of the mill site. Tailings will not be transported on public roads from the
mill site to the repository, in order to minimize the potential spread of
contaminants. Dust suppression will be required during all aspects of tailings
removal, and a decontamination pad will be located at the repository access.
Control fencing will be installed along the perimeter of the road, and the
drainage from the haul road will be contained. The contaminated mill site
buildings have been demolished and the rubble stored on the mill site prior to
removal to the onsite repository for disposal.
A wastewater treatment plant has been set up at the mill site. The plant treats
contaminated surface runoff from the mill site, and water encountered during
the excavation of contaminated materials. The excavation water constitutes the
largest portion of the overall volume. Discharge from the plant to the
Montezuma Creek meets the requirements of the Utah Pollution Discharge
Elimination System regulations.
An independent verification contractor will verify the adequacy of the
remediation by documenting that radiological and chemical residual levels meet
authorized limits through document reviews and field measurements.
The repository is being designed to permanently contain up to a maximum of
approximately 2.0 million cubic meters (2.6 million cubic yards) of
uranium/vanadium mill tailings from the mill site and other properties in the
vicinity of Monticello, Utah. The repository will be lined with a combination
of synthetic and natural liner materials to achieve compliance with minimum
technological requirements established in the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act for containment of hazardous waste in a landfill. Beneath the
polyethylene layer will be an additional soil barrier to control radon
emissions.
Remediation and restoration for this operable unit are scheduled to be
completed in FY 2001.
Operable Unit II: Peripheral Properties
The Monticello peripheral properties include Department-owned and private land
to the north and south of the old mill site that had been leased for the
stockpiling of ore. Also included are the adjoining areas where contaminants
were deposited by wind or surface water along Montezuma Creek and the
irrigation ditches traversing the properties. A total of 24 properties covering
approximately 120 hectares (300 acres) around the site contain most of the
estimated 228,000 cubic meters (300,000 cubic yards) of peripheral property
material. Operable Unit III includes additional peripheral properties,
including the stream bed and banks of a 5.3 kilometer (3.3 mile) length of
Montezuma Creek east of the mill site to the confluence of Montezuma and Vega
Creeks.
Technical risks for Operable Unit II are low because complete removal of the
contaminated materials and replacement with approved materials is an extremely
effective remedy. Conventional building construction and earthwork techniques
can be employed with a high degree of success. On properties where supplemental
standards are appropriate, land-use restrictions will control risks from
remaining contamination. Institutional controls will be in place to ensure that
land-use restrictions are enforced.
ASSESSMENT
Preliminary evaluations of Operable Unit II were conducted to evaluate the
potential presence of contamination from current and historic uses. Based on
the preliminary evaluations, environmental site assessments were performed and
specific areas of concern were identified based on visual observations, field
tests, or documented historical contamination. Further site characterization
activities (including visual inspections, soil and building materials sampling
to aid in the identification of site contaminants, and specific delineation
sampling, where applicable) were completed prior to beginning remedial action.
The contaminants on the peripheral properties have been classified as hazardous
substances. Investigations are also being conducted to evaluate the potential
presence of concentrations of hazardous substances other than radium-226
requiring remediation or special handling as a hazardous or Toxic Substances
Control Act waste. If these substances are identified in unacceptable risk
concentrations, the Department will recommend remediation, and this remediation
will be included in the design for the property. The site assessment activities
are nearing completion, and the data is being used to analyze the risks of
contamination to the public and environment and to develop approaches to
remediate of the properties . Documentation of the risks of contamination to
the public and environment, along with approaches for remediation of the
peripheral properties or definition of institutional controls, is being
prepared for approval by the Environmental Protection Agency and the State of
Utah.
