|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
The Mound Plant is located in Miamisburg, Ohio, approximately 16 kilometers (10
miles) south-southwest of Dayton, Ohio. Most of the 765-hectare (306-acre) site
overlooks the city from a ridge that extends toward downtown Miamisburg from
the southern city limits. Mound Road, on the east side of the plant, is lined
by residences and provides access to the plant's main gate. A Conrail freight
line runs along Mound's western border, and the old Miami-Erie Canal bed runs
west of the track. Approximately half a mile further west from Mound is the
Great Miami River.
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
| (Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
|
|
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
21,085
|
27,079
|
21,330
|
34,835
|
26,826
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
64,292
|
67,623
|
84,312
|
86,424
|
90,370
|
|
| Waste Management
|
9,191
|
8,500
|
4,418
|
3,780
|
3,346
|
|
| Total
|
94,568
|
103,201
|
110,060
|
125,039
|
120,543
|
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
99,847
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
87,465
|
|
|
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
24,639
|
15,079
|
5,096
|
20,162
|
8,531
|
4,485
|
4,485
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
73,760
|
43,024
|
25,112
|
20,974
|
15,713
|
|
|
|
| Waste Management
|
5,608
|
1,393
|
940
|
521 |
|
|
|
|
| Total
|
104,007
|
59,496
|
31,149
|
41,657
|
24,244
|
4,485
|
4,485
|
|
| |
2040
|
2045
|
2050
|
2055
|
2060
|
2065
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
1,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,361
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
892,912
|
| Waste Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,308
|
| Total
|
1,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,356,581
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
In 1947, the Dayton Project of the Manhattan Engineering District became the
Mound site. It reported to the Department of Energy's Office of Defense
Programs until 1995, when the administration of the site was transferred to the
Environmental Management program. Mound's early mission included nuclear
materials research. Later missions included process development, production
engineering, manufacturing and surveillance of detonators, explosive timers,
transducers, firing sets, explosive pellets, components, and specific test
equipment. Additional manufacturing activities at Mound included recovering and
purifying tritium.
SITE MAP
The Office of Defense Programs has transferred all Mound's production
activities to other Department of Energy sites and transferred landlord
responsibilities to Environmental Management. The current mission for the
Environmental Management program at Mound is to "make Mound real property,
equipment and facilities available for development as a commercial industrial
site as safely, economically and timely as possible" This mission includes
extensive environmental restoration, transitioning select Mound facilities for
commercial use, and continued waste management support for the Department of
Energy Office of Nuclear Energy as its mission at the site comes to an end.
Mound's remaining missions include fabrication of radioisotopic electrical
power sources (which is performed by the Office of Nuclear Energy), facility
stabilization, disposition of excess nuclear material and ancillary equipment,
environmental restoration, decommissioning, and waste management. This report
expects that the disposition of nuclear materials, including tritium, will be
completed in FY 1997. Activity levels within the remaining missions will
continue to decrease until remedial action is complete in FY 2015.
Although the Environmental Management program is the landlord at Mound, there
are no directly appropriated landlord costs. All activities at the site are
allocated a percentage of the landlord costs based on their labor hours, square
footage, and gross dollars. All costs presented in this site summary include
allocated landlord indirects. The landlord costs include, but are not limited
to the following: budget analysis, logistics, mail, laundry, contracting and
procurement, material acceptance, training, industrial safety, industrial
hygiene, environmental technical and monitoring activities, utilities, fire
protection, technical security, physical security, and custodial services.
FUTURE USE
This report assumes that the Department will sell Mound and will only have
liability for one facility, called the Technical Building. The Mound Plant is
an industrial complex that would be appropriate for commercial use in the
future. The City of Miamisburg is making efforts to commercialize the site
through the Miamisburg Mound Community Improvement Corporation. A number of
buildings that are no longer needed for the Mound mission have been turned over
to the Corporation to disposition for Commercial/Industrial operations.
Economic development efforts at the site are also closely coordinated with the
general public, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency, and the Ohio Department of Health.
FUTURE USE MAP
This report assumes that the Technical Building will be Controlled Access with
institutional controls maintained by the Department of Energy. However, this
estimate did not consider long-term surveillance and maintenance costs
associated with this building. Mound Plant updates to the Baseline
Environmental Management Report must address this issue.
Through negotiations with the City of Miamisburg, regulators, and other
stakeholders, the future use assumption for the remainder of the Mound site is
predominantly Industrial. Remediation is based on Industrial future use for all
operable units except offsite ground water, which uses the Residential
scenario.
NUCLEAR MATERIAL AND FACILITY STABILIZATION
The Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization program is responsible for
transitioning all 132 buildings at the Mound Plant. This program includes
stabilizing and deactivating facilities to reduce the recurring costs
associated with maintenance, record keeping, and maintaining inventories that
are no longer required by the Department of Energy. When facilities or assets
are declared surplus, the building is assigned to the Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization program, and a survey of the liability, usefulness, and
contamination levels is performed. This estimate assumes that 69 buildings will
require stabilization actions. During this phase of the process, removal of
excess inventory and equipment occurs. If the building or adjacent area is
contaminated, it will transfer to the Environmental Restoration Decommissioning
program.
