|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is composed of two sites: Main Site and
Site 300. The Main Site, also known as the Livermore Site is located
approximately 80 kilometers (50 miles) east of San Francisco and 6.4 kilometers
(4 miles) from downtown Livermore. It occupies approximately 2.6 square
kilometers (one square mile) of relatively flat terrain in the Livermore
Valley. Residential subdivisions were recently built adjacent to the site
boundary. They are separated from the site by a wide city roadway. Site 300 is
approximately 24 kilometers (15 miles) southeast of the Laboratory's Main Site.
It occupies approximately 28.6 square kilometers (11 square miles) of rugged
foothills that straddle Alameda and San Joaquin Counties.
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
| (Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
|
|
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
5,332
|
2,649
|
2,729
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
25,549
|
30,774
|
32,204
|
35,205
|
37,383
|
|
| Waste Management
|
24,455
|
25,004
|
25,754
|
26,527
|
27,322
|
|
| Total
|
50,004
|
55,778
|
63,290
|
64,381
|
67,434
|
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
71,674
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
56,576
|
|
|
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
1,975
|
2,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
30,243
|
20,877
|
13,728
|
11,908
|
11,024
|
11,019
|
5,656
|
|
| Waste Management
|
24,312
|
24,866
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
|
| Total
|
56,529
|
48,203
|
36,816
|
34,996
|
34,112
|
34,107
|
28,744
|
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
5,656
|
5,656
|
5,656
|
5,656
|
710
|
|
|
|
| Waste Management
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
|
| Total
|
28,744
|
28,744
|
28,744
|
28,744
|
23,798
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
|
| |
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,174
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
638,945
|
| Waste Management
|
23,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,746,610
|
| Total
|
23,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,407,729
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
The Department of Energy owns the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Main
Site and Site 300. The Department and the University of California jointly
operate the sites. The Main Site was initially used as a flight training base
and an engine overhaul facility. Transition from Naval operations to scientific
research began in 1950, when the Atomic Energy Commission authorized
construction of a materials-testing accelerator site. The Commission
established the University of California Radiation Laboratory, Livermore Site
(the predecessor of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) as a facility
for nuclear weapons research. Site 300 is a remote high-explosives testing
facility. It hosts several areas for high-explosives components, several
instrumental firing tables for explosives testing, an advanced test particle
accelerator, and various support and service facilities such as a motor-pool
and machine shops.
SITE MAP #1
The current mission of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is research,
testing, and development that focus on national defense and security, energy,
the environment, and biomedicine. The Laboratory's specific defense mission is
researching, testing, and developing technologies related to nuclear weapons.
Over the years, the Laboratory's mission has broadened to meet other national
needs, such as enhancing economic competitiveness and science education.
Based on the 1993 Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report by
the University of California and the Department of Energy, the Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory will continue to be a multidisciplinary research
and development laboratory focussed on national defense. It will continue to
operate both the Main Site and Site 300 for the foreseeable future. This report
assumes that the Department of Energy Office of Defense Programs will continue
to be responsible for all landlord activities and associated costs.
SITE MAP #2
The Department of Energy purchased Site 300 from local ranchers in the 1950s.
The surrounding area is agricultural and has an average population density of
fewer than one person per square mile. The site's mission is researching and
testing nonnuclear high-explosives components for the Department of Energy's
nuclear weapons program. The Department plans to continue using Site 300 to
test high explosives components.
FUTURE USE
The Oakland Office and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have actively
participated in discussions and meetings, coordinated activities, and reached
agreement on future land use with the local community, regulators, and other
interested stakeholders. This report assumes that the Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory will remain a Controlled Access research and development
facility. Future use of the Main Site is classified as Industrial. Site 300
will maintain a mix of Industrial and Open Space/Wildlife Management uses.
FUTURE USE MAP
NUCLEAR MATERIAL AND FACILITY STABILIZATION
This report assumes that the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory will enter
the Environmental Management facility stabilization process in 1998. The report
anticipates that the following facilities at the Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory will enter the Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization program:
a chemistry building (#222), a heavy element facility (#251), and a reactor
dome (#281). These facilities will be transferred to the Environmental
Restoration program in FY 2008. This report assumes that the Environmental
Laboratory Building (#412) and the Accelerator Building (#212) will pass
directly to the Environmental Restoration decommissioning program. The
resulting waste types will include transuranic, lowlevel mixed,
lowlevel, and hazardous. The costs associated with treating, storing, and
disposing of this waste are included in the Waste Management program estimates
provided later in this summary. This report assumes that the stabilization and
maintenance process at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory will be
completed by FY 2008. See the Main Site Map for the location of Nuclear
Material Facility Stabilization program activities.
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Projects and Waste Volume Table
| |
|
|
| 222/ 251 |
1998
|
2008
|
229
|
353
|
293
|
56
|
| 281 |
1998
|
2008
|
40
|
19
|
52
|
6
|
| Total
|
269 |
372
|
345 |
62
|
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
1,975
|
2,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,174
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
Environmental restoration activities at the Main Site and Site 300 are
conducted as two distinct projects and are governed by separate Federal
Facility Agreements. Parties to these agreements include the Department of
Energy, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and the California
Environmental Protection Agency Department of Toxic Substances Control and
Regional Water Quality Control Boards. The Department of Toxic Substances
Control is the lead state agency for the cleanup at both sites.
Past operations at the Laboratory's Main Site involving handling and storing
hazardous materials resulted in the release and subsequent migration of
contaminants into soil and ground water. Nineteen different source areas of
contamination have been identified in various parts of the site. The Main Site
was placed on the National Priorities List by the Environmental Protection
Agency in 1987.
Past operations at Site 300 have resulted in the release of hazardous and
radioactive materials from landfills, dry wells, and wastewater lagoons to soil
and ground water. Some of these contaminants have migrated offsite. Because of
these releases, Site 300 was placed on the National Priorities List in 1990.
The Federal Facilities Agreement for Site 300 identified six operable units for
assessment and remediation.
The costs for shipping and disposition of hazardous waste spent carbon
canisters are built into the Environmental Restoration program. All other costs
associated with treatment, storage, and disposal are borne by the Waste
Management program.
