|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
The Hanford Site occupies approximately 1,450 square kilometers (560 square
miles) of shrub-steppe ecosystem in the southeastern part of the State of
Washington. The sparsely populated site is the location of archeological sites
dating back more than 18,000 years. The Columbia River, which forms the Hanford
Site's eastern boundary, sustains numerous fish and wildlife species, and is
the source of irrigation and drinking water to Pacific Northwest communities.
The river is also significant in the culture of the Tribal people. The City of
Richland is located at the southeast border of the site and the cities of
Kennewick and Pasco are located within 24 kilometers (15 miles) southeast of
the site. Approximately 100,000 people occupy these three cities.
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
| (Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
268,676
|
246,869
|
225,210
|
207,816
|
202,149
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and, includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
179,434
|
131,679
|
151,383
|
150,384
|
150,335
|
|
| Waste Management |
952,980
|
1,134,418
|
1,246,972
|
1,273,651
|
1,147,491
|
|
| Directly Appropriated Landlord
|
27,037
|
18,735
|
13,108
|
12,715
|
12,350
|
|
| Additional Programs |
28,739
|
19,856
|
8,142
|
7,800
|
8,250
|
|
| Total |
1,456,866
|
1,551,558
|
1,644,816
|
1,652,366
|
1,520,575
|
|
| 1996 Appropriation |
1,343,926
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
1,281,955
|
|
|
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
|
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
218,085 |
133,877
|
117,885 |
115,922
|
122,731 |
131,951
|
102,525 |
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
144,232 |
151,573
|
175,265 |
173,186
|
190,441 |
179,767
|
190,114 |
|
| Waste Management |
1,082,970
|
957,763 |
925,960
|
1,011,461 |
900,978
|
536,944 |
338,560
|
|
| Directly Appropriated Landlord
|
16,038 |
10,050
|
8,670 |
7,478
|
6,451 |
5,565
|
4,800 |
|
| Additional Programs |
14,032 |
6,998
|
6,629 |
6,194
|
5,935 |
5,712
|
5,520 |
|
| Total |
1,475,357
|
1,260,261 |
1,234,409
|
1,314,241 |
1,226,536
|
859,939 |
641,519
|
|
|
|
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
65,809 |
33,238
|
27,937 |
24,678
|
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
172,879 |
119,702
|
105,751 |
41,414
|
6,381 |
6,381
|
6,381 |
|
| Waste Management |
248,988
|
569,634 |
290,744
|
59,091 |
51,868
|
51,868 |
51,865
|
|
| Directly Appropriated Landlord
|
4,141 |
3,572
|
3,081 |
1,110
|
|
|
|
|
| Additional Programs |
5,354 |
5,211
|
5,087 |
2,825
|
1,078 |
1,078
|
1,078 |
|
| Total |
497,171
|
731,357 |
432,600
|
129,119 |
59,326
|
59,326 |
59,323
|
|
|
|
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,473,190
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
6,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,349,231
|
| Waste Management |
54,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,666,358
|
| Directly Appropriated Landlord
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354,786
|
| Additional Programs |
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
364,733 |
| Total |
61,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,208,297
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Section
Environmental Restoration Section
Waste Management Section
Landlord Section
FACILITY MISSION
In January 1943, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers selected the Columbia Basin
as the location for the nation's first full-sized plutonium production
operation. Selection criteria developed in 1942 called for a large, remote
tract of land with room for a manufacturing area at least 19 by 26 kilometers
(12 by 16 miles), space for laboratory facilities at least 13 kilometers (8
miles) from the nearest reactor or processing plant, and abundant water and
electricity. The Hanford Site met these criteria. The Manhattan Project soon
developed plans to build production reactors along the Columbia River
(100 Area); processing plants and associated facilities on a plateau near
the center of the site (200 Areas); and the fuel fabrication buildings,
laboratories, and other support facilities near the site's southern boundary
(300 Area). In 1967, the Atomic Energy Commission designated part of the
Hanford Site an arid lands ecology reserve.
The current and future mission of the Hanford Site is to manage the facilities
and inventories of special materials, remedy the environmental contamination
caused by decades of activities related to the production of plutonium, and
support national research efforts in the areas of environmental and other
sciences. The site has been under the direction of Office of Environmental
Management since 1989, and its efforts are now specifically focused on
minimizing, processing, and storing the backlog radioactive and hazardous waste
generated from 1943 through 1993; managing spent nuclear fuels and special
nuclear material; decontaminating and decommissioning facilities no longer
required; and developing technologies to clean up Hanford and other
environmentally contaminated sites. Efforts also include remediating the site,
to the extent practical, to its former state, and managing the site as a
national resource. The natural and cultural resources of the site will be
managed in a manner consistent with Tribal rights. All existing facilities will
be sold for salvage, decommissioned, or converted for commercial use.
