|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
The General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center, which General Electric privately
owns and operates, occupies approximately 640 hectares (1,600 acres) in
Pleasanton, Alameda County, California. The site is located approximately 64
kilometers (40 miles) east of San Francisco and approximately 11 kilometers (7
miles) southwest of the City of Livermore.
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
| (Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
105
|
1,906
|
1,910
|
2,240
|
2,195
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
105
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
105
|
|
|
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
1,551
|
3,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,255
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
Past Department of Energy activities were responsible for contaminating the
highlevel Hot Cell No. 4 and the Emission Spectrograph Enclosure
(glovebox) at the General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center with transuranic
and low-level waste. Both work locations have been idle for more than ten
years, and the Department's current mission at the Center is limited to the
cleanup of Hot Cell No. 4 and the decontamination and disposal of the glovebox.
Characterization activities are currently anticipated to begin in 1997.
SITE MAP
The Department plans to decontaminate Hot Cell No. 4, remove the alpha
enclosure, and certify the cell as free of transuranic contamination. When
restoration activities are complete, General Electric will use the facility for
commercial purposes. As Departmental and General Electric records indicate,
General Electric used the facility for commercial work; therefore, a cost
sharing arrangement is appropriate for this project. The cost sharing
assumptions for this estimate depend on time of usage and can be summarized as
follows: the Department is responsible for 76 percent of the costs relating to
Hot Cell No. 4 and 90 percent of the costs for the glovebox; General Electric
is responsible for 24 percent and 10 percent of these costs, respectively.
However, General Electric has not agreed to these percentages, and a formal
division of the costs will be negotiated in FY 1996. (General Electric has been
contributing to costs since 1982, and this apportionment is based on their
contributions to date.) The costs presented in this site summary are limited to
the Department of Energy's portion; the costs allocated to General Electric are
not included.
Hot Cell No. 4 is one of four hot cells General Electric constructed in 1958
for postirradiation examination of uranium fuel and irradiated reactor
components. All four hot cells are located in the Radioactive Materials
Laboratory in Building 102. Between 1965 and 1967, Hot Cell No. 4 was
decontaminated, equipped with a stainless steel liner to
contain plutonium, and dedicated to the study of mixed oxide fuel rods in
support of the Atomic Energy Commission's fast breeder reactor development
programs. In 1978, Hot Cell No. 4 was placed in a standby condition, but
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory used it for six months in 1981 and 1982,
and the General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center used it for corporate
business for less than ten days per year thereafter. The Department has had no
involvement with the other three hot cells, and its liability is limited to Hot
Cell No. 4.
The glovebox is a 4.9-cubic meter (6.6-cubic yard) stainless steel enclosure
located in the Analytical Chemistry Laboratory in Building 103. The General
Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center installed it in 1968 for emission
spectrographic analyses of mixedoxide fuel specimens for the Department,
but it has not been used since 1980.
There are no current or planned nuclear material and facility stabilization
activities. All waste management costs fall within the scope of Environmental
Restoration. There are no permitted treatment, storage, and disposal facilities
at the site. Since there are no long-term surveillance and monitoring needs,
General Electric is the owner and operator of the General Electric Vallecitos
Nuclear Center and is responsible for all landlord activities at the site. The
Department's liability at this site will end following the last shipment of
transuranic waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in FY 2004.
FUTURE USE
The General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center is a privately owned commercial
research facility. The Department will complete decontamination of Hot Cell No.
4 and disposal of the glovebox before leaving the site. This estimate assumes
that General Electric will continue to use the site for Industrial/Commercial
purposes following release of Hot Cell Number 4 in FY 2000.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
The Environmental Restoration program is the only Department of Energy activity
at the General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center, and the scope for these
activities includes all costs. See the Site Map for the location of
environmental restoration activities.
Fuel examination activities in Hot Cell No. 4 and the glovebox resulted in
radioactive contamination from various fission and activation products.
Decontamination activities will generate two radioactive waste streams: 1)
nonaqueous, remotehandled transuranic waste in the form of construction
debris and equipment, which will be shipped to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant,
and 2) nonaqueous lowlevel waste, also in the form of construction debris
and equipment, which will be shipped to the Hanford facility.
Based on process knowledge, the likelihood of finding any hazardous components
in either Hot Cell No. 4 or the glovebox is small. This estimate assumes that
no hazardous low-level mixed waste will be generated at either location.
The Hot Cell Facility is a Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Department of
Health Services-licensed facility. Therefore, all decontamination and
restoration activities must comply with the requirements and license provisions
of both regulatory agencies.
