|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
The Lakeview former processing site is one of 24 uranium mill processing sites
designated by the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act for remediation
by the Department of Energy. During the 1960s, private firms processed most of
the uranium ore mined in the United States for the Atomic Energy Commission, a
predecessor of the Department of Energy. Congress passed the Act in 1978 in
response to public concern regarding potential health hazards from long-term
exposure to uranium mill tailings. It authorized the Department of Energy to
stabilize, dispose of, and control uranium mill tailings and other contaminated
material at 24 uranium mill processing sites and vicinity properties. For a
general discussion of the UMTRA Program, see the overview presented in the New
Mexico section of this report.
The cost estimate model used for this report provides costs for each of the
UMTRA sites. All costs for waste management activities, program management, and
relevant landlord activities attributable to the Department are provided for
within the scope of environmental restoration. There are no Uranium Mill
Tailings Radiation Control Act sites with either current or planned nuclear
material and facility stabilization activity needs. Funding for all sites is
100 percent nondefense.
LAKEVIEW, OREGON (UMTRA SITE)
The former Lakeview mill and tailings site is located in south-central Oregon,
approximately 26 kilometers (16 miles) north of the California-Oregon border
and 155 kilometers (96 miles) east of Klamath Falls, Oregon. The tailings pile
covered approximately 12 hectares (30 acres) of the 104-hectare (258-acre)
site. Six evaporation ponds occupied another 26 hectares (64 acres).
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
| (Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
84
|
404
|
1,112
|
1,385
|
997
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
36
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
29
|
|
|
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
736
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,761
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
The mission of the mill site was to provide uranium for the United States
Government. The source of contamination was the residual tailings that remained
after the milling process extracted the uranium. The Lakeview uranium mill was
built in 1958 and was operated by the Lakeview Mining Company. Uranium ore was
processed at the mill from 1958 to 1961. In 1968, the mill site was acquired by
the Atlantic Richfield Company, which began a cleanup operation in 1974. By
1977, the mill buildings and the surrounding areas had been decontaminated to
meet State regulations then in effect. The mill was sold in 1978 to the
Precision Pine Company, which used the site as a lumber mill and a stockpile
facility for sawdust and scrap waste.
SITE MAP
The Environmental Management program is responsible for cleaning up surface-
and ground-water contamination at the UMTRA sites. The Uranium Mill Tailings
Radiation Control Act designated the residual radioactive material found at
this site for cleanup and stabilization. The Act directed the Environmental
Protection Agency to promulgate standards (Code of Federal Regulations Title
40, Part 192) and the Department of Energy to perform the cleanup. It also
assigned the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to oversee and certify the cleanup,
and license the completed disposal cell.
FUTURE USE
Remedial action at the processing site was performed under a Remedial Action
Agreement with Lake County, the owner site. Under the terms of the Remedial
Action Agreement, beneficial use of the site will be returned to the owners
upon Nuclear Regulatory Commission certification of compliance with Subpart B
of the Environmental Protection Agency ground-water protection standards. Some
restricted use will be allowed following certification of
surface cleanup. The future use of the site is unknown, but this report assumes
it will be Industrial/Commercial. The disposal site will remain under the
control of the Federal Government, and will be monitored and maintained in
accordance with the Long-Term Surveillance Plan approved by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
Surface remedial action has been completed and the source of contamination has
been stabilized. However, residual milling-related contaminated ground water
remains.
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| UMTRA Ground water
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
208
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,333
|
| Remedial Action
|
5
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
230
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
522
|
317
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,198
|
| Total |
736
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,761
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Surface Project
Surface remedial action was completed at the processing site in October 1989,
and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission certified it in September 1993. The
Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensed the disposal site in September 1995 and
transferred it to the Grand Junction Projects Office's Long-Term Surveillance
and Maintenance program in September 1995.
Remedial action of the Lakeview site, which began in June 1986, involved
relocating approximately 716,680 cubic meters (943,000 cubic yards) of residual
radioactive materials to the Collins Ranch disposal site, located approximately
11 kilometers (seven miles) northwest of Lakeview. Relocation was required
because possible seismic and geothermal activity in the area precluded
stabilizing the residual radioactive material in place.
Ground-Water Compliance Project
The Department is developing a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
pertaining to all 24 UMTRA sites. For a discussion of this statement, see the
UMTRA program narrative in the New Mexico section of this report. Site-specific
National Environmental Policy Act documentation will be developed to propose an
appropriate ground-water compliance strategy and reasonable alternatives for
the Lakeview site once the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement is
completed.
This report assumes a demonstrated compliance strategy with additional
characterization and application of supplemental ground-water standards for the
Lakeview site. For all types of ground-water compliance strategies, once the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission determines that the site is in compliance with
Subpart B of the Environmental Protection Agency Standards and the site is
certified, no additional long-term surveillance or monitoring will be
conducted.
The total volume of contaminated ground water is estimated to be 2.8 billion
liters (727 million gallons), and the contaminant plume extends offsite. The
ground-water contaminants of potential concern are arsenic, boron, cadmium,
chloride, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, polonium-210, sodium, sulfate,
and uranium.
The following milestone dates have been established for planning purposes.
Major Ground-Water Compliance Project Milestones
| Baseline Risk Assessment
|
1996
|
|
Site Observational Work Plan
|
2000
|
|
Publish Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact
|
2001
|
|
Publish Remedial Action Plan
|
2002
|
In 1994, under the UMTRA Ground-water Project, ground-water samples were
collected at the former Lakeview processing site to monitor water quality
changes that have occurred since the removal of the tailings pile, evaporation
ponds, and associated contaminated soil. To assess the extent of ground-water
contamination caused by former processing activities, the baseline/ground-water
quality was compared to the background ground-water quality and the
Environmental Protection Agency UMTRA maximum concentrations limits.
Total dissolved solids and sulfate, arsenic and molybdenum were selected as
indicator parameters because they have historically exceeded the maximum
concentration limits. Manganese, iron, vanadium, nickel, tin, and zinc also
were analyzed to assess potential risks to human health and the environment.
Major cationic and anionic constituents and the field parameters were analyzed
to track changes in background and baseline ground-water quality and in
contaminant migration.
Sulfate appears to define best the extent of site-related contamination in
ground water. The distribution of sulfate concentration data suggests that
separate contaminated areas are associated with the location of the former
tailings pile and evaporation ponds. Different types of background ground water
(nongeothermal or geothermal) also influenced these areas.
Proposed additional data collection will focus on site-specific hydrogeologic
and geochemical conditions, and ground-water quality. These conditions are
located in an area that is naturally affected by geothermal sources and salt
leaching from soils and logging debris fill, which has contributed to the
natural degradation of the environment in the area. Ground water at the site is
not currently used. Some residents in the vicinity use municipal water
supplies, others use wells, and others use bottled water because of the
naturally poor water quality.
Direct Program Management/Support
Program management supports management efforts for the National Environmental
Policy Act process, site characterization and licensing, public
information/participation, applicable state and federal regulator costs,
quality assurance audits, program and management support for the technical
assistance contractor, special studies, document control, technical assistance
contractor site and technical management, cost and schedule controls, planning
and preparation of the federal budget, and the Environmental Management
Progress Tracking System.
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following table presents estimated funding information for the Lakeview
site.
Nondefense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
736
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,761
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
|
 |