This estimate also assumes that approximately 38 buildings will require
decommissioning. After decommissioning, the facilities will transfer back to
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization where their ultimate disposition
will be determined. Approximately 55 buildings will be transferred to the
Miamisburg Mound Community Improvement Corporation for lease. The remainder
will be dismantled or demolished. Modular buildings and trailers will be sold
and removed from the site.
The dispositioning of excess energetic components and materials, excess inert
components, and excess chemicals in the nonradiological areas were complete at
the end of FY 1995. Radiological materials are scheduled to be removed by FY
2000; however, the Department is studying options to accelerate that date. The
Department will complete the removal of chemicals and ancillary equipment
associated with the scheduling transfer units in FY 2002. It will then transfer
buildings with either facility or surrounding media contamination to the
Environmental Restoration decommissioning program.
The Waste Management program is responsible for the costs associated with the
disposal of sanitary waste, chemicals, and radiological waste generated by
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization program. The majority of
radiological waste removal is included in the scope of environmental
restoration activities.
The Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization activities currently include 69
buildings that are grouped into three scheduling transfer units. Scheduling
Transfer Unit MD3 is responsible for Inert Area Facilities Shutdown of 29
buildings with no contamination. Twenty-three of these buildings have been
stabilized and prepared for transfer to the Miamisburg Mound Community
Improvement Corporation for lease or to the Environmental Restoration program
for decommissioning. The remaining six are currently being stabilized.
Activities for this scheduling transfer unit will be completed in FY 1998.
Scheduling Transfer Unit MD4 is responsible for Energetic Materials Facilities
Shutdown. The 33 energetic facilities were used to process powders and
explosive components. Twenty-six buildings have completed stabilization. Ten of
those buildings were released to the Miamisburg Mound Community Improvement
Corporation and have been leased for commercialization. The remaining
facilities will be stabilized and put into post-stabilization surveillance and
maintenance in FY 1996. The stabilization of these buildings will generate 2
cubic meters (2.6 cubic yards) of hazardous waste.
Scheduling Transfer Unit MD5 is responsible for Radiological Facilities
Shutdown. The seven radiological facilities in this scheduling transfer unit
have had a diverse past in supporting radiological projects with nuclear
accountable material and tritium. These facilities will continue processing
work through FY 1999. The Department is currently stabilizing areas in these
facilities that are not needed for ongoing processing work. In FY 2002 all
buildings will be ready for transfer to the Environmental Restoration program
for decommissioning. Approximately 100 cubic meters (131 cubic yards) of
low-level waste and 7 cubic meters (9.2 cubic yards) of hazardous waste will be
generated during the stabilization of these buildings.
All buildings in the Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization program will
undergo stabilization and post-stabilization surveillance and maintenance
activities. Stabilization activities include the consolidating, removing, and
dispositioning of energetic materials, chemicals, equipment, documents, and
ancillary equipment. Ancillary equipment may remain in buildings that are
designated for economic development if they meet the Department of Energy
criteria for release. The removal of classified inventories, equipment, and
documents; stabilization of contaminated production lines; and the removal of
hazardous waste are necessary to reduce surveillance and maintenance costs as
well as minimize environmental, safety and health risks. Heating, ventilation
and air-conditioning systems, and other utilities will be taken out of service
for all buildings, except as required for fire protection or commercialization.
An ongoing surveillance and maintenance program is required to maintain the
safety of the buildings from the time they are stabilized until they are
subsequently available for transfer. Surveillance activities include required
safety and fire inspections, preventive inspections and maintenance, required
repairs to buildings and associated materials, and maintenance and repair of
monitoring instruments.
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
24,639
|
15,079
|
5,096
|
20,162
|
8,531
|
4,485
|
4,485
|
|
| |
2040
|
2045
|
2050
|
2055
|
2060
|
2065
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
1,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,361
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Direct Program Management/Support
This task includes the program management required to perform nuclear material
and facility stabilization activities at the Mound Plant. This list of
activities includes cost/schedule planning and program integration between
activities at the site, other Department of Energy locations, and the
Environmental Protection Agency.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
Environmental restoration at Mound includes remediation of soils and ground
water, facility decontamination and decommissioning, and associated
environmental monitoring. Currently, the program is conducting a Remedial
Investigation of the site. This estimate assumes that all environmental
restoration activities will be complete by FY 2015.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION MAP
The Mound Plant environmental restoration activities operate under a
three-party Federal Facility Agreement. Parties to the agreement are the United
States Environmental Protection Agency, the Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency, and the Department of Energy. The purpose of the agreement was to (1)
identify interim remedial action alternatives appropriate for the site prior to
implementing a final remedial action; (2) establish requirements for performing
Remedial Investigations to determine the nature and extent of the threat to the
public health, welfare, or the environment; (3) establish requirements for the
performance of Feasibility Studies for the site to identify, evaluate, and
select alternatives for appropriate remedial actions; (4) identify the nature,
objectives and schedule of response actions to be taken at the site; (5)
implement the selected interim and final remedial actions in accordance with
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; and (6)
ensure compliance with other federal and state hazardous waste laws and
regulations. Modification of work by the Department of Energy is subject to
approval by the United States Environmental Protection Agency in consultation
with Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
Approximately 400 potential release sites have been documented at the Mound
Plant. Because past operations were very diverse, the plant used a variety of
radioactive materials and chemicals. Radioactive contaminants of greatest
concern are plutonium and thorium. Chemical contaminants of concern include
various volatile organic compounds in the form of solvents, paints, and
industrial cleaning agents. Nine Operable Units were originally established in
the program. The Operable Units divide the site into manageable areas based on
factors such as common plumes, and types of contaminants and media affected.