General Electric has an extensive pollution control and prevention program that
will be employed during the restoration of the hot cell and decontamination and
disposal of the glovebox.
Major Environmental Restoration Activity Milestones
| Preliminary Waste Characterization
|
1997
|
|
Environmental Assessment for Decontamination and Decommissioning Project
|
1997
|
|
Conduct Decontamination and Removal of Glovebox
|
1997
|
|
Begin Decontamination of Hot Cell No. 4
|
1997
|
|
Remote Removal of Hot Cell No. 4 Waste and Equipment
|
1998
|
|
Manned Hot Cell No. 4 Decontamination and Waste Removal
|
1999
|
|
Alpha Enclosure Removal from Hot Cell No. 4
|
2000
|
|
Release of Hot Cell No. 4 to General Electric
|
2000
|
|
Disposal of all Transuranic Waste
|
2004
|
ASSESSMENT
Site and waste characterization of Hot Cell No. 4 and the glovebox have not
been performed. Initial characterization of the two locations will begin in FY
1997 and will include radiological surveys to determine locations and
concentrations of radioactive contamination. Assumed waste volumes and
associated costs will be modified accordingly. Contamination is currently
confined within the boundaries of Hot Cell No. 4 and the glovebox, and the
potential health risk to site workers and the public is low.
DECOMMISSIONING
Preparations to begin decontamination operations, including the development of
required documents, are scheduled to begin in FY 1997. The decontamination
approach will use the simplest and most passive methods first, advancing to
more aggressive methods if needed. Passive techniques include standard
vacuuming, damp cloth wiping, and to a limited degree, hand washing/scrubbing
operations. If these passive methods fail to reduce surface contamination to
acceptable levels, more aggressive decontamination methods will be used. In
order of preference, these decontamination methods include dry abrasive
blasting with a vacuum, scabbing and scarification, and washing with
ultrahigh-pressure water.
Surveillance and maintenance activities for Hot Cell No. 4 will continue
throughout decommissioning activities, because the facility must comply with
the requirements prescribed in both the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the
Department of Health Services licenses. Examples of surveillance and
maintenance activities include, but are not limited to, air monitor calibration
and maintenance, air sampling and analysis, door cylinder replacement, window
oil replacement, and high efficient particulate absorption filter changes. Upon
completion of restoration activities, surveillance and maintenance activities
will continue on facilities that are used to store transuranic waste until all
the waste has been transported to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
All waste management costs fall within the scope of the Environmental
Restoration program. There are no permitted treatment, storage, or disposal
facilities at the General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center. Lowlevel and
transuranic waste will be packaged to meet the Department of Energy's Hanford
or Waste Isolation Pilot Plant criteria as appropriate. The lowlevel waste
will be transported to Hanford for burial. The remotehandled transuranic
waste will be transported to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant for disposal under
applicable Department of Transportation packaging and transportation
requirements.
The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant is currently scheduled to accept remote-handled
transuranic waste in FY 2002. A delay in the plant's ability to accept this
waste will impact the cost and schedule of this project. The plant currently
has a Waste Acceptance Criteria Revision 4 that is being updated to Revision 5.
If the packaging criteria is altered significantly, General Electric will not
be able accommodate the change, because a facility to do the repackaging is not
available. Because of the nature of the material and the potential for
contamination, another hot cell cannot be used.
Given the expected amount of transuranic waste, decommissioning activities are
scheduled to occur over an extended period, with completion expected in FY
2004. On the basis of radiological surveys and site evaluations, the quantity
of contaminated materials to be removed during decontamination activities is
approximately 20 cubic meters (26 cubic yards) of transuranic waste. Removal of
the steel liner will result in approximately 13 cubic meters (18 cubic yards)
of low-level waste. This estimate assumes that low-level mixed and hazardous
waste will not be generated as a result of decommissioning activities.
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439
|
| Facility Decommissioning
|
1,161
|
2,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,706
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
302
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,110
|
| Total |
1,551
|
3,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,255
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Direct Program Management/Support
Program management at the site supports the integration of environmental
restoration activities at the General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center and
includes: tracking, collecting, and reporting costs; preparing programmatic
documents; coordinating permitting and public involvement with appropriate
units of the General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center; managing personnel;
funding independent verification contractor activity; acting as liaison with
external regulatory agencies; and establishing, documenting, and maintaining
technical, cost, and schedule baselines.
| STAKEHOLDER INTERACTIONS
The Oakland Operations Office conducted public participation activities for
eight California sites: Energy Technology Engineering Center, General Atomics,
General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center, Geothermal Test Facility,
Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research, Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and Stanford Linear
Accelerator Center. The office made information about the report available and
invited comments at a number of existing public involvement forums including
the Energy Technology Engineering Center Community Work Group meeting, Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory regulators meeting, San Fransquito Creek (Stanford
Linear Accelerator Site) Coordinated Resource Management Plan Working Group
meeting, Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research community meeting,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Community Work Group meetings, and the
Lawrence Livermore Site 300 regulators meeting. The Oakland Operations Office
newsletter, mailed to 2,000 stakeholders, featured an article about the 1996
report and announced availability of the 1995 report for review.
