Report of Survey of the Los Alamos Tritium Systems Test Assembly Facility
1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this document is to report the results of a survey conducted at
the Los Alamos Tritium Systems Test Assembly (TSTA Facility). The survey was
conducted during the week of 3/20/00.
The primary purpose of the survey is to identify facility conditions and issues
that need to be addressed to transfer responsibility for the facility from the
Office of Science (SC) to the Office of Environmental Management (EM). The
second purpose is to provide EM with insight regarding the facility’s risks and
liabilities, which may influence the management of eventual downstream
life-cycle activities.
The survey and this report are part of a process for implementing the
requirements related to the disposition of excess facilities addressed in DOE
Order 430.1A, LIFE CYCLE ASSET MANAGEMENT, using the associated guidance for
facility transition, deactivation, surveillance & maintenance, and
decommissioning.
1.2 Facility Description
The TSTA facility consists of a TA-21-155 building laboratory area, supporting
systems rooms, offices, and light laboratory space. Originally it was used for
the Rover rocket program and for uranium processing prior to 1975. Its use
since 1984 has been for experimentation with tritium related to the fusion
program. The facility has been designated a moderate hazard nuclear facility.
The facility is generally in very good physical condition.
The scope of transfer for the TSTA facility includes 13,500 ft2 building
space and contents as follows:
-
TA-21-155 North, Room 5502. This 3,700 ft room is the main
experiment area. It is a 95’x35’ high bay and consists of a main floor and a
mezzanine. Systems contained include those described below as Process Systems.
-
TA-21-155 North, 11 rooms. These include 5,990 ft2
of uncontaminated supporting lab space (Control room, support center, equipment
rooms, power supplies, etc.) Systems contained include those described below as
Support and Process Support Systems.
-
TA-21-155 South, 12 rooms. These include 3,820 ft2 adjoining office
space and light-duty laboratory space.
The TSTA space is connected to other LANL facilities to the east by a
breezeway. Boundaries for building are expected to be the footprint plus six
feet in each direction, and any enclosed yards. Boundaries for utilities
associated with the facility are expected to be the first source connection,
exterior to the facility.
The main experimental area contains tritium and depleted uranium (the latter in
hydride storage beds). There are 15 glove boxes in which experiments have been
conducted, a control room for process and auxiliaries operation, a variety of
support and cleanup systems, and a large capacity emergency room cleanup system
that has never been used. A diesel generator is within one of the facility
rooms (it is intended to be outside the near term scope of deactivation).
Systems within the facility are in the following types:
-
Process Systems (Loop1
and non-loop) – These are for the facility’s recent mission and include a
variety of systems used for simulation of tritium fuel processing for a fusion
reactor and for other tritium experimentation.
-
Support Systems – Utility services such as electrical, steam, ventilation, fire
protection, communication, cooling water, breathing air, general vacuum, and
nitrogen.
-
Process Support Systems – Control room, backup power (diesel generator and
uninterruptible power supply), tritium waste processing, gloveboxes, tritium
monitoring, emergency air detritiation system, and solid waste.
The building is constructed of 8-inch concrete masonry block. The floors are
4-inch-thick concrete on grade. The roof over the main experimental area is
sloped asphalt and gravel and is in good condition. The roof over the auxiliary
and office area is 4-inch composite tile and plank P-300 over structural steel
members and in fair condition.
1.3 Organization Representatives
Contacts in transferring and receiving organizations are:
| Los Alamos SC |
Richard Siemon |
| Los Alamos D&D |
Miguel Salazar |
| Albuquerque |
Richard Nevarez |
| Headquarters SC |
Gene Nardella |
| Headquarters EM |
Andrew Szilagyi |
2. Summary, Conclusions & Recommendations
2.1 Comparison With LCAM Requirements
Characterization of the facility to identify and characterize hazardous and/or
radioactive materials and wastes remaining is sufficient for transfer (one open
item, See Table 1
, Section 8). Surveillance and maintenance activities have been routinely
performed to maintain the facility and its remaining hazards in a stable and
known condition pending facility disposition.
For transfer, the primary stabilization activity is tritium removal that should
be conducted to take advantage of existing cleanup systems that will be shut
down and knowledge of the present staff regarding operation of the equipment
and removal/disposal of tritium gas and tritium contaminated components.
