|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
The Bliss and Laughlin Steel site is located at 110 Hopkins Street in south
Buffalo, New York. The facility consists of a single 19,000-square meter
(204,440square foot) building surrounded by approximately 15,000 square
meters (161,400 square feet) of grounds. A large asphalt parking area is
located in the northeastern portion of the property. The site is bordered on
the south and west by a railroad right-of-way and on the east by Hopkins
Street.
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
|
(Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
|
407
|
605
|
|
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
0 |
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
|
| |
| Environmental Restoration
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
965
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
In 1952, Bliss and Laughlin performed machining and straightening operations on
uranium rods under subcontract to National Lead Industries in support of work
for the Atomic Energy Commission. Records indicate that Bliss and Laughlin
machined uranium at the site during September and October 1952. In
addition, 53 drums of turnings generated by Bliss and Laughlin activities
were removed from the site for disposal. In 1972, Bliss and Laughlin sold the
facility to Ramco Steel, Inc. The current owner is Niagara Cold Drawn
Corporation.
SITE MAP
A designation survey of interior and exterior portions of the building
performed by Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education in March 1992
confirmed the presence of fixed residual natural uranium on the floor, columns,
and ceiling in a small area called the special finishing area. The source of
radioactive constituents was processed natural uranium metal, and the primary
radionuclide of concern is uranium238.
Risk to the public from exposure to the radioactive material is minimal because
of the limited extent of residual radioactivity.
FUTURE USE
The site will continue to operate as a coldrolled steel processing
facility, and the Department of Energy will release it with no radiological
restrictions after remediation is complete. Therefore, this report assumes that
future use of the site will remain Industrial/Commercial.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
The Department of Energy has not conducted any remedial action at this site. In
1995, a radiological and chemical characterization revealed an affected surface
area of approximately 185 square meters (2,000 square feet). Because of
the current owner's commercial operational constraints, the Department of
Energy is unable to gain access at this time to clean the affected surface
areas.
The total volume of waste to be addressed under FUSRAP is estimated to be no
more than 15 cubic meters (20 cubic yards). Waste minimization efforts
will consist of scanning radioactive waste and segregating the waste
accordingly.
Key regulators include the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation and Environmental Protection Agency Region II.
ASSESSMENT
All assessment activities at the Bliss and Laughlin Steel site are complete.
The following sections summarizes the results of these activities.
Because of the operations performed at the site, the primary radioactive
constituent is processed natural uranium. Surveys conducted by National Lead of
Ohio during the early 1950s identified residual radioactivity on machinery.
Investigations have not located any records that indicate the radiological
conditions of the site after uranium machining operations ended.
The Department of Energy conducted radiological and chemical characterization
at the Bliss and Laughlin Steel site in 1995. The characterization included a
survey of the floor area and the overheads in the vicinity of the special
finishing area. The Department performed a less intensive survey throughout the
rest of the building, with emphasis on areas adjacent to the special finishing
area, hightraffic areas, and likely areas of material transfer such as
locker rooms. The Department drilled six core samples through the slab in areas
where the potential for migration of constituents was greatest. Investigators
took additional samples from the dust on overhead beams and material on the
floor. A composite sample of floor material was analyzed for total toxicity
characteristic leaching procedure constituents, which included metals, volatile
and semivolatile organics, pesticides, and herbicides.
The characterization revealed an affected surface area of approximately 185
square meters (2,000 square feet). Of 45 locations surveyed on the overheads
above the special finishing area, two showed elevated beta/gamma levels.
Elevated surface radioactivity on the floor in the special finishing area was
limited to approximately 150 square meters (18 by 8.5 meters)
[1,625 square feet (58 by 28 feet)] of floor area, some of it
obstructed by machinery. Investigators surveyed the remainder of the building
as extensively as building conditions allowed and found no evidence of residual
radioactivity. They did not detect any radioactive or hazardous waste
constituents in subsurface soil samples.
REMEDIAL ACTION
The Department of Energy has not performed any remedial action at the site. At
the owner's request, the Department has postponed remedial action and will
reconsider it for FY 1998. This cost estimate assumes remedial action will be
initiated and completed in FY 1998. The scenario used for the Baseline
Environmental Management Report cost estimate assumes building decontamination
and disposal of waste at an existing outofstate commercial disposal
facility. The cost estimate assumes a total site waste volume of 15 cubic
meters (20 cubic yards) of low-level waste.
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
|
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
|
|
|
2005
|
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| FUSRAP - Bliss & Laughlin Steel Site |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Remedial Action
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
965
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following table presents estimated funding information for the Bliss and
Laughlin Steel site.
Nondefense Funding Estimate
|
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
|
| |
2005
|
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
965
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
|