|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
MARYLAND FUSRAP SITE
The only Maryland site within the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action
Program (FUSRAP) is W.R. Grace & Company (see map). FUSRAP was established
in 1974 under the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act to identify, investigate,
and clean up or otherwise control previously decontaminated Manhattan Engineer
District and Atomic Energy Commission sites, together with other sites assigned
to the U.S. Department of Energy by Congress, where residual radioactive
contamination exceeds current guidelines.
FUSRAP encompasses 46 sites in 14 states and is funded through the Oak Ridge
Operations Office. For a general discussion of FUSRAP and associated costs, see
the overview of the program presented in the Tennessee section of this report.
All costs for waste management activities, program management, and relevant
landlord activities attributable to the Department of Energy are provided for
within the scope of environmental restoration. There are no FUSRAP sites with
either current or planned nuclear material and facility stabilization activity
needs. Funding for all sites is 100 percent nondefense.
W.R. GRACE & COMPANY
W.R. Grace & Company is a 36-hectare (90acre) property on an
industrialized peninsula in south Baltimore, Maryland. It is bordered on the
north by Curtis Bay, on the west by Curtis Creek, on the east by the Patapsco
River, and on the south by the Baltimore Municipal Landfill. The Department of
Energy has designated 1.6 of the 36 hectares (4 of the 90 acres) at the
W.R. Grace & Company site for remedial action under FUSRAP.
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
| (Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
1998
|
1999
|
2000
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
0
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
0
|
|
|
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
FY 1996-2000
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
|
228
|
4,070
|
|
|
|
|
21,493
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
Processing of radioactive materials began at the site in July 1955 when
Rare Earths, Inc. (W.R. Grace's predecessor) entered into a contract with
the Atomic Energy Commission. In 1956, the Atomic Energy Commission contract
and Rare Earths' license to possess, transfer, and use radioactive thorium were
transferred to W.R. Grace & Company. The facility where thorium processing
took place (Building 23) operated until late spring of 1957, when W.R.
Grace and the Atomic Energy Commission agreed to terminate the contract,
effective January 31, 1958.
SITE MAP
Thorium processing resulted in approximately 27,540 cubic meters
(36,000 cubic yards) of lowlevel radioactive waste that was buried on
the property at various depths over a 1.6-hectare (4acre) area. Other
contaminated materials, such as filter cloths and miscellaneous equipment, were
also buried. The Department of Energy currently has no active presence at the
site. Access to the designated cleanup area is controlled. No personnel use the
area, and W.R. Grace has no plans to develop it.
FUTURE USE
This report assumes that the site will continue to be used as a chemical
processing facility. Although the company has no current plan to reuse the
affected portion of the property, this report assumes an industrial/commercial
future land use. The proposed disposition of the waste generated during cleanup
involves consolidation and onsite capping.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
Key regulators for the W.R. Grace site are Environmental Protection Agency
Region III, the local health department, and the State Department of the
Environment. An environmental compliance assessment of the site in 1990
included a review of applicable portions of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Clean Water Act, and the
Clean Air Act. Additional sampling and analysis were recommended to
further define the extent of radioactive contamination and determine whether
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act characteristic waste is present in the
radioactive waste burial area.
An Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis will be developed to summarize existing
radiological conditions and to describe and compare remedial action
alternatives and their costs. Future characterization efforts at the site will
generate planning data to develop the approach for remedial action.
Major Environmental Restoration Activity Milestones
| Assessment (Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis with Action
Memorandum)
|
2006
|
| Remedial Action
|
2008
|
ASSESSMENT
Radiation Management Corporation conducted an initial radiological survey of
external gamma radiation levels in the landfill area at the site in 1978.
Results indicated that the contamination was distributed randomly over the
1.6-hectare (4acre) waste burial area, with elevated levels of
radioactivity measured to a depth of 4.5 meters (15 feet) below the
surface.
In July 1979 an aerial radiological survey of the site and nearby areas
verified the 1978 findings. After reviewing data from the two surveys, the
Department of Energy determined that additional radiological characterization
was needed to better define the extent of contamination. In April and October
1979, Oak Ridge National Laboratory completed preliminary survey work to
collect sufficient information to plan and carry out a comprehensive survey of
the W.R. Grace facility. In the waste disposal area, the survey revealed
gamma radiation levels above guidelines. Elevated levels of radioactivity were
detected in several locations on the 16-hectare (40acre) waste management
area surrounding the 1.6-hectare (4acre) residue disposal site. Surfaces
in Building 23 also showed radiation levels exceeding guidelines,
especially around vats and hoppers, and alpha surface contamination exceeding
guidelines on all five levels of the building. Additional radiological and
chemical characterization will be required before remedial action begins.
REMEDIAL ACTION
The Department of Energy has not yet performed any remedial action at the site.
The scenario used for the Baseline Environmental Management Report cost
estimate assumes excavation of contaminated soils, decontamination of
Building 23, and disposal of wastes by consolidation and onsite capping.
The total volume of waste to be addressed under FUSRAP is estimated at 27,540
cubic meters (36,000 cubic yards) of low-level waste.
Support for remediation will involve activities such as surveying to establish
sampling grids and drilling to obtain soil sampling and monitoring well
information. Remedial work will employ typical construction equipment to
excavate contaminated soils and to restore the areas after excavation.
Decontamination of Building 23 will involve washing, scrubbing, and
vacuuming areas of concern.
The Department will sponsor a maintenance and monitoring program for two years
after remedial action is complete. This report assumes that the property owner
will take over these responsibilities at that time. During the twoyear
period of Department of Energy-sponsored maintenance and monitoring, the
Department will monitor ground water, air, surface water, and external gamma
radiation in accordance with applicable regulations.
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
FY 1996-2000
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| FUSRAP - W.R. Grace & Company Site
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
|
228
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
1,805
|
| Remedial Action
|
|
|
3,938
|
|
|
|
|
19,688
|
| Total
|
|
228
|
4,070
|
|
|
|
|
21,493
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following table presents estimated funding information for the W.R. Grace
site.
Nondefense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
FY 1996-2000
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
|
228
|
4,070
|
|
|
|
|
21,493
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
|
 |