There may be contamination residual from prior operations, however, such can
only be determined during dismantling because if it is present, it would be
embedded in floors, walls behind paint or wallboard.
2.2 Transfer Considerations
Transfer of the TSTA from SC to EM should be conducted with the following
criteria for stabilization:
-
The bulk of the tritium will have been removed such that remaining amounts are
considered contamination and not accountable material. After the present
129-gram inventory of mobile tritium has been removed, the remaining tritium
will consist of contamination in experimental and process equipment. Forty to
fifty items with significant gram-quantity contamination (metal getter beds,
molecular sieve beds, cryopumps, and traps, oxidation beds, charcoal beds, oil
filters, pump and compressor oil) will be disposed of as waste. The goal is to
reduce the total tritium inventory to an amount that will allow
re-classification to a radiological facility.
-
Other hazardous materials will have been removed or stabilized, specifically
U-238 adsorption materials will be oxidized (or stabilized otherwise) and the
power supply battery will be removed.
-
Special knowledge of the facility systems will not be required for remaining
operations to perform deactivation, post-deactivation S&M, or
decommissioning. Specifically, all operations requiring use of the Tritium
Waste Treatment system will be completed and the control systems will not be
needed for any operations. The control center will be systematically
de-energized.
-
No systems or tanks, either fixed or portable, will remain pressurized. They
will have been emptied or removed.
Specific details are provided under later discussion of conditions assumed for
transfer and post-stabilization S&M.
2.3 Post-Transfer EM Path Forward & Management Risk
After transfer, the S&M cost can be further reduced by performing a fire
hazards analysis, removing all loose combustibles, draining water systems, and
deactivating the heating steam. Some sort of fire detection may be required.
(Whether or not the fire protection analysis is done and the systems
deactivated before or after transfer is a matter of management decision. It
doesn’t matter who does it from a results viewpoint. However, until SC agrees
it is in their scope, the S&M estimate for these systems is necessarily
included.)
Consideration should be given to performing a low level, but continuous ongoing
D&D to remove gloveboxes and systems over the next several years. The
rationale for doing so is:
-
Availability of staff that know the facility and who are accustomed to dealing
with tritium waste.
-
Utilization of the 2-ton bridge crane, which is in good condition.
-
Use of the exhaust ventilation while it is operable and before fan replacement
would be required.
This mode of D&D is envisioned as an assigned crew, with supervision and
health physics support, who remove components and gloveboxes for disposal on a
week-by-week basis.
2.4 Post-Transfer S&M Reduction via Administrative Contamination
Limit Revision
The current facility TSTA administrative limit for tritium contamination
requiring cleaning is 1,000 dpm/100 cm2. After transfer, an
assessment should be conducted to see if S&M costs can be further reduced
by raising this to the 10,000 dpm/100 cm2
as allowed by DOE’s Radiological Controls Manual (Chapter 2, Article 222),
taking into account the requirements of Appendix D to 10 CFR 835. Until such a
review is conducted, however, the S&M cost necessarily must be based on
current practice.
Table 2 in the Radcon Manual, Summary of Contamination
Values, gives the following values for tritium, tritium oxide, and tritium
organic compounds:
-
Removable: 10,000 dpm/100 cm2
-
Removable + Fixed: 10,000 dpm over area of the probe being used
Notes:
-
The values in Table 2-2 apply to radioactive contamination deposited on exposed
surfaces of components and do not include radionuclides incorporated within the
component’s material. Where contamination by both alpha and beta-gamma emitting
nuclides exists, the limits established for the alpha and beta-gamma emitting
nuclides apply independently.
-
The amount of removable radioactive material per 100 cm2
of surface area should be determined by swiping the area with dry filter or
soft absorbent paper while applying moderate pressure and then assessing the
amount of radioactive material on the swipe with an appropriate instrument of
known efficiency. For objects with a surface area less than 100 cm2,
the entire surface should be swiped, and the activity per unit area should be
based on the actual surface area. Except for transuranics, Ra-228, Ac-227,
Th-228, Th-230, Pa-231 and alpha emitters, it is not necessary to use swiping
techniques to measure removable contamination levels if direct scan surveys
indicate that the total residual contamination levels are below the values for
removable contamination.