Major Environmental Restoration Activity Milestones
| Main Site
|
|
Assessment
|
2001
|
|
Remedial Action
|
2050
|
|
Site 300
|
|
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Closure of the High Explosive Burn Pits
|
1997
|
|
Remediation of Building 834
|
2010
|
|
Surveillance and Monitoring of High Explosive Burn Pit Area
|
2025
|
|
Remediation of General Service Area
|
2040
|
MAIN SITE
The major contaminants in soil and ground water at the Main Site are volatile
organic compounds and petroleum hydrocarbons. The principal volatile compounds
of concern are trichloroethane and tetrachloroethane. Chlorinated hydrocarbons
have been detected in ground water at concentrations of up to ten parts per
million (California drinking water standard is five parts per billion.) Tritium
has also been detected in two areas onsite at concentrations above the drinking
water standard. To date, only one source of tritium, a 1991 leak from a tank at
Building 292, has been identified and closed. Ongoing investigations are
focused on identifying all remaining sources of ground-water contamination.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION MAP
Between 1961 and 1979, an underground fuel-storage tank released approximately
64,430 liters (17,000 gallons) of gasoline. The tank was closed-in-place in
1981 and the soil was remediated in 1993 and 1994. This report assumes that a
No Further Action approach will be required for the soils at this release site.
Ground-water treatment plans have been proposed to reduce the concentrations of
solvents, gasoline, and other contaminants to levels below those specified in
Drinking Water Standards. Negotiations with regulatory agencies resulted in an
agreement to focus on three issues: the western offsite plume capture, the
southern offsite plume capture, and interior areas source control and mass
removal.
ASSESSMENT
The primary groundwater contamination at the Main Site is a 3.6
square-kilometer (1.4squaremile) plume that is threatening private
wells and the municipal water supply wells of the nearby city of Livermore. The
principal contaminant of concern is trichloroethane. Assessment activities have
focussed on determining the extent of ground-water contamination. Chlorinated
hydrocarbons have been detected in ground water at concentrations of up to ten
parts per million.
Remaining assessment activities involve investigating potential source areas
that are identified by the regulatory agencies or the Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory as having radioactive or hazardous materials. Many of the
remaining source areas are buildings where hazardous and/or radiative materials
were handled but where there is no evidence of releases having occurred.
REMEDIAL ACTION
Currently, the Department of Energy is using enhanced pumpandtreat
methods to remediate ground water at five treatment units. It is using onsite
and offsite extraction wells to contain further migration of the plume of
contaminated ground water. By May, 1995, more than 637 million liters (168
million gallons) of ground water was extracted and treated to remove organic
solvents, and more than 37,900 liters (10,000 gallons) of gasoline was
recovered. Activated carbon canisters contaminated with volatile organic
compounds generated by remedial actions are removed to offsite treatment
facilities.
Wells within the plume have been closed and their users provided with a public
water supply. The trichloroethane plume is not expected to affect the municipal
wells for the next 70 years. The planned pump and treat remediation to reduce
the concentrations of contaminants to Maximum Contaminant Levels is expected to
require 50 years. Hydraulic control of the western offsite plume was
established in 1995 and resulted in a diametric decrease in offsite volatile
organic compounds concentrations. The assumed effectiveness of the remedial
action approach negates the need for long-term surveillance and monitoring.
Tritium in ground water will be allowed to decay naturally in place. This
report assumes that the tritium will take approximately 15 years to decay below
Maximum Contaminant Levels. Source controls and mass removal are assumed to be
complete.
Contaminated soils have been remediated and a few remaining areas are
undergoing source investigations. This report assumes that No Further Action
will be required to remediate soils.
DECOMMISSIONING
Decommissioning activities are planned for five buildings currently listed in
the Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Surplus Facilities Inventory.
These facilities include: the Chemistry Building (#222), the Reactor Dome
Building (#281), the Environmental Laboratory Building (#412), the Accelerator
Building (#212), and the Heavy Element Building (#251). Operations at these
facilities include chemistry and material science laboratory analysis,
analytical laboratory operations, and multifunction research laboratory
analysis. Decommissioning activities will include the cleanup and disposal of
radioactive and hazardous materials, including asbestos. The effort will
include planning, characterizing, decontaminating, demolishing, and disposing
of all building materials so that the resultant vacant sites can be landscaped
for soil retention. However, because of data entry errors, this estimate does
not include any costs for decommissioning activities.
SITE 300
The environmental restoration at Site 300 focuses on assessing and remediating
releases of solvents, tritium, and high-explosive components from landfills,
drywells, spills, leaks, and other sources at the site. The site centers its
attention on: solvent releases from debris piles and drywells at the General
Services Area, from the Building 833 and 834 areas, and from the Pit 6
landfill. It also pays particular attention to solvent and high-explosive
component releases from the High-Explosive Process Area, tritium releases from
the Building 850 firing table and the Pit 7 landfill complex, and solvent
releases at the Canyon behind Building 832. See the Site 300 Site Map for the
location of Environmental Restoration program activities.
All major groundwater plumes at Site 300 have been delineated. The major
area of concern is the General Services Area, which houses support facilities,
such as machine shops, administrative offices, and motorpool facilities
for all of Site 300. From 1950 to 1960, solvents were discharged into drywells
or the ground at several locations in this area, resulting in soil and
groundwater contamination. Trichloroethene plumes have reached the shallow
alluvial aquifer in the Corral Hollow Basin and into the regional aquifer at
the General Services Area. At present, the levels of contamination in ground
water and soil do not pose immediate health risks to site workers or the
public. In the area where high explosives are processed, low concentrations of
volatile organic compounds and high explosives are present in soil and perched
waterbearing zones.
Offsite, the contaminated ground water threatens two watersupply wells
that are monitored regularly. The Department of Energy has made a formal
agreement with their users to provide clean water wells or local surface water
supplies. Upon securing the alternative water supplies, the Department will
deactivate the original wells and convert them into monitoring wells.
ASSESSMENT
Assessment activities have focused on determining the extent of onsite and
offsite soil and ground-water contamination. Assessment is 80 percent complete
at Site 300. During the next two years, the Department will investigate
Building 854, the Building 832 Canyon, the "Sandia" Drop Tower, the Building
815 Area, and the Building 850 Area. Volatile organic carbons are believed to
have been released in these areas. Assessment activities will be complete by FY
2001.
The source of contaminants in the eastern General Service Area is an abandoned
debris pile that has been removed. The source of contaminants in the central
General Services Area is closed drywells where solvents were disposed. The
contamination plume at the eastern General Services Area extends offsite and
down the Corral Hollow Alluvial channel for approximately 1.6 kilometers (1
mile).
A thermal testing facility in Building 834 has been operating since 1957.