REMEDIAL ACTION
Removal of tailings from Operable Unit II entails the use of conventional
and environmentally sensitive construction techniques using hand excavation or
vacuum removal of tailings to preserve native vegetation. The Department will
remediate nonradiological hazardous substances on included properties if the
substances pose an unacceptable risk to human health and the environment. Dust
suppression will be required during all aspects of tailings removal. For the
most part, tailings removed from the peripheral properties will be placed in an
interim repository on the mill site, until the permanent repository
construction is completed. Trucks transporting contaminated material to the
mill site from contaminated peripheral properties will be decontaminated and
surveyed. Trucks transporting tailings on public roads will comply with
Department of Transportation regulations. The Operable Unit 2 cleanups are
based on the standards in Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, Part 192,
Subpart A, for radium226 and the "hot-spot" criteria established for
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program sites.
After removal of contamination, the excavation is verified to demonstrate that
remediation to applicable standards for contamination in soil was achieved. An
independent verification contractor also verifies the removal of byproduct
material after remediation on selected properties.
Remediation of the peripheral properties is planned so that contamination
removed from the properties can be ultimately placed in the onsite repository.
Remediation has been completed on three properties, and remediation is in
process on five additional properties. To meet the projected date for cell
closure, all tailings must be removed from the peripheral properties by
November 30, 1998.
The schedule for remediation does not allow response to post-remediation
radon-daughter measurements (indoor radon concentration measurements) that
indicate noncompliance with Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, Part 192
cleanup standards. For those properties, there is a possibility that
contaminated materials may have to be transported separately to a suitable
disposal site or that alternative controls will have to be put in place to
control radon exposure. To minimize potential impacts, the Department is
considering the completion of radon-daughter concentration measurements prior
to or concurrent with remediation of properties where contamination is not
adjacent to the inhabited structure.
Operable Unit III: Surface and Ground Water
Operable Unit III includes contaminated ground water beneath the tailings piles
and downgradient of the mill site. The volume of contaminated water is
estimated at 200,000 cubic meters (53 million gallons). At present, this
shallow aquifer is not used as a private or public drinking water source. At
the mill site, this aquifer is separated from the deeper Burro Canyon aquifer
by a rock formation known as the Dakota Sandstone believed to act as an
aquitard. East of the mill site and the town of Monticello, the Dakota
Sandstone is eroded away by Montezuma Creek, and the shallow alluvial aquifer
comes into direct contact with the Burrow Canyon aquifer in Montezuma Creek
Canyon. The Burro Canyon aquifer, where it is being used as an alternative
drinking water source by the town of Monticello, has not been contaminated. It
is uncertain if other areas of the Burro Canyon aquifer in Montezuma Creek
Canyon are contaminated.
The surface water included in Operable Unit III consists of Montezuma Creek,
which flows through the mill site. Montezuma Creek is a small perennial stream
with headwaters in the Abajo Mountains immediately west of Monticello.
Technical risks for Operable Unit III are high because of the uncertainty
associated with the scope of characterization activities. The scope of these
activities is being finalized with the regulatory authorities, reducing the
risk of performing unnecessary activities. The Grand Junction Projects Office
is currently reviewing the Monticello Surface- and Ground-Water Remedial Action
Project in accordance with the Department of Energy Streamlined Approach for
Environmental Restoration guidelines. This report assumes extensive remediation
of stream-deposited contaminants will not be required, and passive restoration
of contaminated ground water will be used. Therefore, remedial design and
remedial action are not part of the project baseline at this time.
ASSESSMENT
Characterization of the contamination in Montezuma Creek Canyon is required to
determine if contamination presents an unacceptable risk to human health and
the environment. Characterization includes assessing concentrations of
contaminants of concern in sediments, soils, surface water, ground-water and
biota. Previous studies indicate a sixth medium, air, is not a significant
pathway. A baseline risk assessment consisting of a human health risk
assessment and an ecological risk assessment is being prepared. A Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study will include the baseline risk assessment data
and address alternatives for any appropriate remediation of soils, sediments,
surface and ground water, including the proposed performance goals for
remediation of surface and ground water. Numerical modeling results will be
presented to evaluate alternatives for active and passive restoration. Separate
documents, for approval by the Environmental Protection Agency and the State of
Utah, will be prepared on recommendations for the remediation of Montezuma
Creek Canyon sediments and soils and remediation of the surface and ground
water.
