|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
The Energy Technology Engineering Center occupies 36 hectares (90 acres) within
the 1,080-hectare (2,700-acre) Santa Susana Field Laboratory located in the
Simi Hills of Ventura County, approximately 48 kilometers (30 miles) northwest
of downtown Los Angeles. Rockwell International owns the land.
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
|
(Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
| |
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
9,844
|
10,139
|
10,443
|
10,756
|
11,079
|
Grey shaded area reflects
annual cost estimates for the first five years of the site BEMR Base Case (as
of October 1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
4,635
|
7,170
|
9,774
|
11,781
|
9,885
|
| Waste Management
|
2,408
|
2,480
|
2,727
|
2,365
|
2,436
|
| Total
|
16,887
|
19,789
|
22,944
|
24,902
|
23,400
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
9,863
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
23,449
|
|
|
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
| |
2025
|
2030
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
9,844
|
14,265
|
12,704
|
804
|
|
|
|
188,081
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
8,075
|
6,312
|
4,275
|
3,255
|
4,282
|
|
|
130,994
|
| Waste Management
|
2,343
|
1,467
|
1,293
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
31,975
|
| Total
|
20,261
|
22,044
|
18,271
|
5,352
|
4,282
|
|
|
351,050
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
Part of Area IV at Santa Susana Field Laboratory was set aside in the mid-1950s
for nuclear reactor development and testing. Research was primarily related to
the development of sodium-cooled nuclear power plants and space power systems,
using sodium and potassium as coolants. The Energy Technology Engineering
Center is within Area IV of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory. The Center was
established in the mid-1960s as a Department of Energy laboratory for the
development of liquid metal heat transfer systems to support the Office of
Nuclear Energy's Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor program. Operations at
Building 20, the Rockwell International Hot Laboratory, were conducted to
support the Office of Defense Programs, while other facilities at the Energy
Technology Engineering Center supported other Department research programs,
including the Systems for Nuclear Auxiliary Power program. Operations in all
nuclear reactors and some other facilities in Area IV ended by the
mid1970s.
SITE MAP
Office of Nuclear Energy activities at the Energy Technology Engineering Center
were terminated at the end of 1995. Currently, the Energy Technology
Engineering Center's primary mission is applied engineering development of
emerging energy technologies, including energy conservation, solar, geothermal,
and fossil energy.
Environmental restoration and decommissioning activities began at this site in
the early 1970s. In 1976, the Department of Energy began a systematic
decontamination of remaining excess facilities formerly used for reactor
development. As decommissioning activities are completed and buildings are
certified for release without radiological restrictions, they will be
transferred to Rockwell International.
The Environmental Management program mission at the Energy Technology
Engineering Center includes stabilizing and decommissioning facilities and
remediating contaminated ground water and soils. Current activities include air
monitoring for radionuclide contaminants and ground-water monitoring. During FY
1995, interim pump-and-treat tests demonstrated that ground-water contamination
could be reduced. The site is currently waiting for regulator approval to
continue these interim actions until the permanent ground-water cleanup
strategy is selected. The Sodium Disposal Facility is undergoing a Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act closure. The need for further remediation will be
determined by sampling and a healthbased risk assessment. When the
Department of Toxic Substances Control verifies that the site is clean, the pit
will be backfilled and revegetated. Current decontamination and decommissioning
activity involves the Hot Laboratory, which is scheduled for completion in FY
1997.
This baseline report assumes that facility landlord responsibilities, including
infrastructure management and surveillance and maintenance of current Office of
Energy Efficiency facilities, will be the responsibility of the Environmental
Management program beginning in FY 1996.
FUTURE USE
The future of the center has been discussed with the local communities,
regulators, interested stakeholders and the top levels of Department of Energy
management. The present plan is to continue decommissioning program buildings
for transfer back to Rockwell for its use. However, Rockwell is currently
discussing transfer terms with the Community Reuse Organization. This
organization would spearhead a privatization effort that would bring industry
to the site and reduce the Department's obligation to remove the buildings.
Therefore, this estimate assumes that the facility will continue to be used for
Industrial purposes.
NUCLEAR MATERIAL AND FACILITY STABILIZATION
The Energy Technology Engineering Center has not yet entered the Environmental
Management Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization program. The 44
facilities at the Energy Technology Engineering Center that are anticipated to
enter the program include a sodium laboratory, a liquid metals chemical lab,
and hazardous materials storage facilities. The resulting waste types will
include transuranic, low-level, low-level mixed, and hazardous. See the Site
Map for the location of Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization activities.