Most of the release sites for Operable Units 3, 7, and 8 have been closed via
No Further Action proposals. As these three operable units represented several
miscellaneous activities, the remaining active release sites have been mapped
into their respective geographic operable units (Operable Units 1, 2, 4 or 5),
and Operable Unit 9 addresses the site-wide environmental effects posed by
contamination at the Mound Plant.
The Environmental Restoration program also includes the decommissioning of
surplus facilities and associated contaminated soils. This activity includes
removing contaminated soils associated with a building or process system, and
decommissioning underground tanks and piping previously involved with nuclear
operations. Currently, four buildings and portions of other buildings are in
the decontamination and decommissioning program. This estimate assumes that 27
additional buildings will require decontamination and decommissioning. The
final decision will be based on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessments or
screening data.
Major Environmental Restoration Activity Milestones
| Operable Unit 1 - Remedial Action
|
1998
|
|
Operable Unit 2 - Remedial Action
|
2003
|
|
Operable Unit 4 - Remedial Action
|
2008
|
|
Operable Unit 5 - Remedial Action
|
2015
|
|
Operable Unit 6 - Decommissioning
|
2010
|
|
Operable Unit 9 - Record of Decision
|
2012
|
Waste streams associated with remediation include low-level waste and hazardous
waste. Waste volume available to be shipped offsite will vary significantly by
year and will be generated through FY 2013. From remedial actions identified in
the current baseline, waste volume projections will range from 18,573 cubic
meters (24,330 cubic yards) in FY 1998 and FY 1999 to 170 cubic meters (222
cubic yards) in FY 2003. Costs for transportation and disposal of waste
generated from the environmental restoration activities, with the exception of
decommissioning, are included within the scope of the Waste Management program.
This estimate assumes that remedies selected for operable units will be
effective and will not require long-term surveillance and monitoring.
Operable Unit 1
Operable Unit 1 requires the remediation of ground-water contamination from an
old landfill, an old sanitary landfill, and an overflow pond. The major
contaminant of concern is volatile organic compounds. The assessment phase of
work was completed when a Record of Decision was issued in June 1995.
The selected remedy is collection and treatment of contaminated ground water.
The method of the pump-and-treat technology will be determined during the
design phase of the project but is expected to use air stripping
enhanced with high vacuum extraction or air sparging. This report assumes that
this remedy will be effective and, therefore, will not require surveillance or
monitoring when the activity is finished. Nearly 265,000 cubic meters (seven
million gallons) of contaminated ground water will be treated and then
discharged to the Great Miami River through the site's water treatment system.
This activity will be complete in FY 1998.
Operable Unit 2
Contamination of the Main Hill areas includes volatile organic compounds and
tritium in ground-water seeps and radionuclides and volatile organic compounds
in the soil. It is expected that the tritium contamination of the seeps will be
reduced after source cleanup.
The estimate for operable units also assumes that 566 cubic meters (741 cubic
yards) of low-level waste, including miscellaneous debris and soil, will be
excavated and disposed of offsite. The site originally used the debris as fill
material because it met radiological release standards for that time and
includes railroad tracks and shielding components.
| TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Several technologies are available to remediate soils contaminated with
plutonium or thorium and ground water contaminated with volatile organic
compounds. For soil contamination, Mound has tested and evaluated solvent
extraction, magnetic separation, microbiological extraction, physical
separation processes, and phytological processes (plant biomass). The site is
currently focusing its efforts on solvent extraction and contaminated soil
separation processes. For ground-water contamination, Mound has evaluated air
sparging, soil venting, in-well sparging, and duel phase extraction. Mound will
conduct pilot tests on at least one of these technologies.
|
Operable Unit 4
Remediation of plutonium-contaminated soils in the old Miami-Erie Canal bed in
Miamisburg includes the north and south ponds within the community park, the
overflow creek from the canal to the Great Miami River, and the drainage ditch
from the west property line of the Mound site to the canal. Preliminary
assessment work is complete.
An Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis for the Miami-Erie Canal was prepared
to evaluate remedial action alternatives to remove or eliminate the
concentration of plutonium contamination within the soils and sediments. Based
on the analysis, the Department chose a removal action as the preferred
alternative. The data obtained during the removal action will be used in the
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study to verify that the remaining soil
meets established cleanup levels. The field work for the Operable Unit 4
removal action associated with the Miami-Erie Canal is scheduled to start
during FY 1996. The action involves removing soil contaminated with plutonium.
Approximately 13,378 cubic meters (17,525 cubic yards) of low-level waste will
be generated during the three-year life of the project.
