|
Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
The only currently active Connecticut site within the Formerly Utilized Sites
Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) is CE (see map). There is one completed site
located in Connecticut, Seymour Specialty Wire, which is discussed in the
overview of the FUSRAP program presented in the Tennessee section of this
report. FUSRAP was established in 1974 under the provisions of the Atomic
Energy Act to identify, investigate, and clean up or otherwise control
previously decontaminated Manhattan Engineer District and Atomic Energy
Commission sites, together with other sites assigned to the U.S. Department of
Energy by Congress, where residual radioactive contamination exceeds current
guidelines.
FUSRAP encompasses 46 sites in 14 states and is funded through the Oak Ridge
Operations Office. For a general discussion of FUSRAP and associated costs, see
the overview of the program presented in the Tennessee section of this report.
All costs for waste management activities, program management, and relevant
landlord activities attributable to the Department of Energy are provided for
within the scope of environmental restoration. There are no FUSRAP sites with
either current or planned nuclear material and facility stabilization activity
needs. Funding for all sites is 100 percent nondefense.
CE
The CE site, which covers approximately 445 hectares (1,100 acres), is
located on Prospect Hill Road in a mixed industrial and residential area of
Windsor, Connecticut. Interstate 91 adjoins the site on the east, and an
onsite brook runs along the north of the site, eventually joining the
Farmington River.
LOCALITY MAP
Estimated Site Total
| (Thousands of Current Year Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
699
|
3,613
|
1,693
|
3,853
|
4,610
|
Grey shaded area reflects annual cost
estimates for the first five years of the site BEAR Base Case (as of October
1995) and includes 3% annual inflation, see Readers' Guide.
|
| 1996 Appropriation
|
454
|
|
|
These levels reflect the current estimates for
compliance with applicable statutes and agreements (as of March 1996), see
Readers' Guide.
|
| 1997 Congressional Request
|
|
694
|
|
|
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
2,685
|
1,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,321 |
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FACILITY MISSION
In the 1940s and 1950s, the CE facility supplied nonnuclear components for
reactor projects that were managed by the Atomic Energy Commission. In 1955,
new contracts led to the use of highly enriched uranium (i.e., uranium enriched
to more than 20 percent in the isotope uranium235). Since the 1960s,
the facility has been authorized under license to the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission to fabricate low-enriched uranium for light-water-moderated power
reactors and to conduct research and development activities on light-water
reactor fuel.
SITE MAP
The facility's fuel production operations were shut down in 1993, but research
and development activities continue. Currently, CE is undergoing
decontamination and decommissioning of plant facilities where fuel production
took place. The site has submitted a plan for these activities to the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission. Although the site is designated for cleanup under
FUSRAP, the extent of the Department of Energy's responsibility for site
cleanup is limited to the contamination resulting from the use of highly
enriched uranium.
FUTURE USE
This report assumes that the site will continue to operate as a private
industrial facility.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
In 1993, in order to pursue onsite studies, the Department of Energy
tentatively determined that it had authority to conduct remedial action at the
site. In 1994, it concluded that it had this authority for the following
reasons: the Atomic Energy Commission owned and furnished highly enriched
uranium at the site; CE was an Atomic Energy Commission prime contractor; the
Atomic Energy Commission inspected the facility as part of the contracting
process; the Atomic Energy Commission maintained an onsite presence at another
part of the site by constructing and operating a reactor prototype; the Atomic
Energy Commission provided health and safety advice and direction for handling
highly enriched uranium; although the facility is licensed for possession of
nuclear materials, it has never been licensed for production activities
involving highly enriched uranium; and any authority for remedial action at the
site must be restricted to highly enriched uranium or other nuclear materials
that the facility is not licensed to handle.
The Department's authority at the site is restricted to Building 3; other
facilities or areas associated exclusively with Building 3, such as sewer lines
and drain pipes; and contamination that is exclusively highly enriched uranium.
The extent of FUSRAP involvement in remediation has yet to be fully determined.
Radiological characterizations planned for the near future will define the
levels of uranium enrichment in various portions of the facility. These
characterizations will also help to determine the scope of remedial action that
will be necessary and how that action should be carried out. The Department of
Energy will work with CE to assess the nature and extent of contamination and
reach a consensus regarding cleanup. CE is undergoing cleanup activities to
close out existing Nuclear Regulatory Commission licenses.
The site will be cleaned up under authority granted to the Department of Energy
by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
and Executive Order 12580. Documentation required by the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act and the
National Environmental Policy Act in support of remedial action will be
prepared. Key regulators are the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Connecticut
Department of Health Services, the Connecticut Department of Environmental
Protection, and the local health department.
Major Environmental Restoration Activity Milestones
| Assessment (Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis
with Action Memorandum)
|
1998
|
|
Remedial Action
|
2002
|
ASSESSMENT
During the 1980s, radiological surveys identified areas of thorium and uranium
contamination in a "burn and drum" storage area at the site as well as in
drainpipes and sewer lines, a waste storage pad area, and a brook on the
property. CE remediated these areas in 1986. Oak Ridge Associated
Universities performed a 1989 confirmatory survey that concluded the area was
within Nuclear Regulatory Commission guidelines for thorium and uranium in
soil.
In 1993, another survey revealed the presence of highly enriched uranium
residues in areas where the Atomic Energy Commission formerly conducted
activities. The contamination consisted primarily of very small uranium
shavings in five major locations at the site. The survey results indicate the
need for further cleanup. FUSRAP will conduct additional radiological
characterization in the near future to determine more precisely the nature and
extent of contamination at the site and to help identify effective cleanup
strategies.
REMEDIAL ACTION
The Department of Energy has not performed any remedial action at the site.
Upcoming characterization will define areas that need to be addressed in
accordance with FUSRAP guidelines. Until these further investigations are
complete and the data are interpreted, dependable estimates of the volume of
waste resulting from remedial action are not available.
The Department and its contractors will coordinate the planning and
implementation of remedial action with CE and the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission. The scenario used for the Baseline Environmental Management Report
cost estimate assumes decontamination of one building (Building 3), excavation
of contaminated soils, and disposal at an existing outofstate
commercial disposal facility. The cost estimate assumes that the approximate
waste volume is 7,650 cubic meters (10,000 cubic yards) of low-level
waste.
Environmental Restoration Activities Cost Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
|
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| FUSRAP - CE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,803
|
| Remedial Action
|
1,524
|
1,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,518
|
| Total
|
2,685
|
1,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,321
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
FUNDING ESTIMATE
The following table presents estimated funding information for the CE site.
Nondefense Funding Estimate
| (Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
|
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
| Environmental Restoration
|
2,685
|
1,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,321
|
| * Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
|
 |