This report assumes that these facilities will incrementally begin
stabilization in FY 1996. Surveillance and maintenance will be performed to
ensure that any existing contamination remains contained within the facility
and the facility will not deteriorate prior to decommissioning and restoration
activities. Repairs will be made when necessary to maintain the Federal
Government's investment in the facility. This report also assumes the nuclear
material and facility stabilization activities at the Energy Technology
Engineering Center will be completed by 2015.
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
9,844
|
14,265
|
12,704
|
804
|
|
|
|
188,081
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
Research and development activities, past disposal and handling practices, and
solvent use and disposal at the Energy Technology Engineering Center resulted
in contamination of former research buildings, several existing and former
waste management facilities, and site soil and ground water. Because
environmental restoration activities have been conducted at the site since the
early 1970s, many of the initially contaminated facilities have already been
remediated. See the Site Map for the location of Environmental Restoration
program activities.
Radionuclide contamination resulted from research and development activities
performed primarily in the 1960s. These activities included the operation of
ten reactors and seven criticality test facilities, fuel fabrication, reactor
and used fuel disassembly, small scale laboratory work, and onsite storage of
nuclear material. Over the period of 1974 to 1989, a decommissioning activities
program at the Energy Technology Engineering Center removed in excess of 99
percent of the manmade radioactivity generated at the site. The remaining
unconfined radioactivity has been measured at less than 0.1 curie, which is
much less than the radioactivity in the natural environment at the Santa Susana
Field Laboratory. Confined radioactivity is estimated to be less than 10 curies
and is controlled in activated or contaminated structures that are locked,
fenced, and within a guarded perimeter.
The site is not currently, nor is it expected to be placed, on the National
Priorities List. Therefore, the lead regulatory agency in charge of the cleanup
efforts at the Center is the California Department of Toxic Substances Control.
Remedial activities are completed in accordance with applicable state and
federal regulations and requirements and with the approval of the Department of
Toxic Substances Control and other appropriate regulatory agencies.
Collection of waste data and reporting will be coordinated with the Waste
Management program. However, the Environmental Restoration program will manage
and pay for treatment, storage and disposal of waste generated by Hot
Laboratory and Sodium Disposal Facility cleanup activities. Remedial action and
decommissioning activities include costs for treatment, storage and disposal of
this waste. The Waste Management program bears all other costs for treatment,
storage and disposal.
Major Environmental Restoration Activity Milestones
| Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Closure
of Sodium Disposal Facility
|
1996
|
|
Decommissioning of Building 012 (System for Nuclear Auxiliary Power Critical
Facility)
|
1995
|
|
Decommissioning of Building 020 Support Rooms and Outside Area
|
1995
|
|
Decommissioning of Building 020 (Hot Laboratory)
|
1997
|
|
Decommissioning of Building 059 (System for Nuclear Auxiliary Power Reactor
Test Facility) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
|
1998
|
| Building 056 Landfill Decommissioning (Defense)
|
1999
|
|
Closure of Radioactive Materials Handling Facility
|
2001
|
|
Site-Wide Assessment
|
2004
|
|
Facility Surveillance and Monitoring
|
2015
|
|
Department of Energy Obligation at the Site
|
2015
|
ASSESSMENT
The characterization of the perimeter of Area IV was initiated and completed
during FY 1995. Energy Technology Engineering Center solid waste management
units, identified by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facility
Assessment, will also be remediated. These include the Building 056 Landfill,
which is scheduled to begin the closure process in FY 1996 and complete in FY
1998. The Building 056 Landfill will be part of a Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act Facility Investigation for all of the Santa Susana Field
Laboratory. The Facility Investigation work plan was submitted to the
Department of Toxic Substances Control in March 1995. Although approval was
expected in September 1995, the Department of Toxic Substances Control is still
reviewing the work plan. When the Department of Toxic Substances Control
approves the plan, it will also be approving a decision that No Further Action
is required on the Building 100 trench, one of the solid waste management
units. See the Site Map for the location of Environmental Restoration program
activities.
The release of unknown quantities of cleaning solvents and other volatile
organic compounds in the mid-1960s, presumably in connection with rocket tests
conducted outside of Area IV, contaminated ground water beneath the site.
Tritium, gross alpha and beta radioactivity, and radium-226 and -228 have also
contaminated ground water in certain areas. Ground water characterization is
under way, and remediation is scheduled to begin in FY 1998.
Another assessment activity currently underway involves characterization of
ground-water hydrology at the site. The Chatsworth Formation, the primary
geologic constituent, is a sandstone formation. A stable isotope study is under
way to help map the way in which ground water flows. The stable isotope study
involves injecting isotopes of oxygen and hydrogen into the ground and a
systematic sampling of the wells involved in the study, mapping the
ground-water flow.
