|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
Ashland 2, one of the four Tonawanda Site properties, is located at
4545 River Road in the Town of Tonawanda, New York, approximately 5
kilometers (3 miles) northwest of Buffalo. The property occupies
approximately 47 hectares (115 acres) and is bordered by privately and
publicly owned undeveloped property, which is primarily vacant and overgrown
with grass and brush. See Ashland 1 for site map.
TONAWANDA SITES LOCALITY MAP
SITE MAP
Estimated Site Total
| (Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
333
|
6,436
|
1,324
|
27 |
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
281
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
327
|
|
|
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
| Environmental Restoration
|
1,571
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,048
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
From 1957 to 1982, Ashland Oil used a portion of the Ashland 2 property as
a landfill for disposal of general plant refuse and industrial and chemical
byproducts. Ashland Oil closed the landfill in 1982 and covered it with
two feet of clay. The source of radioactive constituents at Ashland 2
was residues from uranium separation processes conducted at the nearby Linde
Center during the 1940s. The waste was disposed of at Ashland 1 and later
transported to landfills at Ashland 2 and Seaway. Between 1974 and 1982,
Ashland Oil transported an unknown quantity of soil mixed with radioactive
residues from Ashland 1 to an area east of the Ashland 2 landfill.
The primary constituents of concern are uranium238, radium226, and
thorium230. The radioactive constituents at Ashland 2 pose minimal
risks to the public because the gamma dose rate from the material is very low
and access to the site is restricted. Ashland Petroleum Company is not
currently conducting commercial operations at Ashland 2.
FUTURE USE
Ashland Petroleum Company currently owns Ashland 2. The company has not
determined its future use after site remediation. Because the site is near the
Niagara River, the local community has included it in a waterfront development
master plan that identifies the area for use in commercial and light industrial
development. This cost estimate adopts the master plan assumption of
Industrial/Commercial use.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
The Department of Energy has not conducted any remedial action at
Ashland 2. Remedial investigation activities conducted in 1989 indicate
that a total of 40,000 cubic meters (52,000 cubic yards) of soil contains
residual lowlevel radioactivity above guidelines.
Ashland 1, Ashland 2, Seaway Industrial Park, and Linde Air Products
are included in the Tonawanda Site integrated environmental documentation
process to comply with requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act and the National Environmental Policy
Act. Key regulators are Environmental Protection Agency Region II and the
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
Major Environmental Restoration Activity Milestones
| Assessment (Record of Decision)
|
1997
|
| Remedial Action
|
2005
|
ASSESSMENT
The Department conducted four characterization efforts at Ashland 2 to
evaluate radioactive constituents and hydrogeological characteristics. Surface
water and soil samples were characterized in 1976 and 1980, respectively. In
1986, a walkover survey of the property was performed, and Engineering-Science
conducted the first phase of an investigation of the inactive industrial
landfill under contract to the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation. Chemical and radiological analyses were performed on surface
water and soil samples from a drainage ditch. In 1988, the second phase of the
landfill investigation included hydrogeological characterization of the Ashland
area and radiological and chemical characterization of surface water, sediment,
and ground water.
The radioactive contamination at Ashland 2 originated from the disposal of the
domestic ore filter cake at Ashland 1 and subsequent excavation,
transportation, and disposal of the filter cake, which was mixed with soil, at
Ashland 2. The primary constituents of interest are uranium, thorium-230,
radium-226, and metals present in the filter cake (aluminum, calcium, copper,
iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, and vanadium). Analytical results
of the soil investigation at Ashland 2 indicated that the Manhattan
Engineer Districtrelated radionuclides and associated metals were
generally confined to the area between the two primary drainage ditches (the
two branches of Rattlesnake Creek) and the access road; investigations detected
minor amounts along the floodplains of the drainage ditches. The maximum depth
of radioactive contamination at Ashland 2 is 2.7 meters
(9 feet), in the area between the two drainage ditches. Smaller areas
located throughout the property have shallower contamination, typically 0.15 to
1.5 meters (0.5 to 5 feet). The highest concentrations occur in the
center of the large contaminated area, primarily in the top 1.5 meters
(5 feet) of soil. Investigations found no hazardous waste.
Ground-water monitoring in 1988 and 1989 revealed no radioactive constituents.
Quarterly well inspections and water level measurements are conducted at
Ashland 2.
REMEDIAL ACTION
The Department of Energy has not conducted any remedial action at
Ashland 2. The scenario used for the Baseline Environmental Management
Report cost estimate assumes complete excavation of the contaminated soils and
onsite disposal at Ashland 1. The cost estimate assumes that a total waste
volume of 40,000 cubic meters (52,000 cubic yards) at Ashland 2 will be
transported to the proposed Ashland containment cell. Although this approach,
which was originally identified in the proposed plan issued in November 1993,
forms the basis of this cost estimate, the Department of Energy acknowledges
that the community did not approve that plan and is currently discussing
alternatives with the community. The Department will adjust the cost estimate
appropriately if an alternate remedy is selected.
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
| FUSRAP - Ashland 2 Site
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589
|
| Remedial Action
|
1,453
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,459
|
| Total |
1,571
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,048
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following table presents estimated funding information for Ashland 2.
Nondefense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
1,571
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,048
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
|
 |