Before 1994, this facility used trichloroethene as a heat transfer fluid. In
the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, trichloroethene was released into the ground
through pipe leaks and spills. In the 1980s, the facility piping and solvent
storage areas were upgraded to prevent further releases. Historical information
about operations and data from site characterization indicate that up to 2084
liters (550 gallons) of trichloroethene was released into the ground. Most of
this material is still present in the soil and ground water.
Contaminant concentrations in soil and ground water are very high at Building
834; and it is likely that pockets of free product trichloroethene (dense
nonaqueous phase liquid) are present. However, the ground water at Building 834
is perched on a lens of clay close to the top surface. A second clay lens is
located below 85 meters (280 feet) of unsaturated sediments. The two clay
systems physically separate the Building 834 site from the regional aquifer and
the perched ground water has virtually no pathway to leave the site. This poses
no risk to the public.
At Pit 6, volatile organic compounds from the closed landfill have contaminated
the uppermost aquifer. The ground water from this uppermost aquifer reaches the
surface at a location approximately 152 meters (500 feet) west of the landfill
within the site boundary where the contaminants slowly evaporate. The
concentrations of volatile organic compounds in the ground water have dropped
significantly since 1987.
A lowlevel tritium plume is emanating from the closed landfill complex of
Pit 3/Pit 5 and the Building 850 firing table. The plume is entirely onsite.
Fate and transport calculations predicted that tritium concentrations offsite
will remain below federal and state drinking water standards. Polychlorinated
biphenyls, volatile organic compounds, and depleted uranium also have been
detected in the ground water of this operable unit; the extent of contamination
is still under investigation.
REMEDIAL ACTION
The treatment of trichloroethene contaminated ground water began at the eastern
General Services Area in 1991. At the central General Services Area, ground
water from a shallow alluvial aquifer has been remediated for trichloroethene
contamination with both pumpandtreat and
soilvaporextraction systems since 1993. By the end of 1994, a total
of 11.6 kilograms (25.6 pounds) of volatile organic compounds had been removed
from the two General Service Area ground-water treatment systems.
The Oakland Operations Office proposed that the Department take advantage of
the unique situation at the Building 834 area to test removal/cleanup
technologies for volatile organic compounds and dense nonaqueous phase liquids.
The regulatory agencies granted approval for this approach and the remedial
alternative was recorded in the Interim Record of Decision for the Building 834
Operable Unit. Concurrently, the Department of Energy is pursuing an exemption
to the Basin Plan for this site from the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
This exemption will allow remediation of the Building 834 plume to
riskbased standards instead of the much more stringent Maximum Contaminant
Level requirement.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act closure of the High Explosive Burn Pits
will begin once the new Explosive Waste Treatment Facility becomes operational,
which is scheduled to occur at the end of FY 1997. This cost estimate assumes
that the facility will be closed in-place using state performance standards.
Closure of the High Explosive Burn Pits will be followed by post-closure
monitoring until 2025. It also assumes that the Central Valley Regional Water
Quality Control Board will not require solid waste assessment tests to be
performed on the existing Site 300 landfills that are presently in the
Environmental Restoration program.
Soil remediation will occur at Building 834 and the General Service Area.
Remediation will prevent further releases of volatile organic carbons to the
ground water. Soil vapor extraction is under way at the central General Service
Area and will be undertaken at Building 834. This report assumes 34,000 cubic
meters (44,540 cubic yards) at Building 834 and 25,000 cubic meters (32,750
cubic yards) at the General Service Area will be remediated.
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Main Site
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Remedial Action
|
14,083
|
9,848
|
6,264
|
5,194
|
4,528
|
4,528
|
4,473
|
|
| Site 300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
2,496
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Remedial Action
|
6,633
|
8,016
|
4,096
|
3,666
|
3,596
|
3,596
|
|
|
| Facility Decommissioning
|
171
|
39
|
33
|
6
|
5
|
4
|
|
|
| Long-Term Surveil. and Monitoring
|
601
|
1,047
|
1,558
|
1,683
|
1,712
|
1,708
|
|
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
6,259
|
1,927
|
1,642
|
1,359
|
1,183
|
1,183
|
1,183
|
|
| Total
|
30,243
|
20,877
|
13,728
|
11,908
|
11,024
|
11,019
|
5,656
|
|
| |
2055
|
2060
|
2065
|
| Main Site
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Remedial Action
|
4,473
|
4,473
|
4,473
|
4,473
|
|
|
|
334,053
|
| Site 300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,158
|
| Remedial Action
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,012
|
| Facility Decommissioning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,289
|
| Long-Term Surveil. and Monitoring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,545
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
1,183
|
1,183
|
1,183
|
1,183
|
710
|
|
|
100,888
|
| Total
|
5,656
|
5,656
|
5,656
|
5,656
|
710
|
|
|
638,945
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Direct Program Management/Support
Program Management tasks support the Environmental Restoration, Waste
Management, Technology Development, and Nuclear Material and Facility
Stabilization activities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Main Site
and Site 300.
Program Management tasks supporting the environmental restoration activity at
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Main Site and Site 300 include personnel
management, strategic planning, financial management, interaction with
Department of Energy and external regulatory agencies, monitoring of project
progress, and administrative support.
Federal grants to the Department of Toxic Substances Control and the two
Regional Water Quality Control Boards have been awarded since 1993 to provide
financial compensation to the state agencies for their expenditures on the Main
Site and on the Site 300 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act program. These grants are renewed every year. For the past
three years, the total annual compensation to the State agencies has been
approximately $300,000. Beginning in 1996, the annual expenditures claimed by
the State agencies against the grants are expected to show a declining trend as
the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study work for Site 300 approaches
completion.
A Technical Assistance Grant of $100,000 was awarded to the local stakeholder
group, Tri-Valley Cares, which has a deep interest in the environmental
restoration program at both the Main Site and Site 300. $50,000 of this fund is
intended to provide for their efforts prior to the Record of Decision stage and
the remaining $50,000 is intended for the Remedial Action phase of the program.
| COST SAVINGS
Cost savings for FY 1995 have been realized in several areas. For the Site-wide
Monitoring and the General Service Area and Building 834 Operable Units, the
regulatory agencies have agreed to accept the use of the "Cost Effective
Sampling" statistical algorithm to reduce the sampling frequency of up to 20
percent of the monitoring wells at Site 300. The monthly monitoring results do
not have to be transmitted to the regulators for review by formal report
submittal as mentioned but are incorporated into the quarterly reports. The
Eastern and Central General Service Area quarterly reports are combined. Total
cost savings for the three operable units is around $250,000.