Operable Unit 5
Operable Unit 5 is the South Property in which soils are contaminated with
plutonium and thorium. Assessment of the soils is complete, and regulators
approved a Remedial Investigation Work Plan in
FY 1994.
Nearly all of the waste generated in Operable Unit 5 is low-level waste,
although volatile organic compound- contaminated soils have been found. This
report expects that 57,927 cubic meters (75,884 cubic yards) of low-level waste
will be generated for treatment or disposal during the life of the project.
Phase 1 field work is complete. It involved removal actions at the Fire
Fighting Training Area, Area 7, Drainage Control System, and some powerhouse
fuel storage tanks. Soils from the Fire Fighting Training Area are currently
being treated with microbes in an onsite temporary facility. The Area 7 actions
included removal of actinium- contaminated soils around buried rubble and
remnants of an old septic tank. The drainage control removal action is
currently under construction. Once complete, it will mitigate the spread of
contamination by storm-water runoff. Soil contaminated with organic chemicals
from around underground fuel oil storage tanks is staged and waiting for
bioremediation in the same facility that is being used to treat the soil from
the Fire Fighting Training Area.
Operable Unit 6 and Decommissioning Activities
Operable Unit 6 constitutes the decommissioning program which manages
decommissioning facilities that are declared surplus and are contaminated with
radiological or hazardous materials. This includes decontaminating and
dispositioning surplus equipment, utilities, underground tanks and piping, and
contaminated soils associated with surplus facilities. The current
decommissioning program began in 1978 and has completed the cleanup of surplus
laboratories, a plutonium processing building, and a waste transfer system.
Based upon preliminary data, this report assumes that 27 additional buildings
will require decontamination and decommissioning.
Historically, the decommissioning program decontaminated facilities and
portions of facilities as necessary for reuse and dismantled facilities when
decontamination for reuse was not economically practical. Accomplishments to
date include: decontamination of 4,180 square meters (4,974 square yards) of
buildings, removal of 2,322 square meters (2,713 square yards) of buildings,
removal of 1,824 meters (6,000 linear feet) of underground piping, and removal
of 12,740 cubic meters (16,689 cubic yards) of contaminated soil for disposal.
The decommissioning program has removed 24,000 tons of contaminated material
from the environment and shipped 200 tons of metal for smelting and reuse.
The decommissioning program is currently performing assessment work on a former
thorium storage building, portions of several plant buildings, and several
contaminated soil areas. It is also performing remediation work on the Special
Metallurgical Building and on the remaining underground waste transfer piping.
Future work will include buildings that become surplus as the plant mission
changes. The decommissioning program performs limited, short-term surveillance
and maintenance activities on facilities as required to ensure personnel safety
and prevent the release of contaminants prior to and during decontamination and
dispositioning activities. The Department develops these surveillance and
maintenance activities for each specific facility based upon the hazards and
the condition of the facility.
Almost all of the waste generated by decommissioning activities is low-level
radioactive waste. Small amounts of hazardous, low-level mixed waste, and
transuranic waste may also be identified during cleanup of specific facilities.
Most of the waste generated is in the form of construction debris or
contaminated soil. The decommissioning program also generates some waste in the
form of contaminated equipment and personal protective equipment.
Decommissioning activities identified in the current baseline will generate
waste through FY 2010. Waste volume will range from 9,711 cubic meters (12,721
cubic yards) in FY 2002 to 7,850 cubic meters (10,284 cubic yards) in FY 2010.
Operable Unit 6 was created to provide the Environmental Protection Agency with
verification that soils impacted by building operations and their subsequent
decontamination and decommissioning projects met established standards and
requirements.
After decommissioning of each building designated for safe shutdown or
transition, Mound will evaluate each to ensure that regulatory cleanup levels
have been met. The Department expects that the verification project will
generate 170 cubic meters (223 cubic yards) of waste for treatment or disposal.
Approximately 29 percent of waste soil is the result of verification sampling
and 71 percent is the result of removal action.
Operable Unit 9
Operable Unit 9 addresses the total site-wide environmental effects of
contamination attributable to Mound. This includes all environmental media and
potential receptors including air, ground water, surface water, soils,
sediments, and plant and animal life. It focuses on the plant area and vicinity
properties but includes measurements up to 20 miles away. The cumulative onsite
and offsite impacts of all other operable units are of concern. The
contaminants of concern include radiological and chemical constituents.
Environmental assessment activities to date have not identified any
contaminated areas that would require remediation. The soil chemistry, bedrock
and Buried Valley Aquifer investigation reports are complete; the ground-water
sweep sampling is complete, and the report has been issued; the ecological
investigation, which is a thorough evaluation of offsite soil and ground-water
contaminant levels as well as a determination of the background levels, is
completed, and the report has been issued; the regional soil sampling is
complete, and the final report has been prepared. Two rounds of residential
well sampling are complete, and the draft report has been prepared; and the
surface-water and sediment sampling for the 1995 spring season was completed.
In addition, the potential for surface water or air emission to contribute to
contamination levels in other operable units has also been evaluated. This
report assumes that no remedial action will be required for this operable unit.