In response to public comment, the narrative for the 1996 report was modified
to provide additional information such as discussion of the removal of
contaminated soils near Trailer 5475 at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Comments relating to national issues were forwarded to Department of Energy
Headquarters. Commentors submitting written comments received letters outlining
action that the Department planned to take in response. If you would like more
information about the report or have questions about the results for these
sites, please contact:
|
Public Participation
Dave Christy
(510) 637-1812
david.christy@oak.doe.gov
|
Technical Liaison
Rich Fallejo
(510) 637-1639
rich.fallejo@.oak.doe.gov
|
Public Affairs
Dave Christy
(510) 637-1812
david.christy@oak.doe.gov
|
DESCRIPTION OF PERSONNEL
Current Composition
The table below represents the current skills needed to conduct the work at
General Electric. The work force is made up solely of federal engineers.
Because there is no contract for environmental restoration activities, no
contractor personnel currently work on the site.
Full-Time Equivalent Composition Table*
*The projection for Full-Time Equivalent employees are based on FY 1996
planning baselines (see Reader's Guide).
Site Management Structure
The Oakland Operations Office is the field organization responsible for
implementing management plans at General Electric. General Electric operates
the facility as a commercial facility. The Oakland Office is the managing
office responsible for the Department of Energy's environmental restoration and
waste management activities at General Electric. It is currently negotiating
with General Electric to award a contract to perform the characterization
activities at the site. No other environmental restoration contracts have been
awarded at this time.
| CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES
If you would like more information about performing work for the Department of
Energy's Environmental Management program at this site, please contact:
|
Major Procurements
Anthony Pino
Director
Program Acquisition and Assistance Division
United States Department of Energy
Oakland Operations Office
1301 Clay Street, MR 700-N
Oakland, CA 94612
p: (510) 637-1850
f: (510) 637--2004
e-mail: anthony.pino@oak.doe.gov
|
Small Business Procurements
Dorothy Martinez
Program Acquisition and Assistance Division
United States Department of Energy
Oakland Operations Office
1301 Clay Street, MR 700-N
Oakland, CA 94612
p: (510) 637-1850
f: (510) 637-2004
e-mail: d.martinez@oak.doe.gov
|
Future Full-Time Equivalent Needs
In FY 1999 and FY 2000, Full-Time Equivalent requirements will include
approximately six personnel, including health physicists, project management
personnel, and technicians required to complete the decontamination and
decommissioning activities. From FY 2001 through FY 2004, the work force will
consist of personnel experienced in the proper disposal and management of
remote-handled transuranic waste.
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following table presents estimated funding information for the General
Electric site.
Nondefense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
1,551
|
3,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,255
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS ESTIMATE
The 1996 life-cycle estimate of $23 million is seven percent lower than the
1995 life-cycle estimate of $25 million, after taking the 1995 expenditure into
account. The projected duration of Environmental Management activities at the
site is 26 years shorter than in the 1995 Baseline Report, ending in 2004.
These changes can be attributed to General Electric's inclusion to the
Department's Small Sites Initiative.
Comparison Table
|
Thousands of Dollars
|
|
| Nuclear Mat. & Fac. Stab.
|
- |
-
|
-
|
-
|
- |
| Environmental Restoration
|
21,807
|
240
|
23,255
|
1,688
|
8 |
| Waste Management
|
-
|
- |
-
|
- |
-
|
| Landlord
|
-
|
- |
-
|
- |
-
|
| Program Management 2
|
3,427
|
120
|
- |
-
|
-
|
| Site Total
|
25,233
|
360
|
23,255
|
1,618
|
7
|
1 The FY 1995 life-cycle and annual costs are provided
to determine the corrected FY 1995 cost.
2 Program Management was reported in an independent cost table last year, but
is reported as a line item in the relevant program (Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization, Environmental Restoration, and Waste Management)
activity cost estimate tables for the FY 1996 Baseline Report.
|
|
 |