For the Pit 6 Operable Unit, under the "Re-engineering Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act" initiative,
negotiations have been successfully concluded with the regulatory agencies to
short circuit the traditional Proposed Plan/Public Meeting/Record of Decision
process. The Feasibility Study document will be re-issued as an engineering
evaluation/cost analysis document and a new cap cover for Pit 6 will be
constructed as a nontime critical removal action. Total savings realized for FY
1995 and 1996 together will be $300,000.
For the High Explosive Process Area Operable Unit, a reduction of the original
characterization scope of work has been successfully negotiated with the
regulators. Reporting of the characterization work can be issued as an addendum
to the site wide report in lieu of a stand-alone report. A total saving of
$350,000 has been realized. Using the same approach, a total savings of
$230,000 has also been realized for the Building 832 Canyon operable unit.
For FY 1996, additional cost savings will be accomplished in several ways. For
the General Services Area Operable Unit, the "Cost Effective Sampling"
statistical algorithm will be further refined to reduce both the sampling
frequency and the number of analyses for all the monitoring locations.
Estimated savings $60,000. For the Pit 6 Operable Unit, the Department will ask
the regulatory agencies to accept a more cost effective cap that will save an
additional $200,000. For the High Explosive Process Area Operable Unit, by
applying the Re-engineering Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act initiative to short circuit the traditional Proposed
Plan/Public Meeting/Record of Decision process, the Feasibility Study document
will no longer be required. Any required removal action will be accomplished as
a Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act nontime
critical removal action. Total savings anticipated will be $255,000. The same
approach should also generate a total savings of $300,000 for the Building
850/Pit 3/Pit 5 Operable Unit.
|
The Department of Energy and the State of California have an
AgreementinPrinciple providing for technical and financial support to
the State for its activities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Main
Site and Site 300. Technical and financial support includes environmental
oversight, monitoring, access, emergency preparedness, and other initiatives to
ensure compliance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations.
|
STAKEHOLDER INTERACTIONS
The Oakland Operations Office conducted public participation activities for
eight California sites: Energy Technology Engineering Center, General Atomics,
General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center, Geothermal Test Facility,
Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research, Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and Stanford Linear
Accelerator Center. The office made information about the report available and
invited comments at a number of existing public involvement forums including
the Energy Technology Engineering Center Community Work Group meeting, Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory regulators meeting, San Fransquito Creek (Stanford
Linear Accelerator Site) Coordinated Resource Management Plan Working Group
meeting, Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research community meeting,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Community Work Group meetings, and the
Lawrence Livermore Site 300 regulators meeting. The Oakland Operations Office
newsletter, mailed to 2,000 stakeholders, featured an article about the 1996
report and announced availability of the 1995 report for review.
In response to public comment, the narrative for the 1996 report was modified
to provide additional information such as discussion of
the removal of contaminated soils near Trailer 5475 at Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory. Comments relating to national issues were forwarded to
Department of Energy Headquarters. Commentors submitting written comments
received letters outlining action that the Department planned to take in
response. If you would like more information about the report or have questions
about the results for these sites, please contact:
|
Public Participation
Dave Christy
(510) 637-1812
david.christy@oak.doe.gov
|
Technical Liaison
Rich Fallejo
(510) 637-1639
rich.fallejo@.oak.doe.gov
|
Public Affairs
Dave Christy
(510) 637-1812
david.christy@oak.doe.gov
|
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Waste management activities costs at the site address waste generated by both
the Office of Defense Programs and the Office of Environmental Management. In
addition to the Main Site and Site 300, satellite operations take place at 2020
Research Drive and the Livermore Airport. Operating under interim status, the
Main Site receives hazardous and mixed waste from Site 300 and the two
satellite operations. No other offsite locations are currently allowed to send
waste to the Main Site. See the Locality Map for the locations of offsite
facilities.
In support of programs at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, the
Hazardous Waste Management Division stores, treats, packages, and prepares for
transport transuranic, transuranic mixed, low-level, low-level mixed, and
hazardous waste. Waste is treated onsite or shipped to an offsite waste
handling facility; no disposal of this waste occurs onsite at Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory.
The Hazardous Waste Management Division manages four active waste management
facilities at the Main Site: Area 514 Facility, the Area 612
Facility, the Building 693 Facility, and the Building 233 Facility. All
Main Site waste facilities are presently operating under interim status permits
issued by the State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control. The
Main Site has submitted a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Part B permit
application for its waste storage and treatment facilities. The Federal
Facilities Compliance Act prescribed Site Treatment Plan addressing mixed waste
is being evaluated by the State of California Department of Toxic Substances
Control. See the Main Site Map for the location of Waste Management program
activities.
In addition to Main Site facilities, the Hazardous Waste Management Division
manages a permitted hazardous waste storage facility, Building 883, at Site
300. The facility is designed primarily for interim storage of hazardous waste
before it is transported to the Main Site for treatment or sent directly
offsite for disposal. Site 300 is fully permitted.
WASTE MANAGEMENT MAP
Waste minimization activities are the responsibility of the Hazardous Waste
Management Division's Pollution Prevention Group. This group performs program
administration, planning, waste characterization, documentation, reporting,
evaluation of new technologies, technology transfer assistance, a
Laboratory-wide awareness program, and integration of pollution prevention into
programmatic activities. The group's activities help to reduce the generation
of hazardous, mixed, radioactive, and nonhazardous (solid) waste. The group
will continue to conduct pollution prevention opportunity assessments for
various Laboratory processes, including engineering and economic analysis and
identification of technologies to be implemented.
Construction projects planned to enhance and streamline waste management
operations at the Laboratory include the Decontamination and Waste Treatment
Facility, the Mixed Waste Management Facility, and the Explosive Waste
Treatment Facility.
The Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility project will provide new,
centralized, and integrated facilities for the Hazardous Waste Management
Division and proposed Mixed Waste Management Facility operations. The
Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility portion of the project will
fulfill all of the Hazardous Waste Management Division's requirements for
storing, handling, treating, and disposing of various Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory-generated waste. The Mixed Waste Management Facility
portion of the project is a demonstration project for research and development
of a molten salt oxidation process and other treatment processes for mixed
waste. The Explosive Waste Treatment Facility, required by a Consent Agreement
with the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, will be used to
destructively dispose of explosive waste at Site 300.
