|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
General Atomics occupies approximately 49 hectares (120 acres) on two contiguous
sites that are 21 kilometers (13 miles) north of downtown San Diego,
California, just southwest of the convergence of Interstates 5 and 805, and
approximately 1.6 kilometers (one mile) east of the Pacific Ocean. The two
sites are referred to as the Main Site and the Sorrento Valley Area, or
collectively as the General Atomics site.
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
| (Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
4,000
|
4,120
|
4,244
|
3,278
|
2,251
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
3,000
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2005
|
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
To support the Department of Energy and its predecessor agency, the Atomic
Energy Commission, as well as commercial customers, General Atomics has
maintained a fully operational Hot Cell Facility at the Main Site for over 30
years. The Hot Cell Facility, which General Atomics owns and operates, has been
used for numerous post-irradiation examinations of Department fuels, structural
materials, reactor dosimetry materials, and instrumentation. The
Department-sponsored activities at the General Atomics Hot Cell Facility
primarily supported the High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor and the
ReducedEnrichment Research Test Reactor programs.
SITE MAP
The Hot Cell Facility occupies Building 23 and an outdoor service yard on
General Atomic's Main Site. The interior of Building 23 has approximately 690
square meters (7,400 square feet) of floor space, consisting of offices, three
hot cells, an operating gallery, and hot and cold auxiliary areas. Operations
in Building 23 were performed under the authority of the United States Nuclear
Regulatory Commission Special Nuclear Material License Number SNM696 and
the State of California Department of Health Services Radioactive Material
License Number 014580.
The Hot Cell Facility Decontamination and Decommissioning Project is the only
activity at the General Atomics site included in the Environmental Management
program because it was the only area at the facility used by the Department of
Energy and predecessor agencies. Past Departmental and commercially-sponsored
activities contaminated the Hot Cell Facility with radioactive and hazardous
materials.
Building 23 is surrounded by a 4,342-square meter (46,740-square foot) fenced
service yard that includes several concrete pads used for staging heavy
equipment and making material transfers into and out of the building. The
remaining area comprises asphalt, soil, scattered small rocks, and disturbed
vegetation. There is a small 37-square meter (400-square foot) metal ancillary
building and four above-ground waste storage tanks. Other equipment includes
the high efficiency particulate air ventilation filtration system, stack, and
temporary storage areas. The yard is enclosed by a 2-meter (7-foot) high
galvanized chain link fence. Physical barriers and security personnel control
access to the yard.
There are no current or planned Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
projects at the General Atomics Site. All waste management activities are
conducted within the scope of the Environmental Restoration program. All
landlord costs associated with this site are the responsibility of the owner,
General Atomics.
FUTURE USE
General Atomics, the owner of the site, will decide the future use. However,
the assumed remedial action approach will allow the former Hot Cell Facility to
be used without radiological restriction, as defined by the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission and the State of California. This report anticipates the future use
of the property will remain Industrial.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
The Environmental Restoration program bears all waste management costs.
Decommissioning of the hot cell is the only Department of Energy liability at
the General Atomics site. Following completion of this project, all
Departmental liability at this site will terminate. Site and facility
characterization was completed in 1995, and decommissioning began in 1996. The
remedial action will result in removal of all waste from the site. This
baseline estimate assumes that the project will be complete in FY 2000. See the
Site Map for environmental restoration activities location.
Major Environmental Restoration Activity Milestones
| Transfer Irradiated Fuel Materials to Building 30
|
1996
|
|
Decommission Hot Cell Facility
|
1999
|
|
Ship Irradiated Fuel Materials to Idaho National Engineering Laboratory
|
2000
|
|
Final Site Closure Report
|
2000
|
|
Site Release
|
2000
|
ASSESSMENT
The examination of post-irradiated fuels, structural materials, reactor
dosimetry materials, and instrumentation in the Hot Cell Facility contaminated
the facility with mixed fission and activation products. The Hot Cell Facility
and site have been characterized for radiological and hazardous contaminants.
The radiological assessment demonstrated that approximately 50 percent of the
wall areas and 79 percent of the floor areas are contaminated. The cell
penetrations (holes in the walls for utilities, etc. that are properly sealed
to prevent contamination from leaving the Hot Cell) are contaminated, and core
drilling results indicate the presence of subsurface contamination in soil
below the facility. Structural materials on the roof and limited areas of the
exterior walls are contaminated.
Hazardous constituent sampling indicated that 23 percent of the floor and walls
are contaminated with low levels of various hazardous constituents, including
polychlorinated biphenyls, semi-volatile organic compounds, and metals. Core
sampling confirmed subsurface hazardous contaminants at low levels in areas
where oils were used. The yard soil assessment indicated limited surface and
subsurface areas of elevated activity primarily from cesium-137, -134 and -60.
Hazardous constituent concentrations were found to be within background range.
The proposed decommissioning alternative involves the piecemeal dismantlement
of the facility. The criteria for release of materials and equipment, facility
structures, and the Hot Cell property rely upon past precedent, which the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission and State of California established for the
General Atomics site. Radiological and hazardous contamination is confined
within the boundaries of the Hot Cell Facility, and health risks to General
Atomics workers and the public will be extremely limited.