SITE MAP
The U.S. Government established the Hanford Engineering Works in 1943 to
support the nation's war-time effort to produce plutonium for the world's first
nuclear weapons. In 30 months, the Manhattan Project built three reactors,
three chemical processing plants to recover plutonium from irradiated fuel, and
64 underground storage tanks. It also built a production reactor fuel
fabrication facility and other support facilities.
The production of plutonium at Hanford involved three steps: 1) fuel
fabrication, in which uranium was fabricated into fuel elements in the 300 Area
of the site; 2) fuel irradiation, in which fuel elements were irradiated in
nuclear reactors in the 100 Area, converting small amounts of the uranium fuel
to plutonium; and 3) chemical processing, in which the irradiated fuel elements
or "slugs" were chemically processed to extract the plutonium in the 200 Area
facilities.
The uranium fuel fabrication processes took place in the 313 Metal Fabrication
Building and the 314 Press Building. The 313 Building was used to machine
uranium rods to desired dimensions for use in Hanford's reactors, jacket
("can") the sized fuel elements, and test the jackets for proper bonding and
sealing. The 314 Building contained equipment to extrude raw uranium billets
into rods and perform final tests on the jacketed elements.
During the 1940s and 1950s, eight reactors were built in the 100 Area. The fuel
for these reactors was fabricated in the 300 Area. The spent fuel discharged
from the reactors was chemically processed to recover uranium and plutonium. N
Reactor, which became operational in 1963, was used for both plutonium
production and steam generation. In addition to the production reactors, there
were two test reactors. The Plutonium Research Test Reactor is located in the
300 Area, and the much larger Fast Flux Test Facility reactor is in the 400
Area. These test reactors were used in fuel materials, isotope production, and
power research.
After the fabricated fuel had been irradiated in the production reactors, the
fuel slugs were chemically separated in the 200 Area where the plutonium was
extracted. The processing buildings included the Plutonium-Uranium Extraction
Plant, where spent fuel was processed to extract plutonium and unused uranium;
the Uranium Oxide Plant, where uranium nitrate was converted to uranium oxide
powder for recycling; and the Plutonium Finishing Plant, where plutonium metal
was fashioned. In addition, Hanford used the B Plant for bismuth phosphate
processing and separation and purification of cesium and strontium for
encapsulation; C Plant (Hot or Strontium Semiworks) for separation and process
development; S Plant (Reduction-Oxidation Plant), for separation through
solvent extraction; T Plant for bismuth phosphate process separation and
subsequent use as a decontamination and repair facility; and U Plant for
chemical separation and processing.
Beginning in 1964, the Department sharply curtailed plutonium production in
response to the nation's changing defense needs. By 1971, eight of the nine
production reactors had been shut down and by 1972, all related fuel separation
facilities, including the Plutonium-Uranium Extraction Plant, had ceased
operations. In the early 1980s, the Department briefly restarted the
Plutonium-Uranium Extraction Plant and the Uranium Oxide Plant; however, these
plants are now permanently shut down.
As a result of the reduction of plutonium production activities, the resources
and capabilities of the Hanford Site were refocused toward developing
nonmilitary applications of nuclear energy. In the 1970s, the Energy Research
and Development Administration, a predecessor to the Department of Energy,
emphasized energy research programs, including solar, geothermal, and advanced
systems; fossil energy; national security; conservation; energy policy
analysis; and resource assessment. During this period, the full-size advanced
test reactor, and the Fast Flux Test Facility were used for large-scale nuclear
fuels testing in support of nuclear energy research.
In 1989, the defense-related plutonium production mission at Hanford was
replaced by the environmental management mission. By that time, production
practices had resulted in the discharge of contaminated liquids into the soil,
ground water, and Columbia River; the disposal of solid waste throughout the
area; and the accumulation of two-thirds of the nation's stored weapons-related
radioactive waste.
Also in 1989, the Hanford Site was placed on the National Priorities List under
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (also
known as Superfund). Since that time, the Department has been committed to
remediation and waste management to decrease potential risks to the site's work
force, the public, and the environment.
| TRI-PARTY AGREEMENT
In 1989, the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the
Washington State Department of Ecology entered into the Tri-Party Agreement, a
formal agreement to reach compliance for major waste streams managed at the
Hanford Site. The agreement currently provides a schedule for site activities
and focuses on backlog waste that must be addressed by the Waste Management
program. However, Milestone 33 of the Tri-Party Agreement requires submission
of reports to assist in defining how newly generated waste, including Nuclear
Material and Facility Stabilization and Environmental Restoration generated
waste, will be sent to the Waste Management program for treatment or disposal.