The schedule for completion of Operable Unit III tasks will coordinate with the
schedule for remediation of the mill site (Operable Unit I). Removal of
contamination, if required, from Montezuma Creek Canyon must be completed
concurrent with or before completion of the mill site and before closure of the
permanent repository, in order to avoid additional costs for offsite disposal.
REMEDIAL ACTION
The remedy for Operable Unit III has not yet been selected. The draft
Record of Decision for the selected remediation of the unit is currently
planned for FY 2000; however, options to advance this are being evaluated as
discussed above. The standards for cleanup will be based on analyses of costs
and benefits applied to the risks associated with surface- and ground-water
contamination.
Operable Unit III may also include the remediation of peripheral property
wetlands along Montezuma Creek. (Remediation of peripheral properties,
excluding these wetlands, is being addressed according to the Operable Unit II
response, which is specified in the Monticello Mill Tailings site 1990 Record
of Decision.) The radiological cleanup standards will be based on the baseline
risk assessment and evaluation of applicable or relevant and appropriate
requirements including Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, Part 192, Subpart
A. Cleanup standards, if required for the remediation of radiological and
nonradiological constituents, will also be developed through the baseline risk
assessment to mitigate any risk to human health and the environment.
Monticello Vicinity Properties
The objective of the Monticello Vicinity Properties Project is to remediate the
commercial, publicly owned, and residential properties in the City of
Monticello that are contaminated by wind-blown materials and by the use of mill
tailings as construction and fill materials. Technical risks for the Monticello
Vicinity Properties Project are high because the extent of possible remedial
action under city streets and associated utilities is not known, and the site
boundary, within which inclusion surveys are required, has been extended. The
Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the State of
Utah have recently finalized a definition of the boundary of the Monticello
Vicinity Properties site, using the preliminary six sections and any other
properties where definite evidence exists that Monticello mill site materials
are present, to determine a radius of 13 kilometers (8 miles). This report
anticipates an additional 25 to 50 properties may be included in the Monticello
Vicinity Properties.
ASSESSMENT
Preliminary evaluations of Monticello Vicinity Properties were conducted to
evaluate the potential presence of contamination from current and historic
uses. Based on the preliminary evaluations, environmental site assessments were
performed and specific areas of concern were identified based on visual
observations, field tests, or documented historical contamination. Further site
characterization activities (including visual inspections, soil and building
materials sampling to aid in the identification of site contaminants, and
specific delineation sampling, where applicable) were completed prior to
beginning remedial action. The contaminants on the vicinity properties have
been classified as hazardous substances. The site assessment activities are
completed, and the data is being used to perform analyses of the risks of
contamination to the public and environment and to develop approaches for
remediation of the properties and disposal of the materials.
REMEDIAL ACTION
The selected remedy for materials on vicinity properties is to remove the
contamination and dispose of it with the mill site tailings. Dust suppression
will be required during all aspects of tailings removal. Tailings removed from
the vicinity properties will be placed in an interim repository on the mill
site until completion of construction of the permanent repository. Trucks
transporting contaminated material to the mill site from contaminated vicinity
properties will be decontaminated and surveyed. Trucks transporting tailings on
public roads will comply with Department of Transportation regulations. This
remedy will be applied to an estimated 410 vicinity properties. Additional
Monticello Vicinity Properties may be identified as a result of expanding the
site boundary. The cleanup will be based on the standards in the Code of
Federal Regulations Title 40, Part 192, Subpart A, for radium-226. For areas
where tailings were deposited by the wind, the "hot-spot" criteria established
for Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program will be used.
Nonradiological hazardous substances are suspected to be present at several
vicinity properties. The Department of Energy will remediate nonradiological
hazardous substances on properties included in the original six sections if the
substances pose an unacceptable risk to human health and the environment.
Investigations will be conducted to evaluate the presence of hazardous
substances other than radium-226. If hazardous substances are identified in
concentrations that pose unacceptable risk, the Department will recommend
remediation, and this remediation will be included in the design for the
property.