Surveillance consists of activities required to monitor personnel, work areas,
equipment, packages, waste streams, and the environment for the protection of
the worker and the general public. It also includes performance checks on
related equipment/instrumentation to support the above activities. Surveillance
and maintenance activities will be phased out as the project progresses.
The Health and Safety Plan presents a detailed listing of surveillance and
maintenance activities and their frequency. The building structure and its
support systems and equipment will require routine maintenance to ensure the
Hot Cell Complex is maintained in a safe standby condition. The structural
envelope, the High Efficiency Particulate Air ventilation system, the
electrical distribution system, fire protection, and certain user project
fixtures are examples of equipment requiring continued routine maintenance.
DECOMMISSIONING
The Department used characterization data to consider the four alternatives for
decommissioning (leave in place, entombment, dismantlement, or decommissioning
in place). It selected facility dismantlement as the decommissioning
alternative. In this alternative, the dismantlement of the facility would take
place, including removal of the facility structure, and remediation of the soil
around the facility, as necessary, followed by Nuclear Regulatory Commission
and State of California inspections and release of the site for Industrial use.
The General Atomics Hot Cell Facility Decontamination and Decommissioning
Project is in the early stages of implementation. The Hot Cell Site and
Facility Characterization Report and the Decommissioning Plan were submitted to
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the State of California in 1995. Hot Cell
Facility decommissioning activities are currently being performed in three
phases.
Phase 1 consisted of disposing of waste materials and irradiated fuel materials
that remained in the hot cell from previous Department of Energy contracts,
determining the magnitude and extent of contamination through characterization,
and preparing the Decommissioning Plan and all required Health & Safety and
National Environmental Policy Act documentation. Phase 1 activities are
generally complete, except for approval of the Decommissioning Plan by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission and State of California and the transfer of the
irradiated fuel materials from Building 23 to Building 30.
The project is ready to proceed to Phase 2, and contract negotiations for this
phase are being conducted. Phase 2 includes decontamination activities;
packaging, shipment, and disposal of radioactive and nonradioactive waste; and
soil remediation.
Phase 3 consists of submitting the closure report to the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission and the State of California, conducting confirmatory surveys, and
obtaining approval from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the State of
California that the Department of Energy scope of work at this site is
complete.
Decontamination operations at the Hot Cell Facility are currently scheduled to
begin in 1996. The assumed approach will involve passive decontamination
methods such as standard vacuuming, damp cloth wiping, and, to a limited
degree, hand washing/scrubbing operations. When passive methods fail to reduce
surface contamination to releasable levels, more aggressive decontamination
methods will be used.
After the facility is dismantled, the affected soil surrounding the facility
will be remediated. Contaminated soil will either be shipped to an offsite or
temporary processing facility or shipped directly to a low-level radioactive
waste disposal facility. For the purposes of this report, direct shipment was
assumed. Following removal of all contamination, a comprehensive final
radiation survey will be conducted and documented in report form. After the
site has been surveyed and it has been documented that it complies with the
approved criteria for release, the final report to the state and the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission requesting release of the site will be submitted. This
report assumes that all radioactive waste generated will be transferred to the
Hanford Site. Sanitary and hazardous waste will be shipped to appropriate
commercial facilities.
The Department of Energy will share the costs of decommissioning the Hot Cell
Facility. The Department will bear 76 percent of the burden, and General
Atomics will bear 24 percent. The costs presented in this estimate represent
the Department's portion of the total budget for this project.
Based on the Hot Cell Facility and site characterization results and planned
decontamination, abatement, remediation, and dismantlement activities,
remediation of the facility and site will generate an estimated 13,635 cubic
meters (17,861 cubic yards) of lowlevel waste, lowlevel mixed waste,
radiologically contaminated asbestos and lead, and other hazardous waste.
The Hot Cell Decontamination and Decommissioning Project will involve
relocating some irradiated fuel materials owned by the Office of Nuclear Energy
from the building to another onsite facility (Building 130) for temporary
storage until a Department of Energy facility is identified. The total amount
of fuel material is 524 grams (1.2 pounds). This estimate assumes the spent
fuel will be transferred to Idaho National Engineering Laboratory in FY 2000.
Transfer activities will include surveillance and maintenance costs, which the
Environmental Restoration program will fund. Irradiated fuel materials transfer
activities will not generate any disposable waste.
All mixed waste generated at General Atomics is stored at the Mixed Waste
Management Facility, which is an interim status (Part A) waste storage facility
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Treatment of mixed waste at
General Atomics is conducted under interim status, which allows neutralization,
filtration, and stabilization activities. The Mixed Waste Management Facility
consists of three areas designated as container storage areas for mixed waste.
The total storage capacity in these three areas is approximately 580 cubic
meters (760 cubic yards), which far exceeds the current and projected mixed
waste inventory at General Atomics.