REMEDIAL ACTION
Past radioactive and hazardous material handling and disposal practices
resulted in contamination at several existing or former disposal units.
Facilities undergoing environmental restoration include the Sodium Disposal
Facility (Building 886), the Building 056 Landfill, and the Radioactive
Materials Handling Facility (Buildings 021, 022, and 075). Previous operations
at some of these facilities also resulted in the contamination of adjacent
soils. The Sodium Disposal Facility recently completed post-remediation
independent verification as part of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
closure.
The Sodium Disposal Facility was contaminated as a result of storage of
radioactive materials, sodium, mercury, and polychlorinated biphenyls. The
Sodium Disposal Facility has undergone extensive remedial operations over the
last few years. During FY 1994, about 344 cubic meters (450 cubic yards) of
mixed waste was shipped to the Envirocare facility (Clive, Utah). During FY
1995, about 763 cubic meters (1,000 cubic yards) of low-level waste was shipped
to Envirocare. During the winter months, the Department of Toxic Substances
Control requires the Center to cover the pit with a tarp and collect and sample
the rain water. To date, all of the rain water has been clean and was
subsequently released to the sewer system.
The Sodium Disposal Facility resulted in some offsite contamination, including
tritium (below drinking-level standards) and other radionuclides (at or below
background levels). Currently, a health-based risk assessment is being
performed as part of the site cleanliness verification activity. If the
Department of Toxic Substances Control agrees that No Further Action is
necessary, then after the rainy season is over in the spring, the pit will be
backfilled with clean soil and revegetated.
The Building 056 Landfill contains contamination from past disposal activities.
The landfill is currently part of a Remedial Facility Investigation that
encompasses all of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory and not just the
Department of Energy portion. Details of the required remedial action will not
be known until the Facility Investigation is completed. Estimated costs are
limited to characterization activities, which will involve a geophysical
survey, sampling, and analysis. This report assumes that all remedial action at
the Energy Technology Engineering Center will be completed by FY 2010.
DECOMMISSIONING
Decommissioning activities involve decommissioning of Department of
Energy-owned surplus facilities and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
closure of the Sodium Disposal Facility and the Radioactive Materials Handling
Facility. All cleanup is being conducted in a manner that allows a Residential
land-use scenario, although it is anticipated that the future use will continue
to be Industrial. Decommissioning activities also include the surveillance and
maintenance of facilities prior to beginning decontamination. Additional work
includes the packaging, shipping, and disposal of both hazardous and
nonhazardous waste generated by decommissioning activities.
Building 012, the System for Nuclear Auxiliary Power Critical Facility contains
structural material contaminated by low-level radioactivity. Decommissioning of
this facility was completed during FY 1995. Final closeout documentation for
release will be completed during FY 1996. The Rockwell International Hot
Laboratory (Building 020), which was contaminated as a result of storage of
radioactive and other material used for research, has been undergoing
decontamination since 1985 and is expected to be complete by FY 1997.
Decommissioning activities have been completed at many of the former nuclear
research sites and are under way at others. Building 012, the System for
Nuclear Auxiliary Power Critical Facility, which was a small decommissioning
project consisting of three rooms, contains structural material contaminated by
low-level radioactivity. The amount of contamination in the fuel storage tubes
was the principal uncertainty and proved to be only on the surface level and
was easily removed. This project was completed in FY 1995 ahead of schedule due
to the decision to delay the decommissioning of the Radioactive Materials
Handling Facility. The decommissioning of the moderator cask (a former onsite
transport cask) was completed in FY 1995.
Buildings 021, 022, and 075, which make up the Radioactive Materials Handling
Facility, contain radioactivity from waste storage activities. This facility
was scheduled to begin decommissioning in FY 1995. However, the project was
delayed until FY 1997 and is expected to be completed in FY 2001. This will be
the last radioactively contaminated facility to undergo decommissioning. It is
the largest decommissioning project at this site and is estimated to cost
between $10 million to $12 million. The Radioactive Materials Handling Facility
is used to support decommissioning activities and contains a decontamination
facility and temporary storage area for radioactive and mixed waste prior to
offsite disposal. A small amount of transuranic waste from previous
decommissioning activities is temporarily stored at the Radioactive Materials
Handling Facility.
Decommissioning of Building 020, the Hot Laboratory, was started in the
mid-1980s. The project is currently about 85 percent complete. During FY 1996,
the hot cells, basement and attic (principally the heating ventilation air
conditioning and filtration system), will be decontaminated. One FY 1996
activity will be the characterization of the drain line sludge. This is
significant because it is the last possible source of mixed waste for this
activity. The last phase of the project will involve conventional demolition of
the structure. The Hot Laboratory will be remediated to a level allowing use
without radiological restriction. This report assumes the Hot Laboratory will
receive funds from the Small Sites Initiative for FY 1997 and the project will
be completed that year.