-
The levels may be averaged over 1 square meter provided the maximum activity in
any area of 100 cm2 is less than three times the values in Table
2-2.
2.5 Stable Metal Tritides Consideration During D&D
A review was conducted of radiological work practices and monitoring currently
being used at Mound to address Stable Metal Tritides (SMT). SMT are tritium
atoms bound to metals that can then be released during size reduction
operations. They are difficult to detect prior to becoming airborne.
The reason for the review was to determine if the practices implemented at
Mound would impact the D&D of other tritium contaminated facilities. The
review concluded that current DOE radiological controls and practices for
monitoring and worker protection being used at existing tritium facilities are
sufficient to protect workers from exposure to SMT.
3. Survey Results
Table 1 - Survey Results
|
Subject of Survey |
Summary |
| 1. Facility Structure |
In general, the overall structure is
in good condition and well maintained. The building was constructed in 1968 and
was stated to have a further life expectancy of 30 years. One location with
indication of cracking was observed in the northwest corner above the
mezzanine. One location was also noted where steam leak had degraded the
wallboard covering in the room containing the non-radioactive support systems.
Both of these are inconsequential and there is no concern about the structural
integrity for several years.
The sloped gravel roof over the main experimental area is in good condition.
The flat built-up roof above the other rooms appears much older and will
require ongoing maintenance, especially after building heat is turned off.
Leakage occurs at the joint where the high bay experimental area adjoins the
rest of the building. We were told that the in-leakage does not result in
contaminated liquid waste, but runs off to the outside. This part of the roof
will likely need replacement within ten years.
A general housekeeping should be performed on the roof to remove all loose
items (bucket, etc.).
|
| 2. Process Systems |
There are a variety of experimental
and associated storage and cleanup systems. The latter include vacuum, waste
Treatment, emergency room cleanup. There are 15 gloveboxes with equipment,
tubing, and instruments that contains tritium. In addition there is a class 4
laser in the facility. It is hazardous when operated. |
| 3. Infrastructure and Support Systems |
-
Experimental area exhaust ventilation motor is relatively new. The fan itself
is old.
-
Fire protection is wet pipe. Condition is good.
-
Heating steam – vintage is 1976 and is judged to have limited life without
substantial ongoing maintenance. Steam heat is needed while the wet pipe fire
protection is still required.
-
The 2-ton bridge crane in experimental area is in good condition –
consideration should be given to ongoing level of facility dismantlement while
this crane is available.
-
Contaminated floor drain system goes via underground pipe to collection area
outside. Pumped from there to waste processing. Conditions are unknown, but
stated to be satisfactory.
-
City water, house vacuum, compressed air, chilled water, etc. appear to be well
maintained.
|
| 4. Nuclear Safety & Materials |
Not applicable. |
| 5. Hazardous Material |
-
Backup batteries, Freon, ethylene glycol, industrial solvents and cleaners.
-
2000-gallon diesel oil storage and 100-gallon day tank.
-
No RCRA storage area.
-
Oxygen, argon, hydrogen, helium, liquid nitrogen.
-
Oil in vacuum pumps and other equipment.
|
| 6. Radioactive Contamination and
Waste |
-
Known contamination is only tritium except for approximately 50 kg U-238 getter
material. Facility was once used for Rover Rocket program and fuel processing,
but no records were provided.
-
The most significant tritium system contamination is the Tritium Waste
Treatment system. It should be purged before transfer.
-
Primary service water loop was stated to be mildly contaminated (6
m
Ci/l tritium).
-
The vacuum line is also internally contaminated, as is the exhaust ventilation.
-
The liquid waste drain system is tritium contaminated and may have
contamination from the pre-1975 uranium processing.
-
Several containers with collected tritium are to be disposed of.