Each of these planned construction projects has an expected useful life of 30
years. Once the useful life of the facility is over, the Environmental
Management program will decommission the buildings. However, this estimate does
not include costs for upgrades or ultimate decommissioning of these facilities.
The Hazardous Waste Management Division's planned waste management activities
and their projected completion dates are shown in the Milestones table below.
Major Waste Management Activity Milestones
| Building 280 Upgrades
|
1996
|
|
Construct the Explosive Waste Treatment Facility
|
1997
|
|
Disposition of Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Waste
|
2002
|
|
Disposition of Environmental Restoration Waste
|
2070
|
|
Defense Programs Support
|
2070
|
Transuranic Waste
GENERATION AND HANDLING
Transuranic mixed and transuranic waste is generated only at the Livermore Main
Site. Virtually all of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's transuranic
waste is generated by the Office of Defense Programs at the Plutonium Facility
(Building 332) and the Heavy Element Facility (Building 251).
Thirty-three 55-gallon drums of transuranic waste were generated and stored in
1994. The annual number of drums usually ranges between 50 and 100, with the
addition of one or two TRUPACT-Standard Waste Boxes (volume of 1.89 cubic
meters [2.55 cubic yards]).
All of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's transuranic waste inventory is
considered to be retrievably stored, because it was all generated before an
approved transuranic waste quality assurance project plan was implemented. Such
a plan should be approved in the latter part of calendar year 1995. The plan
will require further waste characterization, such as radiography and headspace
gas sampling.
TREATMENT
Currently, no transuranic waste stored by the Hazardous Waste Management
Division is known to require treatment to meet the waste acceptance criteria of
the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (Carlsbad, New Mexico). This waste consists of
high efficiency particulate air filters, which may require immobilization of
fine particles, and waste that does not meet TRUPACT-II wattage limits or
actual gas generation requirements for transport. The latter may merely require
repackaging in smaller quantities per drum. Transuranic mixed waste is stored
under the assumption that the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant will be granted a No
Migration Variance and therefore the waste will not require treatment. Organic
liquids are solidified by waste generators under permit exemptions. Some
reactive waste may require permitted treatment by the generators.
STORAGE
Current inventory includes glove box trash (approximately 300 drums), organic
and aqueous solidified liquids (76 drums), metal scrap (3 standard waste boxes
and 30 other boxes, 7 of which also contain high efficiency particulate air
filters), salt blocks (3 drums), and high efficiency particulate air filters (3
drums, 1 nonstandard waste box, and parts of 6 other boxes also containing
metal scrap).
Transuranic waste is stored at Buildings 625 and 612-1, located in the Area 612
Facility, and in the Building 233 Facility, while waiting for disposal at the
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. The Building 233 Facility, used to store high
curie transuranic waste, will be replaced by Building 280 to reduce site
personnel exposure resulting from the continued operation of Building 233. Some
nonmixed waste, such as Plutonium 238-contaminated waste, is stored by their
generators while awaiting radioassay capability.
DISPOSAL
Transuranic waste from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory will be disposed
of at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Existing transuranic waste either meets
the waste acceptance criteria of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant and TRUPACT-II
Authorized Methods of Payload Control Criteria or will meet them after
repackaging or, in a few cases, treatment. Thirty-one nonstandard boxes will be
repackaged in the Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility, which has not
yet been constructed. A small amount of reactive waste will require treatment
to remove this hazardous characteristic. This report assumes the life-cycle
volume of transuranic waste generated will be 2,057 cubic meters (2695 cubic
yards) and the life-cycle volume of transuranic mixed waste generated will be
136 cubic meters (178 cubic yards).
Transuranic waste will be transported in TRUPACT-II Standard Waste Boxes from
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has an approved site-specific TRUPACT-II
Authorized Methods of Payload Control Criteria. Approximately half of Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory's transuranic waste does not currently meet
TRUPACT-II Authorized Methods of Payload Control Criteria wattage limits for
radiolytic hydrogen and methane generation. Studies being conducted by the
Department of Energy Gas Generation Program, and similar studies conducted at
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, are expected to alleviate most of these
problems. The Department may have to repackage some waste to meet wattage or
actual gas generation limits.
All costs for transportation and disposal of transuranic waste are included in
the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant site cost estimates. Characterization and
packaging costs are included in the disposal estimate.
Low-Level Mixed Waste
GENERATION AND HANDLING
Research activities at the Laboratory generate mixed waste displaying a wide
range of chemical and physical properties. Non-Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act or California-only hazardous waste that contains a radiological
component is identified and managed as radioactive waste in accordance with
applicable Department of Energy Orders and federal nuclear regulatory
standards.
TREATMENT
The Hazardous Waste Management Division is responsible for the onsite transfer,
treatment, storage, and preparation for offsite shipment of mixed waste
generated throughout the Laboratory. The treatment methodology designated for
each specific mixed waste stream is established in Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory's Site Treatment Plan as part of the activities required under the
Federal Facilities Compliance Act (1992). Under the Site Treatment Plan, mixed
waste will be treated onsite or stored onsite prior to shipment to offsite
permitted facilities.
Under the Site Treatment Plan, the mixed waste streams generated at Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory are categorized into 11 treatability groups based
on their radiological, matrix, and regulated contaminant parameters. The
treatability group matrix descriptions for Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory waste streams, inventory volumes, and projected five-year additional
generation rates are provided in the following table.
Mixed waste treatment operations at the Livermore Main Site take place at
either the Area 514 Facility or the Area 612 Facility. The treatment processes
include chromium reduction, neutralization, metal precipitation, filtration,
size reduction, and solidification. Incineration is not conducted at the
Livermore Main Site. Treatment such as bulking and pH adjustment may be
performed on a small scale in containers in designated container storage units.
Mixed waste is treated in containers and/or tanks in Building 612, Building
514, Area 514 Waste Treatment Tank Farm, and Building 513. Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory has requested regulatory agency approval to add
centrifugation and evaporation treatment units as well as to increase current
treatment operations for mixed waste.