Building 059, a System for Nuclear Auxiliary Power Reactor Test Facility, has a
radioactively contaminated subsurface vault area, approximately 50 feet
below-grade. The scope of the project has been refocused to include complete
removal of the subsurface contamination, with the result that the project will
not be restarted until FY 1998.
Building 059, the Radiation Decontamination and Decommissioning Project, has
recently undergone a change in scope. Originally, this was a system for Nuclear
Auxiliary Power Project facility. The change results from a decision to remove
the activated concrete because of the privatization effort at the Center. It
will be easier to attract industry to the site if the contamination is removed.
The change in scope necessitates increased funding and delays the scheduled
completion until at least FY 1998. Decommissioning activities are scheduled to
begin at the Large Leak Test Rig in FY 1996. The Rig is the above grade portion
of the Building 059 facility. It is the first of the inactive sodium facilities
to undergo decommissioning. The juxtaposition of these two facilities has
necessitated a coordinated approach to decommissioning. The Decontamination and
Decommissioning Plan for the Rig is due in mid-FY 1996.
All the waste, aside from the one possible source of mixed waste at the Hot
Laboratory, will be low-level radioactive waste consisting of concrete rubble
and scrap metal. The Large Leak Test Rig will produce hazardous material
containing sodium.
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
|
| ETEC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
297
|
38
|
|
808
|
539
|
|
|
8,408
|
| Remedial Action
|
806
|
489
|
500
|
500
|
|
|
|
11,473 |
| Facility Decommissioning
|
6,422
|
5,111
|
3,000
|
1,347
|
3,143
|
|
|
95,113
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
550
|
675
|
775
|
600
|
600
|
|
|
16,000
|
| Total
|
8,075
|
6,312
|
4,275
|
3,255
|
4,282
|
|
|
130,994
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Direct Program Management/Support
Program management represents crosscutting activities associated with
environmental restoration and does not directly support specific operations or
projects.
In addition to program management (that is, the planning and management of
resources and information to accomplish project goals, budgets and schedules)
and facility management (the care, maintenance and replacement of existing
facilities and facility-related equipment), it includes activities like
personnel management and training, administrative support, document development
and control, data base management, liaison activities with the Department of
Energy and external regulatory agencies, and quality assurance and records/data
management.
| STAKEHOLDER INTERACTIONS
The Oakland Operations Office conducted public participation activities for
eight California sites: Energy Technology Engineering Center, General Atomics,
General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center, Geothermal Test Facility,
Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research, Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and Stanford Linear
Accelerator Center. The office made information about the report available and
invited comments at a number of existing public involvement forums including
the Energy Technology Engineering Center Community Work Group meeting, Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory regulators meeting, San Fransquito Creek (Stanford
Linear Accelerator Site) Coordinated Resource Management Plan Working Group
meeting, Laboratory for Energy-Related Health Research community meeting,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Community Work Group meetings, and the
Lawrence Livermore Site 300 regulators meeting. The Oakland Operations Office
newsletter, mailed to 2,000 stakeholders, featured an article about the 1996
report and announced availability of the 1995 report for review.
In response to public comment, the narrative for the 1996 report was modified
to provide additional information such as discussion of the removal of
contaminated soils near Trailer 5475 at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Comments relating to national issues were forwarded to Department of Energy
Headquarters. Commentors submitting written comments received letters outlining
action that the Department planned to take in response. If you would like more
information about the report or have questions about the results for these
sites, please contact:
|
| Public Participation
|
Technical Liaison
|
Public Affairs
|
Dave Christy
(510) 637-1812
david.christy@oak.doe.gov
|
Rich Fallejo
(510) 637-1639
rich.fallejo@.oak.doe.gov
|
Dave Christy
(510) 637-1812
david.christy@oak.doe.gov
|
WASTE MANAGEMENT
The Waste Management program mission at the Energy Technology Engineering
Center is to ensure continued compliance with Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act permitting requirements. Activities include waste characterization
and certification, waste treatment and storage, waste minimization, facility
maintenance, and waste packaging and offsite disposal to support continuing
operations. These activities are performed at the Radioactive Materials
Handling Facility for radioactive and mixed waste and at the Hazardous Waste
Management Facility for alkali metal waste. Each of these facilities operates
under two separate Resource Conservation and Recovery Act permits.
WASTE MANAGEMENT MAP
The Waste Management program manages and funds the operation of two facilities
at the Energy Technology Engineering Center. These facilities and their
associated activities include: (1) storage and treatment of alkali metal waste
at the Hazardous Waste Management Facility; and (2) handling, storage and
disposal of radioactive and mixed waste at the Radioactive Materials Handling
Facility.