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2005
|
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| General Atomics Site
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Remedial Action
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,635
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,365
|
| Total |
3,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Future estimates of waste generation include 20 cubic meters (26 cubic yards)
of sanitary waste, which consists of miscellaneous scrap metal from the
Hot Cell Facility Decontamination and Decommissioning Project and five cubic
meters (7 cubic yards) of wastewater containing zinc and possibly other metals.
Direct Program Management/Support
Program management at the site supports the integration of environmental
restoration activities at General Atomics. These activities include tracking,
collecting, and reporting costs; preparing programmatic documents; coordinating
permitting and public involvement; liaison with external regulatory agencies;
and establishing, documenting, and maintaining technical, cost, and schedule
baselines.
| STAKEHOLDER INTERACTIONS
The Oakland Operations Office conducted public participation activities for
eight California sites: Energy Technology Engineering Center, General Atomics,
General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center, Geothermal Test Facility,
Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research, Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and Stanford Linear
Accelerator Center. The office made information about the report available and
invited comments at a number of existing public involvement forums including
the Energy Technology Engineering Center Community Work Group meeting, Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory regulators meeting, San Fransquito Creek (Stanford
Linear Accelerator Site) Coordinated Resource Management Plan Working Group
meeting, Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research community meeting,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Community Work Group meetings, and the
Lawrence Livermore Site 300 regulators meeting. The Oakland Operations Office
newsletter, mailed to 2,000 stakeholders, featured an article about the 1996
report and announced availability of the 1995 report for review.
In response to public comment, the narrative for the 1996 report was modified
to provide additional information such as discussion of the removal of
contaminated soils near Trailer 5475 at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Comments relating to national issues were forwarded to Department of Energy
Headquarters. Commentors submitting written comments received letters outlining
action that the Department planned to take in response. If you would like more
information about the report or have questions about the results for these
sites, please contact:
|
Public Participation
Dave Christy
(510) 637-1812
david.christy@oak.doe.gov
|
Technical Liaison
Rich Fallejo
(510) 637-1639
rich.fallejo@.oak.doe.gov
|
Public Affairs
Dave Christy
(510) 637-1812
david.christy@oak.doe.gov
|
DESCRIPTION OF PERSONNEL
Current Composition
An organization has been established specifically to decommission the Hot Cell
Facility. Required Hot Cell Facility decommissioning staffing is presented in
the table on the following page. The federal and contractor work force includes
engineers, technicians, crafts personnel, administrators and other professional
staff. Specialized staff and support personnel may be added as the project
progresses. Subcontractors for specific tasks requiring special skills will
complement the staff on an as-needed basis.
Full-Time Equivalent Composition Table*
* The Projections for Full-Time Equivalent employees are based on FY 1996
planning baselines (see Reader's Guide).
Site Management Structure
The Department of Energy has contracted with General Atomics in a cost sharing,
no-fee arrangement as prime contractor and site manager of the General Atomics
Hot Cell Decontamination and Decommissioning Project. The project will be
organized within the General Atomics corporate structure to ensure high
management visibility and priority. Other General Atomics technical and
administrative personnel will support the organization, as required. This
report anticipates no future contracting needs after the expiration of this
contract in 2000.
| CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES
If you would like more information about performing work for the Department of
Energy's Environmental Management program at this site, please contact:
|
Major Procurements
Anthony Pino
Director
Program Acquisition and Assistance Division
United States Department of Energy
Oakland Operations Office
1301 Clay Street, MR 700-N
Oakland, CA 94612
p: (510) 637-1850
f: (510) 637--2004
e-mail: anthony.pino@oak.doe.gov
|
Small Business Procurements
Dorothy Martinez
Program Acquisition and Assistance Division
United States Department of Energy
Oakland Operations Office
1301 Clay Street, MR 700-N
Oakland, CA 94612
p: (510) 637-1850
f: (510) 637-2004
e-mail: d.martinez@oak.doe.gov
|
Future Full-Time Equivalent Needs
The table above presents future contractor Full-Time Equivalents for Hot Cell
Facility decommissioning. Only one federal Full-Time Equivalent is required in
the outyears.
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following table presents estimated funding information for the General
Atomics site.
Nondefense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2005
|
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS ESTIMATE
The estimated life-cycle cost at the General Atomics site is 26 percent higher
in the FY 1996 Baseline Report than it was last year. The increase in the FY
1996 cost estimate is due to more mature analysis available for the
decommissioning, soil remediation, and closeout activities.
Comparison Table
|
Thousands of Dollars
|
|
| Nuclear Mat. & Fac. Stab.
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
13,847
|
2,266
|
17,000
|
5,419
|
47
|
| Waste Management
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Landlord
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Program Management 2
|
2,348
|
434
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Site Total
|
16,194
|
2,700
|
17,000
|
3,506
|
26
|
1.The FY 1995 life-cycle and annual costs are provided
to determine the corrected FY 1995 cost.
2 Program Management was reported in an independent cost table last year, but
is reported as a line item in the relevant program (Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization, Environmental Restoration, and Waste Management)
activity cost estimate tables for the FY 1996 Baseline Report.
|
|
 |