Treatability Group Matrix Descriptions for Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory Waste Streams
| Aqueous liquids and filter cake
|
174
|
1460
|
| Homogeneous solids
|
161
|
170
|
| Organic liquids with water
|
31
|
50
|
| Organic/inorganic debris
|
60
|
59
|
| Inorganic debris |
15
|
5
|
| High-efficiency particulate air filters
|
3
|
15
|
| Elemental lead |
4
|
5
|
| Reactive metals |
1
|
1
|
| Elemental mercury
|
1
|
>1
|
| Other reactives |
4
|
1
|
| Depleted uranium chips with coolant
|
TBD
|
TBD
|
Building 513 in the Area 514 Facility and Building 612 in the Area 612 Facility
contain laboratories used to perform small-scale operations under the
treatability study exemptions. These two laboratories serve three general
functions within the conditions prescribed by the treatability study
requirements: (1) perform preliminary analytical testing (prior to
state-certified analysis) of waste treated in permitted units to verify
reduction of hazardous properties below industrial sewer discharge limits,
below hazardous waste characteristic classification thresholds, and/or below
land ban disposal treatment standards; (2) develop process improvements, test
new or novel process techniques at a test-scale level, provide modeling data,
evaluate performance, or provide evidence for new equipment and/or raw material
selection; and (3) perform bench-scale treatment to minimize waste, meet
Department of Transportation shipping requirements, and/or satisfy land ban
disposal treatment standards.
| TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is developing the Mixed Waste Management
Facility to:
-
demonstrate and evaluate the integration and operation of mixed waste treatment
technologies for low-level, organic, and mixed waste;
-
demonstrate alternatives to incineration;
-
demonstrate equivalency with applicable federal and state incineration-based
standards; and
-
meet other Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Land Disposal Restrictions.
The first treatment technology to be demonstrated and evaluated in the Mixed
Waste Management Facility will be molten salt oxidation. Specific process
support systems, such as ceramic immobilization of process residues, robotic
feed preparation, and experimental off-gas, will also be evaluated for process
effectiveness.
|
Mixed waste streams for which Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory does not
have existing or currently planned treatment capabilities, will be shipped to
the Department of Energy's Hanford facility and the Idaho National Engineering
Laboratory.
STORAGE
The onsite mixed waste management facilities at the Livermore Main Site are the
Area 514 Facility, the Area 612 Facility, the Building 233 Facility, and
the Building 693 Facility. Mixed waste may be received at all four facilities.
No mixed waste management facilities are located at Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory's Site 300. Future storage operations will be centralized and
integrated in the completed Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility.
Containerized mixed waste is stored at an onsite waste management facility
until it is transported offsite to a permitted and approved treatment, storage,
or disposal facility. Mixed waste is packaged in accordance with Environmental
Protection Agency storage containment and waste compatibility requirements and
Department of Transportation regulations for transportation. Seventeen specific
areas are used to store containerized mixed waste. Bulk aqueous mixed waste is
stored in two tank units referred to as the Area 514 Storage Tank 514-R501
Unit and the Area 514 Wastewater Treatment Tank Farm.
DISPOSAL
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory does not dispose of any waste onsite.
Waste disposal is accomplished by one or more of the following methods, listed
in order of preference: onsite treatment followed by discharge to the sewer,
offsite recycling, and/or offsite treatment, storage, and disposal. Treated
waste may be discharged to the sewer under the Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory's permits and agreements with the Livermore Water Reclamation Plant.
This report assumes that 2,330 cubic meters (3052 cubic yards) of mixed
low-level waste will be treated at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory
and subsequently disposed. An additional 372 cubic meters (487 cubic yards)
will be disposed of at the Nevada Test Site.
The treatment of "characteristic" mixed waste is typically designed to remove
the hazardous characteristic through chemical modification or
stabilization/encapsulation to prevent it from leaching out of the waste form.
Once the hazardous nature has been removed or stabilized, the waste becomes
low-level radioactive waste, which, when certified and approved, is disposed of
at the Nevada Test Site.
Envirocare of Utah is presently the only commercial disposal site for mixed
waste. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory will use this site to dispose of
contaminated soils and stabilized residue from the treatment of mixed waste
containing "listed" hazardous components.
Low-Level Waste
GENERATION AND HANDLING
Significant variations in the physical composition of the low-level waste are
prevalent because of the nature of the research work at the Laboratory. The
low-level waste generated by the major programs includes miscellaneous
construction debris, equipment, laboratory trash, stabilized waste, and
contaminated environmental media (e.g., soils, asphalt, concrete, and gravel).
This waste is primarily contaminated with uranium, tritium, and plutonium below
100 nanocuries per gram.
TREATMENT
Low-level waste treatment operations at the Livermore Main Site take place at
either the Area 514 Facility or the Area 612 Facility, and are primarily
for aqueous liquids. The treatment processes include chromium reduction,
neutralization, metal precipitation, filtration, and solidification. Treatment,
such as bulking and pH adjustment, may be performed on a small scale in
containers in designated container storage units. Low-level waste is treated in
containers and/or tanks in Building 612, Building 514, Area 514 Waste Treatment
Tank Farm, and Building 513.
STORAGE
The onsite low-level waste management facilities at the Livermore site consist
of the Area 514 Facility, the Area 612 Facility, the Building 233 Facility, and
the Building 693 Facility. Low-level waste may be received at any of these
facilities. Future storage operations will be centralized at the completed
Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility.
DISPOSAL
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has no waste disposal facility onsite.
Low-level waste is shipped to the Nevada Test site for disposal. This report
assumes 4,429 cubic meters (5,802 cubic yards) of low-level waste will be
generated over the life cycle.
Hazardous Waste
GENERATION AND HANDLING
Hazardous waste types generated include: explosive waste, environmental
restoration generated waste, biohazardous waste, organic liquids, inorganic
liquids, contaminated soils, organic sludges, inorganic sludges, laboratory
chemicals, asbestos, paints, empty containers, polychlorinated
biphenyl-contaminated materials, batteries, inorganic gases, and organic gases.
TREATMENT
With the exception of empty containers, which are compacted in Building 612,
solid hazardous waste is not treated or compacted onsite for volume reduction.
Wastewater that contains hazardous constituents in quantities exceeding sewer
discharge limits is also packaged and shipped offsite. Hazardous wastes shipped
to an offsite treatment, storage, and disposal facility for treatment and/or
disposal include: corrosive liquids, corrosive liquids with metals,
contaminated soils, metal-bearing sludges, laboratory chemicals, asbestos,
paints, empty drums, and polychlorinated biphenyl-contaminated materials. Waste
streams such as solvents, oils, coolant, batteries, certain metal-bearing
waste, and some mercury-containing waste are primarily shipped offsite for
recycling. The waste is typically packaged in Department of
Transportation-approved steel drums and stored in Area 612 prior to
offsite shipment to a licensed treatment, storage and disposal facility or
recycling facility.