The Hazardous Waste Management Facility is dedicated to the storage and
treatment of nonradioactive alkali metal waste and currently operates under a
Part B permit from the State of California. The Hazardous Waste Management
Facility consists of two geographically separated buildings: Building 029 and
Building 133. Building 029 is designed for the storage of sodium-contaminated
parts and components, while Building 133 is designed for treating these
components. Environmental restoration cleanup activities on facility systems
generate the parts and components treated at the facility. Treating the
sodium-contaminated components results in the generation of a dilute sodium
hydroxide solution that must be handled as hazardous waste. The cleaned parts
and components are dispositioned as scrap metal. When storage activities at
Building 029 and treatment activities at Building 133 are complete, cleanup
activities will begin.
The Radioactive Materials Handling Facility is currently operating under
interim status. Operations that are covered under this facility are: (1) the
repackaging of radioactive waste, (2) the limited treatment of mixed waste, and
(3) the storage of radioactive and mixed waste. Environmental restoration
activities generate the waste handled and stored at this facility. Low-level
mixed waste managed at the Radioactive Materials Handling Facility falls under
the auspices of the Federal Facility Compliance Act.
The Federal Facility Compliance Act states that the Department will not be
subject to fines and penalties for mixed low-level waste storage prohibition
violations provided it is in compliance with an approved Site Treatment Plan.
In October 1995, the Site Treatment Plan for the Energy Technology Engineering
Center was signed by the Department's Oakland Office and the State of
California.
Major Waste Management Projects Cost Estimate*
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
|
| Hazardous Waste Management Facility
|
325
|
325
|
325
|
325
|
|
|
|
6,500
|
* Project costs represent a subset of total Waste
Management costs.
** Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Major Waste Management Activity Milestones
| Radioactive Waste Management
|
2001
|
| Hazardous Waste Management
|
2015
|
Transuranic Waste
GENERATION AND HANDLING
The source of most of the transuranic waste generated at the Center has been
decontamination and decommissioning activities at the Rockwell International
Hot Laboratory (Building 020). The remaining transuranic waste was generated
through the decontamination and decommissioning of Building 055, which housed a
fuel fabrication development facility. The Environmental Restoration program
conducted both of these activities.
The Energy Technology Engineering Center expects to generate three more
0.2-cubic meter (55-gallon) drums of transuranic waste, potentially mixed,
which will result from size reduction of a "holdup" tank from the Hot
Laboratory (Building 020). This tank is currently stored at the Radioactive
Materials Handling Facility.
There are no treatment facilities for transuranic waste at the Energy
Technology Engineering Center. There are no plans to treat any transuranic or
transuranic mixed waste onsite.
STORAGE
The Center currently has a total of 34 0.2 cubic meter (55-gallon) drums of
transuranic waste (approximately 7.1 cubic meters [9.2 cubic yards]), some of
which is potentially mixed, stored in belowgrade storage vaults in
Building 022 at the Radioactive Materials Handling Facility. Current plans are
to have all the transuranic and suspected transuranic mixed waste shipped
offsite for disposal by FY 2001.
DISPOSAL
This report assumes that all transuranic waste (12 cubic meters [16 cubic
yards]) from Environmental Management program activities and two cubic meters
(2.6 cubic yards) from Defense Program activities will be shipped to the Idaho
National Engineering Laboratory for treatment and disposal at WIPP. All
transuranic mixed waste (five cubic meters [seven cubic yards]) from
environmental restoration activities will be shipped to the Waste Isolation
Pilot Plant (Carlsbad, New Mexico) for disposal.
All disposal costs for transuranic waste are included in the Waste Isolation
Pilot Plant program estimate. The costs included in this estimate are for
managing transuranic waste and include retrieval, characterization, treatment,
and packaging to meet the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant waste acceptance
criteria.
Low-Level Mixed Waste
GENERATION AND HANDLING
Ongoing environmental restoration activities are not expected to generate
significant additional quantities of mixed waste because of the nature of the
work and the express prohibition on allowing hazardous materials into
radioactive areas. The current inventory of low-level mixed waste constitutes
waste generated through past environmental restoration work and is stored at
the Radioactive Materials Handling Facility. The most recent forecast is that
an additional three cubic meters (3.9 cubic yards) will be generated in FY
1996. This report expects that no additional low-level mixed waste will be
generated after FY 1996.
TREATMENT
Limited treatment was conducted on one low-level mixed waste stream (0.13 cubic
meters [0.17 cubic yards] of electropolish solution) at the Radioactive
Materials Handling Facility in FY 1994. A treatability study was conducted on
the electropolish solution in which it was neutralized with sodium hydroxide.