A total of 375 properties have been remediated to date. Remediation of the
Monticello Vicinity Properties is scheduled for completion in FY 1998. An
independent verification contractor will verify the removal of hazardous
substances after remediation.
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| OU1: Mill Tailings and Mill Site
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Remedial Action
|
17,142
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,116
|
| OU2: Peripheral Properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Remedial Action
|
298
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,630
|
| OU3: Surface and Ground Water
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,655
|
| Monticello Vicinity Properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Remedial Action
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,373
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
2,395
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,174
|
| Total |
21,640
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,948
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Direct Program Management/Support
The Department is a responsible party with respect to present and past releases
at the Monticello sites. The Department is also the lead agency responsible for
providing resources to implement response actions at the sites. The Albuquerque
Operations Office has delegated the authority, responsibility, and
accountability for overall project implementation and contract administration
of the Monticello Projects to the manager of the Grand Junction Projects
Office. The Grand Junction Projects Office manager assigns Department project
managers, as well as matrix support to the Monticello Projects. Program support
includes: health/safety/security oversight, engineering support, personnel
management and training, administrative support, progress tracking, financial
management, site-wide environmental data and compliance reporting, stakeholder
support/public participation, permitting, and contract management.
The Grand Junction Projects Office provides program management support for all
projects within its mission, although these activities are not funded
separately through a program management account. Program management includes
developing, managing, and reporting the cost and schedule; developing and
implementing project plans; and tracking completion of the project tasks in
accordance with applicable regulations, Department of Energy Orders, and
program objectives. Program management activities are tracked and charged to
the Monticello Projects budgets; however, this report identifies program
management costs as 11 percent of the total Environmental Restoration budget.
A community relations program for the Monticello Projects has been developed to
encourage public involvement in environmental restoration decisionmaking. The
goal is to provide understandable, accurate, and timely information to
interested parties during environmental cleanup activities. The program has
established two-way communication between the Department and stakeholders and
maximized opportunities for public involvement.
Monthly information and discussion meetings with city, county, and regulatory
agencies and Site-Specific Advisory Board meetings form the core of Monticello
stakeholder and public participation activities. In addition, ongoing
communication and interaction are maintained with the communities in which the
Grand Junction Projects Office is managing Environmental Restoration programs
through a speakers bureau, site tours, educational outreach programs
concentrating on the sciences and environmental topics, and the issuance of
regular press releases to update project progress and future work schedules.
Payments in the amount of $150,000 are made annually to the State of Utah
Department of Environmental Quality for oversight in support of the Monticello
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
| SUCCESS STORIES
The Grand Junction Projects Office performed a fast-track Monticello repository
design and procurement effort. A total of nine months elapsed from selection of
preferred option to Notice of Award, which was issued three weeks ahead of
schedule.
The Grand Junction Projects Office improved relationships with Monticello
stakeholders by permanently locating a Department of Energy construction
engineer in Monticello and locating a contractor community-relations expert
onsite.
|
Liability Act cleanup effort. The Site-Specific Advisory Board is reimbursed
for expenses associated with its oversight of the remediation effort. The
Department of Energy has agreed in principle to provide $40,000 to $60,000
worth of emergency response equipment and/or training to local responders as
settlement of a stipulated penalty for discharges to Montezuma Creek. No other
payments to the local community, the state, or federal agencies are planned;
nor are any Agreements-In-Principle or grants planned.