-
There may be contamination from prior service; however, such can only be
determined during dismantling.
|
| 7. Environmental |
Waste water drain lines that service
this building and other building to east lead to a pump shed from where they
are pumped to a wastewater processing facility. |
| 8. Characterization Information |
Tritium quantities are generally well
characterized. There is a sump/drain tank in the northeast corner of the
support system area with residual liquid, presumed to be water. It should be
characterized, or prior inspection records retrieved. |
| 9. Surveillance and Maintenance |
Surveillance and maintenance of the
facility has been excellent. |
4. Stabilization and Other Actions Required For Transfer
Characterization
The sump tank in northeast corner of the support system area contains liquid,
presumed to be water. It should be sampled and analyzed, or prior sample
results made available.
Stabilization
-
Tritium will be removed such that:
| - |
Accountable tritium has been removed. |
| - |
An additional amount of non-accountable tritium,
estimated as 15 to 30 grams on 40 to 50 components has been removed. |
| - |
Less than 1.6 grams remains, allowing reduction of the
facility accident scenario such that the facility can be classified as a
radiological facility. |
| - |
Flushing of the Tritium Waste Treatment system has been
conducted to achieve the radiological facility criteria above. |
-
Oxidize, or otherwise stabilize, approximately 50 kg U-238 getter beds to
eliminate potential for pyrophoricity, eventually to be disposed of as waste.
-
Remove the abandoned cooling tower walls, fill, and exposed piping. The
material is severely degraded.
-
Remove batteries for the uninterruptible power supply. They contain acid and
generate hydrogen when charging.
-
If the diesel generator is to be deactivated, remove the fuel oil from the
storage tank and day tank. (Note that the diesel generator is being considered
for adjacent building use, thus remaining in its current location.)
-
Remove experimental equipment (e.g., the Class 4 Laser) and perform "reasonable
effort" house cleaning.
Isolation
See the discussion under S&M for as-left conditions. Tritium containing
components should be assayed and recorded. (Note, the justification required
for change of the facility categorization to "radiological" is that there is
1.6 g or less tritium remaining. The evidence for that justification may
provide sufficient characterization of where it is located.) Gloveboxes and
large hard-to-remove gas volumes will be purged and left sealed, or where
impractical to seal, left open and slowly out-gassing.
To the degree reasonable, process piping should be capped or crimped. (Future
removal will most likely remove piping and components by crimping and cutting
where possible, without necessarily purging, and disposing as waste).
Other
-
Remove anything that would be declared RCRA waste if left. This is to avoid
unnecessary declaration of waste or the need to establish a RCRA storage area.
-
Provide a list and description, or supporting documents, of facility specific
commitments, if any, for which EM will be responsible after transfer.
-
Determine if any of the process equipment remaining in the facility is of
historical significance, and if so, remove it.
-
Agreements (Permits, Licenses, Purchase Orders, Contracts, etc.) - Provide a
list and description, or supporting documents, of facility specific permits,
licenses, purchase orders, contracts, and other agreements, if any, that apply
until the buildings are removed and the SWMU is closed.
-
Assets and Property Management - Provide a list of government owned capital
assets, if any, (as defined in 41 CFR 109, Department of Energy Property
Management Regulations) for which custody will be transferred to EM along with
the facility.
5. Surveillance & Maintenance After Transfer
Surveillance and Maintenance after transfer assumes that a stabilized state has
been established with the following attributes and as-left conditions:
-
Tritium has been removed as described under Stabilization and Actions for
Transfer.
-
Use of the Tritium Waste Treatment system will not be required for any future
activities.
-
Use of the control room and control systems will not be required for any future
deactivation or D&D activities.
-
Tritium contaminated components and piping are sealed where practical to do so.
The level of out-gassing is acceptable from the tritium-contaminated equipment
left in the facility.
-
Power, steam, exhaust ventilation, and wet pipe fire suppression systems remain
operational.
-
Stack monitoring and periodic instrument calibrations are required.
-
Weekly inspections are conducted to:
| - |
Survey to trend spread of tritium
contamination from out-gassing equipment |
| - |
Look for animal and vermin intrusion |
| - |
Look for water in-leakage, or other
changing conditions |
-
Other periodic inspections are conducted to look for structural and roof
degradation:
It is anticipated that within the next ten years, major roof refurbishment and
steam system replacement (or elimination of need) will be required.
An estimate of costs associated with the above is shown in Table 2. However, in
conversations subsequent to these estimates, it was agreed to re-visit these
costs after a stabilization project is underway and a better idea is obtained
of the anticipated conditions of the facility after stabilization (for example,
will the fire system be drained and heating turned off)
.