Re-Baselining Environmental Restoration
In 1995, the decision was made to re-baseline the Environmental Restoration
program based on a new approach to meet the mission for the Mound Plant more
efficiently and effectively. However, because of the timing of the 1996
Baseline Environmental Management Report, a validated budget and schedule
summary was not available. Therefore, the information in this report is based
on the current (1995) baseline. This new approach is highlighted below.
| RE-BASELINING
The new approach involves (1) preparing data packages using existing
information on each of the more than 400 Potential Release Sites; (2)
establishing a working team of decisionmakers from the Department of Energy,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
to make decisions on whether to take No Further Action, perform a removal, or
continue assessment based on the information in the data packages; (3)
reviewing the team decisions with the public and revising the decision as
appropriate; and (4) implementing the decision.
Under the revised baseline, decommissioning activities and work associated with
Operable Units 2, 5, and 6 will be combined and addressed as work in "Onsite
Areas". Operable Units 4 and 9 will be combined and addressed as work in
"Offsite Areas". Operable Unit 1 will be addressed as "Ground-water" work and
will essentially remain the same. After all Potential Release Sites and
buildings in an established geographic area onsite (also known as Release
Block) are declared releasable, the geographic area is available for economic
development activities and transfer to a non-Department of Energy entity. This
approach avoids most of the costly and time-consuming Remedial Investigation
and Feasibility Study Documentation, focuses on remediation instead of
assessment, and makes land and buildings available for reuse by geographic
areas rather than random selection. This approach will allow release of
portions of the site earlier than estimated in the 1996 Baseline Report.
The re-baselining of the Environmental Restoration program is expected to be
completed in 1996. The revised baseline data will be addressed in the next
revision of the Baseline Environmental Management Report.
|
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2025
|
2030
|
| Mound Plant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
7,514
|
1,673
|
2,515
|
3,027
|
4,378
|
|
|
95,536
|
| Remedial Action
|
11,085
|
3,922
|
4,718
|
10,223
|
7,953
|
|
|
189,508
|
| Facility Decommissioning
|
31,774
|
17,123
|
1,221
|
|
|
|
|
250,589
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
23,387
|
20,306
|
16,658
|
7,724
|
3,382
|
|
|
357,279
|
| Total
|
73,760
|
43,024
|
25,112
|
20,974
|
15,713
|
|
|
892,912
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Direct Program Management/Support
Direct program management/support activities include cost/schedule planning and
reporting, negotiating and reporting with regulators, meeting with governmental
bodies and stakeholders, National Environmental Policy Act documentation
(decommissioning only), preparing budget documentation and Activity Data
Sheets, training contractors, performing quality assurance, interfacing with
stakeholders, and managing data/documentation and information systems.
| STAKEHOLDER INTERACTIONS
The Ohio Operations Office had responsibility for public participation
activities for four Ohio sites: Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Fernald
Environmental Management Project, Mound Plant, and Reactive Metals, Inc. The
office presented information about the 1996 report in briefings to a local
stakeholder group. In addition, the Mound Associate Director included
information about the report in a presentation to stakeholders at the Mound
Action Committee meeting. If you would like more information about the report
or have questions about the results for these sites, please contact:
|
| Fernald Environmental Management Site
|
Public Participation
Jane Greenwalt
(513) 865-4468
|
Technical Liaison
Art Kleinrath
(513) 865-3597
|
Public Affairs
Jane Greenwalt
(513) 865-4468
|
The Environmental Restoration program has an approved and validated baseline
for both the remedial action and decommissioning activities. The baseline data
forms the basis for strategic planning, progress tracking, budget preparation,
and control. The Environmental Restoration program operates within the
guidelines established in the Federal Facility Agreement.
WASTE MANAGEMENT
The principal waste types at the Mound Plant are low-level radioactive waste,
hazardous chemical waste from laboratories, sanitary waste, and small amounts
of low-level mixed waste and transuranic waste. The low-level radioactive waste
consists of contaminated soils from decommissioning, sludge from the processing
of wastewater contaminated with alpha radionuclides, and water contaminated
with beta-emitting radionuclides. The Environmental Restoration program
performs remedial actions and decommissioning and decontamination activities
that generate waste, which the Waste Management program is responsible for
disposing. In addition, the Waste Management program receives, on an
intermittent basis, chemical waste generated from the safe shutdown activities
performed by the Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization programs. The
Waste Management program estimates account for all costs associated with
treatment, storage, and disposal for all waste that the Environmental
Management program generates, with the exception of the decommissioning waste
treatment, storage, and disposal costs, which are accounted for in the
Environmental Restoration Activity Costs table under Decommissioning.
Major Waste Management Projects Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Hazardous Waste Storage Facil. - Bldg. 72
|
297 |
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
| Mixed Waste Storage Facil. - Bldg. 23
|
459 |
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,370
|
| Transuranic Waste Storage Facil. - Bldg. 31A
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
| Waste Disp. Processing Plant - Bldg. WD
|
944 |
426
|
426
|
256
|
|
|
|
10,256
|
| Waste Management Staging Facil. - Bldg. 22
|
182 |
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
| * Project costs represent a subset of total Waste
Management costs.
|
| ** Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
WASTE MANAGEMENT MAP
Through mid-FY 1995, low-level waste was exclusively transported for disposal
at the Nevada Test Site. Currently, low-level waste is also transported to
Envirocare of Utah, a commercial disposal site. Uncontaminated waste from
environmental restoration activities is transported to a construction or
sanitary landfill.