When hazardous waste is treated at the Livermore Main Site, treatment
operations take place at either the Area 514 Facility or the Area 612 Facility.
Treatment processes include chemical and/or physical alteration of the waste
through filtration, solidification/stabilization, neutralization, chemical
precipitation, bulking, pH adjustment, silver recovery, chromium reduction, and
size reduction, among others. Future additional treatment is proposed in the
centralized and integrated Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility. The
Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility will also house the research,
development, and demonstration project called the Mixed Waste Management
Facility. Processes and/or equipment may be transitioned out of the Mixed Waste
Management Facility and used for treatment if proven successful.
Waste treatment at Site 300 is currently limited to the burning of explosive
waste at the High Explosive Burn Pits. Future additional treatment at Site 300
is proposed in the new facility called the Explosive Waste Treatment Facility,
where nonnuclear high explosive waste will be destroyed by way of detonation
and/or burning.
STORAGE
Hazardous waste is primarily containerized and stored at a hazardous waste
management facility until they are transported offsite to a permitted and
approved treatment, storage or disposal facility. Hazardous waste is not stored
at the hazardous waste management facilities for longer than one year. Waste is
packaged in containers that meet the waste compatibility requirements of the
Environmental Protection Agency storage regulations.
Each hazardous waste storage area has a continuous base that is impervious to
the waste and each area is constructed so that spills and surface water runoff
can be contained. Hazardous waste is segregated according to hazardous property
information disclosed on the label and waste requisition form. Containers of
incompatible waste are segregated by distance or physically separated by dikes,
berms, or walls. Storage capability at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
includes container storage units, a storage tank farm, and portable tank and
tank trailer storage facilities. Practical hazardous waste storage capacity is
estimated to be 850 cubic meters (1,131 cubic yards).
DISPOSAL
Hazardous waste is primarily sent to appropriate offsite commercial treatment,
storage, and disposal facilities.
However, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory also bulks hazardous waste with
mixed waste for treatment and discharge to the sanitary sewer. The Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory wastewater discharge permit with the Livermore
Water Reclamation Plant defines the limits of hazardous constituents found in
aqueous waste, such as toxic metals, volatile halogenated solvents, radioactive
components, total dissolved solids, pH and other conventional and
nonconventional pollutants. Prior to any discharge, the sewerable wastewater
must be tested and, if it is found to be above internal discharge limits, it
must be treated at the 514 Facility.
Licensed and certified drivers from the Hazardous Waste Management Division
transfer hazardous waste onsite. The waste must meet waste acceptance criteria
before it can be transported from a waste accumulation area to a Hazardous
Waste Management Division storage facility. If the waste meets this acceptance
criteria, it is shipped directly from the waste accumulation area to an
approved offsite treatment, storage, or disposal facility. This report assumes
that 39,824 cubic meters (52,169 cubic yards) of hazardous waste will be
generated over the life cycle.
Direct Program Management/Support
Program management tasks supporting waste management activities at Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory Main Site and Site 300 include facility
management; personnel management and training; administrative support;
document, guidance, and procedure preparation and revision; data and waste
tracking management; liaison with Department of Energy and external regulatory
agencies; inspections and audits; budget preparation and control; and waste
minimization planning. Waste minimization planning includes evaluating,
training, and implementing the following programs: recycling; substituting less
hazardous or nonhazardous raw materials; reducing volume and/or toxicity; and
modifying source processes.
The California Hazardous Waste Source Reduction and Management Review Act
regulates the Waste Minimization program. Pollution prevention planning
activities support the waste generators in reducing hazardous, mixed
radioactive and nonhazardous waste. This support includes program
administration, waste characterization, documentation reporting technology
transfer, the Chemical Exchange Warehouse, and recycling.
Waste Management Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Transuranic Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
21
|
93
|
93
|
93
|
93
|
93
|
93
|
|
| Disposal
|
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
|
| Transuranic Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
1,383
|
1,267
|
1,267
|
1,267
|
1,267
|
1,267
|
1,267
|
|
| Disposal
|
|
346
|
346
|
346
|
346
|
346
|
346
|
|
| Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment
|
135
|
135
|
120
|
120
|
120
|
120
|
120
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
1,488
|
1,488
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
|
| Disposal
|
1,082
|
1,082
|
964
|
964
|
964
|
964
|
964
|
|
| Low-Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment
|
228
|
228
|
202
|
202
|
202
|
202
|
202
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
2,505
|
2,505
|
2,218
|
2,218
|
2,218
|
2,218
|
2,218
|
|
| Disposal
|
1,822
|
1,822
|
1,613
|
1,613
|
1,613
|
1,613
|
1,613
|
|
| Hazardous Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
901
|
901
|
864
|
864
|
864
|
864
|
864
|
|
| Disposal
|
4,805
|
4,805
|
4,609
|
4,609
|
4,609
|
4,609
|
4,609
|
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
9,941
|
10,168
|
9,441
|
9,441
|
9,441
|
9,441
|
9,441
|
|
| Total
|
24,312
|
24,866
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
|
| |
|
| Transuranic Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
93
|
93
|
93
|
93
|
93
|
93
|
93
|
|
| Disposal
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
|
| Transuranic Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
1,267
|
1,267
|
1,267
|
1,267
|
1,267
|
1,267
|
1,267
|
|
| Disposal
|
346
|
346
|
346
|
346
|
346
|
346
|
346
|
|
| Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment
|
120
|
120
|
120
|
120
|
120
|
120
|
120
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
1,325
|
|
| Disposal
|
964
|
964
|
964
|
964
|
964
|
964
|
964
|
|
| Low-Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment
|
202
|
202
|
202
|
202
|
202
|
202
|
202
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
2,218
|
2,218
|
2,218
|
2,218
|
2,218
|
2,218
|
2,218
|
|
| Disposal
|
1,613
|
1,613
|
1,613
|
1,613
|
1,613
|
1,613
|
1,613
|
|
| Hazardous Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
864
|
864
|
864
|
864
|
864
|
864
|
864
|
|
| Disposal
|
4,609
|
4,609
|
4,609
|
4,609
|
4,609
|
4,609
|
4,609
|
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
9,441
|
9,441
|
9,441
|
9,441
|
9,441
|
9,441
|
9,441
|
|
| Total
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
23,088
|
|
| |
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
| Transuranic Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,616
|
| Disposal
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,820
|
| Transuranic Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,605
|
| Disposal
|
346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,220
|
| Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,150
|
| Storage and Handling
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,005
|
| Disposal
|
964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,480
|
| Low-Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,410
|
| Storage and Handling
|
2,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,220
|
| Disposal
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,065
|
| Hazardous Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,170
|
| Disposal
|
4,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347,635
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
9,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
714,214
|
| Total
|
23,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,746,610
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
DESCRIPTION OF PERSONNEL
Current Composition
Environmental Management personnel comprise a multidisciplinary work force that
includes professionals, technicians, laborers, and craft workers. This skill
mix is necessary to conduct the environmental management activities of the
site. The current federal and contractor personnel needs are presented in the
table on the next page.
