|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
The only currently active Illinois site within the Formerly Utilized Sites
Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) is Madison. The three completed sites in
Illinois are Granite City Steel, National Guard Armory, and University of
Chicago. They are summarized in the overview of the FUSRAP program presented in
the Tennessee section of this report. FUSRAP was established in 1974 under the
provisions of the Atomic Energy Act to identify, investigate, and clean up or
otherwise control previously decontaminated Manhattan Engineer District and
Atomic Energy Commission sites, together with other sites assigned to the U.S.
Department of Energy by Congress, where residual radioactive contamination
exceeds current guidelines.
FUSRAP encompasses 46 sites in 14 states and is funded through the Oak Ridge
Operations Office. For a general discussion of FUSRAP and associated costs, see
the overview of the program presented in the Tennessee section of this report.
All costs for waste management activities, program management, and relevant
landlord activities attributable to the Department of Energy are provided for
within the scope of environmental restoration. There are no FUSRAP sites with
either current or planned nuclear material and facility stabilization activity
needs. Funding for all sites is 100 percent nondefense.
MADISON
The Madison site (formerly Dow Chemical Company plant) is located at College and
Weaver Streets in Madison, Illinois, across the Mississippi River from
St. Louis, Missouri. The site consists of a large, multisectional complex
of 10 interconnecting buildings with a total area under roof of
approximately 130,000 square meters (1.4 million square feet). The site
covers approximately 300 hectares (735 acres).
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
| (Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
128
|
9
|
13
|
15
|
21
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
143
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
13
|
|
|
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
36
|
456
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,464
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
Lowlevel radioactive contamination, which is estimated at 7.5 cubic meters
(10 cubic yards), found in dust on roof support beams at the Madison site
originated from uranium extrusion and rod-straightening work conducted by the
Dow Metal Products Division of Dow Chemical Company during the 1950s and 1960s.
Dow operated under subcontract to Mallinckrodt Chemical Company, a prime Atomic
Energy Commission contractor, and supplied materials (chemicals, induction
heating equipment, and magnesium metal products) and services under purchase
orders issued by Mallinckrodt. The site was included in FUSRAP in 1992. The
Department of Energy's present objective at the site is to conduct
environmental restoration activities to eliminate, reduce, or otherwise
mitigate the potential for exposure to radioactive contaminants.
SITE MAP
Uranium238 and thorium232 were the primary contaminants detected at
concentrations exceeding guidelines during a 1989 radiological survey. The
contamination was found in dust from overhead beams in Building 6, where
the uranium extrusion and rodstraightening work occurred. Building 6
is a large multistory metal building with a concrete floor. The potential for
contaminant transport is mainly through airborne particles. Potential exposure
pathways are inhalation and ingestion of exposed radioactive contaminants. The
site is classified as a lowpriority site based on its inaccessibility and
the limited extent of the residual contamination. Because the radioactive
contamination is localized and limited in extent, it is highly unlikely that,
under current use, an individual working in or frequenting these remote areas
would receive significant radiation exposure. However, additional scoping and
survey measurements and sampling are recommended to further define the extent
of indoor uranium contamination southward to Building 4 and northward further
into Building 6. Under current use conditions, there is no significant
exposure risk to site workers or the general public.
FUTURE USE
The site will be released for use with no radiological restrictions after
remedial action is complete. This report assumes that the property will
continue to be used for industrial purposes.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
Environmental restoration of the Madison site will include removing a total of
7.5 cubic meters (10 cubic yards) of low-level waste, 1.5 cubic meters
(2 cubic yards) of contaminated dust, and 6 cubic meters (8 cubic
yards) of workrelated waste, including worker uniforms and personal
protective equipment. Because the site is heavily involved in production
operations for metal extrusion and machining, the present owner, Spectrulite
Consortium, is expected to provide a window of opportunity within the next
decade during which production operations can be interrupted long enough to
allow the Department of Energy to remediate the property.
The environmental regulatory process will focus on compliance with National
Environmental Policy Act requirements. Key regulators include Environmental
Protection Agency Region V, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
and local governments as appropriate.
Major Environmental Restoration Activity Milestones
| Assessment (Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis with Action
Memorandum)
|
2001
|
|
Remedial Action
|
2002
|
ASSESSMENT
Field investigations at the Madison site consisted of a radiological survey in
1989 and a site scoping visit in 1993. The survey included gamma scanning of
accessible floor and wall surfaces throughout the building and on overhead
beams; collection and radiological analysis of indoor dust and debris; and
determination of direct and removable betagamma and alpha activity levels
on overhead beam surfaces.
The walkover survey and sampling of dust from overhead beams identified
uranium238 and thorium232 at concentrations exceeding current
guidelines. No additional sampling and monitoring of environmental media have
been conducted because the contamination is inside a building that is currently
involved in daily production. However, the site scoping visit found the
overhead beams to be significantly more complex than originally thought, making
cleanup more challenging. During the radiological survey, smear samples were
taken only on the lower sections of the beam design, leaving large amounts of
surface area unsurveyed. Conduit and piping that run through the overheads also
are likely to be contaminated. The cleanup effort will require extensive
scaffolding, and many areas are not easily accessible.
The initial site designation report addresses assessments of radioactive
contamination. Detailed characterization, including sampling and analysis, will
be conducted before cleanup begins.
REMEDIAL ACTION
Investigators believe that remedial action was conducted at the Madison site
after two major production campaigns in the late 1950s and early 1960s;
however, no records providing details of the plant cleanup have been located.
The Department of Energy has not yet performed any remedial action at the site.
The selection of a preferred cleanup option will be based on results of the
upcoming characterization, which will provide further information about the
nature and extent of contamination and site-specific waste management
requirements.
The scenario used for the Baseline Environmental Management Report cost
estimate assumes that the 7.5 cubic meters (10 cubic yards) of low-level waste
will be disposed of at an outofstate commercial disposal facility.
The cleanup approach is expected to be a streamlined removal action conducted
under a Department of Energy FUSRAP-expedited protocol that is frequently used
for cleanup of small volumes of contamination within buildings where there is
little threat of contaminant release.
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
FY 1996-2000
|
2005
|
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
Life Cycle*
|
| FUSRAP - Madison Site
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
36
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
340
|
| Remedial Action
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
| Total |
36
|
456
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,464
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following table presents estimated funding information for the Madison
site.
Nondefense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
36
|
456
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,464
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
|