Transuranic Mixed/Transuranic Waste
Previous mission assignments for the Department of Energy at Mound have
generated transuranic and transuranic mixed waste. Major mission assignments
have included development of nuclear weapons processes, space and terrestrial
heat source programs, and subsequent cleanup of those facilities and their
surrounding areas.
There is no projection for additional transuranic or transuranic mixed waste
generation at Mound. As defined by Waste Isolation Pilot Plant guidance,
Mound's waste is contact-handled and retrievable. As of June 1995, the Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant Transuranic Waste Baseline Inventory Report contained
data reporting that Mound has approximately 272 cubic meters (359 cubic yards)
of transuranic and transuranic mixed waste. There are approximately 1,300 drum
equivalents of transuranic waste; 15 of those drum equivalents are in the form
of transuranic mixed or Toxic Substances Control Act transuranic waste.
The transuranic mixed waste stream is made up of leaded gloves and will not
require treatment. The Toxic Substances Control Act waste stream contains
liquid polychlorinated biphenyls, which will require treatment by incineration
prior to storage or disposal. This report assumes the waste will be treated at
the Toxic Substance Control Act Incinerator in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, assuming
Mound can be added to the incinerator Part B permit and that state equity
issues can be resolved.
This waste is stored in Building 31 (transuranic), and in Building 23
(transuranic mixed and Toxic Substances Control Act waste), which is a Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act-permitted facility. This estimate assumes the
waste will be shipped to the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory for
treatment and then shipped to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant for disposal. All
disposal costs for transuranic and transuranic mixed waste are included in the
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant program estimate. The costs included in this
estimate are for managing transuranic and transuranic mixed waste and include
retrieval, characterization, treatment, and packaging to meet the Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant waste acceptance criteria.
Low-Level Mixed Waste
Approximately 100 cubic meters (131 cubic yards) of low-level mixed waste is
being stored onsite as a result of the previous Mound defense program mission.
Future generation is expected to total less than five cubic meters (6.6 cubic
yards). Tritium and plutonium-238 are the major radioactive contaminants
present, although several dozen other isotopes have been used at the site. The
mixed waste streams include the following streams and volumes: scintillation
cocktail, 43.3 cubic meters (57 cubic yards); waste oils, 27.4 cubic meters (36
cubic yards); lead shapes, 5 cubic meters (6.6 cubic yards); lead loaded
gloves; trace amounts of metallic mercury; polychlorinated biphenyl kerosene;
1.1 cubic meters (1.4 cubic yards); and lab packs and other materials, 20 cubic
meters (26 cubic yards).
The low-level mixed waste at Mound will be treated by a combination of small
onsite units, and the larger waste streams will be transported to commercial
treatment facilities or to the Toxic Substances Control Act Incinerator in Oak
Ridge, Tennessee. Scintillation cocktails and the waste oils will be treated by
bulking and sending to a commercial mixed waste thermal treatment unit. Lead
will be decontaminated and macroencapsulated, and mercury will be amalgamated.
The polychlorinated biphenyl kerosene will be shipped to the Toxic Substances
Control Act incinerator. Lab packs will be sorted and surveyed.
Building 23 is the Mound low-level mixed waste storage facility. This Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act compliant storage unit is in interim status and
has sufficient capacity for the current inventory of mixed waste as well as
anticipated future generation. Additionally, Building 23 has sufficient
capacity to store, on a short-term basis, residuals generated from the
treatment of inventoried waste.
Residuals from waste treated offsite will be transported directly to the Nevada
Test Site or a commercial disposal facility. In addition, any mixed waste
treated onsite, such as the mixed waste mercury being amalgamated in an onsite
treatability study, will be sent to a commercial or a Department of Energy
disposal site.
Low-Level Waste
Eighty percent of the low-level waste generated in FY 1995 was the result of
environmental restoration activities. The Nuclear Material and Facility
Stabilization program generated the remaining 20 percent. All of Mound Plant's
low-level waste is generated onsite. The current backlog of low-level waste is
6,339 cubic meters (8,304 cubic yards) and the projected future generation over
the life cycle of this baseline estimate is 147,141 cubic meters (192,755 cubic
yards).
| WASTE MINIMIZATION/POLLUTION PREVENTION
The Mound plant has an active waste minimization and pollution prevention
program based on the reduce, reuse, and recycle concept. Treatment of low-level
radioactive water is one of the more costly waste minimization processes.
Efforts are under way to reduce or eliminate the water that needs treatment.
