|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
Ashland 1, one of the four Tonawanda Site properties, is located in an
industrialized area in the Town of Tonawanda, New York, approximately 5
kilometers (3 miles) northwest of Buffalo. The property covers
approximately 4.4 hectares (10.8 acres) and is bordered on the north and
west by United Refining Company, on the east by Penn Central Transportation
Company, on the southwest by Interstate 90, and on the northeast by Seaway
Industrial Park. While most of the land near Ashland 1 is zoned for industrial
use, much of it remains undeveloped.
(Please click here for ASHLAND 2 Site)
TONAWANDA SITES LOCALITY MAP
SITE MAP
Estimated Site Total
|
(Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
281
|
327
|
672
|
12,207
|
9,694
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
281
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
|
| |
| Environmental Restoration
|
4,203
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,335
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
In June 1943, the Manhattan Engineer District leased the Ashland 1
property, formerly known as the Haist Property, for use by the Federal
Government. In August 1944, the Manhattan Engineer District purchased the
property for use as a disposal site for approximately 7,250 metric tons
(8,000 tons) of ore refinery residues generated from the Linde property in
Tonawanda. The uranium residues were spread over two-thirds of the property to
estimated depths of 0.3 to 1.5 meters (one to five feet).
In 1960, the Atomic Energy Commission determined that the levels of residual
radioactivity at Ashland 1 were below thencurrent criteria and
released the land as surplus. The Ashland Oil Company eventually acquired
the property where, in 1974, it constructed bermed areas and two petroleum
storage tanks. The company deposited most of the soil removed during
construction of the bermed area and drainage ditch on the nearby Seaway
Landfill and Ashland 2 properties. In 1989, Ashland Oil removed the
storage tanks but left the berms in place. Results of Remedial Investigation
activities completed in 1989 indicated that 92,000 cubic meters
(120,000 cubic yards) of soil contained residual radioactivity above
nowcurrent guidelines. Ashland Petroleum Company stores waste that was
detected by this investigation in onsite lowspecificactivity boxes.
The radioactive material poses a minimal risk to the public because its gamma
dose rate is very low and access to the property is restricted.
FUTURE USE
The Ashland Petroleum Company currently owns Ashland 1. The company retained
the portion of the property where radioactive material was present and sold the
balance of the production and storage tank areas to United Refining. United
Refining plans to remove the refining equipment and use the property as a tank
farm and transfer station.
Future use of the Ashland 1 property depends on the final remedy selected
for the Tonawanda site. The Department of Energy proposed Ashland 1 as the site
for construction of a waste containment structure for disposal of waste from
all four Tonawanda Site properties; however, because of local opposition, the
Department of Energy is discussing alternatives with the community. This
estimate assumes that Ashland 1 will be used as the site for construction
of a waste containment structure for disposal of waste from all four Tonawanda
Site properties. Therefore, it assumes that future use of the area with the
containment cell will involve Controlled Access, with the balance of the
property slated for Industrial/Commercial use.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
Residues from uranium separation processes conducted at Linde Center were the
source of the residual radioactivity at the Ashland 1 property. The primary
constituents of concern are uranium238, radium226, and
thorium230.
Ashland 1, Ashland 2, Seaway Industrial Park, and Linde Air Products
are included in the Tonawanda Site integrated environmental documentation
process to comply with requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act and the National Environmental Policy
Act. Key regulators are Environmental Protection Agency Region II and the
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
Major Environmental Restoration Activity Milestones
| Assessment (Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis
with Action Memorandum)
|
1997
|
| Remedial Action |
2005 |
| Transfer Site to Grand Junction Projects Office
Long-Term Surveillance and Monitoring Program
|
2006
|
ASSESSMENT
An initial radiological survey of Ashland 1 was performed in 1958 just
before the Atomic Energy Commission released the former Haist property for use
without removing the remaining residues.
Beginning in 1978, three characterization efforts were conducted to determine
whether radioactive contaminants exceeded existing guidelines. The first,
conducted during October and November 1978, addressed radioactive constituents
in surface water, sediment, and surface and subsurface soils. The second was a
survey consisting of a walkover gamma scan. The third was conducted in two
phases. Phase 1 included sampling and analysis for organic compounds on
the Hazardous Substances List, total organic halides, and selected constituents
in ground water, surface water, and sediment. Phase 2 included
investigation of the hydrogeological characteristics of the Ashland area.
Analytical results for soil at Ashland 1 indicated that Manhattan Engineer
District-related radionuclides (uranium-238, radium-226, and thorium-230) and
characteristic Manhattan Engineer District metals were found across most of the
property. Polyaromatic hydrocarbons were also present in the shallow soils as a
result of disposal or release of petroleum derivatives. The major pathway for
transport of constituents is direct surface runoff carrying particulate
constituents. No hazardous waste was found at the site. Radioactive
contamination in soil was found to extend north and west of the Ashland 1
property. The maximum depth of contamination generally did not exceed
3.3 meters (11 feet). West of Ashland 1, contaminated areas were
identified in and along a drainage ditch that transports storm-water runoff
toward Seaway. The depth of contamination in the ditch varied from 0.15 to
1.8 meters (0.5 to 6 feet). Contamination in these areas may
have been deposited during construction of the berms and ditch. Contaminated
areas north of Ashland 1 were in and along a drainage ditch and extended
onto Seaway Area D. The depth of contamination varied from 0.15 to
0.3 meters (0.5 to 1 feet).
Surface water showed moderate degradation from organics, probably originating
from refinery operations. Sediments in the drainage ditch from Ashland 1
contained Manhattan Engineer District-related radioactive material; sediments
on the northern side of the site contained radionuclides and metals that are
primarily Manhattan Engineer District-related, whereas sediments on the
southern side of the property contained metals primarily related to refinery
operations.
Monitoring conducted from 1987 to late 1990 indicated that the ground water
does not contain radioactive constituents. The Department conducts quarterly
well inspections and water level measurements at the site.
REMEDIAL ACTION
The Department of Energy has not yet conducted any remedial action at
Ashland 1. The scenario used for the Baseline Environmental Management
Report cost estimate assumes complete excavation of the contaminated soils and
onsite disposal at Ashland 1. Although the Department used this option,
which it set forth in the proposed plan issued in November 1993, to establish a
cost estimate, it acknowledges that the community did not agree with that plan
and is currently discussing alternatives with the community. The Department of
Energy will adjust the cost estimate appropriately when it selects the final
remedy.
The cost estimate assumes a total waste volume of 92,000 cubic meters
(120,000 cubic yards) from remedial action at Ashland 1. After
addition of waste from the other three Tonawanda Site properties, including
Ashland 2 [40,000 cubic meters (52,000 cubic yards)], Linde Air
Products [54,000 cubic meters (71,000 cubic yards)], and Seaway
Industrial Park [60,000 cubic meters (78,000 cubic yards)], the
estimate assumes that the total volume at the containment cell will be
246,000 cubic meters (321,000 cubic yards), with closure assumed in
FY 2003. The FUSRAP will perform surveillance of the facility for two more
years and then transfer responsibility for longterm surveillance and
maintenance to the Grand Junction Projects Office Long-term Surveillance and
Monitoring Program in FY 2006.
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
|
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
|
| FY 1996-2000
|
| FUSRAP - Ashland 1 Site
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598
|
| Remedial Action
|
4,083
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,737
|
| Total |
4,203
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,335
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following table presents estimated funding information for Ashland 1.
Nondefense Funding Estimate
|
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996 Dollars)
|
| |
| Environmental Restoration
|
4,203
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,335
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
ASHLAND 2
|
 |