This eliminated the corrosive (hazardous) property of the waste. No low-level
mixed waste treatment activities have been planned in FY 1996 or in the
outyears.
STORAGE
All low-level mixed waste that environmental restoration activities generate is
stored at the Radioactive Materials Handling Facility. At the end of FY 1995,
there were approximately 47 cubic meters (62 cubic yards) of low-level mixed
waste stored at the Radioactive Materials Handling Facility. Some of the
low-level mixed waste streams specifically listed in the Energy Technology
Engineering Center Site Treatment Plan include: leaded paint chips,
high-efficiency particulate air filters and crushed fluorescent tubes
containing mercury.
DISPOSAL
Low-level mixed waste that the Energy Technology Engineering Center generates
will be shipped to the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory for treatment and
disposal, as stated in the Site Treatment Plan. However, the Idaho National
Engineering Laboratory will not begin accepting waste until FY 1997 at the
earliest. Since commercial disposal might prove to be more cost-effective, the
Department's Oakland Office is exploring commercial options for the disposal of
low-level mixed waste. The Energy Technology Engineering Center does not
dispose of any radioactive or mixed waste onsite.
The Energy Technology Engineering Center Site Treatment Plan includes
enforceable milestones and schedules, which the Oakland Operations Office is
now committed to meeting. These milestones include characterization of
specifically listed low-level mixed waste streams in FY 1996 and selection of
treatment options for these waste streams in FY 1997.
The Rocketdyne Transportation Department handles all transportation of waste,
including low-level mixed waste. All low-level mixed waste shipments meet
Department of Transportation and Department of Energy requirements for
transporting waste.
Low-Level Waste
GENERATION AND HANDLING
Environmental restoration activities at Building 020 generate the bulk of
low-level waste presently and in the future. This waste is identified,
characterized, sampled and packaged in accordance with Department of
Transportation and disposal site criteria. These activities take place at the
point of generation or at the Radioactive Materials Handling Facility. This
report anticipates that an additional 2,100 cubic meters (2,751 cubic yards) of
low-level waste will be generated from continuing decontamination and
decommissioning activities through FY 2000.
TREATMENT
No treatment activities are conducted on low-level waste at the Energy
Technology Engineering Center. The low-level waste being generated from
environmental restoration activities at Building 020 contains no hazardous
constituents and will require no treatment prior to its disposal at the Nevada
Test Site.
STORAGE
All low-level waste is stored at the Radioactive Materials Handling Facility in
Department of Transportation- and disposal site-approved containers. The
Radioactive Materials Handling Facility currently has approximately 430 cubic
meters (560 cubic yards) of low-level waste in storage.
DISPOSAL
This report assumes that 2,540 cubic meters (3,327 cubic yards) of low-level
waste, which the Energy Technology Engineering Center generated, will be
disposed of at the Nevada Test Site. Low-level waste generated during
decommissioning of the Hot Laboratory (Building 020) will be shipped to the
Nevada Test Site by FY 1998. The remaining low-level waste expected to be
generated from planned decontamination and decommissioning of the Radioactive
Materials Handling Facility should be shipped offsite by FY 2000. This
completion date of FY 2000 depends on progress made in cleaning up the
Radioactive Materials Handling Facility.
In FY 1995, the Oakland Operations Office shipped approximately 300 cubic
meters (393 cubic yards) of low-level waste from the cleanup of Building 886
(Sodium Burn Pit) to a Department of Energyapproved commercial disposal
facility located in Utah. The Energy Technology Engineering Center does not
dispose of low-level waste onsite.
The Rocketdyne Transportation Department handles all transportation of waste,
including low-level waste. All waste shipments from the Energy Technology
Engineering Center meet the Department of Transportation and Department of
Energy requirements for transporting waste.
Hazardous Waste
GENERATION AND HANDLING
Most of the hazardous waste that the Energy Technology Engineering Center
generates results from the treatment of sodium-contaminated piping and
equipment, which environmental restoration cleanup on facility systems
generates. This piping and equipment is removed from facilities undergoing
decontamination and decommissioning and sent to Building 029 of the Hazardous
Waste Management Facility. From there, the piping and equipment is sent to
Building 133 of the Hazardous Waste Management Facility for treatment.
Some additional hazardous waste is generated through routine maintenance work
and cleanout of various facility inventories. This waste is sent to a 90-day
storage facility (the Hazardous Waste Collection Area), which the Rocketdyne
Environmental Department operates and the Waste Management program partially
funds. This report anticipates that a large influx of chemicals will be sent to
the Hazardous Waste Collection Area in FY 1996 because of the expiration of the
contract and subsequent closure of the Energy Technology Engineering Center
laboratories and buildings.