The current inventory supplies chemicals needed at the site, and the Department
purchases the minimum amount needed. Mound has an active recycling program for
phone books, scrap metal, printer toner cartridges, glass, cardboard, white
paper, and lead batteries.
|
Mound treats wastewater contaminated with alpha- and beta-emitting
radionuclides at the Waste Disposal Building. Various onsite process and
decontamination operations constitute the source of this liquid waste. The
beta-emitting liquids are solidified in 55-gallon steel drums with portland
cement and absorbent clay for disposal. The alpha-emitting contaminated liquids
are treated by co-precipitation/flocculation and the resulting sludge is
solidified with portland cement for disposal. The waste treatment at the Waste
Disposal building is the only low-level waste treatment at Mound, and it is
estimated to continue for the next 20 years. Presently, 220 cubic meters (288
cubic yards) of this solidified low-level waste are generated per year, but
this rate will decrease towards the end of the 20 years as the transition
mission is completed.
The inventory of this low-level waste is temporarily stored in onsite trailers,
except for steel-boxed soils and sludges (which are stored outside until staged
for shipment) and solidified high-activity tritium (which is stored in the
Waste Disposal and Semi Works buildings). The boxes of soil and sludge are
stored on a concrete pad west of Building 105 and along the road near the
Sewage Disposal Building, respectively. A new low-level waste storage and
staging facility will be operational in FY 1996. This new facility, combined
with the anticipated disposal of most backlog waste, will enable Mound to
eliminate all or almost all of the trailers that are used for storage during FY
1996. By FY 1997, the vast majority of Mound's low-level waste will be stored
for just a short duration, allowing for characterization of the waste before
shipment for offsite disposal.
This report assumes that 1,605 cubic meters (2,112 cubic yards) of low-level
waste will be shipped to the Nevada Test Site and another 128,985 cubic meters
(169,717 cubic yards) of low-level waste will be shipped to commercial
facilities. Shipments of low-level waste are expected to continue through FY
2015. Presently, Mound is authorized to ship only contaminated soils, Sewage
Disposal Building sludge, and solidified beta water; however, during FY 1996
Mound expects to have most waste streams approved so that they can be shipped
for disposal to Envirocare of Utah, and Nevada Test Site.
Hazardous Waste
The current major generators of hazardous waste include plant-wide safe
shutdown activities, garage vehicle maintenance, and general facility
maintenance. The wide variety of hazardous waste generated includes:
laboratory/reagent-grade chemicals (acids, bases, oxidizers, flammable liquids,
flammable solids, and miscellaneous toxins); waste oils (not regulated as
hazardous waste in Ohio); polychlorinated biphenyl oils and transformers from a
current site-wide replacement project; and various hazardous debris generated
from process cleanout/teardown projects. The projected generation of hazardous
waste is 1,511 cubic meters (1,988 cubic yards). No hazardous waste is expected
to be generated past FY 2015.
The Retort and Open Burn Unit Treatment Facility is used for the destruction of
explosive components and secondary explosive waste. This unit will cease
operation in FY 1996. Hazardous waste is collected and managed in a Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act interim status storage facility until it is
shipped offsite to commercial treatment and/or disposal facilities.
Sanitary Waste
Mound generates approximately 2,360 metric tons of solid sanitary waste
annually. This number is expected to steadily decrease as the transition of the
site is completed. This report assumes that a total of 22,960 cubic meters
(30,210 cubic yards) will be generated at Mound. All sanitary waste is disposed
of shortly after the time of collection at permitted commercial landfills.
Waste Management Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Transuranic Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
| Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment
|
459
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,370
|
| Disposal
|
198
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080
|
| Low-Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment
|
944
|
426 |
426
|
256 |
|
|
|
10,256
|
| Storage and Handling
|
182 |
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
| Disposal
|
1,559
|
496 |
418
|
218
|
|
|
|
13,451
|
| Hazardous Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment
|
177
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,012
|
| Storage and Handling
|
297 |
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
| Sanitary Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Disposal
|
88
|
35
|
12
|
3
|
|
|
|
690
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
1,663
|
276
|
85
|
44
|
|
|
|
10,341
|
| Total
|
5,608
|
1,393
|
940
|
521 |
|
|
|
42,308
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Direct Program Management/Support
EG&G Mound Applied Technologies, Inc. is responsible for operating the
Radioactive, Hazardous and Mixed Waste Management programs at Mound. Waste
addressed by these activities includes all transuranic and low-level
radioactive waste, all Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and Toxic
Substances Control Act hazardous waste, and all transuranic mixed and low-level
mixed waste. Activities include treatment, storage, and disposal of all of the
above waste streams in accordance with applicable laws and Department of Energy
Orders; generation, collection, and maintenance of required records;
maintenance of storage facilities; communication of waste acceptance criteria
to plant generators; and preparation of National Environmental Policy Act and
Safety Analysis Report documentation. In addition, the Waste Management
oversight of the Mound Waste Minimization program identifies activities
necessary to maintain and train an adequate staff of qualified personnel to
perform the tasks required.
DESCRIPTION OF PERSONNEL
Current Composition
Current staffing requirements, presented in the following table, represent a
site-wide mix of Department of Energy site operation contractors and
subcontractors hired to provide specific environmental restoration expertise.
The Department of Energy work force consists mainly of managers, engineers, and
scientists. This arrangement supports the oversight of site operations and the
management of the interfaces between regulators. The contractor staff is mostly
a mix of professional staff and labor that conducts the day-to-day site
operations and plans and performs site remediation.