Full-Time Equivalent Composition Table*
*The projections for Full-Time Equivalent employees are based on FY 1996
planning baselines (see Reader's Guide).
Site Management Structure
The Oakland Operations Office is the field organization responsible for
implementing Management Plans at the Laboratory. The University of California
is the management and operating contractor responsible for environmental
restoration and waste management activities. The current contract will expire
in FY 1998 and the Oakland Operations office is currently evaluating its
options. Defense Programs performs site management activities.
| CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES
If you would like more information about performing work for the Department of
Energy's Environmental Management program at this site, please contact:
|
Major Procurements
Anthony Pino
Director
Program Acquisition and Assistance Division
United States Department of Energy
Oakland Operations Office
1301 Clay Street, MR 700-N
Oakland, CA 94612
p: (510) 637-1850
f: (510) 637--2004
e-mail: anthony.pino@oak.doe.gov
|
Small Business Procurements
Dorothy Martinez
Program Acquisition and Assistance Division
United States Department of Energy
Oakland Operations Office
1301 Clay Street, MR 700-N
Oakland, CA 94612
p: (510) 637-1850
f: (510) 637-2004
e-mail: d.martinez@oak.doe.gov
|
Future Full-Time Equivalent Needs
This report expects that with declining waste generation and completion of
environmental restoration activities, the number of environmental management
Full-Time Equivalents will also decline accordingly.
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following tables present estimated funding information for the Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory.
Defense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
1,871
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
30,243
|
20,877
|
13,728
|
11,908
|
11,024
|
11,019
|
5,656
|
|
| Waste Management
|
22,204
|
22,737
|
20,802
|
20,802
|
20,802
|
20,802
|
20,802
|
|
| Total
|
54,318
|
45,944
|
34,530
|
32,710
|
31,826
|
31,821
|
26,458
|
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
5,656
|
5,656
|
5,656
|
5,656
|
710
|
|
|
|
| Waste Management
|
20,802
|
20,802
|
20,802
|
20,802
|
20,802
|
20,802
|
20,802
|
|
| Total
|
26,458
|
26,458
|
26,458
|
26,458
|
21,512
|
20,802
|
20,802
|
|
| |
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,010
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
638,945
|
| Waste Management
|
20,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,576,840
|
| Total
|
20,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,236,795
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Nondefense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
104
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Waste Management
|
2,107
|
2,130
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
|
| Total
|
2,211
|
2,259
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Waste Management
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
|
| Total
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
2,286
|
|
| |
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
| Waste Management
|
2,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,770
|
| Total
|
2,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,934
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS ESTIMATE
The FY 1996 life-cycle cost estimate of $2.4 billion represents a 15 percent
increase over the FY 1995 life-cycle estimate of $2.2 billion, after taking the
1995 expenditure of $71 million into account.
Comparison Table
|
Thousands of Dollars
|
|
| Nuclear Mat. & Fac. Stab.
|
36,929
|
-
|
22,174
|
14,755
|
40
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
401,623
|
20,935
|
638,945
|
258,257
|
68
|
| Waste Management
|
1,295,718
|
44,710
|
1,746,610
|
495,602
|
40
|
| Landlord
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Program Management 2
|
438,757
|
5,065
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Site Total
|
2,173,027
|
70,710
|
2,407,729
|
305,412
|
15
|
1 The FY 1995 life-cycle and annual costs are provided
to determine the corrected FY 1995 cost.
2 Program Management was reported in an independent cost table last year, but
is reported as a line item in the relevant program (Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization, Environmental Restoration, and Waste Management)
activity cost estimate tables for the FY 1996 Baseline Report.
|
The overall life-cycle costs for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Environmental Restoration program are 68 percent higher in the 1996 Baseline
Report ($639 million) than in the 1995 Baseline Report ($402 million), after
taking into account the 1995 expenditure of $21 million. There are a number of
changes in estimated cost and duration of Environmental Restoration activities.
Decommissioning costs are $34 million (82 percent) lower in the 1996 report
because an error in data entry caused the inadvertent omission of some costs
for decommissioning activities. Remediation costs increased from $317 million
in 1995 to $482 million in 1996 and surveillance and maintenance cost estimates
increased from $15 million in 1995 to $44 million in 1996. These changes were
the result of applying improved estimating techniques. The estimated duration
of remedial action activities is five years shorter in the 1996 report because
of the application of improved technology. The estimated duration of
surveillance and maintenance activities is also five years shorter and is due
to increased knowledge of the overall project. Program management costs
allocated to the Environmental Restoration program decreased from $188 million
in 1995 to $101 million in 1996 as the result of reduced overhead and improved
cost estimating techniques.
The 1996 life-cycle estimate for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Waste Management program is $1.7 billion, which is a 40 percent increase over
the 1995 estimate of $1.3 billion, after taking the 1995 expenditure into
account. As a result of the national assumption that all Waste Management
support of non-Environmental Management Department of Energy programs will
continue until FY 2070, Waste Management support to the Office of Defense
Programs at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has been extended 40 years.
Hazardous waste management costs decreased from $783 million in the 1995
Baseline Report to $413 million in the 1996 Report. This change is attributed
to using more thorough "bottom up" data and assuming continued success with
waste minimization/pollution prevention activities. Low-level waste costs
increased from $65 million in the 1995 report to $308 million in the 1996
report. Mixed low-level waste costs increased from $165 million to $184 million
in the 1996 Baseline Report. Support costs increased from $304 million in 1995
to $714 million in 1996. These changes are due to improved cost estimating
techniques, an increase in program duration and added work scope. Finally,
estimated transuranic waste management costs decreased from $205 million in
1995 to $128 million in 1996. This is attributed to an assumption in 1996 that
treatment needs for transuranic waste to meet the current Waste Isolation Pilot
Plant Waste Acceptance Criteria were minimal. In contrast, the 1995 report
included costs associated with treatment to Land Disposal Restriction
requirements.
|
 |