TREATMENT
Building 133 is designed for treatment of alkali metal waste (that is,
sodium-contaminated parts and components) and operates under a Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act Part B Permit from the State of California.
Treatment operations at Building 133 result in the generation of a dilute
sodium hydroxide solution that must generally be handled as hazardous waste.
Treatment operations also generate some small amounts of other hazardous waste
that is sent to the 90-day Hazardous Waste Collection Area. The cleaned parts
and components are dispositioned as scrap metal.
Treatment operations at Building 133 generate approximately 58 cubic meters (76
cubic yards) on average of dilute sodium hydroxide that needs to be disposed of
as hazardous waste. This baseline estimate anticipates that the Hazardous Waste
Management Facility will continue operating until FY 2015 because of the large
number of facilities that contain sodium.
STORAGE
Building 029 of the Hazardous Waste Management Facility is dedicated to the
storage of alkali metal waste.
DISPOSAL
All hazardous waste generated at the Hazardous Waste Management Facility and
sent to the 90-day Hazardous Waste Collection Area is manifested and sent to a
permitted commercial facility for treatment, disposal or recycling. No
hazardous waste is disposed of onsite.
The Rocketdyne Transportation Department handles all transportation of waste,
including hazardous waste. All low-level mixed waste shipments meet the
Department of Transportation and Department of Energy requirements for
transporting waste.
Waste Management Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Transuranic Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
15
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
| Disposal
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
| Transuranic Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
76
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
410
|
| Disposal
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
| Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384
|
| Disposal
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
| Low-Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Storage and Handling
|
183
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098
|
| Disposal
|
183
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098
|
| Hazardous Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treatment
|
353
|
353
|
353
|
353
|
|
|
|
7,060
|
| Storage and Handling
|
208
|
208
|
208
|
208
|
|
|
|
4,160
|
| Disposal
|
117
|
117
|
117
|
117
|
|
|
|
2,340
|
| Direct Program Management/Support
|
1,114
|
698
|
615
|
615
|
|
|
|
15,204
|
| Total
|
2,343
|
1,467
|
1,293
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
31,975
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Direct Program Management/Support
Program management represents activities associated with all waste types and
does not directly support specific operations or projects. It provides overall
support and direction for ongoing Waste Management programs, including storage
and treatment activities for the Hazardous Waste Management Facility and
storage, handling and offsite disposal activities at the Radioactive Materials
Disposal Facility. In addition to program management (that is, the planning and
management of resources and information to accomplish project goals, budgets
and schedules) and facility management (the care, maintenance and replacement
of existing facilities and facility-related equipment), activities like
personnel management and training, administrative support, document development
and control, data base management, liaison activities with the Department of
Energy and external regulatory agencies, and quality assurance and records/data
management are included.
LANDLORD ACTIVITIES
The Office of Nuclear Energy is currently the landlord for the Energy
Technology Engineering Center. This estimate anticipates that the facility
landlord responsibilities, including infrastructure management and surveillance
and maintenance of current Office of Nuclear Energy facilities, will be the
responsibility of the Environmental Management program beginning in FY 1997.
During FY 1996, the Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization program will
become responsible for surveillance and maintenance of the inactive sodium
facilities. The Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization program will be the
funding source but will not take ownership of the buildings. The maintenance
and operating contract for the Energy Technology Engineering Center facility
expired at the end of FY 1995. The environmental cleanup is proceeding under
the closeout provisions of the contract. There are also ongoing discussions
regarding a possible privatization effort at the site. The details of any
arrangement are not known at this time. The landlord costs are about $3 million
to $4 million per year. The nuclear material and facility stabilization and
surveillance and maintenance costs will be about $550,000. The exact amount of
the landlord costs and its distribution cannot be settled until the
privatization issue is resolved.
DESCRIPTION OF PERSONNEL
Current Composition
The table below presents the current Full-Time Equivalents needed to conduct
the environmental management activities at the site. The work force comprises
federal and contractor personnel and includes program managers, administrative
support professionals, scientists, engineers, and technicians.
Full-Time Equivalent Composition Table*
* The Projections for Full-Time Equivalent employees are based on FY 1996
planning baselines (see Reader's Guide).
Site Management Structure
The Department of Energy's Oakland Operations Office is the field organization
responsible for implementing management plans at the Energy Technology
Engineering Center. Rocketdyne, a division of Rockwell International, operates
the Center for the Department of Energy. Rocketdyne serves as the management
and operating contractor and is responsible for environmental restoration and
waste management activities at the Center. The Center officially is an Office
of Nuclear Energy facility although there is no ongoing Nuclear Energy
research. The Oakland Office maintains a site office at the Center to perform
basic management functions.