| STAKEHOLDER INTERACTIONS
The Grand Junction Projects Office conducted public participation activities
for Monticello Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act projects. The office issued a news release to key media
representatives, individuals, and agencies to announce the availability of the
1995 report. The office also distributed copies of the 1995 report for
reference to the Grand Junction Projects Office Reading Room; the Mesa County
Public Library in Grand Junction, Colorado; and the Department of Energy Office
in Monticello, Utah. No public comments were received. If you would like more
information about the report or have questions about the results for this site,
please contact:
|
Public Participation
Audrey Berry
(970) 2487727
audrey.berry@gjpomail.doe
gjpo.com
|
Technical Liaison
Chris Pennal
(970) 248-6011
cpennal@gjpomail.doegjpo
com
|
Public Affairs
Audrey Berry
(970) 2487727
audrey.berry@gjpomail.doe
gjpo.com
|
DESCRIPTION OF PERSONNEL
Current Composition
The current composition of personnel assigned to the project reflects ongoing
planning and design remediation activities. As the program matures, the
composition will gradually shift from engineering personnel to field support
personnel. Current staffing requirements represent a site-wide mix of federal
employees and subcontractors, as presented in the table below. The federal work
force consists of managers and administrative and professional employees. The
contractor work force mainly consists of professional staff and labor personnel
who conduct the day-to-day site operations and plan and perform the remediation
of the site.
Full-Time Equivalent Composition Table*
* The Projections for Full-Time Equivalent employees are based on FY 1996
planning baselines (see Reader's Guide).
Site Management Structure
The Department of Energy currently has in place a Federal Acquisition
Requirements-based contract to provide management, engineering, and scientific
services to the Grand Junction Projects Office in support of Department of
Energy programs, including the Monticello Projects. This will be replaced by a
new small business, performance-based contract for operating the Grand Junction
Projects Office Technical Assistance and Remediation contract, which will be
awarded by July 1, 1996. The new contract will have a three-year base period
and two one-year options.
The Department of Energy recently awarded a $33.2 million subcontract for the
construction of the Monticello Projects repository, based on a competitive
procurement. The contract includes excavation, transportation, placement of the
contaminated materials in the repository, and backfilling and grading the mill
site.
| CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES
If you would like more information about performing work for the Department of
Energy's Environmental Management program at this site, please contact:
|
Major Procurements
William Meyers
Director
Contracts and Procurement Division
United States Department of Energy Albuquerque Operations Office
P.O. Box 5400
Albuquerque, NM 87185-5400
p: (505) 845-5777
f: (505) 845-4210
|
Small Business Procurements
Greg Gonzales
Contracts and Procurement Division
United States Department of Energy
Albuquerque Operations Office
P.O. Box 5400
Albuquerque, NM 87185-5400
p: (505) 845-6182
f: (505) 845-4210
|
Future Full-Time Equivalent Needs
Full-Time Equivalent needs for FY 1999 and FY 2000 will remain at the same
level and mix as in FY 1998, although at a reduced number because of the
completion of the Monticello peripheral properties and the Monticello Vicinity
Properties Projects. The scope of work for FY 2001 will consist of closeout
activities; the mix will primarily consist of administrators and other
professionals totaling approximately 250 federal and contractor Full-Time
Equivalents.
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following table presents estimated funding information for the Monticello
Projects.
Nondefense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
21,640
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,948
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS ESTIMATE
The 1996 life-cycle estimate for the Monticello Remedial Action Project is
approximately the same as the 1995 estimate, after taking 1995 expenditures
into account. Projected Environmental Restoration program activity costs are
approximately three percent lower, reflecting a recalculation of project costs
and increased efficiencies in project activities. This rebaselining reflects
more efficient approaches to project staffing, optimization of repository
construction and mill site remediation, and remediation of some peripheral
properties within the mill site.
Comparison Table
| |
Thousands of Dollars
|
|
| Nuclear Mat. & Fac. Stab.
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
133,650
|
19,890
|
109,948
|
3,812
|
3
|
| Waste Management |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Landlord |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Program Management 2
|
1,497
|
4,070
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Site Total |
135,148
|
23,960
|
109,948
|
1,240
|
1
|
1 The FY 1995 life-cycle and annual costs are provided
to determine the corrected FY 1995 cost.
2 Program Management was reported in an independent cost table last year, but
is reported as a line item in the relevant program (Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization, Environmental Restoration, and Waste Management)
activity cost estimate tables for the FY 1996 Baseline Report.
|
|
 |