Table 2 - S&M Cost Estimate Worksheet for Activities After Transfer
| Surveillance
& Maintenance Costs |
Basis for
Estimate |
Annual Estimated
Hours & Capital2 |
Annual Estimated
Cost by |
| EM-22 |
| 1. Nuclear Safety |
N. A. |
|
|
|
|
| 2. Occupational Safety Health |
Include with 11 below. |
|
|
|
|
| 3. Fire Protection |
Include with 11 below. |
|
|
|
|
| 4. Radiation Protection |
4 hours per week surveys. |
200 |
|
$20,000 |
$9,400 |
| 5. Emergency Management |
Include with 11 below. |
|
|
|
|
| 6. Control, Accountability, Security
for SNM |
N. A. |
|
|
|
|
| 7. Training and Qualification |
Include in burdened rate. |
|
|
|
|
| 8. Quality Assurance |
Include with 11 below. |
|
|
|
|
| 9. Engineering, Configuration Control |
Include with 11 below. |
|
|
|
|
| 10. Environmental & Waste
Management |
Miscellaneous calibrations and Stack
monitoring. |
850 to 1,000 |
|
$85,000 |
$49,300 |
| 11. Administration |
(See following Table). |
600 |
|
$60,000 |
|
| 12. Facility Structural S&M |
Roof refurbishment and steam
replacement or elimination. Amortized at $50,000 per year over 10 years. |
|
|
$50,000 |
79,300 |
13. Facility Systems & Components
Surveillance
|
Weekly walkthroughs and repair work
orders. |
700 |
|
$70,000 |
$84,800 |
| Subtotal |
$285,000 |
222,800 |
| Other Direct Costs associated with
S&M. |
Allow 20% of the S&M labor
($325,000) cost for consumables (HEPA filters, equipment replacement and repair
parts, paint, absorbent, etc.). |
|
|
$57,000 |
|
| Site Assessment Costs* |
Space charges presented on 3/21. |
|
|
|
$192,200 |
| -
Utilities |
Space Charge*, 7,583 sq. ft. |
|
|
$250,000 |
|
| -
Security |
|
|
|
|
|
| -
Site Services |
Space Charge*, 7,583 sq. ft. |
|
|
$75,000 |
|
| Subtotal |
$382,000 |
192,200 |
| *Space charges may not
apply, depending on LASL policy. |
Overall Total |
$667,000 |
415,000 |
| Administrative Labor Estimate |
Hrs/Mo |
|
| Maintain Administrative Management Systems |
|
|
|
Perform Management Assessments |
0 |
|
| Maintain Policies, Procedures, & Records
Management Program |
20 |
|
|
Maintain Operating Procedures |
|
0 |
| Maintain Surveillance & Maintenance Procedures |
|
4 |
| Maintain Facility Support Procedures |
|
0 |
| Maintain Administrative Procedures |
|
0 |
| Maintain Records |
|
16 |
| Provide & Maintain Program, Project,
Facility Support |
|
|
|
Provide Project Management Support |
12 |
|
|
Manage Baseline Budget Control & Administration |
|
4 |
| Provide Short & Long Range Schedule Integration,
Database Mgmt., and Maintain the Current Approved Work Plan |
|
4 |
| Provide Future Technical Baseline Planning, MYWP &
Basis of Estimate Planning and Scheduling |
|
4 |
| Provide/Maintain Issues Management/Reporting
& Tracking |
0 |
|
|
Maintain Price Anderson Amendment Act Compliance |
|
0 |
| Maintain Occurrence Reports |
|
0 |
| Conduct Lessons Learned |
|
0 |
| Maintain Facility Administration |
16 |
|
|
Provide/Maintain Minsafe S&M Management |
|
16 |
| Maintain ISMS Program |
|
0 |
| Provide DOE Stakeholder Tour Support |
2 |
|
| Total Hours/Mo. |
50 |
|
| Total Hours/Yr. |
600 |
|
1 "Loop" refers to a system to simulate the
primary loop in a fusion reactor
2
Budget estimate based on $100/hr labor rate - fully burdened
|