|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
The Green River, Mexican Hat, and Salt Lake City former processing sites are
three of 24 uranium mill processing sites designated by the Uranium Mill
Tailings Radiation Control Act for remediation by the Department of Energy.
During the 1960s, private firms processed most of the uranium ore mined in the
United States for the Atomic Energy Commission, a predecessor of the Department
of Energy. Congress passed the Act in 1978 in response to public concern
regarding potential health hazards from long-term exposure to uranium mill
tailings. It authorized the Department of Energy to stabilize, dispose of, and
control uranium mill tailings and other contaminated material at 24 uranium
mill processing sites and vicinity properties. For a general discussion of the
UMTRA Program, see the overview presented in the New Mexico section of this
report.
The cost estimate model used for this report provides costs for each of the
UMTRA sites. All costs for waste management activities, program management, and
relevant landlord activities attributable to the Department are provided for
within the scope of environmental restoration. There are no Uranium Mill
Tailings Radiation Control Act sites with either current or planned nuclear
material and facility stabilization activity needs. Funding for all sites is
100 percent nondefense.
GREEN RIVER, UTAH (UMTRA SITE)
The former Green River mill and tailings site covers approximately 3.6 hectares
(nine acres) and is located in the east-central portion of Utah in Grand
County. The site is 1.6 kilometers (one mile) southeast of the City of Green
River and 113 kilometers (70 miles) west of the Utah-Colorado border. The U.S.
Army's White Sands Missile Range Utah Launch Complex uses most of the vacant
land south and east of the site.
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
| (Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
167
|
155
|
847
|
1,990
|
2,256
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
277
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
19
|
|
|
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
988
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,215
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
The mission of the Green River mill site was to provide uranium for the United
States Government. The source of contamination was the residual tailings that
remained after the milling process extracted the uranium. Union Carbide built
the mill in 1958 and operated it until 1961. Later, the mill buildings were
used for assembly of missile components for the Utah Launch Complex. The State
of Utah acquired ownership of the mill and tailings site in 1988.
SITE MAP
The Environmental Management program is responsible for cleaning up surface-
and ground-water contamination at the UMTRA sites. The Uranium Mill Tailings
Radiation Control Act designated the residual radioactive material found at
this site for cleanup and stabilization. The Act directed the Environmental
Protection Agency to promulgate standards (Code of Federal Regulations, Title
40, Part 192) and the Department of Energy to perform the cleanup. It also
assigned the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to oversee and certify the cleanup,
and license the completed disposal cell.
Pursuant to the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act, the Department of
Energy entered into a Cooperative Agreement in 1983 with the State of Utah. The
agreement outlines the roles and responsibilities of each party. It also
delineates the cost sharing arrangement that makes the Department of Energy
responsible for 100 percent of the assessment costs and 90 percent of the
remediation costs, and the State responsible for the remaining 10 percent of
the remediation costs. In addition, the Department of Energy is responsible for
paying 90 percent of the State*s 10 percent, and the State is responsible for
the remaining 10 percent of these costs (one percent of the total). The Nuclear
Regulatory Commission concurred on the original agreement and must concur on
all major modifications.
FUTURE USE
The State of Utah currently owns the site and will participate in
decisionmaking. When the Nuclear Regulatory Commission certifies the site under
the Surface Project, the State of Utah will transfer the deed for the disposal
cell to the Federal Government, under the custody of the Department of Energy.
It will be monitored and maintained under Controlled Access in accordance with
the Long-Term Surveillance Plan approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Public access to the disposal cell will be restricted. A portion of the
processing site that is not used for the disposal cell of the residual
radioactive material will be dispositioned pursuant to the Uranium Mill
Tailings Radiation Control Act.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
Surface remedial action has been completed, and the source of contamination has
been stabilized. However, residual milling-related contaminated ground water
remains.
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| UMTRA Ground water
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
293
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,924
|
| Remedial Action
|
2
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
693
|
521
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,071
|
| Total |
988
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,215
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Surface Project
Remedial action began in 1988 and was completed in December 1989. The Nuclear
Regulatory Commission certified the site in July 1992 and will license it in
September 1996. The surface project cleanup involved consolidating and
stabilizing the residual radioactive material in a disposal cell at the former
processing site and included remediating 17 vicinity properties. Approximately
290,092 cubic meters (381,700 cubic yards) of contaminated materials were
remediated.
Major Surface Project Milestones
| Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issues General
License
|
1996
|
|
Transfer to Grand Junction Projects Office's Long-Term Surveillance and
Maintenance Program
|
1996
|
The Green River Remedial Action Plan outlines contaminant distribution and
necessary remediation. The Remedial Action Plan, which requires concurrence by
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, was published in March 1991. The UMTRA
Surface Project will conduct surveillance and maintenance of the disposal cell
after completion of remedial action and prior to its transfer to the Grand
Junction Projects Office's Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance program in FY
1996.
Ground-Water Compliance Project
The Department is developing a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
pertaining to all 24 UMTRA sites. For a discussion of the Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement, see the UMTRA program narrative in the New
Mexico section of this report. Site-specific National Environmental Policy Act
documentation will be developed to propose an appropriate ground-water
compliance strategy and reasonable alternatives for the Green River site, after
completion of the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement.
This report assumes a strategy of demonstrated compliance with additional
characterization of ground water. The Project will apply for a supplemental
standards application from the Environmental Protection Agency because the
ground water is not a current or potential source of drinking water, due to
either poor quality or limited quantity. Additional data will be collected to
fill data gaps and to determine the applicability of the supplemental
standards. For all types of ground-water compliance strategies, once the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission determines the site to be in compliance with
Subpart B of the Environmental Protection Agency Standards and the site is
certified, no additional long-term surveillance or monitoring will be
conducted.
The total volume of contaminated ground water is estimated to be 454 million
liters (120 million gallons), and the contaminant plume extends offsite. The
ground-water contaminants of potential concern are arsenic, manganese,
molybdenum, nitrate, radium-226, selenium, sodium, sulfate, uranium, and
vanadium. There are no known uses of the ground water at or near the Green
River processing site. The City of Green River uses water from the Green River,
upriver of the tailings site, for its water supply.
The following milestone dates have been established for planning purposes.
er>
Major Ground-Water Compliance Project Milestones
| Baseline Risk Assessment
|
1996
|
| Site Observational Work Plan
|
2001
|
|
Publish Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact
|
2002
|
|
Publish Remedial Action Plan
|
2003
|
|
Licensing
|
2004
|
The Green River is about 610 meters (2,000 feet) west of the site and
surface-water samples from the river indicate that site-related contaminated
ground water is not adversely affecting surface-water quality. The 1994
monitoring data for the former processing site area does not indicate
significant impacts to ground water in the alluvial sediments from uranium
processing. However, historical site data indicates that contamination related
to the processing site is present in the Brown*s Wash alluvium. Pools of water
that may be created by the discharge of contaminated ground water into Brown* s
Wash are often present downstream of the site. Sediment analysis shows
processing site contamination in Brown's Wash. Sediment contamination appears
to be confined to the immediate vicinity of the former processing site.
Direct Program Management/Support
Program management supports management efforts for the National Environmental
Policy Act process, site characterization and licensing, public
information/participation, applicable state and federal regulator costs,
quality assurance audits, program and management support for the technical
assistance contractor, special studies, document control, technical assistance
contractor site and technical management, cost and schedule controls, planning
and preparation of the federal budget, and the Environmental Management
Progress Tracking System.
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following table presents estimated funding information for the Green River
site.
Nondefense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
988
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,215
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
|
 |