Full-Time Equivalent Composition Table*
* The Projections for Full-Time Equivalent employees are based on FY 1996
planning baselines (see Reader's Guide).
Site Management Structure
EG&G Mound Applied Technologies, Inc. is the Maintenance & Operating
contractor for the Mound Plant under contract with the Department of Energy. It
is responsible for completing work on Environmental Management programs at the
site, as the Department of Energy directs. The existing contract with EG&G
will expire in September 1996, and EG&G will be replaced with a contractor
who is highly motivated to perform environmental remediation and transition of
the site from the Department of Energy. However, the Department of Energy is
committed to using contract reform initiatives that have been developed
elsewhere in the complex to ensure that reasonable remediation costs are
maintained. The Department of Energy has also initiated a process to solicit
and incorporate the values, objectives, and concerns of all stakeholders
impacted by operations at the Mound Plant, including site labor, local
government, the public, and organizations tasked with reuse of the facility.
| CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES
If you would like more information about performing work for the Department of
Energy's Environmental Management program at this site, please contact:
|
Major Procurements
Mona Snyder
Director
Procurement and Contracts Division
United States Department of Energy
Ohio Field Office
P.O. Box 3020
Miamisburg, OH 45343-3020
p: (513) 847-5295
f: (513) 865-3843
|
Small Business Procurements
Melissa Johnson
Procurement and Contracts Division
United States Department of Energy
Ohio Field Office
P.O. Box 3020
Miamisburg, OH 45343-3020
p: (513) 865-4569
f: (513) 865-3843
|
Future Full-Time Equivalent Needs
Beginning in FY 1999 and continuing throughout final remediation and transition
of the Mound plant, the mix of Full-Time Equivalents for the site will reduce
and change. As Mound continues its nuclear material and facility stabilization
disposition activities through FY 1999, the number of Full-Time Equivalents
associated with this area will continue to decline and then drop off
dramatically with the completion of these activities in FY 2002; conversely, as
facilities shut down and become part of the environmental restoration and
decommissioning efforts, an increase in Full-Time Equivalents will occur.
Environmental restoration activities and the Full-Time Equivalents associated
with these efforts will peak at about the same time as full completion of
facility stabilization activities in FY 2002 and decrease through completion of
restoration activities. Waste management activities and Full-Time Equivalents
will continue to decline through FY 1999, after which time a minimal staff will
be maintained. Landlord activities and the Full-Time Equivalents associated
with these programs will continue to decline through FY 1999, after which time
they are expected to remain relatively constant until sale of the site. The
existing unionized labor force will remain relatively constant until FY 2000
when much of the site will no longer be under Department of Energy control.
Other specialties, particularly engineers and scientists, will stabilize in
about FY 2000 and will remain fairly constant through the completion of the
contract. The focus during this period will be on decommissioning and final
remediation of the site.
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following tables present estimated funding information for the Mound Plant.
Defense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
24,356
|
14,906
|
5,038
|
19,930
|
8,433
|
4,434
|
4,434
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
73,760
|
43,024
|
25,112
|
20,974
|
15,713
|
|
|
|
| Waste Management
|
5,608
|
1,393
|
940
|
521 |
|
|
|
|
| Total
|
103,723
|
59,323
|
31,090
|
41,425
|
24,145
|
4,434
|
4,434
|
|
| |
2040
|
2045
|
2050
|
2055
|
2060
|
2065
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
1,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416,516
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
892,912
|
| Waste Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,308
|
| Total
|
1,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,351,735
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Nondefense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
283 |
173
|
59
|
232
|
98
|
52
|
52
|
|
| |
2040
|
2045
|
2050
|
2055
|
2060
|
2065
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,846
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS ESTIMATE
The 1996 life-cycle estimate of $1.4 billion for the Mound Plant represents a
35 percent reduction from the 1995 life-cycle estimate of $2.1 billion.
Waste Management program activity costs reductions reflect the reduced mission
assignment of the Mound Plant as the transition begins to convert Mound from a
Department of Energy production facility to a commercial site. Environmental
Restoration cost estimates are approximately 73 percent higher than the 1995
report estimates because of the inclusion of information on decommissioning
activities that did not appear in the 1995 report. Also, direct program
management support costs have been captured in each program estimate rather
than in a separate line item. See the Comparison Table on the following page
for additional life-cycle cost information.
Comparison Table
| |
Thousands of Dollars
|
|
| Nuclear Mat. & Fac. Stab.
|
424,086 |
11,477
|
421,361 |
8,752
|
2 |
| Environmental Restoration
|
541,183 |
25,745
|
892,912 |
377,474
|
73 |
| Waste Management |
171,374
|
11,477
|
42,308
|
117,589
|
74
|
| Landlord |
805,211
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Program Management 2
|
200,635 |
8,016
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Site Total |
2,142,490
|
45,238 |
1,356,581
|
740,671 |
35
|
1 The FY 1995 life-cycle and annual costs are provided
to determine the corrected FY 1995 cost.
2 Program Management was reported in an independent cost table last year, but
is reported as a line item in the relevant program (Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization, Environmental Restoration, and Waste Management)
activity cost estimate tables for the FY 1996 Baseline Report.
|
|
 |