The Center is currently operating under the closeout provisions of the
maintenance and operating contract (DE-AC03-77SF00700), which expired at the
end of FY 1995. This results in a very favorable overhead rate structure for
environmental cleanup activities. Should a decision to contract out the cleanup
be made, that effort will be conducted under the current contract reform
requirements regarding performance-based contracting.
| CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES
|
| If you would like more information about performing
work for the Department of Energy's Environmental Management program at this
site, please contact:
|
| Major Procurements
|
Small Business Procurements
|
Anthony Pino
Director
Program Acquisition and Assistance Division
United States Department of Energy
Oakland Operations Office
1301 Clay Street, MR 700-N
Oakland, CA 94612
p: (510) 637-1850
f: (510) 637-2004
e-mail: anthony.pino@oak.doe.gov
|
Dorothy Martinez
Program Acquisition and Assistance Division
United States Department of Energy
Oakland Operations Office
1301 Clay Street, MR 700-N
Oakland, CA 94612
p: (510) 637-1850
f: (510) 637-2004
e-mail: d.martinez@oak.doe.gov
|
Future Full-Time Equivalent Needs
There are no additional Full-Time Equivalent needs. After departing from the
site, the federal personnel will return to the Oakland Operations Office, and
the contractor personnel will no longer be needed.
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following tables present estimated funding information for the Energy
Technology Engineering Center.
Defense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
9,556
|
13,848
|
12,333
|
781
|
|
|
|
182,589
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
407
|
491
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
5,992
|
| Waste Management
|
537
|
173
|
84
|
84
|
|
|
|
4,390 |
| Total
|
10,500
|
14,512
|
12,717
|
865
|
|
|
|
192,971 |
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
Nondefense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
|
| Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization
|
287
|
417
|
371
|
23
|
|
|
|
5,492
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
7,667
|
5,821
|
3,975
|
3,255
|
4,282
|
|
|
125,002
|
| Waste Management
|
1,806
|
1,294
|
1,208
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
27,585
|
| Total
|
9,761
|
7,532
|
5,554
|
4,487
|
4,282
|
|
|
158,079
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS ESTIMATE
The 1996 life-cycle estimate for the Energy Technology Engineering Center of
$351 million represents an eight percent increase over the 1995 life-cycle
estimate of $334 million, after taking the 1995 expenditure into account. The
life-cycle estimate for the Environmental Restoration program ($131 million) is
126 percent higher than the 1995 estimate ($62 million), after taking the 1995
expenditure into account. This can be attributed to an increase in
decommissioning costs. New facilities, which increase decommissioning costs at
this site from one million dollars to $95 million and which lengthen the
decommissioning life-cycle duration by four years, are being transitioned into
the Environmental Restoration program. These facilities also impact the
duration of the assessment life cycle, which is 13 years longer in the 1996
Baseline Environmental Management Report, and increase program management costs
and duration.
Comparison Table
|
Thousands of Dollars
|
|
| Nuclear Mat. & Fac. Stab.
|
170,736 |
-
|
188,081 |
17,345
|
10 |
| Environmental Restoration
|
61,688 |
3,803
|
130,994 |
73,109
|
126 |
| Waste Management |
66,143
|
4,174 |
31,975
|
29,994 |
48
|
| Landlord |
16,482
|
- |
-
|
16,482 |
100
|
| Program Management 2
|
19,081 |
517
|
- |
-
|
- |
| Site Total |
334,131
|
8,494 |
351,050
|
25,413 |
8
|
1 The FY 1995 life-cycle and annual costs are provided
to determine the corrected FY 1995 cost.
2 Program Management was reported in an independent cost table last year, but
is reported as a line item in the relevant program (Nuclear Material and
Facility Stabilization, Environmental Restoration, and Waste Management)
activity cost estimate tables for the FY 1996 Baseline Report.
|
Estimated costs for Waste Management program activities are 48 percent lower
than last year ($32 million in 1996 and $66 million in 1995). This is due to a
variety of factors, including improved cost estimation practices for Activity
Data Sheet validation efforts, a shorter low-level waste program duration, and
low-level mixed waste inventories that remain at current levels because of
waste minimization efforts and better information about the remaining waste
streams.
Landlord costs were incorrectly reported last year. The Office of Nuclear
Energy is the Landlord for this facility and the Office of Environmental
Management does not receive direct appropriations for landlord activities at
this site. The costs have been reapportioned as indirects to the applicable
programs in the FY 1996 Baseline Report.
|
 |