Once these reports are completed, dialogue on setting milestones for newly
generated waste will begin.
|
The Department stores contaminated material, scrap, and liquid byproducts in
1,391 locations, including high-level and low-level liquid waste in storage
tanks in the 200 Area. Environmental contamination is found in surface and
subsurface soils. In addition, liquids (principally liquid low-level waste
effluents) have been discharged into the soils and have contaminated about 520
square kilometers (200 square miles) of ground water. While much of this
contamination is below drinking water standards, 11 contaminants (tritium,
carbon tetrachloride, chromium, nitrates, cobalt, strontium, cesium,
technetium, iodine, plutonium, and uranium) exist at levels that exceed these
standards at various locations across the site.
Prior to 1970, solid waste contaminated with hazardous chemicals, plutonium, or
low-level waste was disposed in burial trenches. The burial trenches continued
to be used for waste with hazardous chemicals from 1970 to 1986. After 1970,
most of the plutonium-contaminated waste was placed into partially lined
underground vaults or surface trenches designed for easier retrieval. Hanford
also has sites in which packaged, low-level radioactive and hazardous waste is
buried. These packages include drums, boxes, and bags.
The chemical processing of irradiated fuels generated the largest volume of
Hanford's waste. The process wastewaters were divided into high-level
radioactive alkaline slurries containing heavy metals, organic and inorganic
salts, uranium, plutonium, and mixed fission products stored in underground
waste tanks, and low-level waste streams, such as cooling water, condensates,
and other similar waste discharged to the ground.
Contaminated facilities located in the 100, 200, 300, 400, and 600 Areas
consist of shutdown production and test reactors, chemical separation and
processing plants, waste-handling facilities, and various support structures.
These facilities are contaminated with radioactive and hazardous materials as a
result of the various processes associated with fuel fabrication, fuel
irradiation, and chemical processing, as described previously.
The Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization program will need to stabilize
and deactivate approximately 360 facilities before they are transferred to the
Environmental Restoration program for decommissioning. Approximately 175
facilities have already been assigned to one of five transition projects; the
remaining 185 facilities have yet to be assigned.
FUTURE USE
The Department of Energy has initiated the development of a Comprehensive Land
Use Plan for the Hanford Site to identify existing and planned land uses and
accompanying restrictions. The Department will develop this plan in concert
with its Hanford stakeholders. The process of selecting specific uses will not
be complete for several years. Therefore, the programs and cost estimates
described in this report reflect current assumptions about future uses for the
major areas of the Hanford Site and the current strategy for remediating each
area to an end state compatible with that assumed use.
This report assumes the Columbia River corridor up to the high-water mark and
the North Slope sections are classified as Recreational. The surface,
subsurface, and ground water associated with the North Slope have already been
remediated to a condition that does not preclude any land use.
This report assumes the Fitzner-Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve is
classified as Open Space with Restricted Access. The surface and subsurface of
the Ecology Reserve, including Rattlesnake Mountain, have been remediated to a
condition that does not preclude any land use. This report assumes use of the
ground water is restricted, and the Department will maintain control of it
because its use could affect the behavior of ground water in other parts of
Hanford.
This report assumes the 100 Area to be Open Space with Restricted Access. It
assumes the area along the southern shoreline of the Columbia River will be
restored to a condition compatible with uses such as recreation, wildlife
preserves, and historical/cultural preservation. The Environmental Management
program will remove contamination in surface and subsurface soils, as well as
contamination that threatens the Columbia River. This report assumes the use of
the ground water will be restricted, and control will be maintained by the
Department.
This report also assumes internal areas are Open Space with Restricted Access
and the land will be restored to a condition compatible with wildlife habitat
and occasional Recreational use. Access may be restricted in buffer zones
around nuclear facilities to ensure human health and safety, and use of the
ground water is assumed to be restricted, and control will be maintained by the
Department.
FUTURE USE MAP
The land encompassing the current 300, 400, 1100, and 3000 Areas is assumed to
be held for Industrial use, as are the sites already reserved for commercial
power generation plants, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave
Observatory, and the Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response
Training Center. Remediation of the 1100 Area has been completed. This report
assumes that the 300 and 400 areas will be remediated to standards compatible
with Industrial use. In most instances, contamination will be removed from the
surface and subsurface soils and ground-water use will be restricted, and
control will be maintained by the Department.
While the report assumes the land use for the Central Plateau (200 Area) will
be designated as Controlled Access, it also assumes portions of this area will
be held exclusively for the disposal, containment, and management of waste, and
other compatible uses. It is assumed the Department will use this land for
these purposes and will maintain this area in a stable, safe condition for the
foreseeable future. Surface and subsurface contaminants will be contained in
place, waste disposal areas will be contained and controlled, and major
facilities will be entombed in place. Therefore, the waste management areas
within the Central Plateau are designated Controlled Access. This report
assumes use of the ground water under this area will be restricted indefinitely
and control will be maintained by the Department.
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Section
|
 |